Background
Glucocorticoids (GCs) induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in lymphoblastic cells and therefore constitute a central component in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. GC resistance is a therapeutic problem with an unclear molecular mechanism [
1]. We have demonstrated that rapamycin (Rap), a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, can effectively sensitize anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lymphoid cells to dexamethasone (Dex)-induced apoptosis [
2]. Rap could be used as a potential GC sensitizer in hematological malignancies [
3‐
7]. mTOR is a serine-threonine protein kinase that belongs to the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-related kinase family. The inhibition of mTOR kinase leads to dephosphorylation of its two major downstream signaling components, p70S6 kinase (p70S6K), a kinase implicated in cell proliferation, and eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), a protein that inhibits the translation of 5’-cap mRNAs [
8]. A previous study has reported that genetic prevention of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation (p-4E-BP1) but not p70S6K phosphorylation (p-p70S6K) enhances Dex-induced apoptosis in multiple myeloma cells [
4]. In addition, 4E-BP1 expression correlates with resistance to mTOR inhibitors [
9,
10].
The GC-resistant Raji cell line, established in 1963 from the left maxilla of a 12-year-old African boy with Burkitt lymphoma [
11], with 4E-BP1-null [
12], t(8;14), and high c-Myc expression, is a Rap-resistant cell line [
9,
13]. Unexpectedly, our data showed that Rap effectively potentiates Dex-induced apoptosis in the 4E-BP1-null Raji cells. There should have other underlying mechanisms for the association between mTOR activation and GC resistance.
An increasing number of studies have reported that increased aerobic glycolysis is a hallmark of cancer and plays a role in the chemoresistance of different tumor cells [
14‐
16]. Interestingly, in addition to being a key mediator that regulates cell survival, S6K is also a critical mediator of glycolytic metabolism in mTOR-activated cells [
17]. Targeting glycolysis sensitizes tumor cells to chemotherapy [
18,
19]. Inhibition of the mTOR pathway sensitizes leukemia cells to aurora inhibitors by suppression of the glycolytic metabolism [
20]. More interestingly, mTOR is also a master negative regulator of autophagy [
21]. Bonapace [
22] reported that induction of autophagy-dependent necroptosis is required for childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells to overcome GC resistance. There should have potential links among the mTOR/p70S6K signaling pathway, glycolysis, autophagy and GC resistance.
In our current study, we have shown that the combination of Rap with Dex effectively inhibited the mTOR/p70S6K/glycolysis signaling pathway and induced autophagy, which led to the restoration of GC sensitivity in Rap- and Dex-resistant Raji cells in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, the combination of an mTOR inhibitor with Dex is a promising therapeutic approach for GC-resistant Burkitt lymphoma. More importantly, the study provides further insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in Rap reversing GC resistance. Components of mTOR/p70S6K/glycolysis signaling network could be targeted for the reversion of GC resistance.
Methods
Cell line and culture conditions
The Burkitt lymphoma cell line Raji was purchased from the Shanghai Institute Cell Resources Bank. Raji cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Hyclone, Logan, USA) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine (Hyclone) and antibiotics (100 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin) at 37 °C in a humidified 5 % CO2 in-air atmosphere.
Reagents and antibodies
As described previously [
2], Rap (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and used at a concentration of 10 nM. Dex (Sigma) was dissolved in ethanol and used at a concentration of 1 μM. The final concentrations of DMSO and ethanol in the medium were 0.05 % and 0.01 %, respectively, at which cell proliferation or viability was not obviously altered. Propidium iodide (PI), 3-methyladenine (3-MA), 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Sigma. The pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk was purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). The Annexin V-PI Kit was purchased from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). Antibodies to phospho-glucocorticoid receptor (p-GR) (Ser211), p70S6K, p-p70S6K (Thr421/Ser424), 4E-BP1, p-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), phospho-AMPK (p-AMPK) (Thr172), Cyclin D, p27, Bax, Mcl-1, and Bcl-2 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). The antibody for p21 was purchased from BD Bioscience (San Jose, CA, USA). Antibodies to extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phospho-ERK (p-ERK) were purchased from Upstate/Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). Antibody to LC3 was purchased from Sigma. Antibodies to GR, Bim, Cyclin A, horseradish peroxidase (HRP)–conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody and HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotech (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The actin antibody was obtained from Kangchen Bio-Tech (Shanghai, China).
Cell treatment
Logarithmically growing cells were harvested and plated in 96-well sterile plastic culture plates and 25-cm2 flasks (Corning Inc.), to which various concentrations of Rap or Dex, specifically 10 nM Rap (Rap group), 1 μM Dex (Dex group), 10 nM Rap plus 1 μM Dex (Rap + Dex group) and 0.05 % DMSO plus 0.01 % ethanol (Control group), were added. At the end of the incubation period, cells were transferred to sterile centrifuge tubes, pelleted by centrifugation at 400 g at room temperature for 5 min, and prepared for analysis as described below.
Cell viability assay
MTT assays were performed as described previously. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well plates (100,000/ml) and incubated for 24 or 48 h. Next, 0.5 mg/ml MTT (final concentration) was added to each well for 4 h at 37 °C. Then, solubilization buffer (10 % SDS in 0.01 M HCl) was added to each well, and the plates were further incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. The spectrophotometric absorbance was measured at 570 nm (reference 690 nm) using a multi-plate reader (Multiskan Spectrum, Thermo Electron Co., Waltham, MA, USA). Values were obtained by comparing the experimental cells with their respective controls. Mean values were calculated from triplicate cultures. Coefficient of drug interaction (CDI) was used to analyze the effects of drug combinations. The CDI is calculated as follows: CDI = AB/(A × B). According to the absorbance of each group, AB is the ratio of the combination groups to control group; A or B is the ratio of the single agent group to control group. Thus, a CDI value <1, =1 or >1 indicates that the drugs are synergistic, additive or antagonistic, respectively.
Cell cycle analysis
For each analysis, 106 cells were harvested 48 h after treatment and fixed overnight in 70 % ethanol at 4 °C. Cells were then washed and stained with 5 μg/ml PI in the presence of DNAse-free RNAse (Sigma). After 30 min at room temperature, the cells were analyzed via flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL, USA), acquiring 30,000 events.
Apoptosis assay
The samples were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) twice and stained with annexin V-FLUOS and PI using Annexin-V-FLUOS staining kit (Roche) according to the manufacturer protocol. The percentages of annexin-V single positive cells were determined by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter), as the percentages of cells in the early stages of apoptosis.
Glucose consumption assay
Glucose consumption was measured with a Glucose (HK) Assay Kit (Sigma). Briefly, 1 × 106 cells were grown in 10 ml RPMI containing 2 g/l glucose. After 48 h, the medium was collected by centrifugation to remove the cells. Medium from each condition was incubated for 30 min with the glucose assay reagent. Spectrophotometric absorbance was measured at 340 nm using a multi-plate reader (Multiskan Spectrum). Values were obtained by comparing with a glucose standard solution.
Lactic acid assay
Lactic acid production was measured with a Lactic Acid Assay Kit (Jiancheng, Nanjing, China). Briefly, 1 × 106 cells were grown in 10 ml RPMI. After 48 h, the medium was collected by centrifugation to remove the cells. Medium from each condition was incubated with the lactic acid assay reagent according to the manufacturer protocol. Spectrophotometric absorbance was measured at 530 nm using a multi-plate reader (Multiskan Spectrum). Values were obtained by comparing with a lactic acid standard solution.
In vivo studies
All animal studies were conducted in accordance with the guidelines established by the internal Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Ethics Committee guidelines of Sichuan University. All animals were kept under specific pathogen-free conditions in Laboratory Center of West China Second Hospital, Sichuan University. Female Balb/c (nu/nu) mice (Laboratory Animal Center of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China), 5–6 weeks of age, 16-18 g of weight, were inoculated with 3 × 106 Raji cells subcutaneously (s.c.) in the right flank with an inoculation volume of 0.2 ml. Tumor size was measured by calipers every 2 days. The approximate tumor volume was calculated using the equation V = (length × width × depth)/2. Once palpable tumors were established (tumor volume reaching 30–40 mm3), animals were randomized into 4 groups, each containing 6 mice. Mice were injected intraperitoneally daily with 3 mg/kg/d Rap (Rap group), 15 mg/kg/d Dex (Dex group), 3 mg/kg/d Rap plus 15 mg/kg/d Dex (Rap + Dex group) or PBS (Control group). All animals were ear-tagged and monitored individually throughout the experiment.
Mitochondrial membrane potential detection
The mitochondrial membrane potential (∆ψm) was measured using Rhodamine 123 (Rh123) staining. In brief, Rh123 (10 μM) was loaded into cells for 20 min at 37 °C. The fluorescence intensity of cells was analyzed by flow cytometry (Beckman Coulter) with an excitation wavelength at 488 nm and an emission wavelength at 525 nm.
Analysis of autophagy with MDC staining
The cells were suspended in 0.05 mM Monodansylcadaverine (MDC, Sigma) and incubated at 37 °C for 40 min. Then, the fluorescent changes were observed by fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) with the emission wavelength at 525 nm.
Transmission electron microscopy
Cells were harvested after treatment. Following fixation in 2 % paraformaldehyde/2.5 % glutaraldehyde, pellets were rinsed and post-fixed in 1 % osmium tetroxide/1.25 % potassium ferrocyanide. Samples were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, followed by propylene oxide and infiltrated and embedded in Polybed 812 resin. Ultrathin 70-nm-thick sections were taken from areas selected by light microscopy, mounted on 200 mesh copper grids, and stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. These were observed and photographed using a Jeol J EM-1200EX transmission electron microscope (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Western blotting analysis
Cells (106) were washed twice in cold PBS and then lysed by Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad). Samples were boiled for 5 min at 100 °C. Proteins were separated by 10 % or 15 % SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (0.22 μm or 0.45 μm, Millipore). Non-specific binding sites were blocked with 5 % non-fat dry milk dissolved in TBS (10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.6, 137 mM NaCl) with 0.1 % Tween 20 (TTBS) for 2 h at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary antibody for 2 h at room temperature or at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then washed 3 times in TTBS and incubated for 2 h at room temperature with secondary HRP–conjugated donkey anti-rabbit antibody or HRP-conjugated sheep anti-mouse antibody (Santa Cruz) diluted 1:5000 in TTBS with 5 % non-fat milk. Proteins were visualized by incubation with ECL plus (Millipore). All experiments were carried out independently at least 3 times. The level of Actin protein was used as a control for the amount of protein loaded into each lane.
Statistical analysis
All assays were performed in triplicate, and data are expressed as mean values ± SD. One-way ANOVA was used to compare two groups. A p-value < 0.05 was considered to be significant.
Discussion
Despite the good outcomes with intensive chemotherapy, GC resistance remains a major obstacle to successful treatment of lymphoblastic malignancies. Novel and less toxic treatment strategies are needed, especially for pediatric patients. Recently, the mTOR signaling pathway has received much attention as a potential target in hematological malignancies [
29‐
31]. However, there are still some tumor cells that are resistant to Rap, for example, the Burkitt lymphoma cell line Raji. The Raji cell line possesses several Rap-resistant characteristics described by Houghton, such as the 4E-BP1-null mutation, a high level of cap-independent c-Myc expression, and the association of a4 with PP2Ac [
9]. Furthermore, Raji cells are also resistant to GC. Surprisingly, the present study provides evidence that Rap combined with Dex, both at clinically achievable concentrations, interacted synergistically to inhibit Raji cell viability. This effect was found not only
in vivo but also
in vitro.
To unveil the underlying mechanism, we further studied the effect of the combined treatment on the cell cycle. Rap or Dex alone had no effect on the cell cycle progression of Raji cells. Combined treatment, similar to those Rap-sensitive cells, can induce G
0/G
1 cycle arrest in Raji cells. The down-regulation of Cyclin D1 and Cyclin A along with the up-regulation of CDK inhibitors p21 and p27 has previously been suggested to be the mechanism behind mTOR inhibitor-induced cell cycle arrest in Rap-sensitive cells [
2,
32]. We achieved similar results in the combined group: a strong induction of p27, a slight up-regulation of p21, and down-regulation of Cyclin D1 and Cyclin A. Therefore, combined treatment successfully restored the sensitivity to Rap.
According to the results of the apoptosis assays, combined treatment restored the sensitivity of Raji cells to GC. Bcl-2 family members are critical regulators of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and play critical roles in GC-induced apoptosis [
23]. Members of this family can be divided into two groups: the anti-apoptotic proteins, such as Bcl-2 and Mcl-1, and the pro-apoptotic proteins, such as Bax and Bim. Published papers have verified that Rap restores GC sensitivity and induces apoptosis through the intrinsic apoptotic pathway [
2‐
7]. Our studies showed that in Raji cells, Rap combined with Dex obviously cleaved Bcl-2 and caspase-3. Unlike the reported results [
2‐
7], Rap and Dex alone or combined induced Bim expression clearly, and combined treatment had little effect on Bax and did not affect Mcl-1expression. The changes on bcl-2 related proteins may correlate with GC resistance in Raji cells, which need confirmation by further research. In Burkitt lymphoma cells, enhanced apoptosis in response to chemotherapeutic agents is independent of p53 and Bax [
33]. ∆ψm dissipation is an early event in apoptosis activated through the mitochondrial pathway [
34]. However, there are emerging data suggesting that depending on the cell system under investigation and the apoptotic stimuli used, the dissipation of Δψ
m may or may not be an early event in the apoptotic pathway [
35]. In our study, there were no significant differences between Rap and Dex alone or combination in dissipation of ∆ψm. Further study indicated that the pan-caspase inhibitor z-VAD-fmk only partially interfered with the GC-sensitizing effect of Rap, whereas z-VAD-fmk blocked the cytotoxic effect of Dex in GC-sensitive cells [
22]. The data proved that combined treatment triggers a caspase-independent cell death in Raji cells. Autophagic cell death is the most studied caspase-independent cell death [
24]. Induction of autophagy-dependent necroptosis is a potential mechanism for childhood ALL cells to overcome GC resistance [
22].
As Raji cells lack the expression of 4E-BP1, Rap treatment only reduced the expression of p-p70S6K and cannot arrest the cell cycle. Fortunately, dephosphorylation of p70S6K can effectively induce cell autophagy [
36]. Our results reconfirmed that Rap treatment alone inhibited p-p70S6K expression and induced autophagy in 4E-BP1-null Raji cells; combining Rap with Dex increased these effects. While it is clear that autophagy is a protective mechanism at times of cellular stress, the contribution of autophagy in regulating cancer cell death or survival remains controversial [
37]. In our study, the autophagy inhibitor 3-MA inhibited the viability of Raji cells in the Rap and Dex treatment alone groups. However, 3-MA did not affect the cytotoxicity of the combination treatment by inducing apoptosis. z-VAD-fmk has been reported to induce cell death via autophagy [
38], which may explain why z-VAD-fmk did not fully protect the cells from the combined treatment. Our data showed that Rap combined with Dex induced cell killing depended on caspase-dependent apoptosis and caspase-independent autophagy cell death in Raji cells. Importantly, once the cytotoxicity of the combined treatment is triggered, the cancer cells will not be protected by the inhibition of apoptosis or autophagy.
How can Rap restore Dex-induced apoptosis in 4E-BP1-null Raji cells? Notably, S6K is the core regulator of glycolysis [
17]. Ninety years ago, Otto Warburg [
39] discovered that enhanced aerobic glycolysis distinguishes cancer from normal tissues (also known as the Warburg effect). Upregulation of the cellular metabolism (including glycolytic and oxidative phosphorylative pathways) and proliferation is an important aspect of GC resistance in ALL and may contribute to patient outcome [
40]. GC resistance is directly associated with a glycolytic phenotype [
41] and the activation of glycolysis has suppressive effects on the apoptotic potential [
42]. The inhibition of glycolysis can reverse the GC resistance by inducing apoptosis in ALL cells [
41,
43]. It is noteworthy that although Raji cells are resistant to Rap, Rap treatment alone can diminish p-p70S6K, dissipate ∆ψm and inhibit glycolysis in Raji cells. There may be a potential link among p70S6K, glycolysis and GC resistance. In support of this hypothesis, our data indicated that Rap combined with Dex clearly inhibited glycolysis, and the glycolysis inhibitor 2-DG effectively took the place of Rap. When 2-DG was combined with Dex, it recapitulated the effect of Rap combined with Dex by inducing apoptosis and arresting the cell cycle. We got the same results in Rap-sensitive T-ALL and B-ALL cell lines (data not shown).
GC resistance may be caused by a lack of GR up-regulation upon GC exposure in leukemia cell lines [
44]. However, there is evidence that GC resistance in childhood ALL cannot be attributed to an inability of resistant cells to up-regulate the expression of the GR upon GC exposure, nor to differences in the GR promoter usage [
45]. Another study demonstrated that the Ser211 phosphorylation site is a key regulator of GR transcriptional activation and repression [
46]. Treatment with Dex results in the phosphorylation of GR at Ser211 with increased GR expression in Dex-sensitive CEM clones, whereas in Dex-resistant CEM clones, Rap + Dex elevates p-GR (Ser211) expression with no increase in GR protein [
47]. Our study showed that Rap combined Dex induced the expression of p-GR (Ser211) with no increase in GR expression in Raji cells. Meanwhile, combined treatment did not influence the expression of ERK but inhibited the ERK signaling pathway by reducing p-ERK levels. Garza [
5] found that the Dex-resistant cell lines have high basal levels of p-ERK relative to Dex-sensitive CEM-C7-14 cells. The p-ERK protects against GC-evoked apoptosis in sensitive T-ALL cells [
47]. The inhibition of ERK also restores GC sensitivity in resistant T-ALL cells [
48]. The induction of p-GR (Ser211) and reduction of p-ERK verified directly that combined treatment restored the GC sensitivity in Raji cells.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
LG designed the research, performed a part of the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. LPX and CZ participated in the molecular and animal experiments and helped to draft the manuscript. ZGM helped to design the research and contributed essential tools. YLZ performed a part of the research. YPZ and JG contributed essential tools. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.