Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery 3/2022

16.01.2022 | Review Article

The comparison of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis

verfasst von: Dianchen Wang, Jianwu Jiang, Yang Fu, Pan Qu

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Self-gripping mesh is widely used in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair and some researches report its advantages compared with conventional mesh. The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify studies comparing the results of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Outcomes, including recurrence, chronic pain, operation time, hematoma, seroma and infection, were measured. Four randomized controlled trials and 1 prospective comparative study were analyzed. The incidence of chronic pain in self-gripping group was significantly lower than that in conventional group (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.20, 0.93, P = 0.03), and there was no significant difference in hernia recurrence (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.03, 3.06, P = 0.32), operation time (MD 0.06, 95%CI − 2.32, 2.44, P = 0.96), hematoma (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.33, 3.07, P = 0.99) and seroma (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.49, 1.66, P = 0.73). Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair using self-gripping mesh is associated with a decreased incidence of chronic pain compared with conventional mesh, without increased postoperative complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Deans GT, Wilson MS, Royston CM et al (1995) Recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic repair: possible cause and prevention. Br J Surg 82:539–541CrossRef Deans GT, Wilson MS, Royston CM et al (1995) Recurrent inguinal hernia after laparoscopic repair: possible cause and prevention. Br J Surg 82:539–541CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K et al (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13:878–881CrossRef Stark E, Oestreich K, Wendl K et al (1999) Nerve irritation after laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 13:878–881CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Antoniou SA, Köhler G, Antoniou GA et al (2016) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 211:239–249CrossRef Antoniou SA, Köhler G, Antoniou GA et al (2016) Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing nonpenetrating vs mechanical mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 211:239–249CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Molegraaf M, Kaufmann R, Lange J (2018) Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of long-term results. Surgery 163:351–360CrossRef Molegraaf M, Kaufmann R, Lange J (2018) Comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of long-term results. Surgery 163:351–360CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I et al (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. J Am Coll Surg 208:1107–1114CrossRef Hollinsky C, Kolbe T, Walter I et al (2009) Comparison of a new self-gripping mesh with other fixation methods for laparoscopic hernia repair in a rat model. J Am Coll Surg 208:1107–1114CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang D, Zhang H, Lei T et al (2020) Randomized trial comparing self-gripping mesh with polypropylene mesh in female lichtenstein hernioplasty. Am Surg 86:110–115CrossRef Wang D, Zhang H, Lei T et al (2020) Randomized trial comparing self-gripping mesh with polypropylene mesh in female lichtenstein hernioplasty. Am Surg 86:110–115CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cambal M, Zonca P, Hrbaty B (2012) Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Bratisl Lek Listy 113:103–107PubMed Cambal M, Zonca P, Hrbaty B (2012) Comparison of self-gripping mesh with mesh fixation with fibrin-glue in laparoscopic hernia repair (TAPP). Bratisl Lek Listy 113:103–107PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Romario UF, Puccetti F, Elmore U et al (2013) Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 27:1798–1802CrossRef Romario UF, Puccetti F, Elmore U et al (2013) Self-gripping mesh versus staple fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective comparison. Surg Endosc 27:1798–1802CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ferrarese A, Bindi M, Rivelli M et al (2016) Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients. Open Med 11:497–508CrossRef Ferrarese A, Bindi M, Rivelli M et al (2016) Self-gripping mesh versus fibrin glue fixation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized prospective clinical trial in young and elderly patients. Open Med 11:497–508CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Law TT, Ng KK, Wei R et al (2020) A randomized controlled trial comparing short-term outcomes of self-gripping (Progrip) Mesh versus fibrin sealant in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 30:203–208CrossRef Law TT, Ng KK, Wei R et al (2020) A randomized controlled trial comparing short-term outcomes of self-gripping (Progrip) Mesh versus fibrin sealant in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernioplasty. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 30:203–208CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Denham M, Johnson B, Leong M et al (2019) An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 33:2670–2679CrossRef Denham M, Johnson B, Leong M et al (2019) An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc 33:2670–2679CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, et al (2013) GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working Group Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, et al (2013) GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. The GRADE Working Group
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chinn S (2000) A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 19:3127–3131CrossRef Chinn S (2000) A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 19:3127–3131CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRef Higgins JP, Thompson SG (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539–1558CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Shi Z, Fan X, Zhai S et al (2017) Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Endosc 31:527–537CrossRef Shi Z, Fan X, Zhai S et al (2017) Fibrin glue versus staple for mesh fixation in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Surg Endosc 31:527–537CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Sajid MS, Kalra L, Parampalli U et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 205:726–736CrossRef Sajid MS, Kalra L, Parampalli U et al (2013) A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Am J Surg 205:726–736CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat de Goede B, Klitsie PJ, van Kempen BJ et al (2013) Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:735–742CrossRef de Goede B, Klitsie PJ, van Kempen BJ et al (2013) Meta-analysis of glue versus sutured mesh fixation for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 100:735–742CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB et al (2013) The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain 154:95–102CrossRef Haroutiunian S, Nikolajsen L, Finnerup NB et al (2013) The neuropathic component in persistent postsurgical pain: a systematic literature review. Pain 154:95–102CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G et al (2011) International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 15:239–249CrossRef Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G et al (2011) International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery. Hernia 15:239–249CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J, Ji Z, Li Y (2014) The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg 259:1080–1085CrossRef Li J, Ji Z, Li Y (2014) The comparison of self-gripping mesh and sutured mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis. Ann Surg 259:1080–1085CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13:137–142CrossRef Chastan P (2009) Tension-free open hernia repair using an innovative self-gripping semi-resorbable mesh. Hernia 13:137–142CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolbe T, Hollinsky C, Walter I et al (2010) Influence of a new self-gripping hernia mesh on male fertility in a rat model. Surg Endosc 24:455–461CrossRef Kolbe T, Hollinsky C, Walter I et al (2010) Influence of a new self-gripping hernia mesh on male fertility in a rat model. Surg Endosc 24:455–461CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B et al (2010) Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg 34:1702–1709CrossRef Stremitzer S, Bachleitner-Hofmann T, Gradl B et al (2010) Mesh graft infection following abdominal hernia repair: risk factor evaluation and strategies of mesh graft preservation. A retrospective analysis of 476 operations. World J Surg 34:1702–1709CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The comparison of self-gripping mesh and conventional mesh in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the results of meta-analysis
verfasst von
Dianchen Wang
Jianwu Jiang
Yang Fu
Pan Qu
Publikationsdatum
16.01.2022
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2022
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-021-01218-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2022

Updates in Surgery 3/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.