Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences 5/2019

22.02.2019 | Original Article

The controversy of the normal values of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic accuracy of wrist-dependent CSA revisited

verfasst von: Floriaan G. C. M. De Kleermaeker, Jan Meulstee, Wim I. M. Verhagen

Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

No consensus exists about the upper limit of normal (ULN) of the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the median nerve in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Previously, we demonstrated a strong positive correlation between wrist circumference and CSA. ULN depending on wrist circumference turned out to have a low sensitivity, which was hypothesized to be caused by an age mismatch. The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the found invariance by augmentation of the healthy control group, adding older subjects, and to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the updated normal values.

Methods

CSA and wrist circumference were measured in an additional 42 healthy controls in the ages of 40–60. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were applied to determine predicting factors for CSA. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in a prospective cohort of 253 patients.

Results

A strong correlation was found between wrist circumference and CSA (r = 0.61). Wrist circumference is the most important independent predictor for ULN (r2 = 0.37). We managed to simplify our newly derived regression equations, which turned out to be unrelated to age. Sensitivity of our new equations is low, but higher than a general fixed cut-off value (53.4% and 47.4%, respectively).

Discussion

Wrist circumference is the most important independent predicting factor of CSA. By using our updated equations and taking wrist circumference into account, one can determine a more precise ULN for each individual, which will lead to the improvement of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (US). Sensitivity for US in diagnosing CTS remains low and it can therefore not replace EDX.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cartwright MS, Hobson-Webb LD, Boon AJ, Alter KE, Hunt CH, Flores VH, Werner RA, Shook SJ, Thomas TD, Primack SJ, Walker FO, American Association of N, Electrodiagnostic M (2012) Evidence-based guideline: neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 46(2):287–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.23389 CrossRefPubMed Cartwright MS, Hobson-Webb LD, Boon AJ, Alter KE, Hunt CH, Flores VH, Werner RA, Shook SJ, Thomas TD, Primack SJ, Walker FO, American Association of N, Electrodiagnostic M (2012) Evidence-based guideline: neuromuscular ultrasound for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 46(2):287–293. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​mus.​23389 CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Kale M, Turker H, Diren B (2008) Bifid median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 27(8):1129–1136CrossRefPubMed Bayrak IK, Bayrak AO, Kale M, Turker H, Diren B (2008) Bifid median nerve in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. J Ultrasound Med 27(8):1129–1136CrossRefPubMed
3.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Bussemaker FE, de Waard JW, Bijlsma JW (2001) Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. J Rheumatol 28(1):62–69PubMed Swen WA, Jacobs JW, Bussemaker FE, de Waard JW, Bijlsma JW (2001) Carpal tunnel sonography by the rheumatologist versus nerve conduction study by the neurologist. J Rheumatol 28(1):62–69PubMed
20.
Metadaten
Titel
The controversy of the normal values of ultrasonography in carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic accuracy of wrist-dependent CSA revisited
verfasst von
Floriaan G. C. M. De Kleermaeker
Jan Meulstee
Wim I. M. Verhagen
Publikationsdatum
22.02.2019
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Neurological Sciences / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 1590-1874
Elektronische ISSN: 1590-3478
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-019-03756-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Neurological Sciences 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.