Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017

Open Access 23.08.2016

Surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus based on a minimally invasive approach: vascular and nervous anatomy and technical steps to resection and lymphadenectomy

verfasst von: Miguel A. Cuesta, Nicole van der Wielen, Teus J. Weijs, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Peter van Duijvendijk, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P. Ruurda, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Jennifer Straatman, Harushi Osugi, Donald L. van der Peet

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 4/2017

Abstract

Background

During esophageal dissection and lymphadenectomy of the upper mediastinum by thoracoscopy in prone position, we observed a complex anatomy in which we had to resect the esophagus, dissect vessels and nerves, and take down some of these in order to perform a complete lymphadenectomy. In order to improve the quality of the dissection and standardization of the procedure, we describe the surgical anatomy and steps involved in this procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated twenty consecutive and unedited videos of thoracoscopic esophageal resections. We recorded the vascular anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus, lymph node stations and the steps taken in this procedure. The resulting concept was validated in a prospective study including five patients.

Results

Seventy percent of patients in the retrospective study had one right bronchial artery (RBA) and two left bronchial arteries (LBA). The RBA was divided at both sides of the esophagus in 18 patients, with preservation of one LBA or at least one esophageal branch in all cases. Both recurrent laryngeal nerves were identified in 18 patients. All patients in the prospective study had one RBA and two LBA, and in four patients the RBA was divided at both sides of the esophagus and preserved one of the LBA. Lymphadenectomy was performed of stations 4R, 4L, 2R and 2L, with a median of 11 resected lymph nodes. Both recurrent laryngeal nerves were identified in four patients. In three patients, only the left recurrent nerve could be identified. Two patients showed palsy of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve, and one showed neuropraxia of the left vocal cord.

Conclusions

Knowledge of the surgical anatomy of the upper mediastinum and its anatomical variations is important for standardization of an adequate esophageal resection and paratracheal lymphadenectomy with preservation of any vascularization of the trachea, bronchi and the recurrent laryngeal nerves.
The concept that the aorto-esophageal ligament (also called the meso-esophagus) connects the anterior aspect of the descending aorta to the left side of the esophagus and contains blood vessels, lymph vessels and nerves can only be valid for the infracarinal esophagus [1]. As the supracarinal esophagus is vascularized on both sides, it is of utmost importance to know the variable anatomy when performing an esophageal resection up to the thoracic apex and also for doing a complete lymphadenectomy on both sides of the trachea and of both recurrent laryngeal nerves [25].
The manner in which Eastern World (EW) and Western World (WW) surgeons indicate and perform a lymphadenectomy (LN) differs. In the WW, the majority of surgeons only perform a two-field lymphadenectomy, whereas in Japan the three-field lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for middle and high located squamous cell carcinomas [612]. Also, the range of extent for the two-field lymphadenectomy varies. According to the Consensus Conference of the International Society of Diseases of Esophagus (ISDE), held in Munich 1994, three extents of mediastinal lymphadenectomy are found: the standard LN, the extended two-field LN and the so-called total mediastinal LN [13]. Classically, holding for a two- or three-stage esophageal resection for distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas, after the neoadjuvant therapy expert opinions are seen to be divided. There are surgeons who will not routinely resect paratracheal and recurrent laryngeal nerve stations and only resect these if suspect for metastasis, whereas others may routinely perform a paratracheal lymphadenectomy for the most part only on the right side [1315]. However, during a thoracoscopic approach these stations are clearly visible and resection, if needed, can be performed with optimal safety [1618]. There is some discussion about how to dissect this area and which structures have to be dissected and divided in order to perform an adequate resection with optimal functional outcome for neighbor organs, especially tracheobronchial tree and lung function [1921]. Observations of the supracarinal esophagus during thoracoscopic dissection in prone position prompted us to carry out a retrospective and prospective study with in vivo imaging. And additionally to describe the surgical anatomy concerning anatomical structures and planes of this important part of the upper mediastinum, and doing this in order to perform an adequate esophageal resection with an adequate lymphadenectomy.

Materials and methods

Retrospective study

The surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus and the required steps for resection and lymph node dissection were studied by one of the surgeons (MAC) in 20 consecutive unedited videos of patients in whom a total mediastinal lymphadenectomy had been performed between January 2012 and February 2014. Indication for total mediastinal LN included all patients with squamous cell cancer (SCC) and esophageal cancer in distal locations (mostly located in the middle or high esophagus) with suspected involvement of the lymph nodes in the high mediastinum, as determined by PET-CT scan. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the CROSS scheme [22].

Prospective study

A verification study was performed in five consecutive patients in two hospitals between November 2014 and March 2015, four patients with SCC and one patient with an adenocarcinoma (AC) located in the mid-lower esophagus with suspicion of involvement of the lymph nodes in the upper mediastinum. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy according to the CROSS scheme [22].

Operative technique by thoracoscopy in prone position

In order to perform minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) by thoracoscopy in prone position, we started by opening the mediastinal pleura on both sides of the esophagus, along the right lung and on the left side along the azygos vein. Furthermore, the upper mediastinal pleura is opened on the right side between the vagal nerve and the superior vena cava and on the left side along the left border of the trachea up to the thoracic apex (Fig. 1). After this, the azygos vein is divided by means of a vascular stapler and the right vagal nerve is divided at the lower level of the right bronchus. The next step is to dissect the esophagus with the periesophageal lymph nodes free from the pars membranacea of the trachea and the vascular lateral attachments. Arterial supply of the supracarinal esophagus comes from both sides of the esophagus, and the bronchial arteries also supply the trachea and both bronchi. There is much variation in the numbers and patterns of the bronchial arteries, the most frequent (70 %) being two on the left side and one on the right, but all combinations of one or two on each side are possible. Because of this variability, it is necessary to identify the bronchial arteries during surgery—that is between left and right—before dividing them. The right bronchial artery (RBA) is a branch of the third posterior intercostal artery, and the left bronchial arteries (LBA) are coming directly from the aortic arch. According to the anatomy, the artery that supplies blood to the right bronchus is identified as the RBA (Fig. 2) and should be divided. On the left side, there are frequently two LBA possible to identify during the esophageal dissection from the aorta arch. If we pull the esophagus, the tissue going to esophagus from the aorta is divided, and frequently one of the LBA can be identified. But identifying the left bronchus and dissecting the esophagus free from it, vessels coming from the aortic arch to the left bronchus can be preserved. In practice, from distal to proximal, this implies to divide the RBA at both sides of the esophagus and on the left side to divide the vessels between the aortic arch and the esophagus (one or both LBA), trying to preserve if possible one branch going to the left bronchus (Fig. 3).
Furthermore, these bronchial arteries are not terminal arteries, having many anastomoses in front of the tracheobronchial tree (Fig. 4).
The right vagal nerve goes from lateral behind the subclavian artery, where the right recurrent laryngeal nerve recurs, and courses laterally of the trachea to cross posteriorly of the main right bronchus, giving numerous branches to the right lung and going to the esophagus as the esophageal plexus. The left vagal nerve goes posteriorly of the aortic arch, where the left recurrent nerve recurs (ascending along the left side of the trachea), and from there crosses to the posterior aspect of the main left bronchus and, before access to the esophagus, gives numerous branches to the left lung [21].
If total mediastinal LN is indicated, the high paratracheal mediastinal lymphadenectomy is performed on both sides (Fig. 3), and on the right side the field may be—for practical purposes—divided into two areas: one from the superior vena cava to the right vagal nerve and the other from the right vagal nerve to the trachea. During dissection on the right side, LN of stations 4R and 2R should be performed after identification of the right recurrent laryngeal nerve at the level of the right subclavian artery. On the left side, after LN of the subaortic station (station 5), dissection of station 2L and 4 L can be performed in two ways, frontally along the trachea after identification of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve or to do “en bloc” LN starting with the right side, continuing with a gentle retraction of the trachea through its anterior aspect (in prone position, Fig. 5) to finally end on the left side with identification and preservation of the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (Fig. 6).

Lymph node classifications

There are two lymph node grading classifications specific for esophageal cancer including both mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes stations: the Japanese Society Esophageal Disease (JSED) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Moreover, there is the lymph node grading of the International Association Study Lung Cancer (IASLC) specific for mediastinal lymph node stations [13, 23, 24].
The infracarinal, bronchial and periesophageal lymph nodes can be retrieved en bloc with the specimen, whereas the rest will be taken out separately after resection.

Results

The patient characteristics of the retrospective and prospective study are depicted in Table 1.
Table 1
Characteristics and outcomes of the study groups
 
Retrospective (n = 20)
Prospective (n = 5)
Histology
 Adenocarcinoma
2 (10 %)
1 (20 %)
 Squamous cell carcinoma
18 (90 %)
4 (80 %)
Vascular anatomy
 1 RBA + 2 LBA
14 (70 %)
5 (100 %)
 1 RBA + 1 LBA
6 (30 %)
0
Preserved RBA
2
1
Preserved 1 LBA
14
0
Preserved 1 LBA to trachea
6
5
Lymphadenectomy
 Separate
20
2
 En bloc
0
3
Visualization recurrent laryngeal nerve
 Left recurrent laryngeal nerve
2
1
 Both recurrent laryngeal nerves
18
4
Complications
 Respiratory infection
2
1
 Anastomotic leakage
2
1
 Recurrent nerve palsy
2
1
Eighteen patients had middle and high located SCC, and two patients had AC with suspected involvement of the lymph nodes in the upper mediastinum, as determined by PET-CT scan.

Anatomical findings

In all patients, we identified arterial and nervous structures in the course of the paratracheal lymphadenectomy (2L + R and 4L + R). Anatomical findings are depicted in Table 1.
Fourteen out of 20 patients had one right bronchial artery and two left bronchial arteries (70 %), whereas the other six patients had one right and one left bronchial artery.
In two out of twenty patients in the retrospective study, the RBA was preserved. In the other eighteen patients, the artery was divided during dissection at both sides of the esophagus. In fourteen patients, at least one LBA was preserved on the left side, and in six others the branches to the trachea and left bronchus of the superior LBA could be preserved.
Regarding the prospective study, in all these five cases one right bronchial artery and two left arteries were found, with at least one branch of the superior LBA to the trachea and left bronchus being preserved. Moreover, in one patient the RBA was preserved and in the other four patients the artery was divided at both sides of the esophagus.
Moreover, in eighteen out of twenty patients in the retrospective study, the right and left recurrent laryngeal nerves were visualized, whereas in two only the left was seen while in the prospective study the visualization on the left recurrent laryngeal nerve was reached in all patients, and on the right side only in four could be visualized with the fifth patient having an aberrant right subclavian artery (subclavian lusoria).
In all patients in the retrospective study, the upper mediastinal LN was performed separately, first right and then left along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve. While in the prospective study, in two patients left and right were done separately, whereas in the other three it was performed en bloc.

Oncological outcome

The median number of resected lymph nodes in the supracarinal area was 11 (range 8–14). In six patients (five in the retrospective and one in the prospective study), a median of three lymph node metastases (range 2–5) was found. R0 resection was achieved in 95 % of the patients in the retrospective and in 100 % of the prospective study.

Complications

In the retrospective study, two patients developed a postoperative lung infection, two had a palsy of the left recurrent nerve, and in two others a cervical anastomosis leakage was observed. In the prospective study, there was one patient with respiratory infection, another had a neuropraxia of the left vocal cord, and one had an anastomotic leakage.

Discussion

Having a comprehensive concept of the live surgical anatomy is necessary for ensuring the anatomical accuracy as well as reproducibility of radical resections for cancer.
During conventional transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer, the upper mediastinal area may be a difficult area to visualize, to comprehend and frequently so to dissect for the purpose of performing an adequate esophageal resection and lymphadenectomy. It is a complex area in which the mediastinal vital structures move up in direction to the head and superior extremities. In the thoracoscopic approach, however, precise dissection of this part of the anatomy is possible by the augmentation and the precision of the imaging obtained [18, 2527].
Moreover, when performing an upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy, indications for it and even its extension are still not well established; moreover, its terminology (classification) is not completely standardized [615, 23, 24, 28].
Minimally invasive esophagectomy is increasingly performed [2527], and definition of surgical anatomy is important to accomplish. In a previous study, we have described and called meso-esophagus the fascia and structures between the aorta and the infracarinal esophagus [1]. In this retrospective and prospective study of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in prone position, our aim was to describe the surgical anatomy of the upper mediastinum, and the landmarks and structures that have to be divided, in order to perform an adequate esophagectomy and lymphadenectomy. The numbers of complications recorded as a consequence of this dissection, especially palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerves, can be considered high and may have important consequences for the numbers of respiratory infections [29, 30].
This resulted in a technical annotation on how to perform this challenging dissection in a safe way with the purpose of decreasing the morbidity.
In order to perform the MIE in prone position, first the dissection of the esophagus, periesophageal tissues and subcarinal lymph nodes is performed, which is followed by the dissection of the upper mediastinum. Dissection starts after the opening of the pleura on both sides with division of the vascular structures necessary to free the esophagus and is followed by careful dissection of the esophagus from the pars membranacea of the trachea. After this, if indicated, extended or total lymphadenectomy on the right side is performed followed by lymphadenectomy on the left side.
Bronchial arteries are considered an important vascular and nutritional supply of the esophagus, trachea, bronchi and lungs, but their anatomy shows a great variability. Variations in arterial supply are frequent described but also its terminology for example, high on the right side arterial branches coming from the neck connects with what is called by some esophageal surgeons the tracheoesophageal artery, while by pulmonary surgeons it is called the upper bronchial artery. It originates from the right subclavian artery, runs ventrocaudally and sends branches to trachea and esophagus.
During the operation, it should be carefully observed which vessels are going to the right and which are going to the left side of the esophagus. The finding in our study that 70 % of the patients had one right bronchial artery and two left bronchial arteries is in concordance with the literature [26]. Arterial supply of the esophagus, trachea and principal bronchi is common; therefore, it is important to know which arteries should be divided and which preserved during dissection. Important is to preserve as much as possible of the arterial supply to the trachea and bronchi. On the left side, at least one of the two branches should be preserved, with a preference for the superior bronchial artery with only branches to the trachea and bronchus. If only one exists, only the branches to the esophagus should be divided. Failure to do so may result in impairment of the postoperative respiratory function [19, 20]. In this study, we had been able to preserve at least one bronchial artery or the branch of one going to the trachea in all patients. This is important because these bronchial arteries are not terminal arteries, having many anastomoses in front of the tracheobronchial tree.
In this study, the lymphadenectomy was performed separately, upper paratracheal (2R and 2L) and lower paratracheal lymph node stations (4R and 4L) in all patients in the retrospective study and in two patients in the prospective study, while in three patients in the prospective study this was done en bloc. This is a new approach to perform this type of lymphadenectomy and may be performed because of the visibility obtained during thoracoscopy. The majority of the Japanese surgeons perform a three-field lymphadenectomy for middle and high in the esophagus located SCC, whereas the common procedure in the WW is to perform a two-field LN. In Japan, surgeons initiated the intervention with bilateral neck dissection, with control of both recurrent laryngeal nerves. During lymphadenectomy, preservation of the recurrent nerves is essential and careful dissection, especially on the left side, is important in avoiding a traumatic dissection and traction.
No damage of the recurrent laryngeal nerves was seen during the operations in this series, but clinically two palsies and one temporary neuropraxia of the left nerve were observed. Moreover, the numbers of pulmonary infections and anastomotic leakages in the neck are according to the observed in the TIME trial [25].
The use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not harm the dissection, and the lymph nodes numbers obtained in this area are considered adequate even if the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is known to reduce the numbers of total lymph nodes removed, possibly having more prognostic than therapeutic value [22, 31].
Questions arise whether the prone position of the patient will generate all these advantages in comparison with the thoracoscopy in lateral position. Kawakubo et al. [32] describe the hybrid semiprone position adopted in some centers in Japan to dissect the paratracheal lymph nodes correctly. They described this position as optimal because the lateral decubitus and prone positions can be achieved by rotating the surgical table. They found that if the prone position is adequate for dissection of the middle and lower mediastinum, then the lateral position is better for the upper mediastinum, especially around the left recurrent laryngeal nerve.
Moreover, to perform the thoracic phase of the robot-assisted esophageal resection (RAMIE) the patient is also positioned from the decubitus into this semiprone position in order to work optimally with the robot and at the same time visualize correctly the upper part of the mediastinum [33].
The pertaining comprehensive description is significant. First, it defines the anatomical structures and landmarks for the optimal esophageal resection and lymphadenectomy if indication exists for this on the upper mediastinum. Second, it describes the steps to operate, pointing out how important it is to divide some vascular structures and preserving others. Third, it describes the two possibilities for lymphadenectomy, en bloc or separate left from right. Another important aspects of this esophageal anatomy may be the description of the vagal nerves and the possible importance of preserving the pulmonary branches to protect the pulmonary function postoperatively [21].
Discussion is still going on about the extension of the lymphadenectomy. Independent of the prognosis, when the lymph nodes in the upper mediastinum are involved, total mediastinal lymphadenectomy is indicated in resectable SCC and AC in any location. In the case of AC, mostly located in the distal esophagus and GEJ with no suspected lymph nodes, and especially after neoadjuvant therapy, the question remains open. Currently, it is the personal choice of the surgeon whether to perform standard, extended or total lymphadenectomy. A lymph node and lymphadenectomy survey the TIGER survey is already performed in order to solve this question, especially in the era of neoadjuvant therapy [34].
Dissection by minimally invasive surgery of the upper mediastinum in esophageal surgery can be demanding, partly because of anatomical variation. Having knowledge of the surgical anatomy and landmarks of the resection will improve an understanding of the anatomy, thereby leading to a more adequate and reproducible surgical resection.
In our study, we have determined that important advantages as obtained by minimally invasive surgery—such as visualization and augmentation—have permitted a more complete knowledge and standardization of the surgical anatomy of the upper mediastinum.

Disclosures

Miguel A. Cuesta, Nicole van der Wielen, Teus J. Weijs, Ronald L. A. W. Bleys, Suzanne S. Gisbertz, Peter van Duijvendijk, Richard van Hillegersberg, Jelle P. Ruurda, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Jennifer Straatman, Harushi Osugi, Donald L. van der Peet have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

Die Chirurgie

Print-Titel

Das Abo mit mehr Tiefe

Mit der Zeitschrift Die Chirurgie erhalten Sie zusätzlich Online-Zugriff auf weitere 43 chirurgische Fachzeitschriften, CME-Fortbildungen, Webinare, Vorbereitungskursen zur Facharztprüfung und die digitale Enzyklopädie e.Medpedia.

Bis 30. April 2024 bestellen und im ersten Jahr nur 199 € zahlen!

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL (2015) A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2576–2582CrossRefPubMed Cuesta MA, Weijs TJ, Bleys RL, van Hillegersberg R, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS, Ruurda JP, Straatman J, Osugi H, van der Peet DL (2015) A new concept of the anatomy of the thoracic oesophagus: the meso-oesophagus. Observational study during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Surg Endosc 29:2576–2582CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Anson BJ, McVay CB (1971) Surgical anatomy, 5th edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia Anson BJ, McVay CB (1971) Surgical anatomy, 5th edn. W.B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cauldwell EW, Siekert RG et al (1948) The bronchial arteries; an anatomic study of 150 human cadavers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 86:395–412PubMed Cauldwell EW, Siekert RG et al (1948) The bronchial arteries; an anatomic study of 150 human cadavers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 86:395–412PubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Swigart LL, Siekert RG et al (1950) The esophageal arteries; an anatomic study of 150 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet 90:234–243PubMed Swigart LL, Siekert RG et al (1950) The esophageal arteries; an anatomic study of 150 specimens. Surg Gynecol Obstet 90:234–243PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Salassa JR, Pearson BW, Payne WS (1977) Gross and microscopical blood supply of the trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 24:100–107CrossRefPubMed Salassa JR, Pearson BW, Payne WS (1977) Gross and microscopical blood supply of the trachea. Ann Thorac Surg 24:100–107CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker CM, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Martinez-Jimenez S, Kunin JR, Wible BC (2015) Bronchial arteries: anatomy, function, hypertrophy, and anomalies. Radiographics 35:32–49CrossRefPubMed Walker CM, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Martinez-Jimenez S, Kunin JR, Wible BC (2015) Bronchial arteries: anatomy, function, hypertrophy, and anomalies. Radiographics 35:32–49CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shima I, Toh Y, Tomita Y, Fujii T, Yamasaki K, Higaki K, Noake T et al (1995) Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 222:654–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Fujita H, Kakegawa T, Yamana H, Shima I, Toh Y, Tomita Y, Fujii T, Yamasaki K, Higaki K, Noake T et al (1995) Mortality and morbidity rates, postoperative course, quality of life, and prognosis after extended radical lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparison of three-field lymphadenectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 222:654–662CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Tong D, Law S (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37:1751–1756CrossRefPubMed Tong D, Law S (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is crucial. World J Surg 37:1751–1756CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbella FA, Laurino Neto RM, Allaix ME, Patti MG (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is debatable. World J Surg 37:1757–1767CrossRefPubMed Herbella FA, Laurino Neto RM, Allaix ME, Patti MG (2013) Extended lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer is debatable. World J Surg 37:1757–1767CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Parry K, Haverkamp L, Bruijnen RC, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2015) Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction. Ann Surg Oncol 22:597–603CrossRefPubMed Parry K, Haverkamp L, Bruijnen RC, Siersema PD, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R (2015) Surgical treatment of adenocarcinomas of the gastro-esophageal junction. Ann Surg Oncol 22:597–603CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato T, Sakamoto K (1992) Illustrations and photographs of surgical esophageal anatomy specially prepared for lymph node dissection. In: Color atlas of surgical anatomy for esophageal cancer. Springer, Japan, pp 25–90 Sato T, Sakamoto K (1992) Illustrations and photographs of surgical esophageal anatomy specially prepared for lymph node dissection. In: Color atlas of surgical anatomy for esophageal cancer. Springer, Japan, pp 25–90
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J (2002) Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg 236:177–183CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Bumm R, Wang J (1994) More or less surgery for esophageal cancer: extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma—How much is necessary? Dis Esophagus 7:151–155CrossRef Bumm R, Wang J (1994) More or less surgery for esophageal cancer: extent of lymphadenectomy for squamous cell esophageal carcinoma—How much is necessary? Dis Esophagus 7:151–155CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Sisic L, Blank S, Weichert W, Jager D, Springfeld C, Hochreiter M, Buchler M, Ott K (2013) Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement and the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:973–981CrossRefPubMed Sisic L, Blank S, Weichert W, Jager D, Springfeld C, Hochreiter M, Buchler M, Ott K (2013) Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement and the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:973–981CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiranyatheb P, Osugi H (2015) Radical lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: from the past to the present. Dis Esophagus 28:68–77CrossRefPubMed Hiranyatheb P, Osugi H (2015) Radical lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer: from the past to the present. Dis Esophagus 28:68–77CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85:1457–1459CrossRefPubMed Siewert JR, Stein HJ (1998) Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg 85:1457–1459CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113CrossRefPubMed Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H (2003) A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. Br J Surg 90:108–113CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefPubMed Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, Koike K, Miyazaki K (2010) Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2965–2973CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Hawahara H, Yamana H, Shirohazu G, Yoshimura Y, Minami T, Negoto Y, Irie H, Shima I, Machi J et al (1988) Mediastinal lymphnode dissection procedure during esophageal cancer operation—carefully considered for preserving respiratory function. Jpn J Surg 18:31–34CrossRefPubMed Fujita H, Hawahara H, Yamana H, Shirohazu G, Yoshimura Y, Minami T, Negoto Y, Irie H, Shima I, Machi J et al (1988) Mediastinal lymphnode dissection procedure during esophageal cancer operation—carefully considered for preserving respiratory function. Jpn J Surg 18:31–34CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujita H, Kawahara H, Hidaka M, Mizoguchi Y, Tokunaga H, Yoshimatsu H (1986) Vagal nerve and bronchial artery preserving mediastinal dissection for radical operation of esophageal carcinoma. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 19:2003–2009CrossRef Fujita H, Kawahara H, Hidaka M, Mizoguchi Y, Tokunaga H, Yoshimatsu H (1986) Vagal nerve and bronchial artery preserving mediastinal dissection for radical operation of esophageal carcinoma. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 19:2003–2009CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Hillegersberg R, Bleys RL (2015) Topography and extent of pulmonary vagus nerve supply with respect to transthoracic oesophagectomy. J Anat 227:431–439CrossRefPubMed Weijs TJ, Ruurda JP, Luyer MD, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, van Hillegersberg R, Bleys RL (2015) Topography and extent of pulmonary vagus nerve supply with respect to transthoracic oesophagectomy. J Anat 227:431–439CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Group C (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, Richel DJ, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, Spillenaar Bilgen EJ, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW, van der Gaast A, Group C (2012) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med 366:2074–2084CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Mountain CF, Dresler CM (1997) Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 111:1718–1723CrossRefPubMed Mountain CF, Dresler CM (1997) Regional lymph node classification for lung cancer staging. Chest 111:1718–1723CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Diseases JSFE (1999) Guidelines for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 9th edn. Kanehara & Co, Tokyo Diseases JSFE (1999) Guidelines for clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 9th edn. Kanehara & Co, Tokyo
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, Gisbertz SS, Klinkenbijl JH, Hollmann MW, de Lange ES, Bonjer HJ, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA (2012) Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 379:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, Venkatachlam S (2006) Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position—experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg 203:7–16CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, Christie NA, Weksler B, Landreneau RJ, Abbas G, Schuchert MJ, Nason KS (2012) Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg 256:95–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D, Ectors N (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome—a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lerut T, Nafteux P, Moons J, Coosemans W, Decker G, De Leyn P, Van Raemdonck D, Ectors N (2004) Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome—a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma. Ann Surg 240:962–972CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Ma GW, Situ DR, Ma QL, Long H, Zhang LJ, Lin P, Rong TH (2014) Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:18022–18030PubMedPubMedCentral Ma GW, Situ DR, Ma QL, Long H, Zhang LJ, Lin P, Rong TH (2014) Three-field vs two-field lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 20:18022–18030PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Koyanagi K, Igaki H, Iwabu J, Ochiai H, Tachimori Y (2015) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy: respiratory complications and role of nerve reconstruction. Tohoku J Exp Med 237:1–8CrossRefPubMed Koyanagi K, Igaki H, Iwabu J, Ochiai H, Tachimori Y (2015) Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy: respiratory complications and role of nerve reconstruction. Tohoku J Exp Med 237:1–8CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Talsma KA, Shapiro J, Looman CW, van Hagen P, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, van Laarhoven HW, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW (2014) Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg 260:786–792CrossRef Talsma KA, Shapiro J, Looman CW, van Hagen P, Steyerberg EW, van der Gaast A, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Wijnhoven BP, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, van Laarhoven HW, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Hospers GA, Bonenkamp JJ, Cuesta MA, Blaisse RJ, Busch OR, ten Kate FJ, Creemers GJ, Punt CJ, Plukker JT, Verheul HM, van Dekken H, van der Sangen MJ, Rozema T, Biermann K, Beukema JC, Piet AH, van Rij CM, Reinders JG, Tilanus HW (2014) Lymph node retrieval during esophagectomy with and without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: prognostic and therapeutic impact on survival. Ann Surg 260:786–792CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y (2013) Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46:241–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kawakubo H, Takeuchi H, Kitagawa Y (2013) Current status and future perspectives on minimally invasive esophagectomy. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 46:241–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, van Hilllegersberg R (2015) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 112:257–265CrossRefPubMed Ruurda JP, van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, van Hilllegersberg R (2015) Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol 112:257–265CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat van Rijskwijk AS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van der Peet DL, Gisbertz SS (2015) Differences in oncologic esophageal surgery in terms of surgical approach and extent of lymphadenectomy. Findings of an internation surgey on the treatment of esophageal cancer. International Society for Disease of the Esophagus, Stockholm van Rijskwijk AS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van der Peet DL, Gisbertz SS (2015) Differences in oncologic esophageal surgery in terms of surgical approach and extent of lymphadenectomy. Findings of an internation surgey on the treatment of esophageal cancer. International Society for Disease of the Esophagus, Stockholm
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical anatomy of the supracarinal esophagus based on a minimally invasive approach: vascular and nervous anatomy and technical steps to resection and lymphadenectomy
verfasst von
Miguel A. Cuesta
Nicole van der Wielen
Teus J. Weijs
Ronald L. A. W. Bleys
Suzanne S. Gisbertz
Peter van Duijvendijk
Richard van Hillegersberg
Jelle P. Ruurda
Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen
Jennifer Straatman
Harushi Osugi
Donald L. van der Peet
Publikationsdatum
23.08.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5186-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

Surgical Endoscopy 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.