Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2017

Open Access 01.12.2017 | Editorial

The 10th anniversary of patient safety in surgery

verfasst von: Philip F. Stahel, Wade R. Smith, Ernest E. Moore, Philip S. Mehler, Sebastian Weckbach, Fernando J. Kim, Nathan Butler, Hans-Christoph Pape, Ted J. Clarke, Martin A. Makary, Pierre-Alain Clavien

Erschienen in: Patient Safety in Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2017

This year marks the 10th anniversary of our open-access peer-reviewed journal “Patient Safety in Surgery” (PSS). In our launch editorial on November 7, 2007, we made a statement which appears to be still applicable a decade after the journal’s inception: “Despite the wide range of more than 200 official journals in the field of surgery, there is currently no single medical journal available which specializes on the issue of patient safety in surgery.” [1]. This notion reflects an apparent void in covering the pertinent topic of surgical patient safety in the scientific literature, and PSS seems to continuously represent a “niche” forefront pilot journal based on its exclusive focus dedicated to surgical patient safety. The journal’s international visibility has continuously grown in the past decade. Current statistics show a global readership of PSS in 185 countries with an average of 230,000 article accesses to the journal’s website each month (Fig. 1). This is an impressive increase compared to historical metrics of just 2000 monthly accesses at the time of the journal’s founding in 2007, and an average of 16,000 accesses per month at the 5-year anniversary mark in 2012 [2].
In the past decade, the journal published a total of 325 open-access articles, all of which are cited in PubMed, SpringerLink (https://​link.​springer.​com/​journal/​13037), and other indexing services that are listed on the journal’s website (www.​pssjournal.​com). The journal’s overall rejection rate is 20%. The prevalent countries of origin for articles submitted and published in 2017 are depicted in Fig. 2. The highest-ranking publication in the journal of all times is a review article from 2010 entitled “Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies” [3]. Until present, this particular paper alone has been accessed on the journal’s website more than 110,000 times, and was cited 80 times in other publications [3]. The top-10 most accessed and most cited articles in the journal are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively.
Table 1
Top-10 most accessed articles on the PSS website (as of Nov. 15, 2017)
Rank
Article
Publication year
Accesses (n)
1
Kirchhoff P, et al.
Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2010, 4:5
2010
114,201
2
Stahel PF, et al.
Why do surgeons continue to perform unnecessary surgery?
Patient Saf. Surg. 2017, 11:1
2017
100,785
3
Stornelli N, et al.
The dangers of lithotomy positioning in the operating room: case report of bilateral lower extremity compartment syndrome after a 90-min surgical procedure.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:18
2016
93,699
4
Subramanian V, et al.
The risk of intra-urethral Foley catheter balloon inflation in spinal cord-injured patients: Lessons learned from a retrospective case series.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:14
2016
90,381
5
Oldhafer F, et al.
Monitoring of liver function in a 73-year old patient undergoing ‘Associating Liver Partition and Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy’: case report applying the novel liver maximum function capacity test.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:16
2016
87,966
6
Ten Hagen A, et al.
Anaphylactic shock during cement implantation of a total hip arthroplasty in a patient with underlying mastocytosis: case report of a rare intraoperative complication.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:25
2016
87,958
7
Weckbach S, et al.
A survey on patients’ knowledge and expectations during informed consent for spinal surgery: can we improve the shared decision-making process?
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:15
2016
87,681
8
Almahmoud K, et al.
Trends in intubation rates and durations in ventilated severely injured trauma patients: an analysis from the TraumaRegister DGU®.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:24
2016
85,979
9
Schmitt JW, et al.
Is total hip arthroplasty safely performed in lung transplant patients? Current experience from a retrospective study of the Zurich lung transplant cohort.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:17
2016
84,986
10
Stahel PF, et al.
Introducing the “Bone-Screw-Fastener” for improved screw fixation in orthopedic surgery: a revolutionary paradigm shift?
Patient Saf. Surg. 2017, 11:6
2017
82,464
These metrics exclude access numbers through PubMed and other indexing databases
Table 2
Top-10 most cited PSS articles in other publications (as of Nov. 15, 2017)
Rank
Article
Publication year
Citations (n)
1
Kirchhoff P, et al.
Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2010, 4:5
2010
80
2
de Vries EN, et al.
The SURgical PAtient Safety System (SURPASS) checklist optimizes timing of antibiotic prophylaxis.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2010, 4:6
2010
52
3
Lynn LA, Curry JP.
Patterns of unexpected in-hospital deaths: a root cause analysis.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2011, 5:3
2011
49
4
Zegers M, et al.
The incidence, root-causes, and outcomes of adverse events in surgical units: implication for potential prevention strategies.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2011, 5:13
2011
36
5
O'Connor P, et al.
Surgical checklists: the human factor.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2013, 7:14
2013
28
6
Liu SS, et al.
Risk of postoperative hypoxemia in ambulatory orthopedic surgery patients with diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea: a retrospective observational study.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2010, 4:9
2010
21
7
Youngson GG, Flin R.
Patient safety in surgery: non-technical aspects of safe surgical performance.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2010, 4:4
2010
20
8
Unbeck M, et al.
Is detection of adverse events affected by record review methodology? An evaluation of the Harvard Medical Practice Study method and the Global Trigger Tool.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2013, 7:10
2013
18
9
Andersson AE, et al.
The application of evidence-based measures to reduce surgical site infections during orthopedic surgery - report of a single-center experience in Sweden.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2012, 6:11
2012
18
10
Robinson Y, et al.
Increased occurrence of spinal fractures related to ankylosing spondylitis: a prospective 22-year cohort study in 17,764 patients from a national registry in Sweden.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2013, 7:2
2013
17
Another important aspect related to the journal’s global visibility is reflected by the so-called “Altmetric Attention Score”. This represents an emerging tool designed to assess the public attention that scholarly articles receive through the media, news outlets, blogs, and social media. The score is influenced by the quantity of posts that mention an article and by the quality of the source of posting. Of note, Altmetric measures public attention, not scientific quality. The PSS article with the highest Altmetric Attention Score of all times was a 2017 editorial entitled “Why do surgeons continue to perform unnecessary surgery?” [4]. Impressively, the article’s score of 414 falls into the top-5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric [4]. These statistics reflect on an increased international visibility of the journal in the public media and other outlets. A list of the top-10 PSS articles ranked by Altmetric scores is depicted in Table 3.
Table 3
Top-10 Altmetric Attention Scores (as of Nov. 15, 2017)
Rank
Article
Publication year
Altmetric score
1
Stahel PF, et al.
Why do surgeons continue to perform unnecessary surgery?
Patient Saf. Surg. 2017, 11:1
2017
414
2
Caesar U, et al.
Incidence and root causes of cancellations for elective orthopaedic procedures: a single center experience of 17,625 consecutive cases.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2014, 8:24
2014
50
3
Page AE.
Safety in surgery: the role of shared decision-making.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2015, 9:24
2015
31
3
Lynn LA.
The diagnosis of sepsis revisited - a challenge for young medical scientists in the twenty-first century.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2014, 8:1
2014
31
5
Nwosu A.
The horror of wrong-site surgery continues: report of two cases in a regional trauma centre in Nigeria.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2015, 9:6
2015
25
5
Zeeshan MF, et al.
Incidence of adverse events in an integrated US healthcare system: a retrospective observational study of 82,784 surgical hospitalizations.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2014, 8:23
2014
25
7
Pfeifer R, Pape HC.
Missed injuries in trauma patients: A literature review.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2008, 2:20
2008
22
8
Iglar PJ, Hogan KJ.
Vitamin D status and surgical outcomes: a systematic review.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2015, 9:14
2015
21
9
Charles R, et al.
How to perform a root cause analysis for workup and future prevention of medical errors: a review.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2016, 10:20
2016
19
10
Curry JP, Jungquist CR.
A critical assessment of monitoring practices, patient deterioration, and alarm fatigue on inpatient wards: a review.
Patient Saf. Surg. 2014, 8:29
2014
18
In spite of these impressive metrics, which are reflective of a successful development and increased visibility of the journal since its inception in 2007, there is much work to be done. Notwithstanding significant developments in medical care and technology, the “modern age” of patient safety in the twenty-first century continues to fall short of protecting patients from unnecessary treatment, preventable harm, and death. Shockingly, current statistics have identified medical errors as the 3rd leading cause of death in the United States, secondary only to cardiovascular disease and cancer [5]. The hidden epidemic is subtantiated by evidence-based estimates of more than 400,000 preventable annual deaths occurring in United States hospitals every year [6], which does not take into account the innumerable preventable deaths subsequent to unsafe hospital discharges and medication errors in the outpatient setting. In spite of this egregious system failure, the medical profession continues to accept errors that lead to preventable patient harm as an unfortunate and inevitable “side effect” of modern health care. The unintentional void created by the absence of physician leadership in the field of patient safety has meanwhile been filled by other stakeholders, including patient advocacy groups, malpractice lawyers, and legislators. It is time for a change in mindset. A famous Chinese proverb fittingly states that “the best time to plant a tree was forty years ago; the second-best time is now.” Today is the time for the medical profession to make up for past negligence by taking the lead in driving patient safety as an irrefutable responsibility. The mission of this journal is to continue to provide an international forum for reporting, discussing, and mitigating errors and failures that lead to preventable patient harm and adverse outcomes. We would like to thank our readers, authors, and reviewers for their trust and loyalty over the past decade, and we hope to count on your continuing support of the journal’s mission.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our journal development editor Mr. Marco Casola from BioMedCentral (Springer/Nature) for providing the statistics and metrics shown in this article.

Funding

There were no external funding sources for this editorial.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact the corresponding author for data requests.

FDA clearance

Not applicable for an editorial.
Not applicable for an editorial.
Not applicable for an editorial.

Competing interests

All authors are editors on the journal’s editorial board (www.​pssjournal.​com). The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stahel PF, Smith WR, Hahnloser D, Nigri G, Mauffrey C, Clavien PA. The 5th anniversary of patient safety in surgery - from the Journal's origin to its future vision. Patient Saf Surg. 2012;6:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stahel PF, Smith WR, Hahnloser D, Nigri G, Mauffrey C, Clavien PA. The 5th anniversary of patient safety in surgery - from the Journal's origin to its future vision. Patient Saf Surg. 2012;6:24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error - the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error - the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ. 2016;353:i2139.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9:122–8.CrossRefPubMed James JT. A new, evidence-based estimate of patient harms associated with hospital care. J Patient Saf. 2013;9:122–8.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The 10th anniversary of patient safety in surgery
verfasst von
Philip F. Stahel
Wade R. Smith
Ernest E. Moore
Philip S. Mehler
Sebastian Weckbach
Fernando J. Kim
Nathan Butler
Hans-Christoph Pape
Ted J. Clarke
Martin A. Makary
Pierre-Alain Clavien
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2017
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
Patient Safety in Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2017
Elektronische ISSN: 1754-9493
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-017-0145-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Patient Safety in Surgery 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.