Background
Methods
Purpose of the scoping study
Identifying the research question
P-Population | All types of point of care diagnostics |
---|---|
I-Interventions | Supply chain management (production, selection, quantification, procurement, storage, distribution, redistribution, quality assurance, inventory management, negotiation with suppliers, and safe disposal of use POC diagnostics) |
C-Comparison | Absent supply chain management measures |
O-Outcomes | Availability of POC diagnostic tests Use of POC diagnostic tests |
Literature search
Study selection
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- Evidence of POC diagnostics
- Evidence of the study been conducted in a LMIC
- Evidence of POC diagnostics production
- Evidence of POC diagnostics selection
- Evidence of POC diagnostics quantification
- Evidence of POC diagnostics procurement
- Evidence of POC diagnostics storage
- Evidence of POC diagnostics distribution
- Evidence of POC diagnostics redistribution
- Evidence of POC diagnostics quality assurance
- Evidence of POC diagnostics inventory management
- Evidence of negotiation with suppliers for POC diagnostics supply
- Evidence of safe disposal of used POC diagnostics products
- Evidence of POC diagnostics accessibility
- Evidence of POC diagnostics availability
- Evidence POC diagnostics use
Exclusion criterias
- Lack of evidence of POC diagnostics
- Studies conducted in high income countries
- Laboratory based POC diagnostics
- Studies that do not report on the primary outcomes of the study
Charting the data
Quality of the evidence
Results
Characteristics of included studies
Author and year | Target Population | Type of POC diagnostic | Supply chain management measures reported | Desirable outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alemnji et al., 2011 [56] | General population | HIV | Challenges in procurement, reagent inventory and stock maintenance; timely and quality testing; and challenges with who manages the supply chain systems | Affected confidence in test results and patient care; huge challenges with accessing testing services when services are available at the national level. |
Ansbro et al., 2015 [51] | Pregnant women | Syphilis RSTs | Quality assurance activities and supervision | Reduced clinic waiting time, travel time and increased case detection and treatment, Acceptability and usability of RST kits and quality assurance activities, supply of RST kits less reliable, and stock-out |
Bonawitz et al., 2015 [47] | Pregnant women | Syphilis RSTs | None reported | High levels to complete stock-outs at baseline, midline and end line periods over several weeks |
Hamer et al., 2012 [43] | children < 5 years | Malaria RDTs | Transparent record keeping, adequate supplies, stock management, daily registers and periodic reconciliation of stocks, and ensuring that none had passed their expiration dates | Availability and use of malaria RDTs with over 98% accountability of the RDTs |
Hasselback et al., 2014 [48] | General population | Malaria RDTs | Analysis of distribution system characteristics | High levels of stock-out |
Kyabayinze et al., 2012 [45] | General population | Malaria Microscopy and RDTs | None reported | limited availability of RDTs, limited use of RDTs, lack storage space, and lack of glucometers |
Mabey et al., 2012 [49] | Pregnant women and Sexually active populations | Syphilis RDTs | Training in stock management, record keeping, and quality control, monitoring supply chain problems and provision of sustainable solutions in case of stock-outs | improve access, increase antenatal clinic attendance, availability and use of RSTs |
McGuire et al., 2014 [55] | General population | Diabetes, Blood Pressure, and Dyslipidemia assays | Reported frequent challenges with distribution of devices | Stock-outs and limited use of devices |
Peeling, 2015 | General population | Not specified | Called for redistribution when necessary | Prevent diagnostics from expiring |
Peeling and Ronald, 2009 [54] | General population | Not specified | Reported supply chain failure | Test stock-outs |
Shott et al., 2012 [53] | General population | HIV | Challenges with quality management (QM)systems | Good QM ensures accuracy of devices; transform the availability of tests in real time; and inform proper patient care. |
Smith et al., 2015 [44] | Pregnant women | HIV, Syphilis, and HBV RDTs | No supply chain management measures | Increased coverage increase uptake, test stock-outs, limited uptake, and low testing |
Stevens et al., 2014 [52] | General population | HIV viral load | Raises challenges with reimbursement, quality monitoring, lack guideline and regulations | Where VL testing is available, frequency of CD4 monitoring is reduces or stopped altogether |
Thairu et al., 2011 [50] | General population | HIV (CD4 testing with Guava EasyCD4 | Guava offered to provide a robust supply chain for reagents and maintenance | Increase access to CD4 testing, low repeated testing, poor stock management, tardy response from Guava resulting in lost operating time |
Jaya et al., 2017 [46] | Clinics | HIV rapid testing kits | Compliance to guidelines for purchasing and inventory. | HIV rapid test kits shortage in 4 clinics |
Author and date | Country | Geographical area | Study setting | Study design |
---|---|---|---|---|
Alemnji et al., 2011 [56] | Developing countries | Rural | Resource limited settings | Expert review |
Ansbro et al., 2015 [51] | Zambia | Rural | Antenatal clinic | Mix method |
Bonawitz et al., 2015 [47] | Zambia | Urban and Rural | Antenatal clinic | Quasi-experimental evaluation |
Hamer et al., 2012 [43] | Zambia | Rural | Children clinic | Cluster-randomised controlled trial |
Hasselback et al., 2014 [48] | Mozambique | Urban and Rural | General clinics | Mix method |
Kyabayinze et al., 2012 [45] | Uganda | Rural | General clinic | Cross-sectional survey |
Mabey et al., 2012 [49] | Tanzania, Uganda, China, Peru and Zambia and Brazil | Urban and Rural | Antenatal clinics and Community-based | Mix Method |
McGuire et al., 2014 [55] | Developing Countries | Urban and Rural | Primary and secondary health facilities | Narrative review |
Peeling, 2015 | Developing Countries | Urban and Rural | Resource limited settings | Expert review |
Peeling and Ronald, 2009 [54] | Developing Countries | Urban and Rural | Resource limited settings | Narrative Review |
Shott et al., 2012 [53] | Sub-Sahara Africa | Urban and rural | Resource limited settings | Expert review |
Smith et al., 2015 [53] | Guatemala | Rural | Antenatal clinics and Community-based | Cross-sectional survey |
Stevens et al., 2014 [52] | Developing countries | Urban and rural | Resource limited settings | Expert review |
Thairu et al., 2011 [50] | Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe | Rural | Hospital and community-based clinic | Cohort study |
Jaya et al., 2017 [46] | South Africa | Rural | Primary Healthcare Clinics | Cross-sectional (Audit) |