Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology 6/2014

01.06.2014 | Review

The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review

verfasst von: J. Hallet, H. Milot, S. Drolet, E. Desrosiers, R. C. Grégoire, A. Bouchard

Erschienen in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Ausgabe 6/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Turnbull and Cutait described abdominoperineal pull-through followed by delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCA) in 1961. DCA could reduce anastomotic leaks, pelvic morbidity and use of stomas. Strong evidence about its clinical benefits is still lacking. This systematic review examined the clinical outcomes of DCA for the treatment of malignant or benign colorectal conditions. A systematic search of electronic medical databases was conducted. Two independent reviewers selected studies, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome was pelvic morbidity (anastomotic leak, pelvic abscess or sepsis, use of stoma). Fecal continence and survival data were also analyzed. From 1,251 citations, we included seven observational studies including 1,124 patients. All included studies were considered at high risk of bias. Two studies comparing DCA with immediate anastomosis reported a significant decrease in anastomotic leak, and pelvic abscess or sepsis. Low rates of pelvic morbidity were reported in the other five studies: anastomotic leak 0–7 %, pelvic abscess 0–11.8 % and pelvic sepsis 6.8–10 %. Rates of permanent stoma after DCA were low in six studies (1–6 %), with one study reporting an incidence of 25 %. Fecal continence was reported as satisfying in all studies. No differences were observed in a comparative setting. Survival data were reported in four studies. Clinical heterogeneity and methodological issues precluded meta-analysis. Based on retrospective evidence, DCA offers a low rate of anastomotic leak, pelvic morbidity and use of stoma, with reasonable fecal continence. Results are encouraging, but prospective studies are needed for comparison with standard of care.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342PubMedCrossRef Cutait DE, Figliolini FJ (1961) A new method of colorectal anastomosis in abdominoperineal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 4:335–342PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbull RJ, Cuthbertson F (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for rectal cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115PubMedCrossRef Turnbull RJ, Cuthbertson F (1961) Abdominorectal pull-through resection for rectal cancer and for Hirschsprung’s disease. Delayed posterior colorectal anastomosis. Cleve Clin Q 28:109–115PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818PubMedCrossRef Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD (2010) Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 251:807–818PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57PubMedCrossRef Eriksen MT, Wibe A, Norstein J et al (2005) Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients. Colorectal Dis 7:51–57PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson DE et al (1998) Outcome after proctectomy for rectal cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals: a report from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:64–70PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Longo WE, Virgo KS, Johnson DE et al (1998) Outcome after proctectomy for rectal cancer in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals: a report from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:64–70PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baulieux J, Adham M, Nasser Y et al (1996) Anastomose colo-anale différée sans colostomie temporaire de protection pour cancer bas du rectum après radiothérapie pré-opératoire. Lyon Chirurgie 92:87–93 Baulieux J, Adham M, Nasser Y et al (1996) Anastomose colo-anale différée sans colostomie temporaire de protection pour cancer bas du rectum après radiothérapie pré-opératoire. Lyon Chirurgie 92:87–93
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutait DE (1970) Prevention of pelvic complications in pull-through operations for cancer and benign lesions. Proc R Soc Med 63(Suppl):121–128PubMedCentralPubMed Cutait DE (1970) Prevention of pelvic complications in pull-through operations for cancer and benign lesions. Proc R Soc Med 63(Suppl):121–128PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins J, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane book series. Wiley-Blackwell, West SussexCrossRef Higgins J, Green S (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane book series. Wiley-Blackwell, West SussexCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282:1054–1060PubMedCrossRef Jüni P, Witschi A, Bloch R, Egger M (1999) The hazards of scoring the quality of clinical trials for meta-analysis. JAMA 282:1054–1060PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 370:1453–1457CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC et al (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283:2008–2012PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Baulieux J, Olagne E, De La Roche E et al (1999) Résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels des résections avec anastomose coloanale directe différée dans les cancers du bas rectum préalablement irradiés. Chirurgie 124:240–251PubMedCrossRef Baulieux J, Olagne E, De La Roche E et al (1999) Résultats oncologiques et fonctionnels des résections avec anastomose coloanale directe différée dans les cancers du bas rectum préalablement irradiés. Chirurgie 124:240–251PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Baulieux J, Mabrut JY, Adham M et al (2004) Conservation sphinctérienne après exérèse des cancers bas du rectum. Stratégie multimodale combinant une radiothérapie pré-opératoire et une anastomose colo-anale différée sans stomie de protection. Bull Acad Natle Méd 188:1509–1524 Baulieux J, Mabrut JY, Adham M et al (2004) Conservation sphinctérienne après exérèse des cancers bas du rectum. Stratégie multimodale combinant une radiothérapie pré-opératoire et une anastomose colo-anale différée sans stomie de protection. Bull Acad Natle Méd 188:1509–1524
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chirica M, Parc Y, Tiret E, Dehni N, McNamara D, Parc R (2006) Coloanal sleeve anastomosis (Soave procedure): the ultimate treatment option for complex rectourinary fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1379–1383PubMedCrossRef Chirica M, Parc Y, Tiret E, Dehni N, McNamara D, Parc R (2006) Coloanal sleeve anastomosis (Soave procedure): the ultimate treatment option for complex rectourinary fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1379–1383PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cutait DE, Cutait R, Ioshimoto M, Hyppólito da Silva J, Manzione A (1985) Abdominoperineal endoanal pull-through resection. A comparative study between immediate and delayed colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:294–299PubMedCrossRef Cutait DE, Cutait R, Ioshimoto M, Hyppólito da Silva J, Manzione A (1985) Abdominoperineal endoanal pull-through resection. A comparative study between immediate and delayed colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 28:294–299PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Facy O, Lagoutte N, Jambet S et al (2009) Anastomose colo-anale différée sans stomie de dérivation après résection antérieure basse du rectum. J Chir 146:458–463CrossRef Facy O, Lagoutte N, Jambet S et al (2009) Anastomose colo-anale différée sans stomie de dérivation après résection antérieure basse du rectum. J Chir 146:458–463CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Han F, Li H, Zheng D et al (2010) A new sphincter-preserving operation for low rectal cancer: ultralow anterior resection and colorectal/coloanal anastomosis by supporting bundling-up method. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:873–880PubMedCrossRef Han F, Li H, Zheng D et al (2010) A new sphincter-preserving operation for low rectal cancer: ultralow anterior resection and colorectal/coloanal anastomosis by supporting bundling-up method. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:873–880PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hiranyakas A, Ho Y-H (2011) Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection versus laparoscopic pull-through with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers: a comparative study. Am J Surg 202:291–297PubMedCrossRef Hiranyakas A, Ho Y-H (2011) Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection versus laparoscopic pull-through with coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancers: a comparative study. Am J Surg 202:291–297PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarry J, Faucheron L, Moreno W, Bellera CA, Evrard S (2011) Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas. Eur Surg Oncol 37:127–133CrossRef Jarry J, Faucheron L, Moreno W, Bellera CA, Evrard S (2011) Delayed colo-anal anastomosis is an alternative to prophylactic diverting stoma after total mesorectal excision for middle and low rectal carcinomas. Eur Surg Oncol 37:127–133CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarry J, Faucheron JL (2011) Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection with transanal colonic pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis: a new approach to adult Hirschsprung disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef Jarry J, Faucheron JL (2011) Laparoscopic rectosigmoid resection with transanal colonic pull-through and delayed coloanal anastomosis: a new approach to adult Hirschsprung disease. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1313–1319PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL (1978) Pull-through operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 65:689–695CrossRef Kirwan WO, Turnbull RB Jr, Fazio VW, Weakley FL (1978) Pull-through operation with delayed anastomosis for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 65:689–695CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Olagne E, Baulieux J, de la Roche E et al (2000) Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 191:643–649PubMedCrossRef Olagne E, Baulieux J, de la Roche E et al (2000) Functional results of delayed coloanal anastomosis after preoperative radiotherapy for lower third rectal cancer. J Am Coll Surg 191:643–649PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP et al (2009) Outcomes following Turnbull–Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96:424–429PubMedCrossRef Remzi FH, El Gazzaz G, Kiran RP et al (2009) Outcomes following Turnbull–Cutait abdominoperineal pull-through compared with coloanal anastomosis. Br J Surg 96:424–429PubMedCrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Schein CJ, Weiser R (1982) Pull-up technique for low colorectal anastomosis. Surg Gyn Obst 154:567–569 Schein CJ, Weiser R (1982) Pull-up technique for low colorectal anastomosis. Surg Gyn Obst 154:567–569
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef Hüser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jevarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRef Chow A, Tilney HS, Paraskeva P, Jevarajah S, Zacharakis E, Purkayastha S (2009) The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:711–723PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K (1998) Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:160–163PubMedCrossRef Petersen S, Freitag M, Hellmich G, Ludwig K (1998) Anastomotic leakage: impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:160–163PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Branagan G, Finnis D (2005) Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026PubMedCrossRef Branagan G, Finnis D (2005) Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154PubMedCrossRef McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ (2005) Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:1150–1154PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ et al (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ et al (2004) Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11:8–15PubMedCrossRef Law WL, Choi HK, Lee YM et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage is associated with poor long-term outcome in patients after curative colorectal resection for malignancy. J Gastrointest Surg 11:8–15PubMedCrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Park IJ (2010) Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1190–1196PubMedCrossRef Park IJ (2010) Influence of anastomotic leakage on oncological outcome in patients with rectal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1190–1196PubMedCrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Constantinides V et al (2006) Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Br J Surg 93:19–32PubMedCrossRef Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Constantinides V et al (2006) Meta-analysis of colonic reservoirs versus straight coloanal anastomosis after anterior resection. Br J Surg 93:19–32PubMedCrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris GJ, Lavery IJ, Fazio VW (2002) Reasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1304–1308PubMedCrossRef Harris GJ, Lavery IJ, Fazio VW (2002) Reasons for failure to construct the colonic J-pouch. What can be done to improve the size of the neorectal reservoir should it occur? Dis Colon Rectum 45:1304–1308PubMedCrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1998) Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41:740–746PubMedCrossRef Joo JS, Latulippe JF, Alabaz O, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD (1998) Long-term functional evaluation of straight coloanal anastomosis and colonic J-pouch: is the functional superiority of colonic J-pouch sustained? Dis Colon Rectum 41:740–746PubMedCrossRef
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881PubMedCrossRef Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881PubMedCrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Visick A (1948) Measure radical gastrectomy: review of 505 operations for peptic ulcers. Lancet 1:551–555PubMedCrossRef Visick A (1948) Measure radical gastrectomy: review of 505 operations for peptic ulcers. Lancet 1:551–555PubMedCrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Jorge J, Wexner S (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef Jorge J, Wexner S (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The clinical results of the Turnbull–Cutait delayed coloanal anastomosis: a systematic review
verfasst von
J. Hallet
H. Milot
S. Drolet
E. Desrosiers
R. C. Grégoire
A. Bouchard
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2014
Verlag
Springer Milan
Erschienen in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Ausgabe 6/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Elektronische ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1132-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 6/2014 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.