The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0751-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
LDI and GK equally contributed to the writing of the paper. LDI and GK carried out the background literature research. LDI drafted the manuscript. PDG and PS revised the paper. LDI, GK, NE made substantive intellectual contributions to the planning of the study. DI was responsible for the statistical analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Various clinical and radiological criteria have been suggested to choose one of the numerous techniques in surgical treatment of hallux valgus and rigidus. We hypothesized that the surgeons' professional background will influence that choice depending on specialization, age, type and institution of training as well as his orthopaedic cultural orientation. Since Switzerland is characterized by regional languages (the most important being German and French), we were interested to learn if the linguistic differences had an influence on the orientation of the surgeons towards e.g. Anglo-American or French surgical traditions and/or sources of literature on the subject.
A survey was e-mailed to all members of the Swiss Orthopaedic Society (SGOT-SSOT). Questions were asked regarding respondents’ demographics as well as their preferred treatment for 3 separate cases of (1) moderate and (2) severe hallux valgus and (3) hallux rigidus. The responses were collected and statistically analyzed.
Two hundred thirty of 322 respondents completed the survey(response rate 46 %). as they perform foot surgery on a regular base; 39 % were members of the Swiss Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (SFAS). Selected surgical treatments differed as follows: in joint sparing procedures older and busier surgeons were more likely to use Chevron osteotomies, however more than 50 % preferred a Scarf-type of osteotomy. Along the so-called "Rösti-Graben" separating the French from the German speaking part of Switzerland no significant difference was found in the choice of operation technique.
Nevertheless the fact being a member of SFAS showed significant differences in technical choice in case 2 and 3.
There are significant associations between the surgeons’ age, expertise and training and their preferred operative intervention. Considerable differences in the surgical management were found in the practice of the general orthopaedic surgeons 72 and the foot and ankle specialists. The cultural background and training is not mirroring the classical Swiss east west discrepancy. Despite the large number of surgical options available for hallux valgus, only a small number were preferred by the majority of surgeons.
Additional file 1: Appendix: Questionnaire. (DOCX 32 kb)12891_2015_751_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Hueter C. In Klinic der Gelenkkrankungen mit Einschluss der Orthopaedie. Vogel, Leipzig: Edited; 1870.
Mann RA, Coughlin MJ. Adult hallux valgus. In: Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, editors. Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1999. p. 151–269.
Silver D. The operative treatment of hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1923;5:225.
Plattner PF, Van Manen JW. Results of Akin type proximal phalangeal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity. Orthopedics. 1990;13:989–96. PubMed
Regnauld B. Disorders of the Great Toe. In: Elson R, editor. The Foot: Pathology, Aetiology, Seminology, Clinical Investigation and Treatment. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986. p. 269–81. 344 – 349. CrossRef
Akin OF. The treatment of hallux valgus: a new operative procedure and its results. Med Sentinel. 1925;33:678–9.
Bordelon RL. Technique and use of Akin osteotomy. Contemp Orthop. 1991;23:38–41. PubMed
Jones S, Al Hussainy HA, Ali F, Betts RP, Flowers MJ. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. A prospective clinical and pedobarographic study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:830–6. CrossRef
Keller WL. The surgical treatment of bunions and hallux valgus. NY Med J. 1912;95:696.
Leventen EO. Etiology and treatment of hallux valgus. The chevron procedure. Orthopedics. 1990;13:973–6. PubMed
Mann RA, Clanton TO. Hallux Rigidus: Treatment by Cheilectomy. J Bone Joint Surg. 1988;70-A(3):400–6.
McBride ED. A conservative operation for bunions. J Bone Joint Surg. 1928;10-A:735–9.
Mitchell CL, Fleming JL, Allen R, Glenney C, Sanford GA. Osteotomy-bunionectomy for hallux valgus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1958;40-A:41–58. PubMed
Thordarson DB, Ebramzadeh E, Moorthy M, Lee J, Rudicel S. Correlation of hallux valgus surgical outcome with AOFAS forefoot score and radiological parameters. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26:122–7. PubMed
Pinney S, Song K, Chou L. Surgical Treatment of Mild Hallux Valgus Deformity: The State of Practice among Academic Foot and Ankle Surgeons. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27:970–3. PubMed
Crevoisier X, Mouhsine E, Ortolano V, Udin B, Dutoit M. The scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a review of 84 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:970–6. PubMed
Schneider W, Aigner N, Pinggera O, Knahr K. Chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus. Ten-year results of 112 cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86-B:1016–20. CrossRef
- Surgical management of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus: an email survey among Swiss orthopaedic surgeons regarding their current practice
Lukas Daniel Iselin
Panagiotis D. Symeonidis
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II