Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics 1/2018

Open Access 28.07.2017 | Original Paper

Surgery for greater trochanteric pain syndrome after total hip replacement confers a poor outcome

verfasst von: Eve Robertson-Waters, James R. Berstock, Michael R. Whitehouse, Ashley W. Blom

Erschienen in: International Orthopaedics | Ausgabe 1/2018

Abstract

Purpose

Surgery for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) may be indicated for cases refractory to conservative measures. We aim to evaluate patient reported outcomes and adverse events following surgery.

Methods

Postal questionnaires were used to evaluate a consecutive series of 61 bursectomy and gluteal fascia transposition (GFT) procedures. Study outcomes were Oxford hip score, satisfaction score, visual analogue score, pain lying on the affected side, and the duration of pain relief after surgery.

Results

We received responses regarding 52 procedures at a median of 34 months follow-up; 40% of cases of GTPS occurred following THA. We observed a bimodal distribution of satisfaction scores. The early post-operative complication rate was 13%; an additional seven cases (12%) required further surgery at a later date. Idiopathic GTPS had significantly better post-operative satisfaction than GTPS following THA, 87.5 vs. 37.5 (p = 0.006); Oxford hip scores, 35 vs. 15 (p = 0.015); and visual analogue scores, 20 vs. 73 (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

We observed overall poor outcomes, significant complications and concerning reoperation rates. Cases with previous joint replacement were associated with the worst outcomes.

Introduction

Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a clinical diagnosis of disabling pain localised over the lateral aspect of the hip [1, 2] worsened by lying on the affected side. What was once thought of, and is still sometimes referred to, as ‘trochanteric bursitis’ is now understood to involve a wider number of structures surrounding the greater trochanter including tendinopathy and micro-trauma to the gluteus medius and minimus tendons [3] (Fig. 1), often without classic signs of inflammation implied by the term ‘bursitis’ [4].
The prevalence of GTPS in the general population ranges from 10 to 25% [5]. When participants of an observational study aged between 50 and 79 years were specifically questioned and examined for features of GTPS, the prevalence was identified at 17.6% [4].
A recent series of patients undergoing a trochanteric bursa injection for GTPS rated the pain 6.1 out of 10 in severity on a verbal numeric pain scale, and reported poor function (mean 50.1) on Harris hip scoring prior to the injection [6].
Following total hip arthroplasty (THA) 4–17% of patients report symptoms of GTPS [710]. Low back pain, hip osteoarthritis [11] and rheumatoid arthritis [12], also appear to be predisposing factors. Furthermore, there appears to be a female preponderance, suggesting hip biomechanics including femoral offset may also play a role [4].
Most cases are managed conservatively with simple analgesia, physiotherapy and corticosteroid injections. For refractory cases of GTPS where conservative measures have failed, numerous surgical techniques have been described [13].
Gluteal fascia transposition (GFT) has been described previously as a technique to decompress the greater trochanteric region [14]. To summarise, an ‘H-shaped’ incision is made in the fascia lata over the greater trochanter and the resulting flaps are folded back on themselves and secured with sutures. This technique is also known as fascial windowing. The underlying bursa is then excised.
Many studies looking at the efficacy of surgical techniques for GTPS exclude patients who have undergone previous THA [15, 13]. However, these patients may make up a significant proportion of refractory cases: Baker et al. [14] report preliminary data to suggest that the aetiology of GTPS may have an effect on outcome following GFT, with idiopathic cases appearing to have a more satisfactory outcome than those with previous THA or revision.
This study aims to retrospectively evaluate patient reported outcomes and adverse events following trochanteric bursectomy and gluteal fascia transposition, in relation to aetiology, in a consecutive case series of patients treated by multiple surgeons at our institution.

Patients and methods

Institutional approval was obtained for this study. The BlueSpier (Bluespier, Droitwich, Worcester, UK) electronic database of clinical records was used to retrospectively identify all patients who underwent bursectomy and GFT at our institution between January 2010 and October 2015. Of the 62 procedures we identified in 59 patients, we excluded one patient who presented with a chronic infective bursitis following corticosteroid injection. All included patients had a clinical diagnosis of GTPS (defined by pain around the greater trochanter), had failed conservative treatment (defined as the return of symptoms following at least one successful corticosteroid injection, physiotherapy or both), and had been symptomatic for over one year at the time of surgery.
The clinical records of patients were reviewed and the following data recorded: age; gender; duration of symptoms; underlying aetiology (idiopathic, ipsilateral THA, bilateral THA, ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty, traumatic, rheumatoid arthritis); presence of low back pain or ipsilateral hip osteoarthritis; previous surgery for GTPS; complications; any further procedures carried out since the index GFT.
We sent postal questionnaires to 58 eligible patients regarding 61 fascial transpositions (three patients experienced bilateral GTPS) at a median of 34 months postoperatively (range 9–77). In the absence of a specific validated outcome tool, the following patient reported outcome measures were included: patient satisfaction score; 10 cm visual analogue score referring to current level of pain (0–100, 0 representing no pain); Oxford hip score [16] (OHS; with a score of 0 representing worst function, and 48 best function); Likert scale duration of pain relief following the operation; Binary presence of pain when lying on affected side.
Satisfaction was measured according to the method described by Mahomed [17]. This scale consists of four items focusing on satisfaction with the extent of pain relief, improvement in ability to perform home activities, recreational activities and overall satisfaction. The responses were scored on a stemmed Likert scale (Appendix 1), with the scale score being the mean of the four parts and ranging from 25 (least satisfied) to 100 (most satisfied).
Missing data were completed where possible via telephone interview by one of the authors (ERW). The mean value substitution method was used when a maximum of one data point was not reported for an outcome measure. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, v22.0 (IBM Corp; Armonk, NY) was used for statistical analysis. A Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the outcome of surgical intervention between cases with an idiopathic aetiology and those who had undergone previous THA. Pearson coefficients were used to determine if there was a correlation between the reported outcome scores.

Results

We received responses from 49 patients, regarding 52 (85%) bursectomy and gluteal fascia transposition procedures. Demographic data for the study population are presented according to aetiology in Table 1. Age differed significantly between the idiopathic group (median age 58) and THA group (median age 74), p < 0.05. The results of pre-operative pelvic radiographs and ultrasound scans (USS) are summarised in Table 2. Plain AP radiographs were available for review in 44 out of 49 patients. The most prevalent abnormality was the presence of a bony spur over the trochanter. No varus hips (neck-shaft angle <120°) were identified however there were two valgus hips in the idiopathic GTPS group (neck-shaft angle >140°). An additional pre-operative USS was performed for 38 patients, revealing signs of either trochanteric bursitis or gluteal tendinopathy in 36 cases, see Table 2. Responders and non-responders were not significantly different in median age, length of follow-up or female preponderance. However, one patient in the THA group did not respond, compared to six in the idiopathic group. Both cases where the aetiology was unknown did not respond.
Table 1
Demographics of study population by aetiology
Aetiology
Number of fascial window procedures
Median age (interquartile range)
Males
Females
Idiopathic
31
58 (50.5–67)
7
24
Bilateral THA
8
72 (65–74)
3
5
Ipsilateral THA
10
69 (57–74)
2
8
Revision THA
7
77 (76–81)
2
5
THA (all)
25
74 (65–77)
7
18
Rheumatoid arthritis
2
64
0
2
Traumatic
1
62
0
1
Unavailable
2
65
0
2
Total
61
64 (57–74)
14
47
Table 2
Hip ultrasound (USS) and radiographical features by aetiology
Aetiology
Total
Hip radiographs available
Bony Spur
Reduced off-set
Increased off-set
USS available
USS diagnosis of bursitis (trochanteric/ gluteal) alone
USS diagnosis of tendinopathy alone
USS diagnosis of mixed tendinopathy and bursitis
No evidence of pathology on USS
Idiopathic
31
27
14
0
0
18
12
3
1
2
Bilateral THA
8
8
6
0
3
7
5
0
2
0
Ipsilateral THA
10
10
7
0
0
7
5
0
2
0
Revision THA
7
6
1
2
0
5
3
0
2
0
Rheumatoid arthritis
2
2
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
Traumatic
1
1
0
0
0
0
-
-
-
-
Unavailable
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
40 of 61 cases underwent USS preoperatively. In a number of cases, tendinopathy and trochanteric bursitis were diagnosed together; 56 of 61 cases underwent hip x-ray preoperatively. One traumatic case occurred after fractured neck of femur, fixed with cannulated screws. THA = total hip arthroplasty
Prior surgery for GTPS had been undertaken in six patients in the ipsilateral hip: two labral tear repairs; two fascial windowing; one Z-lengthening; one arthroscopic psoas repair. An additional procedure at the same time as bursectomy and GFT occurred in seven patients: two bony debridement of lateral flare; two abductor reattachment; one psoas release; one repair of short external rotators; one osteophyte removal.

Outcomes

At a median of 34 months follow up, median visual analogue score (VAS) of 52 responses was 53 (interquartile range 10–75). Only four patients reported being completely pain free (VAS pain of 0). The median OHS was 25 (interquartile range 12–40).

Pain lying on side

Figure 2A shows the responses of the total patient group to the question, ‘Do you get pain lying on the affected hip?’. Of the 48 responses completed, 37 (77%) continued to have pain lying on their side following GFT.

Satisfaction

The results of the 52 responses to our satisfaction survey are displayed in Fig. 2b. The distribution of scores was bimodal and symmetrical with a median satisfaction scale score of 62.5 (interquartile range 37.5–93.75) and modes at 100 and 37.5.

Pain relief

Figure 3 shows patient responses to the question ‘Following your operation, for how long did you have pain relief before your symptoms returned?’. Of 51 responses, 11 report no relief at all; in comparison, nine were still pain free at follow-up. Nineteen cases were pain free for a year or more.

Complications

Complications arose after eight of 61 operations in seven patients as follows: three significant post-operative bleeding; one haematoma; two wound infections; one persistent wound infection requiring multiple debridement operations and prosthetic joint infection; one required revision of GFT and LARS ligament (Corin, Cirencester, UK) augmented tendon repair due to persistent pain. A further seven hips required additional operations for GTPS following the index fascial transposition: two LARS ligament augmented gluteal tendon repairs, two revision THA, two psoas releases, one excision of bony spur.

Outcome by aetiology

Postoperative VAS, OHS and satisfaction scores were compared for those with idiopathic aetiology and those with GTPS following THA (Fig. 4). Median satisfaction scores were 37.5 following THA vs. 87.5 for idiopathic cases (p = 0.006); median VAS were 73 THA vs. 20, idiopathic (p = 0.005); median OHS were 15 THA vs. 35 idiopathic (p = 0.015).
Although idiopathic cases tended to be younger, satisfaction scores, VAS and OHS of respondents were not associated with age, gender, the presence or absence of low back pain or osteoarthritis in the same hip using regression analysis. It is not possible to know whether previous surgery was associated with significantly worse outcome measures due to the small sample size.

Reliability of outcome measures

There was significant correlation between satisfaction scoring, VAS and OHS (p < 0.001 for all cases). There was positive correlation between satisfaction and OHS (r = 0.62), and a negative correlation between OHS and VAS (r = −0.902), and satisfaction and VAS (r = −0.701). All patients who answered that they were still pain free had VAS scores of 20 or lower, suggesting reliability of the different outcome measures used.

Discussion

We report a wide variation in outcomes following bursectomy and GFT, suggesting that this surgical intervention does not consistently produce a reliable outcome for refractory cases of GTPS. A disappointingly large number of patients in our case series were dissatisfied with the results of surgery, which is compounded by the relatively low overall median Oxford hip score of 25 (0 worst, 48 best) revealing the disabling nature of this condition, despite a course of conservative therapy and surgical intervention.
Numerous alternative surgical procedures attempt to treat patients with GTPS including open and arthroscopic bursectomy, iliotibial band Z-lengthening, open or arthroscopic tendon repair, and trochanteric osteotomy [13]. In contrast to some other surgical methods, GFT aims to decompress the greater trochanter with excision of the bursa tissue. Whether the fascia is a key contributing cause in the pathoaetiology of GTPS is however unknown.
To our knowledge there has only been one previous study reporting outcomes of bursectomy and GFT [14]. In comparison with this previous study, our results are disappointing. Approximately half of patients in our study were satisfied with their outcome, compared with 75% in the previous study. Our results show that postoperative satisfaction, pain scores and OHS were significantly worse in cases with previous THA compared to idiopathic cases. With these patients making up 40% of cases in our series, our data add to those presented by Baker et al. [14], and are of significance because a consistent and major exclusion factor in studies of outcome following surgery for GTPS is previous ipsilateral THA [13, 15].
We hypothesised that the difference in outcome between idiopathic cases and those following THA may be related to differences in the underlying pathology or age; however, we were not able to identify pathological differences on the basis of ultrasound scanning. Similarly, although idiopathic cases were significantly younger, age did not correlate to any measure of outcome, suggesting that advancing age did not account for the poor outcomes of fascial release after THA. In our series, only five of 25 cases had altered femoral offset following THA, suggesting cases following THA do not necessarily occur due to altered hip biomechanics. Future research might uncover differences in the pathology of THA and idiopathic cases of GTPS. In the meantime, we suggest that patients with GTPS following THA should be appropriately counselled about the poor outcome of gluteal fascial release and bursectomy.
Early complications in both studies were reported in 13% of patients. Although most complications in our series were easily treated such as post-operative bleeding, haematoma and superficial infection, we report one devastating prosthetic joint infection. In addition, a notable proportion of patients require further surgery for GTPS suggesting their pain was not improved; a finding not previously reported for this operation. Complications reported in other surgical techniques for GTPS appear to be similar in nature [13] but have varying rates. Similarly, other studies report substantial rates of re-operation [13, 18].
Alternative surgical management, notably gluteal tendon repair, has been associated with better outcomes [19, 20]. In 72 patients with GTPS undergoing gluteal tendon repair, 90% had no or minimal pain maintained at six and 12 months [20]. In these reports, a specific diagnosis of gluteal tendinopathy was identified on MRI, suggesting that surgery targeted at a specific pathology may be more effective. However, arthroscopic bursectomy without fascial release also appears to have encouraging outcomes at mid-term follow-up [18, 21] with low VAS scores at two years post-operatively, in patients with clinical features of GTPS.
Interpreting the current literature is complicated by the range of underlying pathology which is not always described, the difference in natural history between de novo and recalcitrant GTPS, the lack of specific diagnostic criteria and a lack of a specific tool to measure outcomes in GTPS; as such, widely varying outcomes are reported. However, common to many reports is the exclusion of cases with previous THA. The overall poorer outcomes in our study of GFT for GTPS compared to studies of other surgical techniques may be explained by this difference.
A recent systematic review revealed a lack of evidence to inform the management of GTPS [13]. For conservative measures, four randomised controlled trials have revealed modest but temporary symptomatic relief following corticosteroid injections, and shockwave therapy. The evidence base for patients with recalcitrant GTPS who have not responded to the usual conservative measures is limited to small case series, with variable success reported [13]. We propose that any more invasive surgical treatment method should be superior in not only effect but also length of symptomatic relief. In our case series, at median follow-up of 34 months, 41% retrospectively reported being pain-free for one year, but only four patients were pain free (VAS of 0) at time of follow-up. To our knowledge no prospective studies have directly compared surgical treatments with conservative measures. Such a trial is required, especially in the setting of refractory GTPS where it is important to know if surgery is superior to the continuation of non-operative measures.
Our retrospective case series is limited by a lack of baseline patient reported outcome measures. However, it has a relatively large sample size compared to other case series of surgical interventions for GTPS [14]. We were unable to identify whether physiotherapy was used as an adjunct to surgery in the cases in this series. The complications we report are important to note if surgical intervention is being considered for this condition. This study also importantly reports outcomes beyond the usual clinical follow up period for this patient group, and beyond that reported in other studies.

Conclusion

We report overall poor outcomes following GFT and bursectomy for patients with refractory GTPS. The significant complications and rates of further surgery are concerning and are comparable to those reported in studies of other surgical methods for GTPS. We note significantly worse outcomes in those who have undergone previous THA, compared to idiopathic cases. Patients with previous THA are an important group of patients, who commonly undergo surgical treatment for refractory GTPS but are excluded from other studies. Where cases of GTPS remain refractory to treatment with standard conservative measures such as corticosteroid injection (which tend to produce only temporary symptomatic relief) we note the urgent need for a trial comparing specialist conservative management with targeted surgery in terms of length and degree of efficacy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Eve Robertson-Waters, James Berstock, Michael Whitehouse and Ashley Blom declare no conflict of interest.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen der Fachgebiete, den Premium-Inhalten der dazugehörigen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

© Springer Medizin

Bis 11. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr 50 % sparen!

Anhänge

Appendix 1. Patient Questionnaire and Satisfaction Questions

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fearon AM, Cook JL, Scarvell JM, Neeman T, Cormick W, Smith PN (2014) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome negatively affects work, physical activity and quality of life: a case control study. J Arthroplast 29(2):383–386. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.016 CrossRef Fearon AM, Cook JL, Scarvell JM, Neeman T, Cormick W, Smith PN (2014) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome negatively affects work, physical activity and quality of life: a case control study. J Arthroplast 29(2):383–386. doi:10.​1016/​j.​arth.​2012.​10.​016 CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Park KD, Lee WY, Lee J, Park MH, Ahn JK, Park Y (2016) Factors associated with the outcome of ultrasound-guided trochanteric Bursa injection in greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Pain Physician 19(4):E547–E557PubMed Park KD, Lee WY, Lee J, Park MH, Ahn JK, Park Y (2016) Factors associated with the outcome of ultrasound-guided trochanteric Bursa injection in greater trochanteric pain syndrome: a retrospective cohort study. Pain Physician 19(4):E547–E557PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sayed-Noor AS, Sjoden GO (2006) Greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty: the incidence, clinical outcome and associated factors. Hip Int 16(3):202–206CrossRefPubMed Sayed-Noor AS, Sjoden GO (2006) Greater trochanteric pain after total hip arthroplasty: the incidence, clinical outcome and associated factors. Hip Int 16(3):202–206CrossRefPubMed
9.
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Genth B, Von Düring M, Von Engelhardt LV, Ludwig J, Teske W, Von Schulze-Pellengahr C (2012) Analysis of the sensory innervations of the greater trochanter for improving the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Clin Anat 25(8):1080–1086. doi:10.1002/ca.22035 CrossRefPubMed Genth B, Von Düring M, Von Engelhardt LV, Ludwig J, Teske W, Von Schulze-Pellengahr C (2012) Analysis of the sensory innervations of the greater trochanter for improving the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. Clin Anat 25(8):1080–1086. doi:10.​1002/​ca.​22035 CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Collee G, Dijkmans BA, Vandenbroucke JP, Cats A (1991) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (trochanteric bursitis) in low back pain. Scand J Rheumatol 20(4):262–266CrossRefPubMed Collee G, Dijkmans BA, Vandenbroucke JP, Cats A (1991) Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (trochanteric bursitis) in low back pain. Scand J Rheumatol 20(4):262–266CrossRefPubMed
12.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 78(2):185–190CrossRef Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Bone Joint J 78(2):185–190CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgery for greater trochanteric pain syndrome after total hip replacement confers a poor outcome
verfasst von
Eve Robertson-Waters
James R. Berstock
Michael R. Whitehouse
Ashley W. Blom
Publikationsdatum
28.07.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Orthopaedics / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-017-3546-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

International Orthopaedics 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. 
» Jetzt entdecken

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.