Like many gambling games, the exceedingly popular and lucrative smartphone game “Candy Crush” features near-miss outcomes. In slot machines, a near-miss involves getting two of the needed three high-paying symbols on the pay-line (i.e., just missing the big win). In Candy Crush, the game signals when you just miss getting to the next level by one or two moves. Because near-misses in gambling games have consistently been shown to invigorate play despite being frustrating outcomes, the goal of the present study was to examine whether such near-misses trigger increases in player arousal, frustration and urge to continue play in Candy Crush. Sixty avid Candy Crush players were recruited to play the game for 30 min while having their Heart Rate, Skin Conductance Level, subjective arousal, frustration and urge to play recorded for three types of outcomes: wins (where they level up), losses (where they don’t come close to levelling up), and near-misses (where they just miss levelling up). Near-misses were more arousing than losses as indexed by increased heart rate and greater subjective arousal. Near-misses were also subjectively rated as the most frustrating of all outcomes. Most importantly, of any type of outcome, near-misses triggered the most substantial urge to continue play. These findings suggest that near-misses in Candy Crush play a role in player commitment to the game, and may contribute to players playing longer than intended.
Anderson, G., & Brown, R. (1984). Real and laboratory gambling, sensation-seeking and arousal. British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953), 75(Pt 3), 401–410. CrossRef
Berridge, K. (2004). Motivation concepts in behavioral neuroscience. Physiology & Behavior, 81(2), 179–209. CrossRef
Delfabbro, P., & Winefield, A. (1999). Poker-machine gambling: An analysis of within session characteristics. British Journal of Psychology, 90, 425–439. CrossRef
Dixon, M. J., Harrigan, K. A., & Jarick, M. (2011). Psychophysiological arousal signatures of near-misses in slot machine play. International Gambling Studies, 11(3), 393–407. CrossRef
Dixon, M. R., & Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine players. The Psychological Record, 54(3), 335–348.
Dixon, M. J., Templeton, J., Collins, K., Wojtowicz, L., Harrigan, K. A., Fugelsang, J. A., et al. (2015). Exploring attention in the “reel” world: Visual and auditory influences on reactions to wins and near misses in multiline slot machine play. In J. M. Fawcett, E. F. Risko, & A. Kingstone (Eds.), The handbook of attention (pp. 591–621). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Felton, M., & Lyon, D. O. (1966). The post-reinforcement pause. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behaviour, 9(2), 131–134. CrossRef
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of Reinforcement. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts. CrossRef
Gardner, J. (2014). Could candy crush saga be a gateway to gambling? The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/games/could-candy-crush-saga-be-a-gateway-to-gambling-20140424-zqyj7.html.
Griffiths, M. (1993). Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies, 9(2), 101–120. CrossRef
Grubb, J. (2014). King: 93 M daily candy crush saga players, 500 M installs, and $568 M profit in 2013 (infographic). Retrieved from http://venturebeat.com/2014/02/18/candy-crush-saga-publisher-king-by-the-numbers-inforgraphic/.
Karlsen, F. (2011). Entrapment and near miss: A comparative analysis of psycho-structural elements in gambling games and massively multiplayer online role-playing games. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 9(2), 193–207. CrossRef
Kassinove, J. I., & Schare, M. L. (2001). Effects of the “near miss” and the “big win” on persistence at slot machine gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviours, 15(2), 155–158. CrossRef
King Ltd. (2015). King reports first quarter 2014 results. Retrieved from http://investor.king.com/investors/news/financial-releases/Press-Release-Details/2014/King-Reports-First-Quarter-2014-Results/default.aspx.
Lang, P. J. (1985). The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Anxiety and the anxiety disorders. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lloyd, M. (2016). Free-to-play or pay-to-win? Expert reveals dark side of smartphone games. News 1130. Retrieved from http://www.news1130.com/2016/02/02/dark-side-smartphone-games/.
Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., & Wiers, R. W. (2008). How to push someone’s buttons. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 353–373. CrossRef
Lowe, M. R., & Butryn, M. L. (2007). Hedonic hunger: A new dimension of appetite? Physiology & Behavior, 91(4), 432–439. CrossRef
Reid, R. L. (1986). The psychology of the near-miss. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 32–39. CrossRef
Smith, D. (2014). This is what candy crush saga does to your brain. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/apr/01/candy-crush-saga-app-brain?CMP=twt_gu.
Stange, M. J., Grau, M., Osazuwa, S., & Dixon, M. J. (in press). Reinforcing small wins and frustrating near-misses: further investigation into scratch card gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies.
The Economist. (2013). Sweet spot. The Economist: Business. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/business/21576712-pretender-throne-world-casual-games-sweet-spot.
- The Candy Crush Sweet Tooth: How ‘Near-misses’ in Candy Crush Increase Frustration, and the Urge to Continue Gameplay
Chanel J. Larche
Mike J. Dixon
- Springer US