Erschienen in:
04.10.2018 | Original Paper
Surgical outcomes of 27-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
verfasst von:
Zeon Naruse, Hiroyuki Shimada, Ryusaburo Mori
Erschienen in:
International Ophthalmology
|
Ausgabe 9/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten
Abstract
Purpose
To compare postoperative outcomes of 27-gauge (G) and 25-G vitrectomy conducted as day surgery for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Methods
One hundred eighty-five consecutive PDR patients (185 eyes) who underwent primary vitrectomy (27-G in 64 eyes, 25-G in 121 eyes) were analyzed.
Results
The 27-G and 25-G groups did not differ significantly in preoperative Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) score, age, or preoperative intraocular pressure. The proportions of simultaneous cataract surgery (27-G vs. 25-G: 59.4% vs. 62.4%) and air-filled eyes (76.6% vs. 85.1%) were not significantly different between two groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in ETDRS score at postoperative 1, 3, and 6 months (all, P < 0.0001). Mean gain in ETDRS score from baseline was apparently better in 27-G group than in 25-G group at 1, 3, and 6 months, but there were no significant differences (1 month: 20.3 vs. 13.1 letters, P = 0.0703; 3 months: 22.9 vs. 17.5 letters, P = 0.1561; 6 months: 24.3 vs. 19.3 letters, P = 0.3313). Operation time was apparently longer for 27-G vitrectomy, but there was no significant difference (54.0 vs. 51.1 min, P = 0.3676). The same was observed for postoperative intraocular pressure at postoperative day 1 (19.7 vs. 18.1 mmHg, P = 0.1353). Incidence of postoperative retinal detachment (1.6% vs. 0.8%) and reoperation due to vitreous hemorrhage (6.3% vs. 6.6%) was not different between two groups.
Conclusions
The 27G system is as safe and as useful as the 25G system when used for PDR and can be expected to achieve earlier recovery of postoperative visual acuity.