Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Spine Journal 9/2019

25.05.2019 | Original Article

Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study

verfasst von: Pedro Berjano, Ming Xu, Marco Damilano, Thomas Scholl, Claudio Lamartina, Michael Jekir, Fabio Galbusera

Erschienen in: European Spine Journal | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The biomechanical performance of conventional multi-rod configurations (satellite rods and accessory rods) in pedicle subtraction osteotomies has been previously studied in vitro and using finite element models (FEM). Delta and delta-cross rods are innovative multi-rod configurations where the rod bends were placed only in its proximal and distal extremities in order to obtain a dorsal translation of the central part of the rod respect to the most angulated area of the main rods. However, the biomechanical properties of the delta and delta-cross rods have not been investigated. This study used FEM to analyze the effect of delta-rod configurations on the stiffness and primary rod stress reduction in multiple-rod constructs after pedicle subtraction osteotomy.

Methods

The global range of motion in the spine and the magnitude and distribution of the von Mises stress in the rods were studied using a spine finite element model described previously. A follower load of 400 N along with moments of 7.5 N in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were tested on the spine model. Initial breakage was created on the rod based on the maximum stress location. The post-breakage models were tested under flexion.

Results

Delta and delta-cross rods reduced more range of motion (up to 45% more reduction) and reduced more primary rod stress than other previously tested rod configurations (up to 48% more reduction). After initial rod fracture occurred, delta and delta-cross rods also had less range of motion (up to 23.6% less) and less rod von Mises stress (up to 81.2% less) than other rod configurations did.

Conclusions

Delta and delta-cross rods have better biomechanical performance than satellite rods and accessory rods in pedicle subtraction osteotomies in terms of construct stiffness and rod stress reduction. After the initial rod breakage occurred, the delta and delta-cross rods could minimize the loss of fixation, which have less rod stress and greater residual stiffness than other rod configurations do. Based on this FEA study, delta-rod configurations show more favorable biomechanical behavior than previously described multi-rod configurations.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:454–463CrossRef Bridwell KH, Lewis SJ, Lenke LG (2003) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy for the treatment of fixed sagittal imbalance. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85:454–463CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA (2014) Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicel subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. Spine 39(15):1190–1195CrossRefPubMed Dickson DD, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Koester LA (2014) Risk factors for and assessment of symptomatic pseudarthrosis after lumbar pedicel subtraction osteotomy in adult spinal deformity. Spine 39(15):1190–1195CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Berjano P, Zanirato A, Compagnone D, Redaelli A, Damilano M (2018) Hypercomplex pedicle subtraction osteotomies: definition, early clinical and radiological results and complications. Eur Spine J 27(1):115–122CrossRefPubMed Berjano P, Zanirato A, Compagnone D, Redaelli A, Damilano M (2018) Hypercomplex pedicle subtraction osteotomies: definition, early clinical and radiological results and complications. Eur Spine J 27(1):115–122CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Berjano P, Damilano M, Langella F, Pejrona M, Lamartina C (2014) Osteotomies of the spine:“Technique of the Decade”? Eur Spine J 24(1):1–2 Berjano P, Damilano M, Langella F, Pejrona M, Lamartina C (2014) Osteotomies of the spine:“Technique of the Decade”? Eur Spine J 24(1):1–2
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C (2013) Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. Eur Spine J 22(6):853–858CrossRefPubMedCentral Berjano P, Bassani R, Casero G, Sinigaglia A, Cecchinato R, Lamartina C (2013) Failures and revisions in surgery for sagittal imbalance: analysis of factors influencing failure. Eur Spine J 22(6):853–858CrossRefPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Zanirato A, Damilano M, Formica M, Piazzolla A, Lovi A, Villafane JH, Bernjano P (2018) Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences. Eur Spine J 27(9):2272–2284CrossRefPubMed Zanirato A, Damilano M, Formica M, Piazzolla A, Lovi A, Villafane JH, Bernjano P (2018) Complications in adult spine deformity surgery: a systematic review of the recent literature with reporting of aggregated incidences. Eur Spine J 27(9):2272–2284CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson WF, Perra JH, Mudiyam R, Choma TJ, Zeller RD, Knapp DR, Noordeen HH, Berven SH, Goytan MJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shafferey CI (2011) Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity. Spine 36(12):958–964CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Sansur CA, Donaldson WF, Perra JH, Mudiyam R, Choma TJ, Zeller RD, Knapp DR, Noordeen HH, Berven SH, Goytan MJ, Boachie-Adjei O, Shafferey CI (2011) Short-term morbidity and mortality associated with correction of thoracolumbar fixed sagittal plane deformity. Spine 36(12):958–964CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Berjano P, Pejrona M, Damilano M, Cecchinato R, Aguirre MFI (2015) Corner osteotomy: a modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy for increased sagittal correction in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 24(1):58–65CrossRefPubMed Berjano P, Pejrona M, Damilano M, Cecchinato R, Aguirre MFI (2015) Corner osteotomy: a modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy for increased sagittal correction in the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 24(1):58–65CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Charles YP, Yu B, Steib JP (2016) Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism. Eur Spine J 25(Suppl 1):63–74CrossRefPubMed Charles YP, Yu B, Steib JP (2016) Sacroiliac joint luxation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: report of two cases and analysis of failure mechanism. Eur Spine J 25(Suppl 1):63–74CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Protopsaltis T, Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Fu K-MG, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Deviren V, Kebaish K, Hart R, Burton DC, Line B, Bess S, Ames CP (2014) Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 21(6):994–1003CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Shaffrey E, Klineberg E, Shaffrey CI, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Protopsaltis T, Scheer JK, Mundis GM, Fu K-MG, Gupta MC, Hostin R, Deviren V, Kebaish K, Hart R, Burton DC, Line B, Bess S, Ames CP (2014) Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 21(6):994–1003CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Palumbo MA, Shah KN, Eberson CP, Hart RA, Daniels AH (2015) Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine J 15(6):1409–1414CrossRefPubMed Palumbo MA, Shah KN, Eberson CP, Hart RA, Daniels AH (2015) Outrigger rod technique for supplemental support of posterior spinal arthrodesis. Spine J 15(6):1409–1414CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine 39(22):1899–1904CrossRefPubMed Hyun SJ, Lenke LG, Kim YC, Koester LA, Blanke KM (2014) Comparison of standard 2-rod constructs to multiple-rod constructs for fixation across 3-column spinal osteotomies. Spine 39(22):1899–1904CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Glob Spine J 2(4):213–220CrossRef Deviren V, Tang JA, Scheer JK, Buckley JM, Pekmezci M, McClellan RT, Ames CP (2012) Construct rigidity after fatigue loading in pedicle subtraction osteotomy with or without adjacent interbody structural cages. Glob Spine J 2(4):213–220CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu K-MG, Keshavarzi S, Li CMY, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Bess S (2012) Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 71(4):862–867CrossRefPubMed Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Ames CP, Demakakos J, Fu K-MG, Keshavarzi S, Li CMY, Deviren V, Schwab FJ, Lafage V, Bess S (2012) Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity. Neurosurgery 71(4):862–867CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Januszewski J, Beckman JM, Harris JE, Turner AW, Yen CP, Uribe JS (2017) Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: a finite element study. SNI Spine 8:207 Januszewski J, Beckman JM, Harris JE, Turner AW, Yen CP, Uribe JS (2017) Biomechanical study of rod stress after pedicle subtraction osteotomy versus anterior column reconstruction: a finite element study. SNI Spine 8:207
16.
Zurück zum Zitat La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Liebsch C, Villa T, Luca A, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ (2018) Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J 27(9):2357–2366CrossRefPubMed La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Liebsch C, Villa T, Luca A, Galbusera F, Wilke HJ (2018) Biomechanical advantages of supplemental accessory and satellite rods with and without interbody cages implantation for the stabilization of pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J 27(9):2357–2366CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hallager DW, Martin G, Dahl B, Harris J, Gudipally M, Jenkins S, Wu AM, Bucklen B (2016) Use of supplemental short pre-contoured accessory rods and cobalt chrome alloy posterior rods reduces primary rod strain and range of motion across the pedicle subtraction osteotomy level: an in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 41(7):E388–E395CrossRefPubMed Hallager DW, Martin G, Dahl B, Harris J, Gudipally M, Jenkins S, Wu AM, Bucklen B (2016) Use of supplemental short pre-contoured accessory rods and cobalt chrome alloy posterior rods reduces primary rod strain and range of motion across the pedicle subtraction osteotomy level: an in vitro biomechanical study. Spine 41(7):E388–E395CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Sellei RM, Kobbe P, Dadgar A, Pfeifer R, Behrens M, von Oldenburg G, Pape HC (2015) External fixation design evolution enhances biomechanical frame performance. Injury 46(Suppl 3):23–26CrossRef Sellei RM, Kobbe P, Dadgar A, Pfeifer R, Behrens M, von Oldenburg G, Pape HC (2015) External fixation design evolution enhances biomechanical frame performance. Injury 46(Suppl 3):23–26CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlay JB, Moroz TK, Rorabeck CH, Davey JR, Noume RB (1987) Stability of ten configurations of the Hoffmann external-fixation frame. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):734–744CrossRefPubMed Finlay JB, Moroz TK, Rorabeck CH, Davey JR, Noume RB (1987) Stability of ten configurations of the Hoffmann external-fixation frame. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69(5):734–744CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, Booker R, Betz RR, Ramsey C et al (2012) The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine 37:E687–E695CrossRefPubMed Cahill PJ, Wang W, Asghar J, Booker R, Betz RR, Ramsey C et al (2012) The use of a transition rod may prevent proximal junctional kyphosis in the thoracic spine after scoliosis surgery: a finite element analysis. Spine 37:E687–E695CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7(2):148–154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wilke HJ, Wenger K, Claes L (1998) Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur Spine J 7(2):148–154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jager ZS, İnceoğlu S, Palmer D, Akpolat YT, Cheng WK (2016) Preventing instrumentation failure in three-column spinal osteotomy: biomechanical analysis of rod configuration. Spine Deform 4(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed Jager ZS, İnceoğlu S, Palmer D, Akpolat YT, Cheng WK (2016) Preventing instrumentation failure in three-column spinal osteotomy: biomechanical analysis of rod configuration. Spine Deform 4(1):3–9CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Villa T (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26:764–770CrossRefPubMed Luca A, Ottardi C, Sasso M, Prosdocimo L, La Barbera L, Brayda-Bruno M, Galbusera F, Villa T (2017) Instrumentation failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy: the role of rod material, diameter, and multi-rod constructs. Eur Spine J 26:764–770CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Korupolu SC, Daniels AH (2018) Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model. Orthop Rev 10(1):7541 Korupolu SC, Daniels AH (2018) Biomechanical comparison between titanium and cobalt chromium rods used in a pedicle subtraction osteotomy model. Orthop Rev 10(1):7541
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Luca A, Ottardi C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Villa T, Galbusera F (2017) Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 26(Suppl 4):450–456CrossRefPubMed Luca A, Ottardi C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M, Villa T, Galbusera F (2017) Anterior support reduces the stresses on the posterior instrumentation after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite-element study. Eur Spine J 26(Suppl 4):450–456CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Berjano P, Blanco JF, Rendon D, Villafañe JH, Pescador D, Atienza CM (2015) Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages. Eur Spine J 24(7):918–923CrossRefPubMed Berjano P, Blanco JF, Rendon D, Villafañe JH, Pescador D, Atienza CM (2015) Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages. Eur Spine J 24(7):918–923CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Supplementary delta-rod configurations provide superior stiffness and reduced rod stress compared to traditional multiple-rod configurations after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a finite element study
verfasst von
Pedro Berjano
Ming Xu
Marco Damilano
Thomas Scholl
Claudio Lamartina
Michael Jekir
Fabio Galbusera
Publikationsdatum
25.05.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Spine Journal / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06012-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

European Spine Journal 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.