Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2019

01.10.2018 | Review Article

Technical approach of robotic total right hepatic lobectomy: How we do it?

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Despite advantages of minimally invasive surgery, many hepatobiliary surgeons are hesitant to offer this approach for major hepatic resection due to concerns of difficulty in liver manipulation, bleeding control, and suboptimal oncologic outcomes. The robotic surgical system has revolutionized the way traditional laparoscopic liver resection is undertaken. Limitations of traditional laparoscopy are being resolved by robotic technology. We aimed to describe aspects of minimally invasive liver surgery and our standardized technical approach. We discussed technical aspects of performing robotic total right hepatic lobectomy and described our standardized institutional method. A 79-year-old man with an 11-cm biopsy-proven hepatocellular carcinoma was taken to the operating room for a robotic total right hepatic lobectomy. Past medical and surgical history was consistent with hypertension and diabetes mellitus. Robotic extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach was used to gain inflow vascular control. Right hepatic artery and portal vein were individually dissected and isolated prior to division. An intraoperative robotic ultrasound was utilized to guide liver parenchymal transection, securing negative margins. Robotic vessel sealing device was used as the main energy device during the parenchymal transection. Right hepatic vein was transected intrahepatically using a linear stapler. Operative time was 200 min without intraoperative complications. Estimated blood loss was 100 ml. Postsurgical recovery was uneventful and he was discharged home on postoperative day 4. Minimally invasive robotic total right hepatic lobectomy is feasible with excellent perioperative outcomes.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: the Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2975–2983CrossRefPubMed Hibi T, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2016) Expanding indications and regional diversity in laparoscopic liver resection unveiled by the International Survey on Technical Aspects of Laparoscopic Liver Resection (INSTALL) study. Surg Endosc 30(7):2975–2983CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356CrossRefPubMed Nguyen KT, Marsh JW, Tsung A et al (2011) Comparative benefits of laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection: a critical appraisal. Arch Surg 146(3):348–356CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145(11):1109–1118CrossRefPubMed Croome KP, Yamashita MH (2010) Laparoscopic vs open hepatic resection for benign and malignant tumors: an updated meta-analysis. Arch Surg 145(11):1109–1118CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J et al (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85(10):511–516PubMed Ryska M, Fronek J, Rudis J et al (2006) Manual and robotic laparoscopic liver resection. Two case-reviews. Rozhl Chir 85(10):511–516PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258CrossRefPubMed Choi GH, Choi SH, Kim SH et al (2012) Robotic liver resection: technique and results of 30 consecutive procedures. Surg Endosc 26(8):2247–2258CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Daskalaki D, Gonzalez-Ciccarelli LF, Kim J, Benedetti E (2016) Robotic liver surgery: technical aspects and review of the literature. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 5(4):311–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R et al (2010) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 147(6):830–839CrossRefPubMed Chandra V, Nehra D, Parent R et al (2010) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 147(6):830–839CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A, Geller DA (2015) Reply to letter: “Does the robot provide an advantage over laparoscopic liver resection?” Ann Surg 262(2):e70–e71CrossRef Tsung A, Geller DA (2015) Reply to letter: “Does the robot provide an advantage over laparoscopic liver resection?” Ann Surg 262(2):e70–e71CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed Tsung A, Geller DA, Sukato DC et al (2014) Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison. Ann Surg 259(3):549–555CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720CrossRefPubMed Beppu T, Wakabayashi G, Hasegawa K et al (2015) Long-term and perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases with propensity score matching: a multi-institutional Japanese study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(10):711–720CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y et al (2002) Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 236:397–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(5):371–378CrossRefPubMed Tranchart H, O’Rourke N, Van Dam R et al (2015) Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 22(5):371–378CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875CrossRefPubMed Qiu J, Chen S, Chengyou D (2016) A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms. Surg Endosc 30(3):862–875CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed Ocuin LM, Tsung A (2015) Robotic liver resection for malignancy: current status, oncologic outcomes, comparison to laparoscopy, and future applications. J Surg Oncol 112(3):295–301CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253:342–348CrossRefPubMed Ji WB, Wang HG, Zhao ZM et al (2011) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy in China: initial experience. Ann Surg 253:342–348CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702CrossRefPubMed Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2013) Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcome. Am J Surg 205(6):697–702CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Technical approach of robotic total right hepatic lobectomy: How we do it?
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2018
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-018-0881-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Journal of Robotic Surgery 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.