Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2019

03.07.2019

“That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams

verfasst von: Benjamin Chesluk, PhD, Bradley Gray, PhD, Aimee Eden, PhD, Elizabeth Hansen, BS, Lorna Lynn, MD, Lars Peterson, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

A key component of Maintenance of Certification (MOC) for family and internal medicine physicians is the requirement to pass a periodic examination of medical knowledge. Little is known about the effects of preparing for MOC exams on knowledge and practice.

Objective

To understand how MOC exam preparation can affect knowledge and practice.

Design

Qualitative, semi-structured interviews, 45–60 min each, conducted by telephone at participants’ convenience.

Participants

A total of 80 primary care physicians from the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) and the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) who had recently taken an MOC exam; the sample purposefully selected to represent diversity of experiences with MOC exams and range of opinions about MOC, as well as diversity of participant backgrounds—gender, practice type, etc.

Approach

Close analysis of physicians’ accounts of what they learned when preparing for an MOC exam and how this knowledge affected their practice.

Results

Sixty-seven of 80 physicians stated they gained knowledge relevant to their practice. Sixty-three gave concrete examples of how this affected their practice, including direct changes to patient care (e.g., improved diagnosis or prescribing and reduced unnecessary testing) or less direct changes (e.g., improved ability to co-manage with other providers or communicate with patients). Physicians also described sharing what they learned with others, including peers and trainees.

Limitations

Interviews could have been affected by recall and/or social desirability bias, as well as researchers’ role as board staff. Although we followed a recruitment protocol designed to mitigate recruitment acceptance bias, our findings may not be generalizable to wider groups of physicians.

Conclusions

Most physicians from two primary care specialties interviewed reported ways in which studying for an MOC exam resulted in acquiring knowledge that was both relevant and beneficial to their patient care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Cassel CK, Holmboe ES. Professionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:295–304.PubMedPubMedCentral Cassel CK, Holmboe ES. Professionalism and accountability: the role of specialty board certification. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2008;119:295–304.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013(S1):20–35. Lipner RS, Hess BJ, Phillips RL. Specialty board certification in the United States: issues and evidence. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013(S1):20–35.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray BM, Vandergrift JL, Johnston MM, et al. Association between imposition of a Maintenance of Certification requirement and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations and health care costs. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2348–2357.CrossRefPubMed Gray BM, Vandergrift JL, Johnston MM, et al. Association between imposition of a Maintenance of Certification requirement and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations and health care costs. JAMA. 2014;312(22):2348–2357.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray B, Vandergrift J, Lipner R. Association between the American Board of Internal Medicine’s general internist’s Maintenance of Certification requirement and mammography screening for Medicare beneficiaries. Women's Health Issues. 2018;28(1):35–41.CrossRefPubMed Gray B, Vandergrift J, Lipner R. Association between the American Board of Internal Medicine’s general internist’s Maintenance of Certification requirement and mammography screening for Medicare beneficiaries. Women's Health Issues. 2018;28(1):35–41.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gray B, Vandergrift J, Landon B, Reschovsky J, Lipner R. Associations between American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification status and performance on a set of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set process measures. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(2):97–105.CrossRefPubMed Gray B, Vandergrift J, Landon B, Reschovsky J, Lipner R. Associations between American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification status and performance on a set of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set process measures. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(2):97–105.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Holmboe ES, Lynn L, Duffy FD. Improving the quality of care via Maintenance of Certification and the web: an early status report. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(1):71–83.CrossRefPubMed Holmboe ES, Lynn L, Duffy FD. Improving the quality of care via Maintenance of Certification and the web: an early status report. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(1):71–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonald F, Duhigg L, Arnold G, Hafer R, Lipner R. The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification examination and state medical board disciplinary actions: a population cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(8):1292–1298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McDonald F, Duhigg L, Arnold G, Hafer R, Lipner R. The American Board of Internal Medicine Maintenance of Certification examination and state medical board disciplinary actions: a population cohort study. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(8):1292–1298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Petterson S, McNellis R, Klink K, Meyers D, Bazemore A. The state of primary care in the United States: a chartbook of facts and statistics. Washington, DC: Robert Graham Center; 2018. Petterson S, McNellis R, Klink K, Meyers D, Bazemore A. The state of primary care in the United States: a chartbook of facts and statistics. Washington, DC: Robert Graham Center; 2018.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11(3):Art. 8. Mason M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res. 2010;11(3):Art. 8.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–436.CrossRef Glaser BG. The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Soc Probl. 1965;12(4):436–436.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chesluk B, Eden A, Hansen E, et al. How physicians prepare for Maintenance of Certification exams: a qualitative study. Acad Med. In Press. Chesluk B, Eden A, Hansen E, et al. How physicians prepare for Maintenance of Certification exams: a qualitative study. Acad Med. In Press.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Roediger HL 3rd, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1(3):181–210.CrossRefPubMed Roediger HL 3rd, Karpicke JD. The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006;1(3):181–210.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):249–255.CrossRefPubMed Roediger HL, Karpicke JD. Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol Sci. 2006;17(3):249–255.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
“That Was Pretty Powerful”: a Qualitative Study of What Physicians Learn When Preparing for Their Maintenance-of-Certification Exams
verfasst von
Benjamin Chesluk, PhD
Bradley Gray, PhD
Aimee Eden, PhD
Elizabeth Hansen, BS
Lorna Lynn, MD
Lars Peterson, MD
Publikationsdatum
03.07.2019
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2019
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05118-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2019

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.