Introduction
Under peculiar climatic and environmental conditions, cadaveric putrefaction stops [
1] and “conservative” transformative processes [
2] such as mummification and corification [
3] take place. Responsible for these two phenomena are both the percentage of humidity of the place in which the body remains after death [
4] and the intrinsic conditions of the corpse [
5]. Complete mummification and corification usually require several months to realize, although such phenomena can affect, at much earlier times, focal areas of skin, especially the acromial extremities, with high interindividual variability [
2]. It is very common that, after the exhumation or the discovery of a mummified or corified corpse, a judicial autopsy might be required, possibly followed by histopathological investigations [
6]. However, in such cases, the histological examination assessed with standard preparation can be very difficult or impossible to be performed. Many negative effects can be experienced in all the phases of the histological preparation, due to the intrinsic hardness and dryness of the tissues, their altered stainability, and possible loss of material [
7]. In these cases, it could be very difficult to distinguish the “real pathology” and the possible crucial forensic aspects of wounds from the “post-mortal artifacts” that often overlap each other [
8]. Consequently, it becomes essential to have effective improving histological procedures, such as rehydration techniques. To date, forensic literature identifies Sandison’s rehydrating solution as the best choice for restoring highly degraded skin, such as mummified or corified tissues [
9]. Isolated application of comfort fabric softener on Egyptian mummies has also been described in the 1980s [
10].
The authors tested the efficacy of two innovative rehydrating solutions on mummified and corified corpses: a fabric softener and a body lotion, both commercially used. The effectiveness of these two substances has been evaluated on the basis of their microscopic performance, comparing them to each other, with the Sandison’s rehydration solution and with the direct fixation in formalin. The aim was to identify the most performing one or a valuable alternative, in order to obtain better histological preparations, facilitate forensic diagnoses, and provide forensic pathologists a guideline to follow when facing microscopic examination of these peculiar and insidious cadaveric tissues.
Discussion
Autopsy performed on mummified and corified corpses is characterized by considerable risk of misinterpretations [
11], histological artifacts [
12], and failure in determining both cause [
13] and mode of death [
8]. Indeed, since these tissues are both tough and fragile [
14], as well as affected by severe structural alterations, many negative effects can be experienced in all the phases of the histological preparation [
15]. First of all, the amount of biological matrices to be used in case of repetition of the examination due to sampling or diagnostic errors is very low [
16]. There is also the real risk of the unfeasibility of identifying tissue structures and pathological conditions [
8]. Despite these problems, literature [
6] recognizes the great value and usefulness of the autopsy on mummified and corified bodies [
7], as a gold standard to provide crucial information about injuries suffered by the victim or diseases that occurred intra vitam, even after many years [
17‐
19].
Forensic histological studies focusing on human bodies in an advanced state of decomposition are few [
4,
9,
20‐
24]. There are neither detailed protocols suitable for mummified or corified bodies nor consensus on the exact mechanisms involved in rehydration techniques [
24]. These special post-mortem phenomena have been studied outside forensic practice only concerning a few aspects: rehydration with Sandison’s rehydrating solution to improve histoarchitecture [
9], thermal stabilization to avoid its loss during preparation [
25], prolongation of histological processing time for structural preservation [
26], and successful detection of nuclear chromatin and DNA profiles in highly degraded cadavers without necessarily using bone tissue [
27].
In mummified and corified cadavers, tissue-rehydrating techniques are essential to optimize the microscopic examination [
28], allowing also to improve tissue staining affinity. In detail, they are able to remove the so-called paradox effect, i.e. the tendency of markedly dehydrated connective tissue to turn red (abnormal staining) instead of green [
29,
30].
For these reasons, in the forensic field, there is a continuous quest for improving techniques to obtain high-quality microscopical preparations to facilitate and optimize diagnostics. Therefore, we tested the efficacy on mummified and corified human skin of two innovative commercial substances, i.e., a body lotion and a fabric softener. Their effectiveness was compared with direct fixation in formalin and with Sandison’s rehydration solution, which is currently considered in the literature as the best choice [
9]. Our aim was to evaluate which rehydration solution performed best and whether there was a valid alternative to Sandison.
From a macroscopic point of view, we observed that after 3 days of pretreatment with body lotion, fabric softener, and Sandison’s rehydrating solution, the skin samples appeared to be softer than they were at the time of collection. Nevertheless, after standard fixation in 4% formalin, this characteristic was almost completely lost only in the case of pretreatment with the body lotion, resulting in not being very different from those directly fixed in formalin.
Microscopically, the samples preliminarily treated with the three different rehydrating solutions showed an improvement of the tissue structure and stainability compared to those directly fixated in formalin.
The body lotion, containing in it formulation of polyethylene glycol (PEG), acted as an emollient operating an initial softening and hydration of the skin tissue; moreover, thanks to the presence of silicone oils, it fluidized and made the skin smooth and silky, stretching it. However, these effects were unable to prevent the stiffening and coarctation produced by the subsequent fixation in 4% formalin. Therefore, histo-architectural restoration was only partial for both mummified (including partially charred) and corified skin.
The fabric softener, containing biodegradable cationic surfactants, was most likely able to penetrate deep into tissues, creating electrostatic charges able to distance the fibers from each other. This effect has prevented them from agglomerating, overlapping, and fragmenting, making the skin persistently softer and moisturized, and determining a wide restoration of normal staining. On the whole, there has been a high-grade restoration of the histological morphology for both mummified (including partially charred) and corified skin. Moreover, due to an antibacterial-antifungal agent among its constituents, this solution also prevented the microbial colonization of the skin.
Sandison’s rehydrating solution, containing an emulsifying agent (sodium carbonate, Na2CO3), was able to reduce the superficial tension of the water and to permeate homogeneously the cadaveric material. In addition, the solvent (96% ethanol) rehydrated and eliminated the effects of mummification/corification processes, giving stability to the tissues and preventing them from collapse. At last, the presence of the fixative formalin 1% had a bactericidal action that made the substrate not suitable for bacterial colonization and proliferation. Through this triple action, Sandison’s solution spread quickly and uniformly in the dry and friable skin, removing the dark-brownish pigmentation, giving the tissue persistent softness and transparency. Sandison’s rehydration solution was, therefore, the best solution compared to the other two tested substances.
Comparing the grade of morphological and staining restoration of the three tested substances, it emerges how the body lotion has operated a medium–low-grade restoration, and the fabric softener a high-grade restoration, while Sandison’s rehydration solution an optimal-grade restoration. We can clearly state that Sandison’s rehydration solution is the best rehydrating substance for mummified and corified skin, whereas the fabric softener could be considered a valid alternative.
In the particular case of no. 10, concerning a stabbing homicide with subsequent charring and mummification of the victim, in which the skin sampling was performed close to the edge of the wound, we observed a potentially significant fact that should not be underestimated. Indeed, surprisingly, the microscopic presence of vital hemorrhagic evidence was detectable only in the samples directly fixated in formalin and pretreated with the fabric softener. On the contrary, in the specimens pretreated with body lotion, there were areas suggestive of possible hemorrhagic micro-extravasation, while in the one pretreated with Sandison’s rehydrating solution, the presence of any element referable to blood extravasation could not be detected. It is therefore conceivable that different rehydrating substances may have a different impact on preserving the hemorrhagic infiltrate in the skin. In particular, as far as Sandison’s solution, the presence of Na
2CO
3 can cause the osmotic lysis of red blood cells [
31,
32]; if confirmed, this could undoubtedly be a limitation for the application of Sandison’s solution, since it could deprive the forensic pathologist of crucial information, especially about the vitality of mummified or corified skin lesions or associated with underlying bone fractures. Therefore, further studies on the interaction between rehydrating substances and hemorrhagic infiltrate are necessary.
Meanwhile, this study has confirmed that Sandison’s rehydrating solution is the best performing rehydrating solution but fabric softener is unexpectedly able to provide a high-quality microscopic yield. This has been documented on both mummified (including partially charred) and corified tissues, proving to be extremely conservative also regarding hemorrhagic infiltrates. Therefore, in the absence of Sandison’s rehydrating solution, pretreatment with fabric softener could undoubtedly represent an excellent alternative.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.