The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
ES has been involved in all parts of the study. GS and ÅAS has been the mentors of the study and taken part in all parts except inclusion of patients. MB and JS have been taken part in the planning of the study, inclusion of patients and finalizing the manuscript. UF and LB have been involved in drafting the manuscript and revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Acute appendicitis is one of the most common acute abdominal conditions. Among other parameters, the decision to perform surgical exploration in suspected appendicitis involves diagnostic accuracy, patient age and co-morbidity, patient’s own wishes, the surgeon’s core medical values, expected natural course of non-operative treatment and priority considerations regarding the use of limited resources. Do objective clinical findings, such as radiology and laboratory results, have greater impact on decision-making than “soft” clinical variables? In this study we investigate the parameters that surgeons consider significant in decision-making in cases of suspected appendicitis; specifically we describe the process leading to surgical intervention in real settings.
The purpose of the study was to explore the process behind the decision to undertake surgery on a patient with suspected appendicitis as a model for decision-making in surgery.
All appendectomy procedures (n = 201) at the Department of Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital performed in 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Every two consecutive patients seeking for abdominal pain after each case undergoing surgery were included as controls. Signs and symptoms documented in the medical records were registered according to a standardized protocol. The outcome of this retrospective review formed the basis of a prospective registration of patients undergoing appendectomy. During a three- month period in 2011, the surgeons who made the decision to perform acute appendectomy on 117 consecutive appendectomized patients at the Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, and Södersjukhuset, were asked to answer a questionnaire about symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures considered in their treatment decision. They were also asked which three symptoms, signs and diagnostic measures had the greatest impact on their decision to perform appendectomy.
In the retrospective review, tenderness in the right fossa had the greatest impact (OR 76) on treatment decision. In the prospective registration, the most frequent symptom present at treatment decision was pain in the right fossa (94 %). Tenderness in the right fossa (69 %) was also most important for the decision to perform surgery. Apart from local status, image diagnostics and blood sample results had the greatest impact.
Local tenderness in the right fossa, lab results and the results of radiological investigations had the greatest impact on treatment decision.
Paulson EK, Kalady MF, Pappas TN. Clinical practice. Suspected appendicitis. N Eng J Med. 2003;348:236–42. CrossRef
Croskerry P. The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Aca Emerg Me. 2000;7:1223–31. CrossRef
Young JS, Smith RL, Guerlain S, Nolley B. How residents think and make medical decisions: implications for education and patient safety. Am Surg. 2007;73:548–53. PubMed
Cole MA, Maldonado N. Evidence-based management of suspected appendicitis in the emergency department. Emerg Med Pract. 2011;13:1–29. PubMed
Antevil J, Rivera L, Langenberg B, Brown CV. The influence of age and gender on the utility of computed tomography to diagnose acute appendicitis. Am Surg. 2004;70(10):850–3.
Fenyö G. Routine use of a scoring system for decision-making in suspected acute appendicites in adults. Acta Chir Scand. 1987;153:545–51. PubMed
- Surgical decision-making in acute appendicitis
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie
Mail Icon II