Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019

13.02.2019 | Health Services Research and Global Oncology

Survey of Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates 2005–2016: Insight into Initial Practice

verfasst von: Samantha Ruff, MD, Sadia Ilyas, MD, Seth M. Steinberg, PhD, Zaria Tatalovich, PhD, Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD, Michael D’Angelica, MD, Chandrajit P. Raut, MD, Msc, Keith A. Delman, MD, Jonathan M. Hernandez, MD, Jeremy L. Davis, MD

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 6/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Despite burgeoning interest in Complex General Surgical Oncology (CGSO) fellowship training, little is reported about postgraduate employment. The goal of this study was to characterize CGSO graduates’ first employment and to identify factors that influenced this decision.

Methods

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) and Society of Surgical Oncology developed and distributed an electronic survey to CGSO fellows who graduated from 2005 to 2016.

Results

The survey response rate was 47% (237/509). Fifty-seven percent of respondents were first employed as faculty surgeons at a university-based/affiliated hospital, with 15% returning to their residency institution. The distribution of respondents’ current employment across the United States mirrored the locations of their hometowns. Eighty-five percent of respondents care for patients across at least three disease types, most commonly hepatopancreatobiliary (81%), esophagus/gastric (75%), and sarcoma (74%). Twenty-seven percent of respondents spend the majority of their time in one area of surgical oncology; melanoma, breast, and head/neck were the most common. Two-thirds of respondents (67%) reported that they performed either clinical or basic science research as part of their current position. Multiple factors influenced the decision of first faculty position.

Conclusions

Most CGSO graduates are employed at academic medical centers across the country in proximity to NCI-designated centers, treat a variety of disease types, and spend a percentage of their time dedicated to clinical research.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Berman RS, Weigel RJ. Training and certification of the surgical oncologist. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(4):45.PubMed Berman RS, Weigel RJ. Training and certification of the surgical oncologist. Chin Clin Oncol. 2014;3(4):45.PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Heslin MJ, Coit DG, Brennan MF. Surgical oncology fellowship: viable pathway to academic surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(6):542–5.CrossRefPubMed Heslin MJ, Coit DG, Brennan MF. Surgical oncology fellowship: viable pathway to academic surgery? Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(6):542–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee DY, Flaherty DC, Lau BJ, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of surgical oncology fellows on ACGME accreditation and the complex general surgical oncology certification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3776–84.CrossRefPubMed Lee DY, Flaherty DC, Lau BJ, et al. Attitudes and perceptions of surgical oncology fellows on ACGME accreditation and the complex general surgical oncology certification. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(12):3776–84.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2013. Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2013.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Institute of Medicine. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care Through the Oncology Workforce: Sustaining Research and Care in the 21st Century: Workshop Summary. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2009. Institute of Medicine. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care Through the Oncology Workforce: Sustaining Research and Care in the 21st Century: Workshop Summary. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2009.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tabrizian P, Overbey J, Carrasco-Avino G, Bagiella E, Labow DM, Sarpel U. Escalation of socioeconomic disparities among patients with colorectal cancer receiving advanced surgical treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1746–50.CrossRefPubMed Tabrizian P, Overbey J, Carrasco-Avino G, Bagiella E, Labow DM, Sarpel U. Escalation of socioeconomic disparities among patients with colorectal cancer receiving advanced surgical treatment. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1746–50.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang N, Cao F, Liu F, et al. The effect of socioeconomic status on health-care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang N, Cao F, Liu F, et al. The effect of socioeconomic status on health-care delay and treatment of esophageal cancer. J Transl Med. 2015;13:241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Balch CM, Shanafelt TD, Sloan J, Satele DV, Kuerer HM. Burnout and career satisfaction among surgical oncologists compared with other surgical specialties. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):16–25.CrossRefPubMed Balch CM, Shanafelt TD, Sloan J, Satele DV, Kuerer HM. Burnout and career satisfaction among surgical oncologists compared with other surgical specialties. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(1):16–25.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuerer HM, Eberlein TJ, Pollock RE, et al. Career satisfaction, practice patterns, and burnout among surgical oncologists: report on the quality of life of members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3043–53.CrossRefPubMed Kuerer HM, Eberlein TJ, Pollock RE, et al. Career satisfaction, practice patterns, and burnout among surgical oncologists: report on the quality of life of members of the Society of Surgical Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(11):3043–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB. National Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):217–21.CrossRefPubMed Mann M, Tendulkar A, Birger N, Howard C, Ratcliffe MB. National Institutes of Health funding for surgical research. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):217–21.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Evers BM. The evolving role of the surgeon scientist. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;220(4):387–95.CrossRef Evers BM. The evolving role of the surgeon scientist. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;220(4):387–95.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Survey of Surgical Oncology Fellowship Graduates 2005–2016: Insight into Initial Practice
verfasst von
Samantha Ruff, MD
Sadia Ilyas, MD
Seth M. Steinberg, PhD
Zaria Tatalovich, PhD
Sarah A. McLaughlin, MD
Michael D’Angelica, MD
Chandrajit P. Raut, MD, Msc
Keith A. Delman, MD
Jonathan M. Hernandez, MD
Jeremy L. Davis, MD
Publikationsdatum
13.02.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 6/2019
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-07220-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2019

Annals of Surgical Oncology 6/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.