Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016

23.02.2016 | Review

Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy

verfasst von: Mauro Podda, Alessandra Saba, Federica Porru, Adolfo Pisanu

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 11/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is currently a paucity of research comparing the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) with those obtained with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC). This meta-analysis aimed to examine whether SILC shows real benefits over MLC, especially in terms of feasibility, safety, and oncological adequacy.

Methods

A literature review of studies comparing SILC and MLC has been performed which looked at the following outcomes: mortality, morbidity, and oncological parameters of adequacy, as well as other potential benefits and drawbacks. Standardized mean difference for continuous variables and odds ratios for qualitative variables were calculated.

Results

Thirty studies comparing SILC and MLC were reviewed: two prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs), eight prospective studies, and 20 retrospective comparative observational studies. Overall, in a cohort of 3502 patients who underwent surgery, SILC was used in 1068 cases (30.5 %) and MLC was used in 2434 cases (69.5 %). Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower when the SILC procedure had been used (75.06 vs. 91.45 ml, P = 0.03); bowel function recovered significantly earlier in the SILC patients (1.96 vs. 2.15 days, P = 0.03); mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SILC group (5.55 vs. 6.60 days, P = 0.0005); and length of skin incision was significantly shorter in SILC patients (3.98 vs. 5.28 cm, P = 0.01). However, in the latter four outcomes, evidence of heterogeneity was found. In contrast, MLC showed significantly better results when compared to SILC in terms of distal free margins (12.26 vs. 10.98 cm, P = 0.01).

Conclusions

SILC could be considered as a safe and feasible alternative to MLC in experienced hands. Further evidence for this surgical procedure should be assessed in the form of high-quality RCTs, with additional focus on its use in low rectal cancer resection.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Bernstein M, Gerome N (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 10:133–136CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Reissman P, Pfeifer J, Bernstein M, Gerome N (1996) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: analysis of 140 cases. Surg Endosc 10:133–136CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Fung AKY, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99:1353–1364CrossRefPubMed Fung AKY, Aly EH (2012) Systematic review of single-incision laparoscopic colonic surgery. Br J Surg 99:1353–1364CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826CrossRefPubMed Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP (2008) Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 10:823–826CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016CrossRefPubMed Bucher P, Pugin F, Morel P (2008) Single port access laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:1013–1016CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Chew M-H, Chang M-H, Tan W-S, Wong M-T, Tang C-L (2013) Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutives cases. Surg Endosc 27:471–477CrossRefPubMed Chew M-H, Chang M-H, Tan W-S, Wong M-T, Tang C-L (2013) Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutives cases. Surg Endosc 27:471–477CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kwag S-J, Kim JG, Oh S-T, Kang W-K (2013) Single incision vs. conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a case-matched study. Am J Surg 206:320–325CrossRefPubMed Kwag S-J, Kim JG, Oh S-T, Kang W-K (2013) Single incision vs. conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for sigmoid colon cancer: a case-matched study. Am J Surg 206:320–325CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedraza R, Aminian A, Nieto J, Faraj K, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and comparative analysis. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.1155/2013/283438 Pedraza R, Aminian A, Nieto J, Faraj K, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: short-term outcomes and comparative analysis. Minim Invasive Surg. doi:10.​1155/​2013/​283438
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Vasilakis V, Clark CE, Liasis L, Papaconstantinou HT (2013) Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique. J Surg Res 180:201e–207eCrossRef Vasilakis V, Clark CE, Liasis L, Papaconstantinou HT (2013) Noncosmetic benefits of single-incision laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a case-matched comparison with multiport laparoscopic technique. J Surg Res 180:201e–207eCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Yun J-A, Yun SH, Park YA, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy for malignancy: assessment of perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:2122–2130CrossRefPubMed Yun J-A, Yun SH, Park YA, Cho YB, Kim HC, Lee WY, Chun HK (2013) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy compared with conventional laparoscopy for malignancy: assessment of perioperative and short-term oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc 27:2122–2130CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Lazzara S, La Malfa G, Navarra G (2012) Single-incision versus three-port conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: is there any real need to go single? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:621–624CrossRef Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Lazzara S, La Malfa G, Navarra G (2012) Single-incision versus three-port conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: is there any real need to go single? J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:621–624CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Egi H, Hattori M, Hinoi T, Takakura Y, Kawaguchi Y, Shimomura M, Tokunaga M, Adachi T, Urushihara T, Itamoto T, Ohdan H (2012) Single-port laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a comparison of surgical results. World J Surg Oncol 10:61. doi:10.1186/1477-7819-10-61 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Egi H, Hattori M, Hinoi T, Takakura Y, Kawaguchi Y, Shimomura M, Tokunaga M, Adachi T, Urushihara T, Itamoto T, Ohdan H (2012) Single-port laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a comparison of surgical results. World J Surg Oncol 10:61. doi:10.​1186/​1477-7819-10-61 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fujii S, Watanabe K, Ota M, Watanabe J, Ichikawa Y, Yamagishi S, Tatsumi K, Suwa H, Kunisaki C, Taguri M, Morita S, Endo I (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case–control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost. Surg Endosc 26:1403–1411CrossRefPubMed Fujii S, Watanabe K, Ota M, Watanabe J, Ichikawa Y, Yamagishi S, Tatsumi K, Suwa H, Kunisaki C, Taguri M, Morita S, Endo I (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery using colon-lifting technique for colorectal cancer: a matched case–control comparison with standard multiport laparoscopic surgery in terms of short-term results and access instrument cost. Surg Endosc 26:1403–1411CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaujoux S, Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y (2012) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg 16:629–634CrossRefPubMed Gaujoux S, Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Ferron M, Panis Y (2012) Safety, feasibility, and short-term outcomes of single port access colorectal surgery: a single institutional case-matched study. J Gastrointest Surg 16:629–634CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, Trombetta S (2012) Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg 204:115–120CrossRefPubMed Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Mereu A, Binda B, Brachini G, Trombetta S (2012) Standard laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: early results of a randomized prospective study. Am J Surg 204:115–120CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Lee Y (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series of 90 cases. Surg Endosc 26:S249–S430 Katsuno G, Fukunaga M, Lee Y (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series of 90 cases. Surg Endosc 26:S249–S430
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Osborne AJ, Lim J, Gash KJ, Chaudhary B, Dixon AR (2012) Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic high anterior resection with standard laparoscopic high anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 15:329–333CrossRef Osborne AJ, Lim J, Gash KJ, Chaudhary B, Dixon AR (2012) Comparison of single-incision laparoscopic high anterior resection with standard laparoscopic high anterior resection. Colorectal Dis 15:329–333CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon JTC, Cheung CW, Fan JKM, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734CrossRefPubMed Poon JTC, Cheung CW, Fan JKM, Lo OS, Law WL (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic colectomy for colonic neoplasm: a randomized, controlled trial. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734CrossRef Ramos-Valadez DI, Ragupathi M, Nieto J, Patel CB, Miller S, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2012) Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a case-matched series. Surg Endosc 26:2729–2734CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, Lips DJ, Prins HA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients. Dig Surg 29:477–483CrossRefPubMed Velthuis S, van den Boezem PB, Lips DJ, Prins HA, Cuesta MA, Sietses C (2012) Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes after single-incision laparoscopic versus multiport laparoscopic right colectomy: a two-center, prospective case-controlled study of 100 patients. Dig Surg 29:477–483CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs. straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186CrossRefPubMed Champagne BJ, Lee EC, Leblanc F, Stein SL, Delaney CP (2011) Single-incision vs. straight laparoscopic segmental colectomy: a case-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 54:183–186CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Chen WT-L, Chang S-C, Chiang H-C, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed Chen WT-L, Chang S-C, Chiang H-C, Lo WY, Jeng LB, Wu C, Ke TW (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surg Endosc 25:1887–1892CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim S-J, Ryu GO, Choi B-J, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940CrossRefPubMed Kim S-J, Ryu GO, Choi B-J, Kim JG, Lee KJ, Lee SC, Oh ST (2011) The short-term outcomes of conventional and single-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 254:933–940CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai CW, Edwards TJ, Clements DM, Coleman MG (2011) Single port laparoscopic right colonic resection using a ‘vessel-first’ approach. Colorectal Dis 14:1138–1144CrossRef Lai CW, Edwards TJ, Clements DM, Coleman MG (2011) Single port laparoscopic right colonic resection using a ‘vessel-first’ approach. Colorectal Dis 14:1138–1144CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee SW, Milsom JW, Nash GM (2011) Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1355–1361CrossRefPubMed Lee SW, Milsom JW, Nash GM (2011) Single-incision versus multiport laparoscopic right and hand-assisted left colectomy: a case-matched comparison. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1355–1361CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu C-C, Lin SE, Chung K-C, Rau K-M (2011) Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 14:e171–e176CrossRef Lu C-C, Lin SE, Chung K-C, Rau K-M (2011) Comparison of clinical outcome of single-incision laparoscopic surgery using a simplified access system with conventional laparoscopic surgery for malignant colorectal disease. Colorectal Dis 14:e171–e176CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat McNally ME, Moore BT, Brown KM (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 25:3559–3565CrossRefPubMed McNally ME, Moore BT, Brown KM (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for malignant disease. Surg Endosc 25:3559–3565CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Papaconstantinou HT, Scott TJ (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 150:820–827CrossRefPubMed Papaconstantinou HT, Scott TJ (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: assessment of oncologic resection and short-term outcomes in a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopy. Surgery 150:820–827CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2011) Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 14:634–641CrossRef Wolthuis AM, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, D’Hoore A (2011) Outcomes for case-matched single-port colectomy are comparable with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Colorectal Dis 14:634–641CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1549–1554CrossRefPubMed Adair J, Gromski MA, Lim RB, Nagle D (2010) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: experience with 17 consecutive cases and comparison with multiport laparoscopic right colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1549–1554CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880CrossRefPubMed Gandhi DP, Ragupathi M, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2010) Single-incision versus hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a case-matched series. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1875–1880CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, Selzer DJ, Wiebke EA, Robb BW, George VV (2010) Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1467–1472CrossRefPubMed Waters JA, Guzman MJ, Fajardo AD, Selzer DJ, Wiebke EA, Robb BW, George VV (2010) Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 53:1467–1472CrossRefPubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Keshava A, Young CJ, Richardson GL, De-Loyde K (2013) A historical comparison of single incision and conventional multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Colorectal Dis 15:e618–e622CrossRefPubMed Keshava A, Young CJ, Richardson GL, De-Loyde K (2013) A historical comparison of single incision and conventional multiport laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Colorectal Dis 15:e618–e622CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Lim SW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2014) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 87:131–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lim SW, Kim HR, Kim YJ (2014) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy for colorectal cancer: comparison with conventional laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 87:131–138CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Khayat A, Maggiori L, Vicaut E, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Does single port improve results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery? A propensity score adjustment analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4063-7 PubMed Khayat A, Maggiori L, Vicaut E, Ferron M, Panis Y (2015) Does single port improve results of laparoscopic colorectal surgery? A propensity score adjustment analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4063-7 PubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Yang TX, Chua TC (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:89–101CrossRefPubMed Yang TX, Chua TC (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int J Colorectal Dis 28:89–101CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y (2012) Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than thousand procedures. Colorectal Dis 14:e643–e654CrossRefPubMed Maggiori L, Gaujoux S, Tribillon E, Bretagnol F, Panis Y (2012) Single-incision laparoscopy for colorectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of more than thousand procedures. Colorectal Dis 14:e643–e654CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Li P, Wang DR, Wang LH, Li YK, Chen J (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for colectomy: a meta-analysis of eleven recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1345–1349CrossRefPubMed Li P, Wang DR, Wang LH, Li YK, Chen J (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery vs. multiport laparoscopic surgery for colectomy: a meta-analysis of eleven recent studies. Hepatogastroenterology 59:1345–1349CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Lujàn JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy vs. multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319CrossRefPubMed Lujàn JA, Soriano MT, Abrisqueta J, Pérez D, Parrilla P (2015) Single-port colectomy vs. multi-port laparoscopic colectomy. Systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 2800 procedures. Cir Esp 93:307–319CrossRefPubMed
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Hassan I, You YN, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Barnes SA, Pemberton JH (2008) Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally invasive colorectal practice. Surg Endosc 22:739–743CrossRefPubMed Hassan I, You YN, Cima RR, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Barnes SA, Pemberton JH (2008) Hand-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery: practice patterns and clinical outcomes in a minimally invasive colorectal practice. Surg Endosc 22:739–743CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, Read TE, Arnell TD, Birnbaum EH, Feingold DL, Lee SW, Mutch MG, Sonoda T, Yan Y, Whelan RL (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:818–826CrossRefPubMed Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, Read TE, Arnell TD, Birnbaum EH, Feingold DL, Lee SW, Mutch MG, Sonoda T, Yan Y, Whelan RL (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 51:818–826CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008CrossRefPubMed Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Pisanu A, Porceddu G, Reccia I, Saba A, Uccheddu A (2013) Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. J Surg Res 183:e49–e59CrossRefPubMed Pisanu A, Porceddu G, Reccia I, Saba A, Uccheddu A (2013) Meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional multiport laparoscopic appendectomy. J Surg Res 183:e49–e59CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy. A multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69CrossRefPubMed Champagne BJ, Papaconstantinou HT, Parmar SS, Nagle DA, Young-Fadok TM, Lee EC, Delaney CP (2012) Single-incision versus standard multiport laparoscopic colectomy. A multicenter, case-controlled comparison. Ann Surg 255:66–69CrossRefPubMed
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–82CrossRefPubMed Papaconstantinou HT, Sharp N, Thomas JS (2011) Single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy: a case-matched comparison with standard laparoscopic and hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques. J Am Coll Surg 213:72–82CrossRefPubMed
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 255:667–676CrossRefPubMed Makino T, Milsom JW, Lee SW (2012) Feasibility and safety of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 255:667–676CrossRefPubMed
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Leblanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Stein SL, Marderstein E, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP (2010) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits. Diagn Ther Endosc. doi:10.1155/2010/913216 PubMedPubMedCentral Leblanc F, Champagne BJ, Augestad KM, Stein SL, Marderstein E, Reynolds HL, Delaney CP (2010) Single incision laparoscopic colectomy: technical aspects, feasibility, and expected benefits. Diagn Ther Endosc. doi:10.​1155/​2010/​913216 PubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller DS, Ibarra S, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ponte OM, Madhoun N, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2015) Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4268-9 Keller DS, Ibarra S, Flores-Gonzalez JR, Ponte OM, Madhoun N, Pickron TB, Haas EM (2015) Outcomes for single-incision laparoscopic colectomy surgery in obese patients: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-015-4268-9
53.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim HO, Yoo CH, Lee SR, Son BH, Park YL, Shin JH, Kim H, Han WK (2012) Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery. J Korean Surg Soc 82:172–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kim HO, Yoo CH, Lee SR, Son BH, Park YL, Shin JH, Kim H, Han WK (2012) Pain after laparoscopic appendectomy: a comparison of transumbilical single-port and conventional laparoscopic surgery. J Korean Surg Soc 82:172–178CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing single-incision laparoscopic colectomy and multiport laparoscopic colectomy
verfasst von
Mauro Podda
Alessandra Saba
Federica Porru
Adolfo Pisanu
Publikationsdatum
23.02.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 11/2016
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4812-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2016

Surgical Endoscopy 11/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.