Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 1/2017

22.10.2016 | Original Article

The Daily Readiness Huddle: a process to rapidly identify issues and foster improvement through problem-solving accountability

verfasst von: Lane F. Donnelly, Shirley S. Cherian, Kimberly B. Chua, Sam Thankachan, Laura A. Millecker, Alex G. Koroll, George S. Bisset III

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Because of the increasing complexities of providing imaging for pediatric health care services, a more reliable process to manage the daily delivery of care is necessary. Objective We describe our Daily Readiness Huddle and the effects of the process on problem identification and improvement.

Materials and methods

Our Daily Readiness Huddle has four elements: metrics review, clinical volume review, daily readiness assessment, and problem accountability. It is attended by radiologists, directors, managers, front-line staff with concerns, representatives from support services (information technology [IT] and biomedical engineering [biomed]), and representatives who join the meeting in a virtual format from off-site locations. Data are visually displayed on erasable whiteboards. The daily readiness assessment uses queues to determine whether anyone has concerns or outlier data in regard to S-MESA (Safety, Methods, Equipment, Supplies or Associates). Through this assessment, problems are identified and categorized as quick hits (will be resolved in 24–48 h, not requiring project management) and complex issues. Complex issues are assigned an owner, quality coach and report-back date. Additionally, projects are defined as improvements that are often strategic, are anticipated to take more than 60 days, and do not necessarily arise out of identified issues during the Daily Readiness Huddle. We tracked and calculated the mean, median and range of days to resolution and completion for complex issues and for projects during the first full year of implementing this process.

Results

During the first 12 months, 91 complex issues were identified and resolved, 11 projects were in progress and 33 completed, with 23 other projects active or in planning. Time to resolution of complex issues (in days) was mean 37.5, median 34.0, and range 1–105. For projects, time to completion (in days) was mean 86.0, median 84.0, and range 5–280.

Conclusion

The Daily Readiness Huddle process has given us a framework to rapidly identify issues, bring accountability to problem-solving, and foster improvement. It has also had a positive effect on team-building and coordination.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wachter R (2015) The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. McGraw Hill Professional, New York, pp 1–243 Wachter R (2015) The digital doctor: hope, hype, and harm at the dawn of medicine’s computer age. McGraw Hill Professional, New York, pp 1–243
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly LF (2014) Daily management systems in medicine. Radiographics 44:1209–1212 Donnelly LF (2014) Daily management systems in medicine. Radiographics 44:1209–1212
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly LF (2016) The Daily Readiness Huddle? A key component to a system of care. J Health Syst Pol Res 3:22.1–22.7 Donnelly LF (2016) The Daily Readiness Huddle? A key component to a system of care. J Health Syst Pol Res 3:22.1–22.7
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann D (2010) Creating a lean culture — tools to sustain lean conversions, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–103 Mann D (2010) Creating a lean culture — tools to sustain lean conversions, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 3–103
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Liker JK, Convis GL (2012) The Toyota way to lean leadership — achieving and sustaining excellence through leadership development. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 121–143 Liker JK, Convis GL (2012) The Toyota way to lean leadership — achieving and sustaining excellence through leadership development. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 121–143
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Koenigsaecker G (2009) Leading the lean enterprise transformation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–77 Koenigsaecker G (2009) Leading the lean enterprise transformation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 9–77
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way. 14 management principles form the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1–159 Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way. 14 management principles form the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw Hill, New York, pp 1–159
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Bussell J (2012) Anatomy of a lean leader as illustrated by 10 modern CEOs and Abraham Lincoln. UL LLC, Northbrook, pp 1–150 Bussell J (2012) Anatomy of a lean leader as illustrated by 10 modern CEOs and Abraham Lincoln. UL LLC, Northbrook, pp 1–150
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Toussaint J, Gerard RA (2010) On the mend. Revolutionizing healthcare to save lives and transform the industry. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, pp 1–138 Toussaint J, Gerard RA (2010) On the mend. Revolutionizing healthcare to save lives and transform the industry. Lean Enterprise Institute, Cambridge, pp 1–138
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70:71–79PubMed Kaplan RS, Norton DP (1992) The balanced scorecard — measures that drive performance. Harv Bus Rev 70:71–79PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Zelman WN, Pink GH, Matthias CB (2003) Use of a balanced scorecard in health care. J Health Care Finance 29:1–16PubMed Zelman WN, Pink GH, Matthias CB (2003) Use of a balanced scorecard in health care. J Health Care Finance 29:1–16PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Donnelly LF, Gessner KE, Dickerson JM et al (2010) Department scorecard — a tool to help drive imaging delivery performance. Radiographics 30:2029–2038 Donnelly LF, Gessner KE, Dickerson JM et al (2010) Department scorecard — a tool to help drive imaging delivery performance. Radiographics 30:2029–2038
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson CD, Krecke KN, Miranda R et al (2009) Developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. Radiographics 29:951–959CrossRefPubMed Johnson CD, Krecke KN, Miranda R et al (2009) Developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer. Radiographics 29:951–959CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Daily Readiness Huddle: a process to rapidly identify issues and foster improvement through problem-solving accountability
verfasst von
Lane F. Donnelly
Shirley S. Cherian
Kimberly B. Chua
Sam Thankachan
Laura A. Millecker
Alex G. Koroll
George S. Bisset III
Publikationsdatum
22.10.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3712-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Pediatric Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Letter to the Editor

Response to Dr. Frush

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.