The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-015-0829-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
MMJW, NWLS and JCG co-wrote the manuscript. MMJW, NWLS, JCG, AB, AS, MSHB and LCJ formed the Amsterdam Wrist Rules Project committee, which designed and implemented the study, and reviewed the manuscript. MMJW and NWLS are the guarantors. MM, NLS, RV, JMU reviewed the manuscript and coordinated the study at the different study locations. EW and MMJW wrote the statistical analysis plan and EW reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
MMJW is a physician and clinical epidemiologist who is working on her PhD in trauma surgery; AB is a surgeon with a special interest in trauma care; AS is a radiology resident who is also doing a PhD in trauma surgery; MSHB is a surgical resident and working on her PhD in trauma surgery; MM is professor of musculoskeletal radiology; LCJ is an emergency physician; NLS is a trauma surgeon, as are RV and JMU. EWS is a clinical epidemiologist and professor of medical decision making. EWS has written extensively about deriving, validating and implementing clinical decision models. JCG is professor of trauma surgery and head of the Trauma Unit in a tertiary Academic Medical Centre and NWLS is a trauma surgeon and clinical epidemiologist.
Although only 39 % of patients with wrist trauma have sustained a fracture, the majority of patients is routinely referred for radiography. The purpose of this study was to derive and externally validate a clinical decision rule that selects patients with acute wrist trauma in the Emergency Department (ED) for radiography.
This multicenter prospective study consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting wrist fractures in patients following wrist trauma; (2) external validation of this model; and (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The study was conducted in the EDs of five Dutch hospitals: one academic hospital (derivation cohort) and four regional hospitals (external validation cohort). We included all adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The main outcome was fracture of the wrist (distal radius, distal ulna or carpal bones) diagnosed on conventional X-rays.
A total of 882 patients were analyzed; 487 in the derivation cohort and 395 in the validation cohort. We derived a clinical prediction model with eight variables: age; sex, swelling of the wrist; swelling of the anatomical snuffbox, visible deformation; distal radius tender to palpation; pain on radial deviation and painful axial compression of the thumb. The Area Under the Curve at external validation of this model was 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.77–0.85). The sensitivity and specificity of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules (AWR) in the external validation cohort were 98 % (95 % CI: 95–99 %) and 21 % (95 % CI: 15 %–28). The negative predictive value was 90 % (95 % CI: 81–99 %).
The Amsterdam Wrist Rules is a clinical prediction rule with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value for fractures of the wrist. Although external validation showed low specificity and 100 % sensitivity could not be achieved, the Amsterdam Wrist Rules can provide physicians in the Emergency Department with a useful screening tool to select patients with acute wrist trauma for radiography. The upcoming implementation study will further reveal the impact of the Amsterdam Wrist Rules on the anticipated reduction of X-rays requested, missed fractures, Emergency Department waiting times and health care costs.
This study was registered in the Dutch Trial Registry, reference number NTR2544 on October 1st, 2010.
Additional file 1. Number of patients with missings according to variable and characteristics of patients with and without prehensile grip strength as missing variable. (DOC 48 kb)12891_2015_829_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Angermann P, Lohmann M. Hand and wrist injuries. A study of 50.272 injuries. Ugeskr Laeger. 1995;157(6):734–7. PubMed
ROYAL COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGISTS WORKING PARTY. Radiography of injured arms and legs in eight accident and emergency units in England and Wales. Royal College of Radiologists Working Party. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985;291(6505):1325–8. CrossRef
Gleadhill DN, Thomson JY, Simms P. Can more efficient use be made of x ray examinations in the accident and emergency department? British medical journal (Clinical research ed1981). 1987;294(6577):943–7. CrossRef
Stiell I, Wells G, Laupacis A, Brison R, Verbeek R, Vandemheen K, et al. Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group BMJ. 1995;311(7005):594–7.
Charny MC, Ennis WP, Roberts CJ, Evans KT. Can the use of radiography of arms and legs in accident and emergency units be made more efficient? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987;294(6567):291–3. CrossRef
Cevik AA, Gunal I, Manisali M, Yanturali S, Atilla R, Pekdemir M, et al. Evaluation of physical findings in acute wrist trauma in the emergency department. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003;9(4):257–61. PubMed
Calvo-Lorenzo I, Martínez-De La Llana O, Blanco-Santiago D, Zabala-Echenagusia J, Laita-Legarreta A, Azores-Galeano X. Would it be possible to develop a set of Ottawa wrist rules to facilitate clinical decision making? Revista Española de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología (English Edition). 2008;52(5):315–21. CrossRef
Steyerberg E. Study design for prediction models. In: Anonymous, editor. Clinical prediction models, a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 50–1.
Steyerberg E. Evaluation of performance. In: Anonymous, editor. Clinical Prediction Models, a Practical Approach to Development, Validation, and Updating. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 270–9.
Steyerberg E. Overfitting and optimism in prediction models. In: Anonymous, editor. Clinical prediction models, a practical approach to development, validation, and updating. New York: Springer; 2009. p. 94-95–96.
- The Amsterdam wrist rules: the multicenter prospective derivation and external validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute wrist trauma
Monique M. J. Walenkamp
M. Suzan H. Beerekamp
L. Cara Jager
Nico L. Sosef
Romuald van Velde
Jan M. Ultee
Ewout W. Steyerberg
J. Carel Goslings
Niels W. L. Schep
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Mail Icon II