Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2017

13.06.2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Survival outcome and prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study

verfasst von: Ekaterina Petrova, Felix Rückert, Sebastian Zach, YinFeng Shen, Jürgen Weitz, Robert Grützmann, Uwe A. Wittel, Frank Makowiec, Ulrich T. Hopt, Peter Bronsert, Florian Kühn, Bettina M. Rau, Roman E. Izrailov, Igor E. Khatkov, Hryhoriy Lapshyn, Louisa Bolm, Dirk Bausch, Tobias Keck, Ulrich F. Wellner, Gabriel Seifert

Erschienen in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Pancreatoduodenectomy is the most common operative procedure performed for distal bile duct carcinoma. Data on outcome after surgery for this rare malignancy is scarce, especially from western countries. The purpose of this study is to explore the prognostic factors and outcome after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma.

Methods

Patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma were identified from institutional databases of five German and one Russian academic centers for pancreatic surgery. Univariable and multivariable general linear model, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression were used to identify prognostic factors for postoperative mortality and overall survival.

Results

N = 228 patients operated from 1994 to 2015 were included. Reoperation (OR 5.38, 95%CI 1.51–19.22, p = 0.010), grade B/C postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (OR 3.73, 95%CI 1.13–12.35, p = 0.031), grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 4.29, 95%CI 1.25–14.72, p = 0.038), and advanced age (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.12–14.03, p = 0.033) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality in multivariable analysis. Median survival was 29 months, 5-year survival 27%. Positive resection margin (HR 2.07, 95%CI 1.29–3.33, p = 0.003), high tumor grade (HR 1.71, 95%CI 1.13–2.58, p = 0.010), lymph node (HR 1.68, 95%CI 1.13–2.51, p = 0.011), and distant metastases (HR 2.70, 95%CI 1.21–5.58, p = 0.014), as well as severe non-fatal postoperative complications (HR 1.64, 95%CI 1.04–2.58, p = 0.033) were independent negative prognostic factors for survival in multivariable analysis.

Conclusion

Distant metastases and positive resection margin are the strongest negative prognostic factors for survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma; thus, surgery with curative intent is only warranted in patients with local disease, where R0 resection is feasible.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al (2010) WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system, 4th edn. International Agency for Research in Cancer, Lyon Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH et al (2010) WHO classification of tumors of the digestive system, 4th edn. International Agency for Research in Cancer, Lyon
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice A et al (2010) Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2:407–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cardinale V, Semeraro R, Torrice A et al (2010) Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2:407–416CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Schmuck RB, de Carvalho-Fischer CV, Neumann C et al (2016) Distal bile duct carcinomas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: postulating a common tumor entity. Cancer Med 5:88–99CrossRefPubMed Schmuck RB, de Carvalho-Fischer CV, Neumann C et al (2016) Distal bile duct carcinomas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: postulating a common tumor entity. Cancer Med 5:88–99CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellner UF, Shen Y, Keck T et al (2016) The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival. Surg Today 47:271–279CrossRefPubMed Wellner UF, Shen Y, Keck T et al (2016) The survival outcome and prognostic factors for distal cholangiocarcinoma following surgical resection: a meta-analysis for the 5-year survival. Surg Today 47:271–279CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP et al (2012) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery 152:S43–S49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ferrone CR, Pieretti-Vanmarcke R, Bloom JP et al (2012) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: long-term survival does not equal cure. Surgery 152:S43–S49CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1273–1281CrossRefPubMed Valle J, Wasan H, Palmer DH et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362:1273–1281CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kulke MH, Tempero MA, Niedzwiecki D et al (2009) Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: CALGB 89904. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27:5506–5512CrossRef Kulke MH, Tempero MA, Niedzwiecki D et al (2009) Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine administered at a fixed dose rate or in combination with cisplatin, docetaxel, or irinotecan in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer: CALGB 89904. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27:5506–5512CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G et al (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed Bartoli FG, Arnone GB, Ravera G et al (1991) Pancreatic fistula and relative mortality in malignant disease after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Review and statistical meta-analysis regarding 15 years of literature. Anticancer Res 11:1831–1848PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB 12:696–702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H et al (2010) A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB 12:696–702CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G et al (2005) Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 138:8–13CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C et al (2007) Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 142:761–768CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C et al (2007) Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 142:20–25CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rezvan PH, Lee KJ, Simpson JA (2015) The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:30CrossRef Rezvan PH, Lee KJ, Simpson JA (2015) The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical research. BMC Med Res Methodol 15:30CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009, NIH publication # 09-7473 National Cancer Institute, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0, NCI, NIH, DHHS. May 29, 2009, NIH publication # 09-7473
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48CrossRef Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRef Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S et al (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL et al (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRefPubMed Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T et al (2011) Prognostic factors after surgical resection for intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 18:651–658CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 102:399–406CrossRefPubMed Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T et al (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg. 102:399–406CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi SB, Park SW, Kim KS et al (2009) The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection. J Surg Oncol 99:335–342CrossRefPubMed Choi SB, Park SW, Kim KS et al (2009) The survival outcome and prognostic factors for middle and distal bile duct cancer following surgical resection. J Surg Oncol 99:335–342CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiao Q-L, Zhang T-P, Guo J-C et al (2011) Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Am Surg 77:1445–1448PubMed Qiao Q-L, Zhang T-P, Guo J-C et al (2011) Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Am Surg 77:1445–1448PubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez J, Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S et al (2008) An aggressive approach to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas is warranted: margin status does not impact survival after resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:807–814CrossRefPubMed Hernandez J, Cowgill SM, Al-Saadi S et al (2008) An aggressive approach to extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas is warranted: margin status does not impact survival after resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:807–814CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Cheng Q, Luo X, Zhang B et al (2007) Distal bile duct carcinoma: prognostic factors after curative surgery. A series of 112 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1212–1219CrossRefPubMed Cheng Q, Luo X, Zhang B et al (2007) Distal bile duct carcinoma: prognostic factors after curative surgery. A series of 112 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1212–1219CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRefPubMed Verbeke CS, Gladhaug IP (2012) Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer. Br J Surg 99:1036–1049CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong S-M, Pawlik TM, Cho H et al (2009) Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma. Surgery 146:250–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hong S-M, Pawlik TM, Cho H et al (2009) Depth of tumor invasion better predicts prognosis than the current American Joint Committee on Cancer T classification for distal bile duct carcinoma. Surgery 146:250–257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Moon A, Choi DW, Choi SH et al (2015) Validation of T stage according to depth of invasion and N stage subclassification based on number of metastatic lymph nodes for distal extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2064CrossRef Moon A, Choi DW, Choi SH et al (2015) Validation of T stage according to depth of invasion and N stage subclassification based on number of metastatic lymph nodes for distal extrahepatic bile duct (EBD) carcinoma. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2064CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiltberger G, Krenzien F, Benzing C et al (2016) Prognostic accuracy of the seventh edition of the TNM classification compared with the fifth and sixth edition for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1320–1326CrossRefPubMed Wiltberger G, Krenzien F, Benzing C et al (2016) Prognostic accuracy of the seventh edition of the TNM classification compared with the fifth and sixth edition for distal cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1320–1326CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HJ, Kim CY, Hur YH et al (2014) Prognostic factors for survival after curative resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Surg Today 44:1879–1886CrossRefPubMed Kim HJ, Kim CY, Hur YH et al (2014) Prognostic factors for survival after curative resection of distal cholangiocarcinoma: perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Surg Today 44:1879–1886CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Addeo P, Delpero JR, Paye F et al (2014) Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. HPB 16:46–55CrossRefPubMed Addeo P, Delpero JR, Paye F et al (2014) Pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma and its association with morbidity: a multicentre study of the French Surgical Association. HPB 16:46–55CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Distler M, Rückert F, Hunger M et al (2013) Evaluation of survival in patients after pancreatic head resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg 13:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Distler M, Rückert F, Hunger M et al (2013) Evaluation of survival in patients after pancreatic head resection for ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Surg 13:12CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Courtin-Tanguy L, Rayar M, Bergeat D et al (2016) The true prognosis of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113:575–580CrossRefPubMed Courtin-Tanguy L, Rayar M, Bergeat D et al (2016) The true prognosis of resected distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 113:575–580CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Kawai M, Murakami Y, Motoi F et al (2016) Grade B pancreatic fistulas do not affect survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a multicenter observational study. Surgery 160(2):293–305CrossRefPubMed Kawai M, Murakami Y, Motoi F et al (2016) Grade B pancreatic fistulas do not affect survival after pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a multicenter observational study. Surgery 160(2):293–305CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600CrossRefPubMed Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C et al (2014) Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery 156(3):591–600CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrucciani N, Nigri G, Debs T et al (2016) Frozen section analysis of the pancreatic margin during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: does extending the resection to obtain a secondary R0 provide a survival benefit? Results of a systematic review. Pancreatology 16(6):1037–1043CrossRefPubMed Petrucciani N, Nigri G, Debs T et al (2016) Frozen section analysis of the pancreatic margin during pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer: does extending the resection to obtain a secondary R0 provide a survival benefit? Results of a systematic review. Pancreatology 16(6):1037–1043CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Survival outcome and prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy for distal bile duct carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study
verfasst von
Ekaterina Petrova
Felix Rückert
Sebastian Zach
YinFeng Shen
Jürgen Weitz
Robert Grützmann
Uwe A. Wittel
Frank Makowiec
Ulrich T. Hopt
Peter Bronsert
Florian Kühn
Bettina M. Rau
Roman E. Izrailov
Igor E. Khatkov
Hryhoriy Lapshyn
Louisa Bolm
Dirk Bausch
Tobias Keck
Ulrich F. Wellner
Gabriel Seifert
Publikationsdatum
13.06.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1590-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 5/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.