Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2018 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2018 Open Access

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018

Supply factors as determinants of treatment costs: clinicians’ assessments of a given set of referrals to community mental health centers in Norway

Zeitschrift:
BMC Health Services Research > Ausgabe 1/2018
Autoren:
Knut Reidar Wangen, Sverre Grepperud
Wichtige Hinweise

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12913-018-2884-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Previous works that uses patterns of prior spending to predict future mental health care expenses (utilization models) are mainly concerned with demand (need) variables. In this paper, we introduce supply variables, both individual rater variables and center variables. The aim is to assess these variables’ explanatory power, and to investigate whether not accounting for such variables could create biased estimates for the effects of need variables.

Methods

We employed an observational study design where the same set of referrals was assessed by a sample of clinicians, thus creating data with a panel structure being particularly relevant for analyzing supply factors. The referrals were obtained from Norwegian Community Mental Health Centers (outpatient services), and the clinicians assessed the referrals with respect to recommended treatment costs and health status.

Results

Supply variables accounted for more than 10% of the total variation and about one third of the explained variation. Two groups of supply variables, individual rater variables and center variables (institutions) were equally important.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that supply factors are important but ignoring such variables, when analyzing demand variables, do not generally seem to produce biased (confounded) coefficients.
Zusatzmaterial
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Histogram of treatment costs and log treatment costs, with normal density plots; Table S1. Distribution of reccomended treatment types; Table S2. Estimates for fixed effects in models III and IV; Table S3. Estimates for fixed effects in models V-VII; Table S4. Variant of Models II and III, with rater-specific effects. (DOCX 42 kb)
12913_2018_2884_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

BMC Health Services Research 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe