Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2012

01.03.2012 | Original Article

The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery

verfasst von: Timothy A. Plerhoples, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Sherry M. Wren

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There is increasing interest in understanding the toll that operating takes on a surgeon’s body. The effect of robotic surgery on surgeon discomfort has not been studied. We sought to document the discomfort of robotic surgery compared with open and laparoscopic surgery and to investigate the factors that affect the risk of physical symptoms. Nineteen-thousand eight-hundred and sixty-eight surgeons from all specialties trained in the use of robots were sent a 26-question online survey and 1,407 responded. One-thousand two-hundred and fifteen surgeons who practiced all three approaches were used in the analysis. Eight-hundred and seventy-one surgeons had physical discomfort or symptoms attributable to operating. Of those with symptoms, 55.4% attributed most of the symptoms to laparoscopic surgery, 36.3% to open surgery, and 8.3% to robotic surgery. A higher case load was predictive of increased symptoms for open and laparoscopic surgery, but not for robotic surgery. Robotic surgery was less likely than open or laparoscopic surgery to lead to neck, back, hip, knee, ankle, foot, and shoulder pain and less likely than laparoscopic surgery to lead to elbow and wrist pain. Robotic surgery was more likely than either open or laparoscopic surgery to lead to eye pain, and more likely than open surgery to lead to finger pain. Nearly a third (30.3%) of surgeons admit to giving consideration to their own discomfort when choosing an operative modality. Robotic surgery has promise in reducing the risk of physical discomfort for the operator. This is important as more surgeons consider their own health when choosing a surgical modality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313PubMedCrossRef Park A, Lee G, Seagull FJ, Meenaghan N, Dexter D (2010) Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. J Am Coll Surg 210(3):306–313PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11(2):139–142PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Rab GT, Abu-Ghaida H, Alarcon A, Chung J (1997) A comparison of surgeons’ posture during laparoscopic and open surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 11(2):139–142PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD et al (2001) An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 182(6):720–724PubMedCrossRef Nguyen NT, Ho HS, Smith WD et al (2001) An ergonomic evaluation of surgeons’ axial skeletal and upper extremity movements during laparoscopic and open surgery. Am J Surg 182(6):720–724PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC et al (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71(3):404–407PubMedCrossRef Gofrit ON, Mikahail AA, Zorn KC et al (2008) Surgeons’ perceptions and injuries during and after urologic laparoscopic surgery. Urology 71(3):404–407PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Stomberg MW, Tronstad S-E, Hedberg K et al (2010) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders when performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(1):49–53PubMedCrossRef Stomberg MW, Tronstad S-E, Hedberg K et al (2010) Work-related musculoskeletal disorders when performing laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 20(1):49–53PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW et al (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184PubMedCrossRef Szeto GPY, Ho P, Ting ACW et al (2009) Work-related musculoskeletal symptoms in surgeons. J Occup Rehabil 19(2):175–184PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22(11):2421–2427PubMedCrossRef van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22(11):2421–2427PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liberman AS, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2005) Injuries sustained by colorectal surgeons performing colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 19(12):1606–1609PubMedCrossRef Liberman AS, Shrier I, Gordon PH (2005) Injuries sustained by colorectal surgeons performing colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 19(12):1606–1609PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Totté ER, Pierie JPEN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23(6):1279–1285PubMedCrossRef van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Totté ER, Pierie JPEN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23(6):1279–1285PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat van Veelan MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Kazemier G (2004) Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 13(3):161–166CrossRef van Veelan MA, Jakimowicz JJ, Kazemier G (2004) Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 13(3):161–166CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Wauben LSGL, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RHM (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20(8):1268–1274PubMedCrossRef Wauben LSGL, van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RHM (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20(8):1268–1274PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Smith W (2006) An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. J Surg Res 134(1):87–92PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van’t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(6):1365–1371PubMedCrossRef van der Schatte Olivier RH, Van’t Hullenaar CDP, Ruurda JP, Broeders IAMJ (2009) Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23(6):1365–1371PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Bagrodia A, Raman JD (2009) Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Endourol 23(4):627–633PubMedCrossRef Bagrodia A, Raman JD (2009) Ergonomics considerations of radical prostatectomy: physician perspective of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted techniques. J Endourol 23(4):627–633PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Elhage O, Murphy D, Challacombe B, Shortland A, Dasgupta P (2007) Ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Clin Pract 61(2):186–188PubMedCrossRef Elhage O, Murphy D, Challacombe B, Shortland A, Dasgupta P (2007) Ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Clin Pract 61(2):186–188PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15(10):1204–1207PubMedCrossRef Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15(10):1204–1207PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Sprague S, Quigley L, Bhandari M (2009) Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 3):27–34PubMedCrossRef Sprague S, Quigley L, Bhandari M (2009) Survey design in orthopaedic surgery: getting surgeons to respond. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 3):27–34PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery
verfasst von
Timothy A. Plerhoples
Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Sherry M. Wren
Publikationsdatum
01.03.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2012
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0330-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2012

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.