The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12904-015-0062-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.
All of the authors contributed substantially to this manuscript. The first author (QL) participated in the design of the study, carried out the literature search/analysis, and drafted the manuscript. The second and third authors (YX and HZ) also made substantial contributions to the literature search/analysis and writing of the paper. The last author (AL) supervised the study, participated in its design and coordination, and made critical revisions for important intellectual content. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
As the primary informal caregiver for cancer patients, spousal caregivers are a population at a high risk of hidden morbidity. The factors impacting couples coping with cancer are complex, and within spousal caregiver-patient dyads the impact is mutual. The aim of this study is to explain the process that led to the development of an acceptable, feasible, and potentially effective ‘Caring for Couples Coping with Cancer “4Cs” Programme’ to support couples coping with cancer as the unit of intervention in China.
The Medical Research Council’s (MRC) framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions was adopted to develop an intervention for couples coping with cancer. Three steps were taken in the process of developing the 4Cs programme, namely: (1) identifying the evidence base by conducting a series of extensive reviews of the relevant literature and conducting a focus group study; (2) identifying/developing a theory by proposing a preliminary Live with Love Conceptual Framework ‘P-LLCF’ for cancer couple dyads; and (3) modelling the process and outcomes of the 4Cs programme.
The programme that was developed is comprised of six individual sessions to be delivered by the researcher/therapists over 6 weeks. The main contents of the sessions of the 4Cs programme are: primary stressors (section 1); secondary stressors (section 2); dyadic mediator (section 3); dyadic appraisal (section 4); dyadic coping (section 5); and a programme overview (section 6). The emphasis of the programme is on supporting couples coping with cancer. A booklet was developed to provide the participants with easy access to written information about their common concerns in caring for loved ones with cancer.
Guided by the MRC guidelines, a potentially effective, feasible, and acceptable 4Cs programme aimed at supporting couples coping with cancer as a dyad was developed. Future research is needed to pilot and evaluate the feasibility, modelling, and outcomes of this 4Cs programme.
Additional file 1: Figure S1. A preliminary conceptualization of the overall experiences of couples living and coping with cancer. (DOC 225 kb)12904_2015_62_MOESM1_ESM.doc
Additional file 2: Figure S2. A preliminary Live with Love Conceptual Framework (P-LLCF) for Cancer Couple Dyads. (DOC 98 kb)12904_2015_62_MOESM2_ESM.doc
Glajchen M. The emerging role and needs of family caregivers in cancer care. J Support Oncol. 2004;2:145–55. PubMed
Steele RG, Fitch MI. Coping strategies of family caregivers of home hospice patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996;23:955–60. PubMed
Dankoski ME, Pais S. What’s love got to do with it? Couples, illness, and MFT. J Couple Relatsh Ther. 2007;6:31–43. CrossRef
Medical Research Council. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. Retrieved from: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/32899190_Developing_and_Evaluating_Complex_Interventions_New_Guidance_Online.
Li Q, Loke AY. A review of literature on family caregivers of cancer patients in Mainland China. Chin J Nurs. 2012;47:1132–5.
Carbonneau H, Caron C, Desrosiers J. Development of a conceptual framework of positive aspects of caregiving in dementia. Dementia. 2010;9:327–53. CrossRef
Walker LO, Avant KC. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2005.
Lukens EP, McFarlane WR. Psychoeducation as Evidence-Based Practice: Considerations for Practice, Research, and Policy. Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention. 2004;4:205–25. CrossRef
Medical Dictionary. Skills training - definition of skills training in the medical dictionary - by the free online medical dictionary, thesaurus and encyclopedia. Retrieved from: http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/skills+training.
Therapy CB. What is cognitive behavior therapy? Retrieved from: http://archive.is/gepnh.
Gmelch S, Bodenmann G, Meuwly N, Ledermann T, Steffen-Sozinova O, Striegl K. Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI): A questionnaire assessing dyadic coping in couples. Zeitschrift Fur Familienforschung. 2008;20:185–202.
Bodenmann G. Dyadisches Coping Inventar (DCI). Testmanual [Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI). Test manual]. Bern: Huber & Hogrefe; 2008.
Crane DR, Middleton KC, Bean RA. Establishing criterion scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale. Am J Fam Ther. 2000;28(1):53–60. CrossRef
Busby DM, Crane DR, Larson JH, Christensen C. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. J Marital Fam Ther. 1995;21:289–308. CrossRef
- The development of a complex intervention in China: the ‘Caring for Couples Coping with Cancer “4Cs” Programme’ to support couples coping with cancer
Alice Yuen Loke
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II