Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy 3/2018

15.09.2017

The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery

verfasst von: Robert K. Cleary, Andrew J. Mullard, Jane Ferraro, Scott E. Regenbogen

Erschienen in: Surgical Endoscopy | Ausgabe 3/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Conversion from minimally invasive to open colorectal surgery remains common and costly. Robotic colorectal surgery is associated with lower rates of conversion than laparoscopy, but institutions and payers remain concerned about equipment and implementation costs. Recognizing that reimbursement reform and bundled payments expand perspectives on cost to include the entire surgical episode, we evaluated the role of minimally invasive conversion in total payments.

Methods

This is an observational study from a linked data registry including clinical data from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative and payment data from the Michigan Value Collaborative between July 2012 and April 2015. We evaluated colorectal resections initiated with open and minimally invasive approaches, and compared reported risk-adjusted and price-standardized 30-day episode payments and their components.

Results

We identified 1061 open, 1604 laparoscopic, and 275 robotic colorectal resections. Adjusted episode payments were significantly higher for open operations than for minimally invasive procedures completed without conversion ($19,489 vs. $15,518, p < 0.001). The conversion rate was significantly higher with laparoscopic than robotic operations (15.1 vs. 7.6%, p < 0.001). Adjusted episode payments for minimally invasive operations converted to open were significantly higher than for those completed by minimally invasive approaches ($18,098 vs. $15,518, p < 0.001). Payments for operations completed robotically were greater than those completed laparoscopically ($16,949 vs. $15,250, p < 0.001), but the difference was substantially decreased when conversion to open cases was included ($16,939 vs. $15,699, p = 0.041).

Conclusion

Episode payments for open colorectal surgery exceed both laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive options. Conversion to open surgery significantly increases the payments associated with minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Because conversion rates in robotic colorectal operations are half of those in laparoscopy, the excess expenditures attributable to robotics are attenuated by consideration of the cost of conversions.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson BS, Coory MD, Gordon LG, Lumley JW (2014) Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake. Surg Endosc 28:1515–1521CrossRefPubMed Thompson BS, Coory MD, Gordon LG, Lumley JW (2014) Cost savings for elective laparoscopic resection compared with open resection for colorectal cancer in a region of high uptake. Surg Endosc 28:1515–1521CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jordan J, Dowson H, Gage H, Jackson D, Rockall T (2014) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study. CEOR 6:414–422 Jordan J, Dowson H, Gage H, Jackson D, Rockall T (2014) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study. CEOR 6:414–422
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L, Costedio M, Gorgun E, Kalady MF, Kessler H, Lavery IC, Remzi FH (2016) Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg. doi:10.1097/SLA0000000000001815 Silva-Velazco J, Dietz DW, Stocchi L, Costedio M, Gorgun E, Kalady MF, Kessler H, Lavery IC, Remzi FH (2016) Considering value in rectal cancer surgery: an analysis of costs and outcomes on the open, laparoscopic, and robotic approach for proctectomy. Ann Surg. doi:10.​1097/​SLA0000000000001​815
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Harr JN, Juo YY, Luka S, Agarwal S, Brody F, Obias V (2016) Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:3505–3510CrossRefPubMed Harr JN, Juo YY, Luka S, Agarwal S, Brody F, Obias V (2016) Incisional and port-site hernias following robotic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:3505–3510CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fox J, Gross CP, Longo W, Reddy V (2012) Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 55:501–508CrossRefPubMed Fox J, Gross CP, Longo W, Reddy V (2012) Laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of cancer has been widely adopted in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 55:501–508CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Damle RN, Macomber CW, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Sweeney WB, Sturrock PR, Maykel JA, Santry HP, Alavi K (2014) Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 218:1223–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Damle RN, Macomber CW, Flahive JM, Davids JS, Sweeney WB, Sturrock PR, Maykel JA, Santry HP, Alavi K (2014) Surgeon volume and elective resection for colon cancer: an analysis of outcomes and use of laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 218:1223–1230CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRefPubMed Halabi WJ, Kang CY, Nguyen VQ, Carmichael JC, Mills S, Stamos MJ, Pigazzi A (2013) Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes. World J Surg 37:2782–2790CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Phelan M, Smith BR, Stamos MJ (2015) Variations in laparoscopic colectomy utilization in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 58:950–956CrossRefPubMed Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Phelan M, Smith BR, Stamos MJ (2015) Variations in laparoscopic colectomy utilization in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 58:950–956CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2014) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMed Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Lawrence JK, Champagne BJ, Delaney CP (2014) Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection. Surg Endosc 28:212–221CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466CrossRefPubMed Tyler JA, Fox JP, Desai MM, Perry WB, Glasgow SC (2013) Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era. Dis Colon Rectum 56:458–466CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708CrossRefPubMed Rawlings AL, Woodland JH, Vegunta RK, Crawford DL (2007) Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 21:1701–1708CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V (2013) Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg 79:553–560PubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Hollis RH, Cannon JA, Singletary BA, Korb ML, Hawn MT, Heslin MJ (2016) Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:850–856CrossRefPubMed Hollis RH, Cannon JA, Singletary BA, Korb ML, Hawn MT, Heslin MJ (2016) Understanding the value of both laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared to open approach in colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:850–856CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopic assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed Jayne DG, Thorpe HC, Copeland J, Quirke P, Brown JM, Guillou PJ (2010) Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 97:1638–1645CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMed Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75–82CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB, Vandewarker JF, Cleary RK (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 30:1576–1584CrossRefPubMed Bhama AR, Obias V, Welch KB, Vandewarker JF, Cleary RK (2016) A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes using the American College of Surgeons—National Surgical Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. Surg Endosc 30:1576–1584CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Kraphol G, Vandewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463CrossRefPubMed Tam MS, Kaoutzanis C, Mullard AJ, Regenbogen SE, Franz MG, Hendren S, Kraphol G, Vandewarker JF, Lampman RM, Cleary RK (2016) A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 30:455–463CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gottlieb DJ, Zhou W, Song Y, Andrews KG, Skinner JS, Sutherland JM (2010) Prices don’t drive regional Medicare spending variations. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(3):537–543CrossRef Gottlieb DJ, Zhou W, Song Y, Andrews KG, Skinner JS, Sutherland JM (2010) Prices don’t drive regional Medicare spending variations. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(3):537–543CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dolejs SC, Waters JA, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5239-5 Dolejs SC, Waters JA, Ceppa EP, Zarzaur BL (2016) Laparoscopic versus robotic colectomy: a national surgical quality improvement project analysis. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-016-5239-5
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Feinberg AE, Elnahas A, Bashir S, Cleghorn MC, Quereshy FA (2016) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections with respect to 30-day perioperative morbidity. Can J Surg 59:262–267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Feinberg AE, Elnahas A, Bashir S, Cleghorn MC, Quereshy FA (2016) Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic colorectal resections with respect to 30-day perioperative morbidity. Can J Surg 59:262–267CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang X, Wei ZQ, Bie M, Peng XD, Chen C (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 30:5601–5614CrossRefPubMed Zhang X, Wei ZQ, Bie M, Peng XD, Chen C (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 30:5601–5614CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multi-centre, randomized trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multi-centre, randomized trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JK, Lo SH, Law WL (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630CrossRefPubMed Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JK, Lo SH, Law WL (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Chew MH, Ng KH, Fook-Chong MC, Eu KW (2011) Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcome analysis of 418 cases from a single institution. World J Surg 35:178–185CrossRefPubMed Chew MH, Ng KH, Fook-Chong MC, Eu KW (2011) Redefining conversion in laparoscopic colectomy and its influence on outcome analysis of 418 cases from a single institution. World J Surg 35:178–185CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664CrossRefPubMed Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial. Ann Surg 246:655–664CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfeifer J, Wexner SD, Reissman O, Bernstein M, Nogueras JJ, Singh S, Weiss E (1995) Laparoscopic versus open colon surgery. Costs and outcome. Surg Endosc 12:1322–1326 Pfeifer J, Wexner SD, Reissman O, Bernstein M, Nogueras JJ, Singh S, Weiss E (1995) Laparoscopic versus open colon surgery. Costs and outcome. Surg Endosc 12:1322–1326
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed Leung KL, Kwok SPY, Lam SCW, Lee JFY, Yiu RYC, Ng SSM, Lai PBS, Lau WY (2004) Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomized trial. Lancet 363:1187–1192CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowson HM, Gage H, Jackson D, Qiao Y, Williams P, Rockall TA (2012) Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a prospective cost analysis. Colorectal Dis 14:1424–1430CrossRefPubMed Dowson HM, Gage H, Jackson D, Qiao Y, Williams P, Rockall TA (2012) Laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: a prospective cost analysis. Colorectal Dis 14:1424–1430CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, Gage H, Lovell DP, Rockall TA (2007) Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:908–919CrossRefPubMed Dowson HM, Huang A, Soon Y, Gage H, Lovell DP, Rockall TA (2007) Systematic review of the costs of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 50:908–919CrossRefPubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Fitch K, Bochner A, Haas EM (2016) A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery—payer, provider, and patient benefits. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-016-5295-x Keller DS, Senagore AJ, Fitch K, Bochner A, Haas EM (2016) A new perspective on the value of minimally invasive colorectal surgery—payer, provider, and patient benefits. Surg Endosc. doi:10.​1007/​s00464-016-5295-x
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Healy MA, Regenbogen SE, Kanters AE, Suwanabol PA, Varban OA, Campbell DA, Dimick JB, Byrn JC (2017) Surgeon variation in complications with minimally invasive and open colectomy: results from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. JAMA Surg. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1527 Healy MA, Regenbogen SE, Kanters AE, Suwanabol PA, Varban OA, Campbell DA, Dimick JB, Byrn JC (2017) Surgeon variation in complications with minimally invasive and open colectomy: results from the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. JAMA Surg. doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2017.​1527
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolfschoten NE, van Leersum NJ, Gooiker GA, van de Mheen PJM, Eddes EH, Kievit J, Brand R, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA, Tollenaar RAEM (2013) Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg 257:916–921CrossRefPubMed Kolfschoten NE, van Leersum NJ, Gooiker GA, van de Mheen PJM, Eddes EH, Kievit J, Brand R, Tanis PJ, Bemelman WA, Tollenaar RAEM (2013) Successful and safe introduction of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Dutch hospitals. Ann Surg 257:916–921CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Regenbogen SE, Veenstra CM, Hawley ST, Banerjee M, Ward KC, Kato I, Morris AM (2014) The personal financial burden of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Cancer 120:3073–3081CrossRef Regenbogen SE, Veenstra CM, Hawley ST, Banerjee M, Ward KC, Kato I, Morris AM (2014) The personal financial burden of complications after colorectal cancer surgery. Cancer 120:3073–3081CrossRef
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Morelli L, Guadagni S, Lorenzoni V, DiFranco G, Cobuccio L, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Moglia A, Ferrari V, DiCandio G, Mosca F, Turchetti G (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the daVinci Si. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1639–1648CrossRefPubMed Morelli L, Guadagni S, Lorenzoni V, DiFranco G, Cobuccio L, Palmeri M, Caprili G, D’Isidoro C, Moglia A, Ferrari V, DiCandio G, Mosca F, Turchetti G (2016) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer in a single surgeon’s experience: a cost analysis covering the initial 50 robotic cases with the daVinci Si. Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1639–1648CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeo HL, Isaacs AJ, Abelson JS, Milsom JW, Sedrakyan A (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomies using a large national database: outcomes and trends related to surgery center volume. Dis Colon Rectum 59:535–542CrossRefPubMed Yeo HL, Isaacs AJ, Abelson JS, Milsom JW, Sedrakyan A (2016) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic colectomies using a large national database: outcomes and trends related to surgery center volume. Dis Colon Rectum 59:535–542CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Schootman M, Hendren A, Ratnapradipa K, Stringer L, Davidson NO (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59:1011–1018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schootman M, Hendren A, Ratnapradipa K, Stringer L, Davidson NO (2016) Adoption of robotic technology for treating colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 59:1011–1018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
The cost of conversion in robotic and laparoscopic colorectal surgery
verfasst von
Robert K. Cleary
Andrew J. Mullard
Jane Ferraro
Scott E. Regenbogen
Publikationsdatum
15.09.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Surgical Endoscopy / Ausgabe 3/2018
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5839-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2018

Surgical Endoscopy 3/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.