Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2008

01.10.2008 | Other

Technical Enhancements to Breast Ductal Lavage

verfasst von: Julianne Tondre, Mitra Nejad, Ashley Casano, Dixie Mills, MD, Susan Love

Erschienen in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Ausgabe 10/2008

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Ductal lavage is a technique that samples the contents of breast ducts for research into the biology of breast cancer. Enthusiasm for this method has declined because of technical challenges associated with the procedure. These include: difficulty in duct cannulation, high levels of subject discomfort, and an inability to confirm perforation.

Methods

As part of a larger institutional review board (IRB)-approved study, consenting healthy women underwent ductal lavage of 3–4 ducts in one breast. Intranipple lidocaine was administered before duct cannulation. Ductoscopy was performed prior to catheterization and high-definition ultrasound was used for imaging during the lavage procedure. Pain scores were recorded at 24 hours and 2 weeks. Subjects were asked to return in 6 months for a repeat of the procedure.

Results

Ductoscopy was performed prior to lavage under real-time ultrasound 308 times in 107 subjects. There were 280 confirmed ducts (90.9%) and 21 perforations (6.8%), while seven (2.3%) were indeterminate. Subjects reported minimal discomfort, and 91% reported a 0 (0–10 range) pain score 2 weeks after the procedure. The retention rate was 90% at 6 months.

Conclusion

The injection of lidocaine directly into the nipple greatly increases the feasibility of duct cannulation and improves subject comfort. Confirmation of duct cannulation and lavage can be documented with ductoscopy and ultrasound imaging. These procedures can be added to ductal lavage to facilitate its use as a research tool.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Goldstein LJ, et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older. Cancer 2003; 98:918–25PubMedCrossRef Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Goldstein LJ, et al. Routine mammography is associated with earlier stage disease and greater eligibility for breast conservation in breast carcinoma patients age 40 years and older. Cancer 2003; 98:918–25PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 20:1546–54 Ernster VL, Ballard-Barbash R, Barlow WE, et al. Detection of ductal carcinoma in situ in women undergoing screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 20:1546–54
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–19PubMedCrossRef Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, et al. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002; 359:909–19PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Vacek PM, Geller BM, Weaver DL, et al. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont: 1975–1999. Cancer 2002; 94:2160–8PubMedCrossRef Vacek PM, Geller BM, Weaver DL, et al. Increased mammography use and its impact on earlier breast cancer detection in Vermont: 1975–1999. Cancer 2002; 94:2160–8PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Petrakis NL. Physiologic, biochemical, and cytological aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986; 8:7–19PubMedCrossRef Petrakis NL. Physiologic, biochemical, and cytological aspects of nipple aspirate fluid. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1986; 8:7–19PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Maddux AJ, Ashfaq R, Naftalis E, et al. Patient and duct selection for nipple duct lavage. Am J Surg 2004; 188:390–4PubMedCrossRef Maddux AJ, Ashfaq R, Naftalis E, et al. Patient and duct selection for nipple duct lavage. Am J Surg 2004; 188:390–4PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bushnaq ZI, Ashfaq R, Leitch AM, et al. Patient variables that predict atypical cytology by nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2007; 109:1247–54PubMedCrossRef Bushnaq ZI, Ashfaq R, Leitch AM, et al. Patient variables that predict atypical cytology by nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2007; 109:1247–54PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sharma P, Klemp JR, Simonsen M, et al. Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 87:59–64PubMedCrossRef Sharma P, Klemp JR, Simonsen M, et al. Failure of high risk women to produce nipple aspirate fluid does not exclude detection of cytologic atypia in random periareolar fine needle aspiration specimens. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004; 87:59–64PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kurian AW, Mills MA, Jaffee M, et al. Ductal lavage of fluid-yielding and non-fluid-yielding ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and other women at high inherited breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1082–9PubMedCrossRef Kurian AW, Mills MA, Jaffee M, et al. Ductal lavage of fluid-yielding and non-fluid-yielding ducts in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and other women at high inherited breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14:1082–9PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitchell G, Antill YC, Murray W, et al. Nipple aspiration and ductal lavage in women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R1122–31PubMedCrossRef Mitchell G, Antill YC, Murray W, et al. Nipple aspiration and ductal lavage in women with a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast Cancer Res 2005; 7:R1122–31PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Thompson PA, et al. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 99:97–104PubMedCrossRef Krishnamurthy S, Sneige N, Thompson PA, et al. Nipple aspirate fluid cytology in breast carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 99:97–104PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1624–32PubMedCrossRef Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001; 93:1624–32PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Ljung BM, Chew KL, Moore DH, et al. Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diag Cytopathol 2004; 30:143–50CrossRef Ljung BM, Chew KL, Moore DH, et al. Cytology of ductal lavage fluid of the breast. Diag Cytopathol 2004; 30:143–50CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Badve S. Ductal lavage and its histopathologic basis: a cautionary tale. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:166–71PubMedCrossRef Badve S. Ductal lavage and its histopathologic basis: a cautionary tale. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:166–71PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, et al. Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2005; 103:1129–36PubMedCrossRef Johnson-Maddux A, Ashfaq R, Cler L, et al. Reproducibility of cytologic atypia in repeat nipple duct lavage. Cancer 2005; 103:1129–36PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vogel VG. Atypia in the assessment of breast cancer risk: implications for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:151–7PubMedCrossRef Vogel VG. Atypia in the assessment of breast cancer risk: implications for management. Diagn Cytopathol 2004; 30:151–7PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Visvanathan K, Santor D, Ali SZ, et al. The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer—a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16:950–5PubMedCrossRef Visvanathan K, Santor D, Ali SZ, et al. The reliability of nipple aspirate and ductal lavage in women at increased risk for breast cancer—a potential tool for breast cancer risk assessment and biomarker evaluation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007; 16:950–5PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Patil DB, Lankes HA, Nayar R, et al. Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 (Epub ahead of print) Patil DB, Lankes HA, Nayar R, et al. Reproducibility of ductal lavage cytology and cellularity over a six month interval in high risk women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2007 (Epub ahead of print)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and technical considerations of mammary ductoscopy in human mastectomy specimens. Breast J 2000; 6:161–5PubMedCrossRef Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, et al. Feasibility and technical considerations of mammary ductoscopy in human mastectomy specimens. Breast J 2000; 6:161–5PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dooley WC. Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:38–42PubMedCrossRef Dooley WC. Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2003; 10:38–42PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, et al. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 2005; 241:575–81PubMedCrossRef Moncrief RM, Nayar R, Diaz LK, et al. A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge. Ann Surg 2005; 241:575–81PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kothari A, Beechey-Newman N, Kulkarni D. Breast duct micro-endoscopy: a study of technique and a morphological classification of endo-luminal lesions. Breast 2006; 15:363–9PubMedCrossRef Kothari A, Beechey-Newman N, Kulkarni D. Breast duct micro-endoscopy: a study of technique and a morphological classification of endo-luminal lesions. Breast 2006; 15:363–9PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, et al. Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:555–64PubMedCrossRef Danforth DN, Abati A, Filie A, et al. Combined breast ductal lavage and ductal endoscopy for the evaluation of the high-risk breast: a feasibility study. J Surg Oncol 2006; 94:555–64PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Redlich PN, Purdy AC, Shidham VB, et al. Feasibility of breast duct lavage performed by a physician extender. Surgery 2004; 136:1077–80PubMedCrossRef Redlich PN, Purdy AC, Shidham VB, et al. Feasibility of breast duct lavage performed by a physician extender. Surgery 2004; 136:1077–80PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat O’Shaughnessy JA. Ductal lavage: clinical utility and future promise. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:753–69PubMedCrossRef O’Shaughnessy JA. Ductal lavage: clinical utility and future promise. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 83:753–69PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Arun B, Valero V, Logan C, et al. Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:4943–8PubMedCrossRef Arun B, Valero V, Logan C, et al. Comparison of ductal lavage and random periareolar fine needle aspiration as tissue acquisition methods in early breast cancer prevention trials. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13:4943–8PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Love SM, Barsky SH. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer 2004; 101:1947–57PubMedCrossRef Love SM, Barsky SH. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer 2004; 101:1947–57PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Technical Enhancements to Breast Ductal Lavage
verfasst von
Julianne Tondre
Mitra Nejad
Ashley Casano
Dixie Mills, MD
Susan Love
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2008
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Ausgabe 10/2008
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0060-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2008

Annals of Surgical Oncology 10/2008 Zur Ausgabe

Gastrointestinal Oncology

Sentinel Node Biopsy Without Scars

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.