Skip to main content
main-content

01.12.2011 | Research article | Ausgabe 1/2011 Open Access

BMC Public Health 1/2011

The association between failed quit attempts and increased levels of psychological distress in smokers in a large New Zealand cohort

Zeitschrift:
BMC Public Health > Ausgabe 1/2011
Autoren:
Frederieke S van der Deen, Kristie N Carter, Nick Wilson, Sunny Collings
Wichtige Hinweise

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FSvdD performed literature study, participated in statistical analysis, and drafted manuscript. KNC designed study, performed statistical analysis, and helped drafting manuscript. NW was involved in design study and participated in interpreting results. SC participated in interpreting results. All authors read and approved the manuscript.

Background

A number of national health surveys have shown that people with poorer mental health are more likely to be current smokers, be more heavily dependent on nicotine, have greater difficulty to successfully quit smoking and consequently be more likely to develop smoking-related illnesses than people with better mental health status [15].
The existing literature on the associations between depression and smoking quit rates is conflicting. Although some studies have not shown associations between history of depression and quit rates or the motivation and intent to quit [68], it has frequently been shown that people with depressive symptoms are less likely to successfully abstain from smoking [911]. Also, smokers with a history of major depression who have successfully quit have a higher risk of developing new depressive symptoms for a period of at least six months post-quitting [12]. However, another study found that successful quitting was not associated with an increased incidence of major depressive episodes, while not staying successfully abstinent after a quit attempt was [13]. A recent study following a cohort of smokers showed that longer-term smoking abstinence (9 months) did not lead to an increased risk of depressive symptoms or anxiety [14]. However, this study had a small number of quitters and did not examine those who had attempted but failed to quit smoking.
Recently, it was found in the US that current smokers who attempt but fail to quit report higher mean levels of serious psychological distress than others (i.e., those who have never smoked, or who are former smokers or current smokers who have not tried to quit) [15]. Current smoking and unsuccessful quit attempts in the last 12 months were in another study also associated with high levels of psychological distress [16]. In addition, this study showed that the longer a person had successfully quit smoking, the more similar their levels of psychological distress were compared to a never smoker [16]. Another study in which the relationship between smoking cessation and depression was investigated showed that the prevalence of lifetime depression was highest among unsuccessful quitters compared to those smokers who had not tried to quit and ex-smokers [17]. The fact that long-term ex-smokers are less anxious and depressed than current smokers may be because people who successfully quit smoking have better mental health overall [18].
In New Zealand (NZ), it has been estimated that approximately 33% of smoking occurs among those with mental disorders [19]. Moreover, the prevalence of such disorders among adult smokers is higher than in adult non-smokers and compared to the general population [20]. Currently, tobacco cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of preventable mortality in NZ as in many other developed countries [21, 22]. In addition, the lifetime prevalence of mental disorders is moderately high in NZ-almost 50% of the population will meet criteria for an anxiety, mood, substance use or eating disorder at one point over the life course [23].
A better understanding of the nature of the association between mental health and both smoking and quitting could enable the development of better targeted and more appropriate smoking cessation interventions. The objectives of the present study are therefore twofold. The first is to examine the association between smoking status and psychological distress using data from a NZ nationally representative survey. The second is to examine the association between the history of quitting behaviours and psychological distress in ex- and current- smokers.

Methods

Data

This study is a cross-sectional analysis of Wave 3 (2004) data from the Survey of Families, Income and Employment (SoFIE) which was conducted from 2002 to 2010 (SoFIE data Wave 1 to 7 version 1). In short, SoFIE is a nationally representative longitudinal survey of the usually resident population living in private households in NZ [24]. During annual face-to-face interviews, information was obtained on individual and family factors such as labour market activity, education, marital status and household income. In Wave 3 of the survey, a detailed health module included questions on health-related quality of life, mental health, chronic disease and health behaviours. The initial sample comprised approximately 11,500 responding private households (response rate of 77%) with 22,270 adults responding in Wave 1 which reduced to 20,375 in Wave 2 and 19,225 in Wave 3. The final analysis sample was restricted to 18,525 adult respondents at Wave 3, as there were 700 people with missing smoking information.

Measures

Exposures

Smoking status
For the first objective of the study, the exposure measure was smoking status classified as "never", "ex" or "current" smoker. Responses to two questions about tobacco cigarette smoking were used to determine the respondents' smoking status. The first question was: "Do you regularly smoke one or more tobacco cigarettes a day?" A person was classified as "never smoker" (reference group) if he/she had never regularly smoked one or more cigarettes a day; as "ex-smoker" if he/she reported not regularly smoking but having "ever been a regular smoker of one or more cigarettes a day"; and finally as "current smoker" if he/she reported currently smoking one or more cigarettes a day on a regular basis. "Tobacco cigarette" was self-defined (there was no differentiation between store-bought and roll-your-own cigarettes or type of cigarette smoked).
Quit status
For the second objective, the exposure of interest was quit status, using only current and ex-smokers for this analysis. The quit status of the respondents was assessed by asking current smokers: "In the last 12 months, have you tried to stop smoking altogether?" and ex-smokers: "How old were you the last time you quit smoking?" Using the information on temporality of quit behaviours, we created a four-level quit status variable, defined as: (i) "long-term ex-smokers" (reference group) including ex-smokers who successfully quit smoking five or more years ago; (ii) "recent ex-smokers" including ex-smokers who quit within the last five years; (iii) "unsuccesful quitters" including current smokers with a failed quit attempt in the 12 months preceding the interview; and (iv) "non-quitters" including current smokers who had made no attempt to quit in the previous 12 months.

Outcome

Psychological distress
For all of the analyses the main outcome of interest was the level of non-specific psychological distress at Wave 3. This was measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (Kessler-10) [2527], a 10-item questionnaire with questions regarding negative emotional states (e.g., feeling nervous, hopeless or worthless) in the previous four weeks. For analysis the Kessler-10 scores were grouped into four levels: "low" (score of 10-15), "moderate" (score of 16-21), "high" (score of 22-29) and "very high" (score of 30 or higher) [25, 28]. For regression analyses these were dichotomised into low to moderate versus high to very high levels of psychological distress.

Other variables

Data on demographic confounders were taken from the Wave 3 interview: age, sex, prioritised ethnicity (NZ/European, Māori, Pacific, Asian, other) [29] and legal marital status (never married, divorced/separated/widowed, and legally married).
Socioeconomic factors considered to be confounders were: labour market activity (employed, not employed but seeking work, or not employed and not seeking work); highest educational qualification (no school qualification, school qualification, post-school vocational qualification, degree/higher qualification); equivalised household income (categorised into quintiles); and two measures of deprivation. The first was the small area specific deprivation index (NZDep) [30]. The second measure of deprivation was the NZ-specific individual deprivation index (NZiDep), a measure of the individual socioeconomic position determined from eight "yes or no" questions about financial deprivation (e.g. use of food grants or the need to borrow money for day-to-day needs) [31]. The scores for NZiDep are grouped into five values, ranging from one (no deprivation factors) to five (more than 5 deprivation factors) [31]. We chose to adjust for these socioeconomic confounders in the present analyses as people with lower socioeconomic status are known to have an increased risk of ever taking up smoking and less likely to give up on smoking [3234]. Moreover, in NZ it has been shown that prevalence of mental disorders is higher among those with lower socioeconomic status (as measured by education, household income and small area index of deprivation) [23].

Statistical analysis

All analyses were conducted using individual unit data in SAS 8.2 in the Statistics NZ data laboratory. Logistic regression was used to explore the association of smoking status (objective 1) and quit status (objective 2) with high to very high levels of psychological distress compared to low to moderate levels of psychological distress. Models were built sequentially by adjusting first for demographic confounders, then adjusting for socioeconomic confounders and finally adjusting for NZiDep in the model.

Results

Smoking status and psychological distress

Of the 18,525 respondents, 20% were current smokers, 25% were ex-smokers and 55% were never smokers (Table 1). Compared to never smokers, current smokers were more likely to be male, of younger age, Māori ethnicity, never married, have lower educational qualifications, lower incomes, live in deprived neighbourhoods, and report more factors of individual deprivation. Current smokers were more likely to report high to very high levels of psychological distress than ex- or never-smokers. Logistic regression models (Table 2) show that compared to never smokers, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of reporting high to very high levels of psychological distress was significantly greater for current smokers (model 4: OR: 1.45; 95% CI: 1.24-1.69); and marginally significant for ex-smokers (aOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.39).
Table 1
Demographic and socioeconomic variables by smoking and quit status
 
All
Never smoker
 
Ex-smoker quit > = 5 yrs
Ex-smoker quit < 5 yrs
Current smoker
tried to quit
Current smoker not
tried to quit
 
N
N
row%
col%
N
row%
col%
N
row%
col%
N
row%
col%
N
row%
col%
All
18525
10110
54.6
 
3595
19.4
 
1065
5.8
 
1470
7.9
 
2285
12.3
 
Kessler 10
                
   Low + moderate
17120
9495
55.5
93.9
3360
19.6
93.5
955
5.6
89.7
1225
7.2
83.3
2055
12.0
89.9
   High + very high
1270
530
41.7
5.2
200
15.8
5.6
100
7.9
9.4
230
18.1
15.7
205
16.1
9.0
Sex
                
   Female
10340
5680
54.9
56.2
1725
16.7
48.0
585
5.7
54.9
835
8.1
56.8
1160
11.2
50.8
   Male
8885
4430
49.9
43.8
1870
21.1
52.0
480
5.4
45.1
635
7.2
43.2
1125
12.7
49.2
Age group (years)
                
   15-24
3135
2160
68.9
21.4
25
0.8
0.7
165
5.3
15.5
285
9.1
19.4
345
11.0
15.1
   25-44
6515
3350
51.4
33.1
775
11.9
21.6
510
7.8
47.9
650
10.0
44.2
980
15.0
42.9
   45-64
6345
3025
47.7
29.9
1575
24.8
43.8
290
4.6
27.2
450
7.1
30.6
795
12.5
34.8
   65+
3230
1575
48.8
15.6
1220
37.8
33.9
95
2.9
8.9
85
2.6
5.8
165
5.1
7.2
Ethnicity
                
   NZ/European
14495
7705
53.2
76.2
3035
20.9
84.4
810
5.6
76.1
940
6.5
64.0
1580
10.9
69.2
   Māori
2375
860
36.2
8.5
350
14.7
9.7
155
6.5
14.6
360
15.2
24.5
520
21.9
22.8
   Pacific
900
515
57.2
5.1
75
8.3
2.1
45
5.0
4.2
95
10.6
6.5
95
10.6
4.2
   Asian
1010
775
76.7
7.7
55
5.5
1.5
30
3.0
2.8
50
5.0
3.4
50
5.0
2.2
   Other
440
255
58.0
2.5
75
17.1
2.1
25
5.7
2.4
30
6.8
2.0
35
8.0
1.5
Marital status
                
   Married
9610
5260
54.7
52.0
2415
25.1
67.2
490
5.1
46.0
510
5.3
34.7
890
9.3
39.0
   Divorced, widowed, separated
3235
1430
44.2
14.1
825
25.5
23.0
180
5.6
16.9
330
10.2
22.5
455
14.1
19.9
   Never married
5770
3415
59.2
33.8
355
6.2
9.9
395
6.9
37.1
635
11.0
43.2
935
16.2
40.9
Maximum educational level
                
   Degree
2705
1835
67.8
18.2
425
15.7
11.8
120
4.4
11.3
90
3.3
6.1
135
5.0
5.9
   Post-school qualification
6495
3165
48.7
31.3
1375
21.2
38.3
385
5.9
36.2
540
8.3
36.7
825
12.7
36.1
   School qualification
5165
2950
57.1
29.2
760
14.7
21.1
325
6.3
30.5
375
7.3
25.5
575
11.1
25.2
   No qualification
4855
2160
44.5
21.4
1030
21.2
28.7
235
4.8
22.1
465
9.6
31.6
745
15.4
32.6
Labour market activity
                
   Working
12435
6610
53.2
65.4
2075
16.7
57.7
750
6.0
70.4
965
7.8
65.7
1605
12.9
70.2
   Not employed, looking for work
370
150
40.5
1.5
35
9.5
1.0
20
5.4
1.9
55
14.9
3.7
90
24.3
3.9
   Not employed, not looking for work
6395
3350
52.4
33.1
1485
23.2
41.3
295
4.6
27.7
450
7.0
30.6
590
9.2
25.8
NZDep2001 area unit (quintiles)
                
   NZDepQ1 (least deprived)
3860
2455
63.6
24.3
770
20.0
21.4
185
4.8
17.4
155
4.0
10.5
240
6.2
10.5
   NZDepQ2
3830
2220
58.0
22.0
790
20.6
22.0
205
5.4
19.3
215
5.6
14.6
335
8.8
14.7
   NZDepQ3
3440
1840
53.5
18.2
635
18.5
17.7
210
6.1
19.7
285
8.3
19.4
430
12.5
18.8
   NZDepQ4
4000
2000
50.0
19.8
785
19.6
21.8
245
6.1
23.0
340
8.5
23.1
565
14.1
24.7
   NZDepQ5 (most deprived)
3690
1595
43.2
15.8
610
16.5
17.0
220
6.0
20.7
475
12.9
32.3
715
19.4
31.3
Household income (quintiles)
                
   Q1 (lowest income)
3845
1620
42.1
16.0
585
15.2
16.3
195
5.1
18.3
415
10.8
28.2
505
13.1
22.1
   Q2
3845
1910
49.7
18.9
880
22.9
24.5
210
5.5
19.7
335
8.7
22.8
470
12.2
20.6
   Q3
3845
2075
54.0
20.5
695
18.1
19.3
210
5.5
19.7
290
7.5
19.7
525
13.7
23.0
   Q4
3845
2160
56.2
21.4
710
18.5
19.8
230
6.0
21.6
240
6.2
16.3
470
12.2
20.6
   Q5 (highest income)
3845
2345
61.0
23.2
725
18.9
20.2
220
5.7
20.7
190
5.0
12.9
310
8.1
13.6
NZiDep
                
   0 individual deprivation factors
13370
7810
58.4
77.3
2795
20.9
77.8
675
5.1
63.4
720
5.4
49.0
1355
10.1
59.3
   1 individual deprivation factors
2790
1400
50.2
13.9
460
16.5
12.8
195
7.0
18.3
305
10.9
20.8
425
15.2
18.6
   2 individual deprivation factors
1110
480
43.2
4.8
170
15.3
4.7
90
8.1
8.5
145
13.1
9.9
225
20.3
9.9
   3-4 individual deprivation factors
980
350
35.7
3.5
140
14.3
3.9
75
7.7
7.0
205
20.9
14.0
210
21.4
9.2
   5+ individual deprivation factors
295
60
20.3
0.6
35
11.9
1.0
25
8.5
2.4
100
33.9
6.8
75
25.4
3.3
Table 2
Logistic regression odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of high to very high levels of psychological distress by smoking status
Smoking status
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
 
OR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
Never smokers (ref)
1
 
1
 
1
 
1
 
Current smokers
2.44
(2.13-2.79)
2.21
(1.91-2.55)
1.82
(1.57-2.11)
1.45
(1.24-1.69)
Ex-smokers
1.28
(1.10-1.48)
1.42
(1.21-1.66)
1.33
(1.13-1.56)
1.18
(1.00-1.39)
Model 1 = Crude model
Model 2 = Adjusted for Age, Sex, Prioritised Ethnicity and Marital Status
Model 3 = Adjusted as per Model 2 plus: Household Income, Labour Market Activity, Educational Qualification and NZ (area) Deprivation
Model 4 = Adjusted as per Model 3 plus: NZ individual deprivation (NZiDep)

Quit status and psychological distress

Of the 8,415 current and ex-smoker respondents included in the Objective 2 analysis, 43% were long-term ex-smokers (77% of ex-smokers), 13% were recent ex-smokers (23% of ex-smokers), 17% were unsuccessful quitters (39% of current smokers) and 27% were non-quitters (61% of current smokers) (Table 1). Unsuccessful quitters were more likely to be female, had lower incomes and reported more individual deprivation factors. Moreover, unsuccessful quitters had much higher levels of high or very high levels of psychological distress (16%) than any other group.
In the logistic regression analyses (Table 3), recent ex-smokers (who had quit in the past five years) had elevated odds of high to very high levels of psychological distress in all four models compared to long-term ex-smokers (model 4: aOR = 1.33, 95% CI: 1.00-1.76). This pattern was similar for non-quitters (compared to long-term ex-smokers). The odds of high to very high levels of psychological distress were significantly greater for unsuccessful quitters compared to long-term ex-smokers (model 4: aOR = 1.73, 95% CI: 1.36-2.21), although the 95% confidence interval overlapped with that for recent ex-smokers (and non-quitters).
Table 3
Logistic regression odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of high to very high levels of psychological distress by quit status (in ex and current smokers only)
Smoking and quit status
Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
Model 4
 
OR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
aOR
95% CI
Ex-smoker, quit > = 5 years ago (reference)
1
 
1
 
1
 
1
 
Ex-smoker, quit < 5 years ago
1.67
(1.30-2.16)
1.42
(1.08-1.86)
1.39
(1.05-1.82)
1.33
(1.00-1.76)
Current smoker tried to quit (last 12 months)
3.06
(2.50-3.75
2.37
(1.89-2.97)
2.02
(1.60-2.55)
1.73
(1.36-2.21)
Current smoker, not tried to quit (last 12 months)
1.65
(1.35-2.02)
1.34
(1.07-1.68)
1.20
(0.95-1.51)
1.16
(0.92-1.47)
Model 1 = Crude model
Model 2 = Adjusted for Age, Sex, Prioritised Ethnicity and Marital Status
Model 3 = Adjusted as per Model 2 plus: Household Income, Labour Market Activity, Educational Qualification and NZ (area) Deprivation
Model 4 = Adjusted as per Model 3 plus: NZ individual deprivation (NZiDep)

Discussion

After adjusting for a wide range of demographic and socioeconomic variables, we found a strong relationship between smoking status and psychological distress, with current smokers being almost 50% more likely to report higher levels of psychological distress than never smokers. The uniqueness of the SoFIE data allowed us to investigate in more detail the association between quitting smoking and psychological distress while adjusting for a range of demographic and socioeconomic variables. Compared to long-term ex-smokers (who had quit 5 or more years ago) we also found elevated odds for high to very high levels of psychological distress in recent ex-smokers, and non-quitters (significant in most but not all models). However, the odds appeared to be raised more in unsuccessful quitters, although the confidence intervals overlapped. These findings have a number of methodological and public health implications.

Methodological implications

The observed association between smoking status and psychological distress among current smokers may be largely explained by the increased levels of psychological distress in current smokers who recently made an attempt to quit smoking but failed. It is well known that smoking cessation can be a difficult process with several quit attempts often preceding long-term abstinence [35]. While longer-term abstinence may not be associated with an increase in depressive or anxiety symptoms [14], our study shows that unsuccessful quitting is strongly associated with high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, failing to take recent unsuccessful quit attempts into account in analyses of smoking and mental health status may lead to misleading results. A recent longitudinal study from NZ argued that cigarette smoking increases the risk of depressive symptoms [36]. However, this study did not take into account recent quit attempts. Our results suggest that attempts at quitting smoking may partly explain the relationship between smoking and symptoms of mental disorders. However, this relationship is complex and modelling it is challenging.

Public health implications

Although the apparent occurrence of increased levels of psychological distress in unsuccessful quitters needs further study, we suggest in the meantime that health professionals take a precautionary approach and assume that this elevated distress could potentially be ameliorated by raising the success rate of quitting amongst these smokers. This could be achieved by strengthening population-level tobacco control measures that support quitting and staying quit (e.g., high tobacco taxes and restrictions on tobacco marketing). It would also be assisted by the tailoring of quitting support for those with elevated psychological distress. To assess psychological distress among clients, quitting support (face-to-face, quit lines and web-based services) could use the Kessler-10 scale and adapt their services to the outcome of this measure. In addition, the value of successful quitting as a means to lower psychological distress can potentially be highlighted.

Strengths and limitations of this study

The main strengths of this study were the large sample size and the ability to adjust for a wide range of potential demographic and socioeconomic confounders in regression modelling. We used the Kessler-10 measure of psychological distress, which is used as a screening tool for mental health morbidity at the population level [37]. It gives a measure of experienced non-specific psychological distress on a continuum rather than a clinical disease classification and findings of the present study are therefore of greater relevance in informing national population-level services and national public health messages. It has been shown that high and very high scores on the Kessler-10 are associated with clinical measures of anxiety and depressive disorders [25, 38]. The previous US study that found a strong relationship between unsuccessful quit attempts and high levels of psychological distress, used the Kessler-6 scale [15] which is not as robust as the Kessler-10. Also, in this study the authors could not establish a relationship between the history of quit behaviours and psychological distress, due to a lack of information on how long ago respondents had quit smoking or when they had made a quit attempt [15]. Therefore, one of the strengths of our study is that the SoFIE dataset contains information on how long ago ex-smokers quit smoking, and therefore we were able to construct a variable for quitting smoking over different time intervals.
Our findings are supported by a recent study in which the association between smoking, quitting and psychological distress was investigated [16]. Although the authors of this study were also able to construct an interval variable for quit status and found a much stronger relationship between failed quit attempts and psychological distress, the uniqueness of the SoFIE data enabled us to adjust this relationship for a wider range of demographic and socioeconomic variables (e.g., prioritised ethnicity, marital status, an individual measure of deprivation (NZiDep), labour market activity and household income). In addition we consider that having a referent group of long term ex-smokers (who quit five or more years ago) is potentially more appropriate than using never smokers.
Several limitations need to be considered in the interpretation of our results. Firstly, this was a cross-sectional (Wave 3) analysis, using data from a longitudinal survey. Therefore we cannot infer causality in the direction of the relationship i.e. if the failure of quitting smoking causes higher levels of psychological distress or that higher levels of psychological distress cause failure in quitting smoking. Future research using the longitudinal SoFIE data will allow more in-depth analyses of the causal pathway between quitting behaviour and psychological distress. Although the original SoFIE study was a nationally representative survey the first module health data was collected in Wave 3 with a response rate of 77% of the original adult population (at Wave 1). It has been shown that younger people of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to drop out of the survey [24]. This sample attrition may have led to selection bias and negatively influenced the generalisability of the study results. However, unless the dropout rates were jointly distributed by smoking or quit status and psychological distress, we argue that the effect of attrition on our exposure-outcome relationship would have been minimal.
There are also some limitations to the smoking questions in the survey. There was no differentiation between types of cigarettes or tobacco consumed. However, recently a NZ study showed that quitting behaviour did not differ by the type of consumed cigarettes [39]. Also no information was collected on quit attempts more than 12 months ago, or specific quit strategies in unsuccessful attempts. Moreover, questions on smoking can potentially be sensitive, and so there may be some information (social desirability) bias present (especially given evidence around smoking denormalisation in NZ in recent years [40]. However, our proportion of current smokers (20%) is the same as that shown in the NZ Health Survey 2006/2007 and 2006 Census and recently it has been shown that self-reports of smoking during face-to-face surveys are quite accurate [4143]. Finally, there might be unmeasured confounders influencing the relationship between smoking, attempting to quit smoking and mental health such as family support, the household environment or previous quit attempts. Not controlling for these factors may have led to an overestimate of the true association.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the significant association between smoking and psychological distress might be partly due to increased levels of psychological distress in current smokers who tried to quit in the last year. This issue needs further study as it may have important implications for optimising the design of quitting support provided by family members and health services.

Acknowledgements

SoFIE-Health is primarily funded by the Health Research Council of New Zealand as part of the Health Inequalities Research Programme. Ethics approval was obtained for the SoFIE Health module from the University of Otago Ethics Committee. This work was undertaken as part of an academic internship for a Masters in Health and Society (FSvdD) from Wageningen University.
Statistics New Zealand Security Statement
Access to the data used in this study was provided by Statistics New Zealand in a secure environment designed to give effect to the confidentiality provisions of the Statistics Act, 1975. The results in this study and any errors contained therein are those of the author, not Statistics New Zealand.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

FSvdD performed literature study, participated in statistical analysis, and drafted manuscript. KNC designed study, performed statistical analysis, and helped drafting manuscript. NW was involved in design study and participated in interpreting results. SC participated in interpreting results. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Literatur
Über diesen Artikel

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

BMC Public Health 1/2011 Zur Ausgabe