Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2008

01.01.2008 | Gastrointestinal Oncology

Surgically Managed Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Comparative and Prognostic Analysis

verfasst von: Imran Hassan, MD, Y. Nancy You, MD, Roman Shyyan, MD, Eric J. Dozois, MD, Thomas C. Smyrk, MD, Scott H. Okuno, MD, Cathy D. Schleck, BS, David O. Hodge, MS, John H. Donohue, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 1/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been shown to have marked clinical efficacy in patients with unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). We performed a comparative and prognostic analysis of our experience with surgically managed GIST to determine factors associated with adverse oncologic outcomes.

Methods

Oncologic outcomes of 191 patients with primary GIST surgically managed between 1978 and 2004 at a single institution were reviewed. Prognostic factors were analyzed by Cox analysis (hazard ratio [HR] and 95% confidence interval [95% CI]) and included age, sex, disease presentation (asymptomatic vs. symptomatic), tumor site (stomach, small bowel, colorectal), disease extent (localized vs. metastatic) and risk levels (high, intermediate, low, very-low) assigned on the basis of size and number of mitoses according to current National Institutes of Health recommendations. Primary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS).

Results

A total of 186 patients (97%) had c-kit–positive GIST. There were 54% high, 22% intermediate, 18% low, and 8% very low risk GIST originating from the stomach (54%), small bowel (36%), and colon and rectum (10%). Median patient age was 65 (range, 13–91) years, and 108 subjects (57%) were male. Seventy-two percent of patients had symptomatic local disease, and 21% patients had synchronous metastases. Most (95%) underwent R0 resections of their primary tumor. Among 146 patients (76%) with localized disease at presentation undergoing R0 resection, the 5-year DFS was 65%. High-risk GIST (HR 12, 95% CI, 5–32, P < .0001), symptomatic presentation (HR 2.5, 95% CI, 1.1–6, P = .04), and GIST in the small bowel (HR 2.8, 95% CI, 1–5, P = .003) were independently associated with decreased DFS. After a median follow-up of 63 months among survivors, the 5-year DSS was 68%. High-risk disease (HR 14.3, 95% CI, 5–41, P < .0001), symptomatic presentation (HR 3.1, 95% CI, 1.2–7.9, P = .02), and GIST in the small bowel (2.6,3 95% CI, 1–5, P = .006) were independently associated with decreased DSS.

Conclusions

High-risk GIST are associated with increased disease recurrence and decreased survival despite complete surgical resection. These patients should receive adjuvant therapy in the form of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Gold JS, Dematteo RP. Combined surgical and molecular therapy: the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model. Ann Surg 2006;244:176–84PubMedCrossRef Gold JS, Dematteo RP. Combined surgical and molecular therapy: the gastrointestinal stromal tumor model. Ann Surg 2006;244:176–84PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364(9440):1127–34PubMedCrossRef Verweij J, Casali PG, Zalcberg J, et al. Progression-free survival in gastrointestinal stromal tumours with high-dose imatinib: randomised trial. Lancet 2004;364(9440):1127–34PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat van Oosterom AT, Judson IR, Verweij J, et al. Update of phase I study of imatinib (STI571) in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a report of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2002;38(Suppl 5):S83–7PubMedCrossRef van Oosterom AT, Judson IR, Verweij J, et al. Update of phase I study of imatinib (STI571) in advanced soft tissue sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a report of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer 2002;38(Suppl 5):S83–7PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368(9544):1329–38PubMed Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006;368(9544):1329–38PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Dematteo RP, Antonescu CR, Chadaram Y, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate in patients with primary high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) following complete resection: safety results from the US Intergroup Phase II Trial ACOSOG Z9000 (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2005:9009 Dematteo RP, Antonescu CR, Chadaram Y, et al. Adjuvant imatinib mesylate in patients with primary high risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) following complete resection: safety results from the US Intergroup Phase II Trial ACOSOG Z9000 (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2005:9009
7.
Zurück zum Zitat DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, et al. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000;231:51–8PubMedCrossRef DeMatteo RP, Lewis JJ, Leung D, et al. Two hundred gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recurrence patterns and prognostic factors for survival. Ann Surg 2000;231:51–8PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Aparicio T, Boige V, Sabourin JC, et al. Prognostic factors after surgery of primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:1098–103PubMedCrossRef Aparicio T, Boige V, Sabourin JC, et al. Prognostic factors after surgery of primary resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 2004;30:1098–103PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Besana-Ciani I, Boni L, Dionigi G, et al. Outcome and long term results of surgical resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Scand J Surg 2003;92:195–9PubMed Besana-Ciani I, Boni L, Dionigi G, et al. Outcome and long term results of surgical resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Scand J Surg 2003;92:195–9PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Bumming P, Ahlman H, Andersson J, et al. Population-based study of the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 2006;93:836–43PubMedCrossRef Bumming P, Ahlman H, Andersson J, et al. Population-based study of the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 2006;93:836–43PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, HL Sobin L, et al. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002;33:478–83PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, El-Rifai W, HL Sobin L, et al. Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a review. Hum Pathol 2002;33:478–83PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, et al. The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136:383–9PubMedCrossRef Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, et al. The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136:383–9PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459–65PubMedCrossRef Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless C, et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol 2002;33:459–65PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821–9PubMedCrossRef Nilsson B, Bumming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era—a population-based study in western Sweden. Cancer 2005;103:821–9PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Langer C, Gunawan B, Schuler P, et al. Prognostic factors influencing surgical management and outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 2003;90:332–9PubMedCrossRef Langer C, Gunawan B, Schuler P, et al. Prognostic factors influencing surgical management and outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Br J Surg 2003;90:332–9PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:162–8PubMedCrossRef Tran T, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: an analysis of 1,458 cases from 1992 to 2000. Am J Gastroenterol 2005;100:162–8PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, et al. The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136:383–9PubMedCrossRef Pierie JP, Choudry U, Muzikansky A, et al. The effect of surgery and grade on outcome of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Arch Surg 2001;136:383–9PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu PC, Langerman A, Ryan CW, et al. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era. Surgery 2003;134:656–65PubMedCrossRef Wu PC, Langerman A, Ryan CW, et al. Surgical treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib (STI-571) era. Surgery 2003;134:656–65PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:477–89PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, Makhlouf H, Sobin LH, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:477–89PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Ruka W, Rutkowski P, Nowecki Z, et al. Other malignant neoplasms in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Med Sci Monitor 2004;10:LE13–4 Ruka W, Rutkowski P, Nowecki Z, et al. Other malignant neoplasms in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Med Sci Monitor 2004;10:LE13–4
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chacon M, Roca E, Barugel M, et al. Report of solid cancer in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). J Clin Oncol 2004;22(14 Suppl):9065 Chacon M, Roca E, Barugel M, et al. Report of solid cancer in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). J Clin Oncol 2004;22(14 Suppl):9065
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tryggvason G, Gislason HG, Magnusson MK, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland 1990–2003: the Icelandic GIST Study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer 2005;117:289–93PubMedCrossRef Tryggvason G, Gislason HG, Magnusson MK, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors in Iceland 1990–2003: the Icelandic GIST Study, a population-based incidence and pathologic risk stratification study. Int J Cancer 2005;117:289–93PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, et al. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:82–7PubMedCrossRef Emory TS, Sobin LH, Lukes L, et al. Prognosis of gastrointestinal smooth-muscle (stromal) tumors: dependence on anatomic site. Am J Surg Pathol 1999;23:82–7PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117 (KIT). Mod Pathol 2000;13:1134–42PubMedCrossRef Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Sarlomo-Rikala M. Immunohistochemical spectrum of GISTs at different sites and their differential diagnosis with a reference to CD117 (KIT). Mod Pathol 2000;13:1134–42PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Antonescu CR, Viale A, Sarran L, et al. Gene expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors is distinguished by KIT genotype and anatomic site. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3282–90PubMedCrossRef Antonescu CR, Viale A, Sarran L, et al. Gene expression in gastrointestinal stromal tumors is distinguished by KIT genotype and anatomic site. Clin Cancer Res 2004;10:3282–90PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, et al. Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2325–31PubMedCrossRef Raut CP, Posner M, Desai J, et al. Surgical management of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors after treatment with targeted systemic therapy using kinase inhibitors. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2325–31PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Surgically Managed Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Comparative and Prognostic Analysis
verfasst von
Imran Hassan, MD
Y. Nancy You, MD
Roman Shyyan, MD
Eric J. Dozois, MD
Thomas C. Smyrk, MD
Scott H. Okuno, MD
Cathy D. Schleck, BS
David O. Hodge, MS
John H. Donohue, MD
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9633-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 1/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.