Introduction
Methods
Study design
Item no | Recommendation | |
---|---|---|
Title and abstract | 1 | (a) Indicate the study’s design with a commonly used term in the title or the abstract The abstract describes the study design as “an observational, prospective study” |
(b) Provide in the abstract an informative and balanced summary of what was done and what was found The abstract describes the methods and findings | ||
Introduction | ||
Background/rationale | 2 | Explain the scientific background and rationale for the investigation being reported The background and rationale are described in the Introduction, pages 3 & 4 |
Objectives | 3 | State specific objectives, including any prespecified hypotheses The specific aims of the study are stated in the last 2 paragraphs of the Introduction, page 4 |
Methods | ||
Study design | 4 | Present key elements of study design early in the paper The study design is discussed in the Introduction and in the “Study design and treatment” paragraph of the Methods section |
Setting | 5 | Describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection The institutional setting, study locations are described and study timing is discussed in the “Study design and treatment” paragraph of the Methods section |
Participants | 6 | (a) Give the eligibility criteria, and the sources and methods of selection of participants. Describe methods of follow-up Selection of the sample is discussed in the “Study design and treatment” paragraph of the Methods section |
(b) For matched studies, give matching criteria and number of exposed and unexposed N/A | ||
Variables | 7 | Clearly define all outcomes, exposures, predictors, potential confounders, and effect modifiers. Give diagnostic criteria, if applicable Outcomes, exposures, predictors etc. are discussed in the “Clinical parameters”, “Biochemical, metabolic and histological analyses”, “Isolation, characterization and differentiation of human visceral fat preadipocytes”, “Glucose uptake”, “RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR analysis”, “Fluorescence microscopy”, “Oxygen consumption analysis” and “Statistical analysis” paragraphs of the Methods section. The primary outcome of the clinical study was to evaluate the effect of TTh (Testosterone Therapy) on LUTS (Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) in severely obese men with moderate to severe urinary symptoms, as evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) questionnaire; however, this and other secondary clinical outcomes are not reported in the manuscript and will be described in future publications. The outcomes reported in the present manuscript were changes over time between and within HYPO and HYPO + TTh groups in insulin sensitivity, adipogenic potential and mitochondrial function of preadipocytes (hPADs) isolated from adipose tissue biopsies and in the severity of NAFLD evaluated by triglycerides assay and liver biopsies histology |
Data sources/measurement | 8* | For each variable of interest, give sources of data and details of methods of assessment (measurement). Describe comparability of assessment methods if there is more than one group Measurement of the outcomes are discussed in the “Clinical parameters”, “Biochemical, metabolic and histological analyses”, “Isolation, characterization and differentiation of human visceral fat preadipocytes”, “Glucose uptake”, “RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR analysis”, “Fluorescence microscopy”, “Oxygen consumption analysis” and “Statistical analysis” paragraphs of the Methods section |
Bias | 9 | Describe any efforts to address potential sources of bias The presence of a possible selection bias is reported in the Limitations |
Study size | 10 | Explain how the study size was arrived at Sample determination is reported in the “Study design and treatment” paragraph of the Methods section. Sample size calculation was based on the difference in means for the primary outcome (change in IPSS total score) among 3 independent groups. For a two-sided paired Student’s t-test, with α and power equal to 5% and 90%, the enrollment of 30 patients per group was required to detect a minimum clinically significant difference between the changes of IPSS score measured at baseline and at follow-up |
Quantitative variables | 11 | Explain how quantitative variables were handled in the analyses. If applicable, describe which groupings were chosen and why Use of variables is discussed in the “Statistical analysis” subsection |
Statistical methods | 12 | (a) Describe all statistical methods, including those used to control for confounding |
(b) Describe any methods used to examine subgroups and interactions | ||
(c) Explain how missing data were addressed | ||
(d) If applicable, explain how loss to follow-up was addressed | ||
(e) Describe any sensitivity analyses Statistical methods are discussed in the “Statistical analysis” subsection | ||
Results | ||
Participants | 13* | (a) Report numbers of individuals at each stage of study—eg numbers potentially eligible, examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analyzed |
(b) Give reasons for non-participation at each stage | ||
(c) Consider use of a flow diagram Numbers examined for eligibility, confirmed eligible, included in the study, completing follow-up, and analyzed are reported in the “Study design and treatment” subsection | ||
Descriptive data | 14* | (a) Give characteristics of study participants (eg demographic, clinical, social) and information on exposures and potential confounders |
(b) Indicate number of participants with missing data for each variable of interest | ||
(c) Summarize follow-up time (eg, average and total amount) Characteristics of study participants are reported in the “Characteristics of subjects undergoing bariatric surgery” subsection and in Table 2. Follow-up time is reported in the “Study design and treatment” subsection. There were no missing data for the outcomes considered in this manuscript | ||
Outcome data | 15* | Report numbers of outcome events or summary measures over time Measures are reported throughout the Results Section |
Main results | 16 | (a) Give unadjusted estimates and, if applicable, confounder-adjusted estimates and their precision (eg, 95% confidence interval). Make clear which confounders were adjusted for and why they were included |
(b) Report category boundaries when continuous variables were categorized N/A | ||
(c) If relevant, consider translating estimates of relative risk into absolute risk for a meaningful time period N/A | ||
Other analyses | 17 | Report other analyses done—eg analyses of subgroups and interactions, and sensitivity analyses N/A |
Discussion | ||
Key results | 18 | Summarize key results with reference to study objectives Results are summarized in the Discussion section, page 17 |
Limitations | 19 | Discuss limitations of the study, taking into account sources of potential bias or imprecision. Discuss both direction and magnitude of any potential bias Limitations are discussed in the second-to-last paragraphs of the Discussion section (pages 21–22) |
Interpretation | 20 | Give a cautious overall interpretation of results considering objectives, limitations, multiplicity of analyses, results from similar studies, and other relevant evidence See final paragraph of the Discussion section |
Generalisability | 21 | Discuss the generalisability (external validity) of the study results See limitations in the second-to-last paragraphs of the Discussion section (pages 21–22) |
Other information | ||
Funding | 22 | Give the source of funding and the role of the funders for the present study and, if applicable, for the original study on which the present article is based Funding is reported in the Title Page. The original study on which the present article is based is registered and described in the U.S. National Library of Medicine Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02248467) |
Patient recruitment
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Interventions
Follow-up
Clinical parameters
Biochemical, metabolic and histological analyses
Isolation, characterization and differentiation of human visceral fat preadipocytes
RNA extraction and quantitative RT-PCR analysis
Glucose uptake
Fluorescence microscopy
Oxygen consumption analysis
Statistical analysis
Results
Characteristics of subjects undergoing bariatric surgery at baseline and at surgery
Eugonadal (n = 17) | Hypogonadal (n = 46) | Hypogonadal + TTh (n = 15) | |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 44.5 ± 3.1 | 44.7 ± 1.4 | 50.1 ± 2.8 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 42.4 ± 1.8 | 47.2 ± 1.3 | 42.5 ± 1.2 |
WC (cm) | 133.7 ± 4.0 | 146.1 ± 2.4 | 131.7 ± 2.8 |
Systolic BP (mmHg) | 126.1 ± 3.5 | 133.5 ± 2.7 | 131.7 ± 2.8 |
Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 77.3 ± 2.2 | 83.6 ± 1.7 | 83.0 ± 2.3 |
Use of on demand PDE5i % (n) | (0) | (0) | (2) |
Use of glucose-lowering drugs % (n) | 23.5 (4) | 26.1 (12) | 20.0 (3) |
Metformin % (n) | (4) | (12) | (3) |
Repaglinide % (n) | (0) | (2) | (1) |
GLP-1 analogs % (n) | (1) | (0) | (2) |
DPPIV inhibitors % (n) | (0) | (2) | (1) |
Insulin % (n) | (0) | (2) | (0) |
Use of lipid-lowering drugs (%) | 5.9 (1) | 13.0 (6) | 20.0 (3) |
Statin (%) | (1) | (4) | (3) |
Fibrates (%) | (0) | (2) | (0) |
Omega-3 fatty acids (%) | (0) | (1) | (0) |
Ezetimibe (%) | (0) | (1) | (0) |
Total testosterone (nmol/l) | 15.7 ± 0.9 | 7.6 ± 0.4* | 7.4 ± 0.5* |
SHBG (nmol/l) | 38.2 [34.6–46.9] | 25.0 [14.6–34.9]° | 32.3 [18.6–34.5]° |
cfT (pmol/l) | 311.2 ± 14.1 | 157.1 ± 6.4* | 153.0 ± 9.4* |
LH (U/l) | 5.6 [3.4–6.7] | 3.8 [2.7–5.4] | 3.2 [1.8–5.1] |
17β estradiol (pmol/l) | 153.5 [104.2–180.0] | 130.0 [95.0–150.0] | 101.0 [85.0–140.0] |
Hematocrit (%) | 44.5 ± 1.3 | 45.1 ± 0.5 | 44.5 ± 1.2 |
PSA (ng/dl) | 0.5 [0.3–0.7] | 0.5 [0.3–0.9] | 0.5 [0.4–1.3] |
Glycaemia (g/l) | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.1 |
HbA1c (mmol/mol) | 40.2 ± 2.2 | 45.4 ± 2.6 | 46.3 ± 3.7 |
Triglycerides (mg/dl) | 97.0 [74.0–188.0] | 145.0 [110.0–205.5] | 152.0 [105.0–236.0] |
Total cholesterol (mg/dl) | 187.6 ± 9.8 | 208.3 ± 8.3 | 199.4 ± 10.7 |
HDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 44.1 ± 2.4 | 42.6 ± 1.7 | 39.0 ± 1.5 |
LDL cholesterol (mg/dl) | 115.0 ± 5.7 | 133.5 ± 7.1 | 118.9 ± 9.6 |
T2DM % (n) | (4) | (9) | (3) |
Hypertension % (n) | (7) | (20) | (9) |
Cardiovascular diseases % (n) | (4) | (4) | (2) |
MetS % (n) | 61.5 (8) | 87.5 (35) | 80 (12) |
AMS total score | 30.5 [26.0–34.5] | 32.5 [25.5–39.5] | 32.0 [26.0–40.0] |
AMS sexual symptoms score | 6.5 [5.0–13.2] | 7.0 [5.0–10.5] | 12.0 [11.0–15.0]* |
IPSS total score | 10 [8–25] | 8 [8–24] | 10 [8–16] |
Biochemical characteristics of hypogonadal men and their change over time according to TTh
Variable | Treatment | Baseline | V1 | V1 vs. baseline within group (p) |
---|---|---|---|---|
BMI (kg/m2) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 46.6 [43.7–49.3] 46.1 [41.6–50.7] | 47.6 [44.6–50.6] 45.5 [41.0–50.0] | 0.619 0.848 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.665 | ||||
Fasting glucose (mg/dL) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 119.8 [106.6–133.0] 123.3 [104.1–142.3] | 138.6 [124.9–152.4] 122.8 [100.2–145.4] | 0.050 0.979 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.275 | ||||
Insulin (mU/L) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 39.2 [31.1–47.2] 36.0 [24.1–48.0] | 16.6 [8.2–25.1] 21.3 [6.0–36.6] | < 0.0001 0.130 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.494 | ||||
Total cholesterol (mg/dL) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 201.8 [191.7–211.8] 204.5 [189.4–219.6] | 201.1 [190.7–211.5] 177.8 [159.9–195.6] * | 0.927 0.022 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.059 | ||||
HDL cholesterol (mg/dL) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 41.0 [38.7–43.2] 41.2 [37.8–44.6] | 38.7 [36.3–41.0] 34.6 [30.6–38.6] | 0.154 0.011 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.165 | ||||
Triglycerides (mg/dL) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 153.5 [133.9–176.0] 143.3 [116.7–175.9] | 197.3 [171.2–227.3] 160.9 [126.1–205.4] | 0.010 0.456 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.464 | ||||
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST; U/L) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 28.4 [20.6–36.2] 31.1 [19.6–42.5] | 45.3 [37.4–53.2] 38.7 [24.7–52.7] | 0.002 0.386 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.373 | ||||
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT; U/L) | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 45.0 [35.2–54.9] 50.6 [36.1–65.0] | 67.9 [57.8–77.9] 50.0 [32.4–67.7] | 0.001 0.960 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.076 | ||||
Fatty Liver Index | HYPO HYPO + TTh | 99.1 [98.8–99.4] 99.2 [98.8–99.7] | 99.1 [98.8–99.3] 98.4 [97.9–98.8] * | 0.797 0.001 |
Interaction time × treatment p = 0.007 |
Correlations between liver biopsies scores, TTh and cFT levels and liver triglycerides levels at time of surgery
Treatment with testosterone enhances the expression of genes involved in lipid metabolism and insulin signaling in liver tissue
AR mRNA expression | r | p |
---|---|---|
Lipid metabolism-related genes | ||
ACAT1 | 0.812 | 0.000 |
ACC1 | 0.271 | 0.043 |
ACLY1 | 0.674 | 0.000 |
ChREBP | − 0.291 | 0.030 |
CPT1 | 0.028 | 0.837 |
ELOVL6 | 0.138 | 0.309 |
FAS | 0.440 | 0.001 |
HMGCR | 0.656 | 0.000 |
HMGCS | 0.643 | 0.000 |
LXR | 0.742 | 0.000 |
PPARα | 0.792 | 0.000 |
PPARδ | 0.722 | 0.000 |
PPARγ | 0.660 | 0.000 |
SCD1 | 0.612 | 0.000 |
SREBF1 | 0.589 | 0.000 |
SREBF2 | 0.692 | 0.000 |
Lipid handling-related genes | ||
PLIN | 0.398 | 0.002 |
SNAP23 | 0.673 | 0.000 |
STX5 | 0.708 | 0.000 |
VAMP4 | 0.350 | 0.009 |
Glycogen synthesis-related genes | ||
GCK | 0.145 | 0.338 |
GYS2 | 0.420 | 0.003 |
PGM1 | 0.637 | 0.000 |
Glucose Transport- and Insulin signaling-related genes | ||
GLUT2 | 0.611 | 0.000 |
GLUT4 | 0.660 | 0.000 |
IRS1 | 0.522 | 0.000 |
STAMP2 | 0.288 | 0.035 |