nach oben

Current HIV/AIDS Reports

Erschienen in:

23.05.2020 | eHealth and HIV (J Simoni and B Guthrie, Section Editors)

The CAN-DO-IT Model: a Process for Developing and Refining Online Recruitment in HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health Research

verfasst von: Kathryn Macapagal, Dennis H. Li, Antonia Clifford, Krystal Madkins, Brian Mustanski

Erschienen in: Current HIV/AIDS Reports | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

HIV/AIDS and sexual health research has increasingly relied on online recruitment in recent years. However, as potential online recruitment avenues (e.g., dating and sexual networking applications, websites, social media) have proliferated, navigating this process has become increasingly complex. This paper presents a practical model to guide researchers through online recruitment irrespective of platform.

Recent Findings

The CAN-DO-IT model reflects 7 iterative steps based on work by the authors and other investigators: conceptualize scope of recruitment campaign, acquire necessary expertise, navigate online platforms, develop advertisements, optimize recruitment-to-enrollment workflow, implement advertising campaign, and track performance of campaigns and respond accordingly.

Summary

Online recruitment can accelerate HIV/AIDS research, yet relatively limited guidance exists to facilitate this process across platforms. The CAN-DO-IT model presents one approach to demystify online recruitment and reduce enrollment barriers.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Mustanski BS. Getting wired: exploiting the internet for the collection of valid sexuality data. J Sex Res. 2001;38(4):292–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490109552100.CrossRef

Grov C, Breslow AS, Newcomb ME, Rosenberger JG, Bauermeister JA. Gay and bisexual men's use of the internet: research from the 1990s through 2013. J Sex Res. 2014;51(4):390–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2013.871626.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Catania J, Osmond D, Stall R, Pollack L, Paul JP, Blower S, et al. The continuing HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(6):907–14.CrossRef

Ybarra ML, Prescott TL, Phillips GL 2nd, Bull SS, Parsons JT, Mustanski B. Pilot RCT results of an mHealth HIV prevention program for sexual minority male adolescents. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2999.CrossRef

Mustanski B, Parsons JT, Sullivan PS, Madkins K, Rosenberg E, Swann G. Biomedical and behavioral outcomes of keep it up!: an eHealth HIV prevention program RCT. Am J Prev Med. 2018;55(2):151–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.026.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Macapagal K, Bettin E, Matson M, Kraus A, Fisher CB, Mustanski B. Measuring discomfort in health research relative to everyday events and routine care: an application to sexual and gender minority youth. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(5):594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.10.293.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Newcomb ME, Swann G, Mohr D, Mustanski B. Do diary studies cause behavior change? An examination of reactivity in sexual risk and substance use in young men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2018;22:2284–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2027-3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Newcomb ME, Macapagal KR, Feinstein BA, Bettin E, Swann G, Whitton SW. Integrating HIV prevention and relationship education for young same-sex male couples: a pilot trial of the 2GETHER intervention. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(8):2464–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1674-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mustanski B, Macapagal K, Thomann M, Feinstein BA, Newcomb ME, Motley D, et al. Parents’ perspectives about adolescent boys’ involvement in biomedical HIV prevention research. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(7):1923–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1035-0.CrossRefPubMed

10.

• Iribarren SJ, Ghazzawi A, Sheinfil AZ, Frasca T, Brown W, Lopez-Rios J, et al. Mixed-method evaluation of social media-based tools and traditional strategies to recruit high-risk and hard-to-reach populations into an HIV prevention intervention study. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(1):347–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1956-6. This empirical paper compares in-person and online recruitment strategies for enrolling men who have sex with men and transgender women into an HIV testing study in New York and Puerto Rico. The paper provides a table of advantages/disadvantages of different recruitment approaches and a nuanced discussion of recruitment by platform and demographic characteristics.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Buckingham L, Becher J, Voytek CD, Fiore D, Dunbar D, Davis-Vogel A, et al. Going social: success in online recruitment of men who have sex with men for prevention HIV vaccine research. Vaccine. 2017;35(27):3498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Nelson KM, Ramirez JJ, Carey MP. Developing online recruitment and retention methods for HIV prevention research among adolescent males who are interested in sex with males: interviews with adolescent males. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(12):ARTN e428 PMID 29269343. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8959.CrossRef

13.

Prescott TL, Phillips Ii G, DuBois LZ, Bull SS, Mustanski B, Ybarra ML. Reaching adolescent gay, bisexual, and queer men online: development and refinement of a national recruitment strategy. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8):e200. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5602.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

• Miller-Perusse M, Horvath KJ, Chavanduka T, Stephenson R. Recruitment and enrollment of a national sample of transgender youth via social media: experiences from project moxie. Transgend Health. 2019;4(1):157–61. https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2018.0062This paper compares the success of different social media strategies for enrolling transgender youth into an online HIV prevention study.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Lattie EG, Kaiser SM, Alam N, Tomasino KN, Sargent E, Rubanovich CK, et al. A practical do-it-yourself recruitment framework for concurrent eHealth clinical trials: identification of efficient and cost-effective methods for decision making (part 2). J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(11):e11050. https://doi.org/10.2196/11050.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

•• Kubicek K, Robles M. Tips and tricks for successful research recruitment: a toolkit for a community-based approach. 2016. This toolkit outlines important considerations for recruitment and retention of diverse communities/populations in clinical research, describes the role of community engagement in this process, and offers some tips on digital recruitment strategies.

17.

Schrager SM, Steiner RJ, Bouris AM, Macapagal K, Brown CH. Methodological considerations for advancing research on the health and well-being of sexual and gender minority youth. LGBT Health. 2018.

18.

Matthews AK, Rak K, Anderson E, Bostwick W, Ramirez-Valles J, Ruiz RA, et al. White paper from a CTSA workshop series on special and underserved populations: enhancing investigator readiness to conduct research involving LGBT populations. J Clin Transl Sci. 2018;2(4):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2018.317.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

•• Howcutt SJ, Barnett AL, Barbosa-Boucas S, Smith LA. Research recruitment: a marketing framework to improve sample representativeness in health research. J Adv Nurs. 2018;74(4):968–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13490. This paper proposes a five-part framework based on psychological and marketing theories to facilitate enrollment into health research. The framework describes how factors such as prospective participants' motivations, perceptions, and attitudes can be considered in the recruitment process.CrossRefPubMed

20.

•• Arigo D, Pagoto S, Carter-Harris L, Lillie SE, Nebeker C. Using social media for health research: methodological and ethical considerations for recruitment and intervention delivery. Digit Health. 2018;4:2055207618771757. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207618771757. This paper provides a glossary for common terms used in social media advertising, identifies typical pitfalls in recruitment for health research and how using social media can address those issues, and describes common ethical issues in using social media for health research and recruitment.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Macapagal K, Kraus A, Moskowitz DA, Birnholtz J. Geosocial networking application use, characteristics of app-met sexual partners, and sexual behavior among sexual and gender minority adolescents assigned male at birth. J Sex Res. in press.

22.

Macapagal K, Kraus A, Korpak AK, Jozsa K, Moskowitz DA. PrEP awareness, uptake, barriers, and correlates among adolescents assigned male at birth who have sex with males in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-1429-2.CrossRef

23.

Pew Research Center. Teens, social media & technology 2018: Pew Research Center 2018 2018-03-31 Contract No.: 2019-04-10.

24.

Duncan DT, Park SH, Hambrick HR, Dangerfield Ii DT, Goedel WC, Brewer R, et al. Characterizing geosocial-networking app use among young Black men who have sex with men: a multi-city cross-sectional survey in the Southern United States. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018;6(6):e10316. https://doi.org/10.2196/10316.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Badal HJ, Stryker JE, DeLuca N, Purcell DW. Swipe right: dating website and app use among men who have sex with men. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(4):1265–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1882-7.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Community based participatory research for health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2003.

27.

Corbie-Smith G, Moody-Ayers S, Thrasher AD. Closing the circle between minority inclusion in research and health disparities. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(13):1362–4.CrossRef

28.

Quinn SC. Ethics in public health research: protecting human subjects: the role of community advisory boards. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(6):918–22. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.6.918.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Goedel WC, Brooks FA, Duncan DT. Approaches to sampling gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men from geosocial-networking smartphone applications: a methodological note. Sociol Sci. 2016;5(4):51.

30.

• Jones R, Lacroix LJ, Porcher E. Facebook advertising to recruit young, urban women into an HIV prevention clinical trial. AIDS Behav. 2017;21(11):3141–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-017-1797-3This paper provides a detailed example of using Facebook’s self-service advertising platform for recruitment of young women of color into an HIV prevention study.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Reback CJ, Ferlito D, Kisler KA, Fletcher JB. Recruiting, linking, and retaining high-risk transgender women into HIV prevention and care services: an overview of barriers, strategies, and lessons learned. Int J Transgend. 2015;16(4):209–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2015.1081085.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Gonzalez R, Hill BS. Engaging transgender women and transgender men in digital spaces. In: Community Compass. HIV Vaccine Trials Network. 2019. https://www.hvtn.org/en/community/community-compass/vol19-issue1/Engaging-Transgender-Women-and-Transgender-Men-in-Digital-Spaces.html. Accessed 1 19.

33.

Arayasirikul S, Chen YH, Jin H, Wilson E. A web 2.0 and epidemiology mash-up: using respondent-driven sampling in combination with social network site recruitment to reach young transwomen. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(6):1265–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1234-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Sun CJ, Sutfin E, Bachmann LH, Stowers J, Rhodes SD. Comparing men who have sex with men and transgender women who use Grindr, other similar social and sexual networking apps, or no social and sexual networking apps: implications for recruitment and health promotion. J AIDS Clin Res. 2018;9(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6113.1000757.

35.

•• Gelinas L, Pierce R, Winkler S, Cohen IG, Lynch HF, Bierer BE. Using social media as a research recruitment tool: ethical issues and recommendations. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(3):3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2016.1276644. This paper identifies key ethical issues in social media recruitment for research; describes ethical considerations in three case examples (online patient support groups, paid Facebook advertisements, sexual networking applications); and provides a checklist for investigators proposing and IRBs evaluating studies with social media recruitment.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

36.

Grov C, Cain D, Whitfield TH, Rendina HJ, Pawson M, Ventuneac A, et al. Recruiting a U.S. national sample of HIV-negative gay and bisexual men to complete at-home self-administered HIV/STI testing and surveys: challenges and opportunities. Sex Res Social Policy. 2016;13(1):1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0212-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Lachowsky NJ, Lal A, Forrest JI, Card KG, Cui Z, Sereda P, et al. Including online-recruited seeds: a respondent-driven sample of men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(3):e51. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5258.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Newcomb ME, Sarno EL, Bettin E, Carey J, Ciolino JD, Hill R, et al. Relationship education and hiv prevention for young male couples administered online via videoconference: protocol of a national randomized controlled trial of 2GETHER. J Med Internet Res Preprints. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.15883.

39.

Hays RD, Liu H, Kapteyn A. Use of internet panels to conduct surveys. Behav Res Methods. 2015;47(3):685–90. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0617-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Shao W, Guan W, Clark MA, Liu T, Santelices C, Cortes DE, et al. Variations in recruitment yield, costs, speed and participant diversity across internet platforms in a global study examining the efficacy of an Hiv/Aids and Hiv testing animated and live-action video among English- or Spanish-speaking internet or social media users. Digit Cult Educ. 2015;7(1):40–86.PubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Beymer MR, Holloway IW, Grov C. Comparing self-reported demographic and sexual behavioral factors among men who have sex with men recruited through Mechanical Turk, Qualtrics, and a HIV/STI clinic-based sample: implications for researchers and providers. Arch Sex Behav. 2017;47:133–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0932-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

ResearchMatch. About ResearchMatch. 2019. https://www.researchmatch.org/about/. Accessed October 31 2019.

43.

Dodge B, Ford JV, Bo N, Tu W, Pachankis J, Herbenick D, et al. HIV risk and prevention outcomes in a probability-based sample of gay and bisexual men in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;82(4):355–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000002151.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Sullivan PS, Khosropour CM, Luisi N, Amsden M, Coggia T, Wingood GM, et al. Bias in online recruitment and retention of racial and ethnic minority men who have sex with men. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(2):e38 v13i2e38.CrossRef

45.

Reiter PL, Katz ML, Bauermeister JA, Shoben AB, Paskett ED, McRee AL. Recruiting young gay and bisexual men for a human papillomavirus vaccination intervention through social media: the effects of advertisement content. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017;3(2):e33. https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.7545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Taylor CR. The six principles of digital advertising. Int J Advert. 2009;28(3):411–8. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048709200679.CrossRef

47.

Abadie R, Goldenberg S, Welch-Lazoritz M, Fisher CB. Establishing trust in HIV/HCV research among people who inject drugs (PWID): insights from empirical research. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0208410. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208410.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Rendina HJ, Mustanski B. Privacy, trust, and data sharing in web-based and mobile research: participant perspectives in a large nationwide sample of men who have sex with men in the United States. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(7):e233. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Mustanski B, Coventry R, Macapagal K, Arbeit MR, Fisher CB. Sexual and gender minority adolescents’ views on HIV research participation and parental permission: a mixed-methods study. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017;49(2):111–21. https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12027.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

Ventuneac A, Li DH, Mongrella MC, Moskowitz DA, Weingardt KR, Brown CH, et al. Exploring potential implementation barriers and facilitators of the SMART program: a stepped-care package of eHealth HIV prevention interventions for adolescent men who have sex with men. Sex Res Soc Policy. 2019:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-019-00402-3.

51.

Teitcher JE, Bockting WO, Bauermeister JA, Hoefer CJ, Miner MH, Klitzman RL. Detecting, preventing, and responding to “fraudsters” in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(1):116–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/jlme.12200.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Ballard AM, Cardwell T, Young AM. Fraud detection protocol for web-based research among men who have sex with men: development and descriptive evaluation. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2019;5(1):e12344. https://doi.org/10.2196/12344.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Robinson-Cimpian JP. Inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educ Res. 2014;43(4):171–85. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x14534297.CrossRef

54.

Cimpian JR, Timmer JD, Birkett MA, Marro RL, Turner BC, Phillips GL 2nd. Bias from potentially mischievous responders on large-scale estimates of lesbian, gay, bisexual, or questioning (LGBQ)-heterosexual youth health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(S4):S258–S65. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Mustanski B. A pragmatic trial of two strategies for implementing an effective eHealth prevention program (R01MH118213). National Institute of Mental Health; 2018-2023.

56.

• Carter-Harris L. Facebook targeted advertisement for research recruitment: a primer for nurse researchers. Appl Nurs Res. 2016;32:144–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2016.07.006. This paper provides a detailed description on how to use Facebook's self-service advertising platform to create, schedule, pay for, and track ads health research.CrossRefPubMed

57.

•• Bender JL, Cyr AB, Arbuckle L, Ferris LE. Ethics and privacy implications of using the internet and social media to recruit participants for health research: a privacy-by-design framework for online recruitment. J Med Internet Res. 2017;19(4):ARTN e104. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7029. This paper describes the authors' online recruitment campaign for a health research study and how they responded to their ethics review board's concerns about online privacy. Based on this experience and an internationally recognized standard for privacy protection, a framework emphasizing methods to protect prospective participants' privacy is proposed.CrossRef

58.

Curtis BL. Social networking and online recruiting for HIV research: ethical challenges. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014;9(1):58–70. https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

59.

Topolovec-Vranic J, Natarajan K. The use of social media in recruitment for medical research studies: a scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(11):e286. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5698.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Thornton L, Batterham PJ, Fassnacht DB, Kay-Lambkin F, Calear AL, Hunt S. Recruiting for health, medical or psychosocial research using Facebook: systematic review. Internet Interv. 2016;4:72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.02.001.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

•• Fisher CB, Bragard E, Bloom R. Informational risk in HIV eHealth intervention research: recruitment, data maintenance and implications for informed consent. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. in press; This paper provides a review of key ethical issues in eHealth HIV research and provides practical solutions to address informational risks during recruitment, data management, and informed consent.

62.

• Research Center for Optimal Digital Ethics Health. Connected and open research ethics (CORE) platform. 2019. https://thecore-platform.ucsd.edu/. Accessed October 29 2019. This open-access resource provides a library of research protocols, consent forms, and other guidance for investigators conducting digital health research and recruitment. A discussion forum on the website allows investigators to post questions and receive answers germane to online research and recruitment.

63.

Mustanski B, Morgan E, D'Aquila R, Birkett M, Janulis P, Newcomb ME. Individual and network factors associated with racial disparities in HIV among young men who have sex with men: results from the RADAR cohort study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019;80(1):24–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000001886.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Mustanski B, Ryan DT, Hayford C, Phillips G 2nd, Newcomb ME, Smith JD. Geographic and individual associations with PrEP stigma: results from the RADAR cohort of diverse young men who have sex with men and transgender women. AIDS Behav. 2018;22(9):3044–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2159-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Greene GJ, Madkins K, Andrews K, Dispenza J, Mustanski B. Implementation and evaluation of the Keep It Up! online HIV prevention intervention in a community-based setting. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(3):231–45. https://doi.org/10.1521/aeap.2016.28.3.231.CrossRefPubMed

66.

Mustanski B, Garofalo R, Monahan C, Gratzer B, Andrews R. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an online HIV prevention program for diverse young men who have sex with men: the Keep It Up! intervention. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(9):2999–3012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-013-0507-z.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: The CAN-DO-IT Model: a Process for Developing and Refining Online Recruitment in HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health Research
verfasst von: Kathryn Macapagal
Dennis H. Li
Antonia Clifford
Krystal Madkins
Brian Mustanski
Publikationsdatum: 23.05.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current HIV/AIDS Reports / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1548-3568
Elektronische ISSN: 1548-3576
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11904-020-00491-5

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

^{Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag}

Kostenlos registrieren

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

19.04.2024 | Vorhofflimmern | Nachrichten

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The CAN-DO-IT Model: a Process for Developing and Refining Online Recruitment in HIV/AIDS and Sexual Health Research

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Update Innere Medizin

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for HIV Prevention: Emerging Approaches to Ending the Epidemic

Improving Care Outcomes for PLWH Experiencing Homelessness and Unstable Housing: a Synthetic Review of Clinic-Based Strategies

Ethical Considerations in HIV eHealth Intervention Research: Implications for Informational Risk in Recruitment, Data Maintenance, and Consent Procedures

Senotherapeutics and HIV-1 Persistence

Pediatric HIV: the Potential of Immune Therapeutics to Achieve Viral Remission and Functional Cure

A Review of Usability Evaluation Methods and Their Use for Testing eHealth HIV Interventions

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Neu im Fachgebiet Innere Medizin

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Prostatakarzinom: EU initiiert neues Screeningkonzept

Blasenkarzinom – Biomarker statt Zytologie?

Antihypertensiva schützen auch alte Menschen noch vor Demenz

Update Innere Medizin