Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Journal of Robotic Surgery
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020

04.04.2019 | Original Article

The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis

verfasst von: Tara M. Connelly, Zoya Malik, Rishabh Sehgal, Gerrard Byrnes, J. Calvin Coffey, Colin Peirce

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Since the first robotic assisted surgery in 1985, the number of procedures performed annually has steadily increased. Bibliometric analysis highlights the key studies that have influenced current practice in a field of interest. We use bibliometric analysis to evaluate the 100 most cited manuscripts on robotic surgery and discuss their content and influence on the evolution of the platform. The terms ‘robotic surgery,’ ‘robot assisted surgery’ and ‘robot-assisted surgery’ were used to search Thomson Reuters Web of Science database for full length, English language manuscripts. The top 100 cited manuscripts were analyzed by manuscript type, surgical specialty, first and last author, institution, year and journal of publication. 14,980 manuscripts were returned. Within the top 100 cited manuscripts, the majority featured urological surgery (n = 28), followed by combined results from multiple surgical subspecialties (n = 15) and colorectal surgery (n = 13). The majority of manuscripts featured case series/reports (n = 42), followed by comparative studies (n = 24). The most cited paper authored by Nelson et al. (432 citations) reviewed technological advances in the field. The year and country with the greatest number of publications were 2009 (n = 15) and the USA (n = 68). The Johns Hopkins University published the most top 100 manuscripts (n = 18). The 100 most cited manuscripts reflect the progression of robotic surgery from a basic instrument-holding platform to today’s articulated instruments with 3D technology. From feasibility studies to multicenter trials, this analysis demonstrates how robotic assisted surgery has gained acceptance in urological, colorectal, general, cardiothoracic, orthopedic, maxillofacial and neuro surgery.
Literatur
1.
Alemzadeh H, Raman J, Leveson N, Kalbarczyk Z, Iyer RK (2016) Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA data. PLoS One 11:e0151470PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
2.
Pugin F, Bucher P, Morel P (2011) History of robotic surgery: from AESOP(R) and ZEUS(R) to da Vinci(R). J Visc Surg 148:e3–e8PubMedCrossRef
3.
4.
Ballantyne GH (2002) Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring—review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 16:1389–1402CrossRef
5.
Loonen MP, Hage JJ, Kon M (2008) Plastic surgery classics: characteristics of 50 top-cited articles in four plastic surgery journals since 1946. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:320e–327ePubMedCrossRef
6.
Dubin D, Hafner AW, Arndt KA (1993) Citation classics in clinical dermatologic journals. Citation analysis, biomedical journals, and landmark articles, 1945–1990. Arch Dermatol 129:1121–1129PubMedCrossRef
7.
Paladugu R, Schein M, Gardezi S, Wise L (2002) One hundred citation classics in general surgical journals. World J Surg 26:1099–1105PubMedCrossRef
8.
Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP (2010) The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1338–1343PubMedCrossRef
9.
Joyce CW, Kelly JC, Sugrue C (2014) A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential papers in burns. Burns 40:30–37PubMedCrossRef
10.
Kavanagh RG, Kelly JC, Kelly PM, Moore DP (2013) The 100 classic papers of pediatric orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 95:e134 (American volume) PubMedCrossRef
11.
Taylor RH, Stoianovici D (2003) Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19:765–781CrossRef
12.
Drake JM, Joy M, Goldenberg A, Kreindler D (1991) Computer- and robot-assisted resection of thalamic astrocytomas in children. Neurosurgery 29:27–33PubMedCrossRef
13.
Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261:619–629PubMed
14.
Taylor RH, Paul HA, Hanson W et al (1994) An image-directed robotic system for precise orthopaedic surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 10:261–275CrossRef
15.
Sung GT, Gill IS (2001) Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems. Urology 58:893–898PubMedCrossRef
16.
Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC et al (2012) Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 62:368–381PubMedCrossRef
17.
Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R et al (2012) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 62:1023–1033PubMedCrossRef
18.
Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA (2012) Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62:1–15PubMedCrossRef
19.
Nifong LW, Chitwood WR, Pappas PS et al (2005) Robotic mitral valve surgery: a United States multicenter trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:1395–1404PubMedCrossRef
20.
Pigazzi A, Luca F, Patriti A et al (2010) Multicentric study on robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 17:1614–1620PubMedCrossRef
21.
Collinson FJ, Jayne DG, Pigazzi A et al (2012) An international, multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, unblinded, parallel-group trial of robotic-assisted versus standard laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:233–241PubMedCrossRef
22.
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Magnuson JS et al (2012) Transoral robotic surgery: a multicenter study to assess feasibility, safety, and surgical margins. Laryngoscope 122:1701–1707PubMedCrossRef
23.
Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB et al (1995) Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J Urol 154:2134–2136PubMedCrossRef
24.
Lenihan J, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:589–594PubMedCrossRef
25.
Bokhari MB, Patel CB, Ramos-Valadez DI et al (2011) Learning curve for roboticassisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 25:855–860PubMedCrossRef
26.
Seglen PO (1997) Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality. Allergy 52:1050–1056PubMedCrossRef
27.
Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M et al (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138:777–784PubMedCrossRef
28.
Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M et al (2003) A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int 92:205–210PubMedCrossRef
29.
Menon M, Shrivastava A, Sarle R et al (2003) Vattikuti Institute Prostatectomy: a single-team experience of 100 cases. J Endourol 17:785–790PubMedCrossRef
30.
O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W et al (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116:1465–1472PubMedCrossRef
31.
Benway BM, Bhayani SB, Rogers CG et al (2009) Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes. J Urol 182:866–872PubMedCrossRef
32.
Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al (2003) Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 92:232–236PubMedCrossRef
33.
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Snyder W et al (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: radical tonsillectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 133:1220–1226CrossRefPubMed
34.
DiGioia AM, Jaramaz B, Colgan BD (1998) Computer assisted orthopaedic surgery—image guided and robotic assistive technologies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:8–16CrossRef
35.
Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M (2007) Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer 110:1951–1958PubMedCrossRef
36.
Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G et al (2007) Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur Urol 51:45–55PubMedCrossRef
37.
Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al (2001) Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 25:1467–1477PubMedCrossRef
38.
Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R et al (2010) Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 57:196–201PubMedCrossRef
39.
Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d’Attellis N et al (1999) Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:4–10PubMedCrossRef
40.
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64:914–918PubMedCrossRef
41.
Taylor R, Jensen P, Whitcomb L et al (1999) A steady-hand robotic system for microsurgical augmentation. Int J Robot Res 18:1201–1210CrossRef
42.
Baik SH, Kwon HY, Kim JS et al (2009) Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study. Ann Surg Oncol 16:1480–1487PubMedCrossRef
43.
Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A et al (2001) Computer-enhanced ‘robotic’ cardiac cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121:842–853PubMedCrossRef
44.
Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN et al (2013) Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologicdisease. JAMA 309:689–698PubMedCrossRef
45.
Kang SW, Lee SC, Lee SH et al (2009) Robotic thyroid surgery using a gasless, transaxillary approach and the da Vinci S system: the operative outcomes of 338 consecutive patients. Surgery 146:1048–1055PubMedCrossRef
46.
Sackier JM and WangY (1994) Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery. From concept to development. Surg Endosc. 1994 Jan;8(1):63-6PubMedCrossRef
47.
48.
D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168PubMedCrossRef
49.
Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL et al (2008) Robotic radical hysteretomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol 109:86–91PubMedCrossRef
50.
Nguyen PL, Gu X, Lipsitz SR et al (2011) Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1517–1524PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Snyder W et al (2007) Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 116:19–23PubMedCrossRef
52.
Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy prostatectomy with a remote controlled robot. J Urol 165:1964–1966PubMedCrossRef
53.
Lee RS, Retik AB, Borer JG et al (2006) Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol 175:683–687PubMedCrossRef
54.
Weber PA, Merola S, Wasielewski A et al (2002) Telerobotic-assisted laparoscopic right and sigmoid colectomies for benign disease. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1689–1694PubMedCrossRef
55.
Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM et al (2010) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc 24:1646–1657PubMedCrossRef
56.
Benway BM, Wang AJ, Cabello JM et al (2009) Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes. Eur Urol 55:592–599PubMedCrossRef
57.
Okamura AM (2004) Methods for haptic feedback in teleoperated robot-assisted surgery. Ind Robot 31:499–508CrossRef
58.
Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1633–1639PubMedCrossRef
59.
Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A et al (2011) Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118:1005–1013PubMedCrossRef
60.
Kang SW, Jeong JJ, Yun JS et al (2009) Robot-assisted endoscopic surgery for thyroid cancer: experience with the first 100 patients. Surg Endosc 2:2399–2406CrossRef
61.
Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP et al (2009) Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report. BJU Int 103:366–369PubMedCrossRef
62.
63.
Talamini MA, Chapman S, Horgan S et al (2003) A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 17:1521–1524CrossRefPubMed
64.
Pigazzi A, Ellenhorn JD, Ballantyne GH et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 20:1521–1525PubMedCrossRef
65.
Moore EJ, Olsen KD, Kasperbauer JL (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of feasiblity and functional outcomes. Laryngoscope 119:2156–2164PubMedCrossRef
66.
Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T et al (2000) Total endoscopic computer enhanced coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 17:38–45PubMedCrossRef
67.
Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al (2009) Radical prostectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubicand robotassisted techniques. BJU Int 103:448–453PubMedCrossRef
68.
Song J, Oh SJ, Kang WH et al (2009) Robot- assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an intial 100 consecutive procedures. Ann Surg 249:927–932PubMedCrossRef
69.
Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262PubMedCrossRef
70.
Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M et al (2011) “Zero ischemia” partial nephrectomy: novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 59:128–134PubMedCrossRef
71.
Peirs J, Clijnen J, Reynaerts D et al (2004) A micro optical force sensor for force feedback during minimally invasive robotic surgery. Sens Actuators A 115:447–455CrossRef
72.
Seamon LG, Cohn DE, Henretta MS et al (2009) Miniamally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: robotics or laparoscopy? Gynecol Oncol 113:36–41PubMedCrossRef
73.
Tholey G, Desai JP, Castellanos AE (2005) Force feedback plays a significant role in minimally invasive surgery: results and analysis. Ann Surg 241:102–109PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
74.
Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM et al (2008) Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 112:1201–1206PubMedCrossRef
75.
Horgan S, Vanuno D (2001) Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 11:415–419PubMedCrossRef
76.
Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G et al (2004) First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25:844–851PubMedCrossRef
77.
Gehrig PA, Cantrell LA, Shafer A et al (2008) What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obsese woman? Gynecol Oncol 111:41–45PubMedCrossRef
78.
Baik SH, Ko YT, Kang CM et al (2008) Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilotrandomized trial. Surg Endosc 22:1601–1608PubMedCrossRef
79.
Wang AJ, Bhayani SB (2009) Robotic partial nephretomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: single-surgeon analysis of > 100 consecutive procedures. Urology 73:306–310PubMedCrossRef
80.
Hassfeld S, Mühling J (2001) Computer assisted oral and maxillofacial surgery-a review and assessment of technology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30(1):2–13PubMedCrossRef
81.
Rogers CG, Singh A, Blatt AM et al (2008) Robotic partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: surgical technique. Eur Urol 53:514–521PubMedCrossRef
82.
Genden EM, Desai S, Sung CK (2009) Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck cancer: a preliminaryexperience. Head Neck 31:283–289PubMedCrossRef
83.
Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA et al (2007) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 51:755–762PubMedCrossRef
84.
Rassweiler J, Hruza M, Teber D et al (2006) Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy –critical analysis of the results. Eur Urol 49:612–624PubMedCrossRef
85.
Hanly EJ, Talamini MA (2004) Robotic abdominal surgery. Am J Surg 188:19S26SCrossRef
86.
87.
Mottrie A, De Naeyer G, Schatteman P et al (2010) Impact of the learning curve on perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent roboticpartial nephrectomy for parenchymal renal tumours. Eur Urol 58:127–132PubMedCrossRef
88.
Yu HY, Hevelone ND, Lipsitz SR et al (2012) Use, costs and comparative effectiveness of robotic assisted, laparoscopic and open urological surgery. J Urol 187:1392–1398PubMedCrossRef
89.
Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A et al (2005) Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 174:2291–2296PubMedCrossRef
90.
Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM et al (2005) Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129:151–158PubMedCrossRef
91.
92.
Simaan N, Xu K, Kapoor A et al (2009) Design and integration of a telerobotic telerobotic system for minimally invasive surgery of the throat. Int J Rob Res 1:1134–1153CrossRef
93.
Ballantyne GH, Moll F (2003) The da Vinci telerobotic surgical system: the virtual operative field and telepresence surgery. Surg Clin North Am 83:1293–1304CrossRefPubMed
94.
van der Meijden OA, Schijven MP (2009) The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surg Endosc 23:1180–1190PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
95.
Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW Jr, Cohen MA et al (2010) Transoral robotic surgery for advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:1079–1085PubMedCrossRef
96.
Hellan M, Anderson C, Ellenhorn JD et al (2007) Short-term outcomes after roboticassisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3168–3173PubMedCrossRef
97.
Kim JY, Kim NK, Lee KY et al (2012) A comparative study of voiding and sexual function after total mesorectal excision with autonomic nerve preservation for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus robotic surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2485–2493PubMedCrossRef
98.
Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK et al (2006) Positive surgical margins in roboticassisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol 49:866–871PubMedCrossRef
99.
Camarillo DB, Krummel TM, Salisbury JK Jr (2004) Robotic technology in surgery: past, present, and future. Am J Surg 188:2S–15SPubMedCrossRef
100.
Shoham M, Burman M, Zehavi E et al (2003) Bone-mounted miniature robot for surgical procedures: concept and clinical applications. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 19:893–901CrossRef
101.
Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D et al (2005) Advantages and limits of robotassisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience. Surg Endosc 19:117–119PubMedCrossRef
102.
Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL et al (2005) Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174(6):2323–2329PubMedCrossRef
103.
Spinoglio G, Summa M, Priora F et al (2008) Robotic colorectal surgery: first 50 cases experience. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1627–32104PubMedCrossRef
104.
Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A et al (2004) Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:790–795PubMed
105.
Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B et al (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol 40:70–74PubMedCrossRef
106.
Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G et al (2007) Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J Urol 177:929–931PubMedCrossRef
107.
Daouadi M, Zureikat AH, Zenati MS et al (2013) Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique. Ann Surg 257:128–132PubMedCrossRef
108.
Aron M, Koenig P, Kaouk JH et al (2008) Robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison from a high-volume centre. BJU Int 102:86–92PubMedCrossRef
109.
Kaul S, Laungani R, Sarle R et al (2007) da Vinci-assisted robotic partial nephrectomy: technique and results at a mean of 15 months of follow-up. Eur Urol 51:186–191PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis
verfasst von
Tara M. Connelly
Zoya Malik
Rishabh Sehgal
Gerrard Byrnes
J. Calvin Coffey
Colin Peirce
Publikationsdatum
04.04.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Original Article

Transoral robotic surgery using the Medrobotic Flex® system: the Adelaide experience

Original Article

Pre-operative factors that predict trifecta and pentafecta in robotic assisted partial nephrectomy

Original Article

Training of laparoscopic novices both individually and in dyads using a simulation task

Original Article

Eye gaze of endoscopists during simulated colonoscopy

Original Article

Perioperative safety, feasibility, and oncologic utility of transoral robotic surgery with da Vinci Xi platform

Letter to the Editor

The role of robotic-assisted surgery for the treatment of diverticular disease

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

10.04.2024 | Narbenhernie | Nachrichten

Deutlich weniger Narbenhernien mit der Small-Bites-Technik

09.04.2024 | Appendektomie | Nachrichten

Appendektomie: Vorsicht bei systemischen Glukokortikoiden!
weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs
CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.