Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine 11/2018

03.07.2018 | Original

Terlipressin versus norepinephrine as infusion in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial

verfasst von: Zi-Meng Liu, Juan Chen, Qiuye Kou, Qinhan Lin, Xiaobo Huang, Zhanhong Tang, Yan Kang, Ke Li, Lixin Zhou, Qing Song, Tongwen Sun, Ling Zhao, Xue Wang, Xiandi He, Chunting Wang, Benquan Wu, Jiandong Lin, Shiying Yuan, Qin Gu, Kejian Qian, Xianqing Shi, Yongwen Feng, Aihua Lin, Xiaoshun He, Xiang-Dong Guan, Study Group of investigators

Erschienen in: Intensive Care Medicine | Ausgabe 11/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Recent clinical data suggest that terlipressin, a vasopressin analogue, may be more beneficial in septic shock patients than catecholamines. However, terlipressin’s effect on mortality is unknown. We set out to ascertain the efficacy and safety of continuous terlipressin infusion compared with norepinephrine (NE) in patients with septic shock.

Methods

In this multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial, patients with septic shock recruited from 21 intensive care units in 11 provinces of China were randomised (1:1) to receive either terlipressin (20–160 µg/h with maximum infusion rate of 4 mg/day) or NE (4–30 µg/min) before open-label vasopressors. The primary endpoint was mortality 28 days after the start of infusion. Primary efficacy endpoint analysis and safety analysis were performed on the data from a modified intention-to-treat population.

Results

Between 1 January 2013 and 28 February 2016, 617 patients were randomised (312 to the terlipressin group, 305 to the NE group). The modified intention-to-treat population comprised 526 (85.3%) patients (260 in the terlipressin group and 266 in the NE group). There was no significant difference in 28-day mortality rate between the terlipressin group (40%) and the NE group (38%) (odds ratio 0.93 [95% CI 0.55–1.56]; p = 0.80). Change in SOFA score on day 7 was similar between the two groups: − 7 (IQR − 11 to 3) in the terlipressin group and − 6 (IQR − 10 to 5) in the NE group. There was no difference between the groups in the number of days alive and free of vasopressors. Overall, serious adverse events were more common in the terlipressin group than in the NE group (30% vs 12%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial, we observed no difference in mortality between terlipressin and NE infusion in patients with septic shock. Patients in the terlipressin group had a higher number of serious adverse events.

Trial registration

This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: ID NCT01697410.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B (2003) Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Réa network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:165–172CrossRef Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B (2003) Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Réa network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 168:165–172CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344CrossRef Vincent JL, Sakr Y, Sprung CL (2006) Sepsis in European intensive care units: results of the SOAP study. Crit Care Med 34:344CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801–810CrossRef Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315:801–810CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W et al (2017) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43:304–377CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Mullner M, Urbanek B, Havel C, Losert H et al (2004) Vasopressors for shock. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 3:CD3709 Mullner M, Urbanek B, Havel C, Losert H et al (2004) Vasopressors for shock. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev 3:CD3709
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J et al (2008) Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 358:877–887CrossRef Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J et al (2008) Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 358:877–887CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2016) Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:509–518CrossRef Gordon AC, Mason AJ, Thirunavukkarasu N et al (2016) Effect of early vasopressin vs norepinephrine on kidney failure in patients with septic shock: the VANISH randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:509–518CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lange Matthias, Ertmer Christian, Westphal Martin (2009) Vasopressin vs. terlipressin in the treatment of cardiovascular failure in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 34:821–832CrossRef Lange Matthias, Ertmer Christian, Westphal Martin (2009) Vasopressin vs. terlipressin in the treatment of cardiovascular failure in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 34:821–832CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Torgersen C, Dunser MW, Wenzel V et al (2010) Comparing two different arginine vasopressin doses in advanced vasodilatory shock: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Intensive Care Med 36:57CrossRef Torgersen C, Dunser MW, Wenzel V et al (2010) Comparing two different arginine vasopressin doses in advanced vasodilatory shock: a randomized, controlled, open-label trial. Intensive Care Med 36:57CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Salazar M, Hu BB, Vazquez J et al (2015) Exogenous vasopressin-induced hyponatremia in patients with vasodilatory shock: two case reports and literature review. J Intensive Care Med 30:253CrossRef Salazar M, Hu BB, Vazquez J et al (2015) Exogenous vasopressin-induced hyponatremia in patients with vasodilatory shock: two case reports and literature review. J Intensive Care Med 30:253CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Leone M, Albanèse J, Delmas A et al (2004) Terlipressin in catecholamine-resistant septic shock patients. Shock 22:314–319CrossRef Leone M, Albanèse J, Delmas A et al (2004) Terlipressin in catecholamine-resistant septic shock patients. Shock 22:314–319CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli A, Ertmer C, Rehberg S et al (2009) Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study. Crit care 13:R130CrossRef Morelli A, Ertmer C, Rehberg S et al (2009) Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study. Crit care 13:R130CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sepra N, Nassar Junior AP, Cardoso SO et al (2012) Vasopressin and terlipressin in adult vasodilatory shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 16:R154CrossRef Sepra N, Nassar Junior AP, Cardoso SO et al (2012) Vasopressin and terlipressin in adult vasodilatory shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials. Crit Care 16:R154CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Polito Angelo, Parisini Emilio, Ricci Zaccaria et al (2012) Vasopressin for treatment of vasodilatory shock: an ESICM systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 38:9–19CrossRef Polito Angelo, Parisini Emilio, Ricci Zaccaria et al (2012) Vasopressin for treatment of vasodilatory shock: an ESICM systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 38:9–19CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup (2013) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228CrossRef Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup (2013) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Intensive Care Med 39:165–228CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gordon Lan KK, Demets DL (1983) Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 70:659–663CrossRef Gordon Lan KK, Demets DL (1983) Discrete sequential boundaries for clinical trials. Biometrika 70:659–663CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G et al (2002) Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 325:652–654CrossRef Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G et al (2002) Post-randomisation exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 325:652–654CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat SepNet Critical Care Trials Group (2016) Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study. Intensive Care Med 42:1980–1989CrossRef SepNet Critical Care Trials Group (2016) Incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock in German intensive care units: the prospective, multicentre INSEP study. Intensive Care Med 42:1980–1989CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F et al (1998) Working Group on “Sepsis-Related Problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 26:1793–1800CrossRef Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F et al (1998) Working Group on “Sepsis-Related Problems” of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Crit Care Med 26:1793–1800CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL et al (2005) Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 33:2194–2201CrossRef Levy MM, Macias WL, Vincent JL et al (2005) Early changes in organ function predict eventual survival in severe sepsis. Crit Care Med 33:2194–2201CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL (2001) Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 286:1754–1758CrossRef Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent JL (2001) Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA 286:1754–1758CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Lange M, Ertmer C, Rehberg S et al (2011) Effects of two different dosing regimens of terlipressin on organ functions in ovine endotoxemia. Inflamm Res 60:429–437CrossRef Lange M, Ertmer C, Rehberg S et al (2011) Effects of two different dosing regimens of terlipressin on organ functions in ovine endotoxemia. Inflamm Res 60:429–437CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli Andrea, Rocco Monica, Conti Giorgio et al (2004) Effects of terlipressin on systemic and regional haemodynamics in catecholamine-treated hyperkinetic septic shock. Intensive Care Med 30:597–604CrossRef Morelli Andrea, Rocco Monica, Conti Giorgio et al (2004) Effects of terlipressin on systemic and regional haemodynamics in catecholamine-treated hyperkinetic septic shock. Intensive Care Med 30:597–604CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rehberg Sebastian, Ertmer Christian, Köhler Gabriele et al (2009) Role of arginine vasopressin and terlipressin as first-line vasopressor agents in fulminant ovine septic shock. Intensive Care Med 35:1286–1296CrossRef Rehberg Sebastian, Ertmer Christian, Köhler Gabriele et al (2009) Role of arginine vasopressin and terlipressin as first-line vasopressor agents in fulminant ovine septic shock. Intensive Care Med 35:1286–1296CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell JA, Vincent JL, Kjølbye AL et al (2017) Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V1A agonist, is an effective substitute for norepinephrine in a phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled trial in septic shock patients. Crit Care 21:213CrossRef Russell JA, Vincent JL, Kjølbye AL et al (2017) Selepressin, a novel selective vasopressin V1A agonist, is an effective substitute for norepinephrine in a phase IIa randomized, placebo-controlled trial in septic shock patients. Crit Care 21:213CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ozel Coskun BD, Karaman A, Gorkem H et al (2014) Terlipressin-induced ischemic skin necrosis: a rare association. Am J Case Rep 15:476–479CrossRef Ozel Coskun BD, Karaman A, Gorkem H et al (2014) Terlipressin-induced ischemic skin necrosis: a rare association. Am J Case Rep 15:476–479CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Albanèse J, Leone M, Delmas A, Martin C (2005) Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med 33:1897–1902CrossRef Albanèse J, Leone M, Delmas A, Martin C (2005) Terlipressin or norepinephrine in hyperdynamic septic shock: a prospective, randomized study. Crit Care Med 33:1897–1902CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Xiao X, Zhang J, Wang Y et al (2016) Effects of terlipressin on patients with sepsis via improving tissue blood flow. J Surg Res 200:274–282CrossRef Xiao X, Zhang J, Wang Y et al (2016) Effects of terlipressin on patients with sepsis via improving tissue blood flow. J Surg Res 200:274–282CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Terlipressin versus norepinephrine as infusion in patients with septic shock: a multicentre, randomised, double-blinded trial
verfasst von
Zi-Meng Liu
Juan Chen
Qiuye Kou
Qinhan Lin
Xiaobo Huang
Zhanhong Tang
Yan Kang
Ke Li
Lixin Zhou
Qing Song
Tongwen Sun
Ling Zhao
Xue Wang
Xiandi He
Chunting Wang
Benquan Wu
Jiandong Lin
Shiying Yuan
Qin Gu
Kejian Qian
Xianqing Shi
Yongwen Feng
Aihua Lin
Xiaoshun He
Xiang-Dong Guan
Study Group of investigators
Publikationsdatum
03.07.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Intensive Care Medicine / Ausgabe 11/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5267-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2018

Intensive Care Medicine 11/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.