The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-04026-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Spine degenerative
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The purpose of this study is to assess the trends and regional variations in the operative techniques used for degenerative or rheumatoid cervical spine disease in Finland between 1999 and 2015.
The Finnish Hospital Discharge Register (FHDR) was searched for the data on all the primary operations for degenerative cervical spine disease (DCSD) or rheumatoid atlanto-axial subluxation (rAAS). Operative codes were used to identify the patients from the FHDR and combined with diagnosis codes to verify patient inclusion. The patients were classified into three groups: anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF), posterior decompression and fusion (PDF) and decompression.
A total of 19,701 primary operations were included. The adjusted incidence of ACDF rose from 6.5 to 27.3 operations/100,000 adults. ACDF became the favoured technique in all the diagnostic groups except AAS, and by 2015, ACDF comprised 84.5% of the operations. The incidence of PDF for DCSD increased from 0.2 to 0.7/100,000 people. Solely decompressive operations declined from 13.7 to 4.0 operations/100,000 people. The regional differences in the incidence of operations were most marked in the incidence of ACDF, with overall incidences ranging from 11.2 to 37.0 operations/100,000. The distribution of the operative techniques used varied as well.
Between 1999 and 2015, the operative techniques used for DCSD changed from prevalently decompressive to utilising ACDF in 68.8 to 91.0% of the operations, depending on the treating hospital. ACDF became the most commonly applied technique for all degenerative diagnoses except AAS.
ESM 1 (PDF 212 kb)701_2019_4026_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Alosh H, Riley LH, 3rd, Skolasky RL (2009) Insurance status, geography, race, and ethnicity as predictors of anterior cervical spine surgery rates and in-hospital mortality: an examination of United States trends from 1992 to 2005. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1956–1962
Anderson PA, Matz PG, Groff MW, Heary RF, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK, Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (2009) Laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:150–156
Angevine PD, Arons RR, McCormick PC (2003) National and regional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and without anterior fusion, 1990-1999. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:931–940 discussion 940
Bono CM, Ghiselli G, Gilbert TJ, Kreiner DS, Reitman C, Summers JT, Baisden JL, Easa J, Fernand R, Lamer T, Matz PG, Mazanec DJ, Resnick DK, Shaffer WO, Sharma AK, Timmons RB, Toton JF, North American Spine Society (2011) An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of cervical radiculopathy from degenerative disorders. Spine J 11:64–72
Boselie TF, Willems PC, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel EC, van Santbrink H (2012) Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD009173
Cunningham MR, Hershman S, Bendo J (2010) Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:537–543 CrossRef
Dong L, Xu Z, Chen X, Wang D, Li D, Liu T, Hao D (2017) The change of adjacent segment after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.010
Fehlings MG, Kopjar B, Ibrahim A, Tetreault LA, Arnold PM, Defino H, Kale SS, Yoon ST, Barbagallo GM, Bartels RHM, Zhou Q, Vaccaro AR, Zileli M, Tan G, Yukawa Y, Brodke DS, Shaffrey CI, Santos de Moraes O, Woodard EJ, Scerrati M, Tanaka M, Toyone T, Sasso RC, Janssen ME, Gokaslan ZL, Alvarado M, Bolger C, Bono CM, Dekutoski MB (2018) Geographic variations in clinical presentation and outcomes of decompressive surgery in patients with symptomatic degenerative cervical myelopathy: analysis of a prospective, international multicenter cohort study of 757 patients. Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.265
Gebremariam L, Koes BW, Peul WC, Huisstede BM (2012) Evaluation of treatment effectiveness for the herniated cervical disc: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:109–118 CrossRef
Gutman G, Rosenzweig DH, Golan JD (2018) Surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002324
Heller JG, Raich AL, Dettori JR, Riew KD (2013) Comparative effectiveness of different types of cervical laminoplasty. Evid Based Spine Care J 4:105–115 CrossRef
Jacobs W, Willems PC, van Limbeek J, Bartels R, Pavlov P, Anderson PG, Oner C (2011) Single or double-level anterior interbody fusion techniques for cervical degenerative disc disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004958. doi:CD004958
Jiang SD, Jiang LS, Dai LY (2012) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132:155–161 CrossRef
Kotkansalo A, Leinonen V, Korajoki M, Salmenkivi J, Korhonen K, Malmivaara A (2019) Surgery for degenerative cervical spine disease in Finland, 1999-2015. Acta Neurochir. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-019-03958-6
Kristiansen J, Balteskard L, Slettebø H, Nygaard ØP, Lied B, Kolstad F, Solberg TK (2016) The use of surgery for cervical degenerative disease in Norway in the period 2008-2014 : a population-based study of 6511 procedures. Acta Neurochir. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2760-1
Lawrence BD, Jacobs WB, Norvell DC, Hermsmeyer JT, Chapman JR, Brodke DS (2013) Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:173–182 CrossRef
Liu CY, Zygourakis CC, Yoon S, Kliot T, Moriates C, Ratliff J, Dudley RA, Gonzales R, Mummaneni PV, Ames CP (2017) Trends in utilization and cost of cervical spine surgery using the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2001 to 2013. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001999
Luo J, Gong M, Huang S, Yu T, Zou X (2015) Incidence of adjacent segment degeneration in cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical decompression and fusion meta-analysis of prospective studies. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135:155–160 CrossRef
Marquez-Lara A, Nandyala SV, Fineberg SJ, Singh K (2014) Current trends in demographics, practice, and in-hospital outcomes in cervical spine surgery: a national database analysis between 2002 and 2011. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39:476–481 CrossRef
McGuire KJ, Harrast J, Herkowitz H, Weinstein JN (2012) Geographic variation in the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease: American Board of Orthopedic Surgery Quality Improvement Initiative; part II candidates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:57–66 CrossRef
Mummaneni PV, Kaiser MG, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, Holly LT, Ryken TC, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK, Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons (2009) Cervical surgical techniques for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:130–141
Nunley PD, Jawahar A, Kerr EJ 3rd, Gordon CJ, Cavanaugh DA, Birdsong EM, Stocks M, Danielson G (2012) Factors affecting the incidence of symptomatic adjacent-level disease in cervical spine after total disc arthroplasty: 2- to 4-year follow-up of 3 prospective randomized trials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:445–451 CrossRef
Oglesby M, Fineberg SJ, Patel AA, Pelton MA, Singh K (2013) Epidemiological trends in cervical spine surgery for degenerative diseases between 2002 and 2009. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:1226–1232 CrossRef
Patil PG, Turner DA, Pietrobon R (2005) National trends in surgical procedures for degenerative cervical spine disease: 1990-2000. Neurosurgery 57:753–758 CrossRef
Ryken TC, Heary RF, Matz PG, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Holly LT, Kaiser MG, Mummaneni PV, Choudhri TF, Vresilovic EJ, Resnick DK (2009) Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and Congress of Neurological Surgeons cervical laminectomy for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11:142–149 CrossRef
Salzmann SN, Derman PB, Lampe LP, Kueper J, Pan TJ, Yang J, Shue J, Girardi FP, Lyman S, Hughes AP (2018) Cervical spinal fusion: 16-year trends in epidemiology, indications, and in-hospital outcomes by surgical approach. World Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.004
Shamji MF, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Tackett S, Brown C, Isaacs RE (2009) Impact of surgical approach on complications and resource utilization of cervical spine fusion: a nationwide perspective to the surgical treatment of diffuse cervical spondylosis. Spine J 9:31–38 CrossRef
Sun Y, Li L, Zhao J, Gu R (2015) Comparison between anterior approaches and posterior approaches for the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2015.04.011
Sund R (2012) Quality of the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register: a systematic review. Scand J Public Health 40:505–515 CrossRef
Verhagen AP, van Middelkoop M, Rubinstein SM, Ostelo R, Jacobs W, Peul W, Koes BW, van Tulder MW (2013) Effect of various kinds of cervical spinal surgery on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain 154:2388–2396 CrossRef
Vleggeert-Lankamp C (2018) The NECK trial: effectiveness of anterior cervical discectomy with or without interbody fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of cervical disc herniation. doi: 10.17026/dans-xun-epxm
Wang MC, Chan L, Maiman DJ, Kreuter W, Deyo RA (2007) Complications and mortality associated with cervical spine surgery for degenerative disease in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:342–347 CrossRef
Wang MC, Kreuter W, Wolfla CE, Maiman DJ, Deyo RA (2009) Trends and variations in cervical spine surgery in the United States: Medicare beneficiaries, 1992 to 2005. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:955–961 CrossRef
Wilson JR, Tetreault LA, Kim J, Shamji MF, Harrop JS, Mroz T, Cho S, Fehlings MG (2017) State of the art in degenerative cervical myelopathy: an update on current clinical evidence. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw083
Woods BI, Hilibrand AS (2015) Cervical radiculopathy: epidemiology, etiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Spinal Disord Tech 28:251–259 CrossRef
- Surgical techniques for degenerative cervical spine in Finland from 1999 to 2015
- Springer Vienna
Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie
Mail Icon II