Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2021

18.09.2021 | Original Article

Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database

verfasst von: Michael L. Horsey, Andrew D. Sparks, Debra Lai, Aalap Herur-Raman, Matthew Ng, Vincent Obias

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 12/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Minimally invasive resection of colon cancer at the splenic flexure can be technically challenging with concerns for a suboptimal oncologic outcome. We aimed to compare open and minimally invasive approaches following curative resection.

Methods

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with non-metastatic colon adenocarcinoma at the splenic flexure who underwent resection from 2010 to 2016. Cohorts were separated into open and minimally invasive approaches, and demographic and clinicopathologic variables were compared. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was utilized to balance potential confounding covariates between cohorts to elucidate the independent association between surgical approach and outcomes. Kaplan–Meier estimation and Cox-proportional hazards regression were used to analyze survival. Secondary outcomes were analyzed by way of logistic regression or Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

After matching, 842 patients were compared between approaches. Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had no significant difference in regional nodes ≥ 12 examined, positive margins, negative circumferential margins, unplanned 30-day readmission, or time from surgery to initiation of chemotherapy when compared to patients who underwent open surgery. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly associated with decreased odds of 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and decreased mortality hazard for 5-year overall survival compared to open surgery.

Conclusion

The optimal approach for surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer has not been standardized given its rarity and exclusion from randomized controlled trials. Our retrospective review suggests that minimally invasive resection of splenic flexure colon cancers in carefully selected patients is associated with equivalent oncologic outcomes as well as improved short and long-term survival compared to an open approach.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cameron JL, Cameron AM (2019) Current surgical therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam Cameron JL, Cameron AM (2019) Current surgical therapy. Elsevier, Amsterdam
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Steffen C, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH (1987) Carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum 30:872–874CrossRef Steffen C, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH (1987) Carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Dis Colon Rectum 30:872–874CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767CrossRef Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6(7):477–484CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoint of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726 Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, Heath RM, Brown JM (2005) MRC CLASICC trial group. Short-term endpoint of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer: multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365(9472):1718–1726
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229CrossRef Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taura P, Pique JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet 359(9325):2224–2229CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350(20):2050-2059 Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. New Engl J Med 350(20):2050-2059
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7CrossRef Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248(1):1–7CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat De’Angelis N, Hain E, Disabato M et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:623–630 De’Angelis N, Hain E, Disabato M et al (2016) Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:623–630
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakashima M, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2011) Colon cancer in the splenic flexure: comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:415–418CrossRef Nakashima M, Akiyoshi T, Ueno M et al (2011) Colon cancer in the splenic flexure: comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:415–418CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Harji D, Watson L, Gallagher Burke D, Sagar P, Griffiths B (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure cancers: short and long-term outcomes in comparison with conventional open surgery. Clin Surg 1:1065 Harji D, Watson L, Gallagher Burke D, Sagar P, Griffiths B (2016) Laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure cancers: short and long-term outcomes in comparison with conventional open surgery. Clin Surg 1:1065
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Carlini M, Spoletini D, Castaldi F, Giovannini C, Passaro U (2016) Laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure tumors. Updates Surg 68(1):77–83CrossRef Carlini M, Spoletini D, Castaldi F, Giovannini C, Passaro U (2016) Laparoscopic resection of splenic flexure tumors. Updates Surg 68(1):77–83CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Okuda J, Yamamoto M, Tanaka K, Masubuchi S, Uchiyama K (2016) Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer at splenic flexure: technical aspects and results. Updates Surg 68:71–75CrossRef Okuda J, Yamamoto M, Tanaka K, Masubuchi S, Uchiyama K (2016) Laparoscopic resection of transverse colon cancer at splenic flexure: technical aspects and results. Updates Surg 68:71–75CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisani Ceretti A, Maroni N, Sacchi M et al (2015) Laparoscopic colonic resection for splenic flexure cancer: our experience. BMC Gastroenterol 15:76–81CrossRef Pisani Ceretti A, Maroni N, Sacchi M et al (2015) Laparoscopic colonic resection for splenic flexure cancer: our experience. BMC Gastroenterol 15:76–81CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Ohbatake M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Kurosaki N, Ayabe H, Ishikawa H (2001) Surgical treatment and subsequent outcome of patients with carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Surg Today 31:204–209CrossRef Nakagoe T, Sawai T, Tsuji T, Jibiki M, Ohbatake M, Nanashima A, Yamaguchi H, Yasutake T, Kurosaki N, Ayabe H, Ishikawa H (2001) Surgical treatment and subsequent outcome of patients with carcinoma of the splenic flexure. Surg Today 31:204–209CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2010) Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2749–2754CrossRef Akiyoshi T, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M et al (2010) Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc 24:2749–2754CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MK, Lee IK, Kang WK, Cho HM, Kye BH, Jalloun HE, Kim JG (2017) Longterm oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 93(1):35–42CrossRef Kim MK, Lee IK, Kang WK, Cho HM, Kye BH, Jalloun HE, Kim JG (2017) Longterm oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for splenic flexure colon cancer are comparable to conventional open surgery. Ann Surg Treat Res 93(1):35–42CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K et al (2009) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces anoncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278CrossRef West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K et al (2009) Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces anoncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 28:272–278CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgical management of splenic flexure colon cancer: a retrospective propensity-matched study comparing open and minimally invasive approaches using the national cancer database
verfasst von
Michael L. Horsey
Andrew D. Sparks
Debra Lai
Aalap Herur-Raman
Matthew Ng
Vincent Obias
Publikationsdatum
18.09.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-021-04029-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2021

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 12/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.