Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine 3/2019

29.05.2018 | Short Communication

The effects of extra PCR cycles when amplifying skeletal samples with the GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit

verfasst von: Michelle Harrel, David Gangitano, Sheree Hughes-Stamm

Erschienen in: International Journal of Legal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

When samples with low amounts of DNA are amplified using short tandem repeats (STRs), stochastic effects such as allele and locus dropout or drop-in, allele imbalance, and increased stutter often occur making data interpretation more difficult. The most common approach to improving STR results from low template samples is to increase the number of PCR cycles. Although more alleles may be recovered, stochastic effects may be exaggerated resulting in more complicated STR profiles. This work reports the effect of additional PCR cycles (29 vs. 30, 31, and 32) on STR success from environmentally challenged bone and tooth samples using the GlobalFiler® DNA Amplification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). In addition, we compared the efficiency of two DNA extraction kits for skeletal samples: QIAamp® DNA Investigator (QIAGEN) and PrepFiler® BTA™ Forensic DNA Extraction (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kits. Results showed that more DNA was recovered from samples using the PrepFiler® BTA™ kit; but regardless of the extraction method, the number of alleles detected and the peak heights both increased with an increase in PCR cycle number. Although more alleles were reported in almost all samples, the most notable improvement was observed in samples with the DNA template < 120 pg. A general increase in the number of PCR artifacts was detected in STR profiles generated using 30–32 cycles. Overall, this study provides supporting evidence that STR profile completeness and quality may be improved when low template skeletal samples are amplified with extra PCR cycles (up to 32 cycles) using the GlobalFiler® DNA Amplification Kit.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghatak S, Muthukumaran RB, Nachimuthu SK (2013) A simple method of genomic DNA extraction from human samples for PCR-RFLP analysis. J Biomol Tech 24:224–231PubMedPubMedCentral Ghatak S, Muthukumaran RB, Nachimuthu SK (2013) A simple method of genomic DNA extraction from human samples for PCR-RFLP analysis. J Biomol Tech 24:224–231PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Loreille OM, Diegoli TM, Irwin JA, Coble MD, Parsons TJ (2007) High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:191–195CrossRef Loreille OM, Diegoli TM, Irwin JA, Coble MD, Parsons TJ (2007) High efficiency DNA extraction from bone by total demineralization. Forensic Sci Int Genet 1:191–195CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Miloš A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L, Huel RL, Katzmarzyk C, Rizvić A, Parsons TJ (2007) Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croat Med J 48:486–493PubMedPubMedCentral Miloš A, Selmanović A, Smajlović L, Huel RL, Katzmarzyk C, Rizvić A, Parsons TJ (2007) Success rates of nuclear short tandem repeat typing from different skeletal elements. Croat Med J 48:486–493PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee HY, Park MJ, Kim NY, Sim JE, Yang WI, Shin K-J (2010) Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:275–280CrossRef Lee HY, Park MJ, Kim NY, Sim JE, Yang WI, Shin K-J (2010) Simple and highly effective DNA extraction methods from old skeletal remains using silica columns. Forensic Sci Int Genet 4:275–280CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Abuidrees AS, Alhamad NA, Alsaadany K (2016) A suitable method for dna extraction from bones for forensic applications: a case study. Arab J Forensic Sci Forensic Med 1:346–352 Abuidrees AS, Alhamad NA, Alsaadany K (2016) A suitable method for dna extraction from bones for forensic applications: a case study. Arab J Forensic Sci Forensic Med 1:346–352
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Hochmeister MN, Budowle B, Borer UV, Eggmann U, Comey CT, Dirnhofer R (1991) Typing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from compact bone from human remains. J Forensic Sci 36:1649–1661PubMed Hochmeister MN, Budowle B, Borer UV, Eggmann U, Comey CT, Dirnhofer R (1991) Typing of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) extracted from compact bone from human remains. J Forensic Sci 36:1649–1661PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J (2000) An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int 112:17–40CrossRef Gill P, Whitaker J, Flaxman C, Brown N, Buckleton J (2000) An investigation of the rigor of interpretation rules for STRs derived from less than 100 pg of DNA. Forensic Sci Int 112:17–40CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Gill P (2001) Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J 42:229–232PubMed Gill P (2001) Application of low copy number DNA profiling. Croat Med J 42:229–232PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Whitaker JP, Cotton EA, Gill P (2001) A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR® SGM Plus™ multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int 123:215–223CrossRef Whitaker JP, Cotton EA, Gill P (2001) A comparison of the characteristics of profiles produced with the AMPFlSTR® SGM Plus™ multiplex system for both standard and low copy number (LCN) STR DNA analysis. Forensic Sci Int 123:215–223CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Forster L, Thomson J, Kutranov S (2008) Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle “low copy number”(LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2:318–328CrossRef Forster L, Thomson J, Kutranov S (2008) Direct comparison of post-28-cycle PCR purification and modified capillary electrophoresis methods with the 34-cycle “low copy number”(LCN) method for analysis of trace forensic DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2:318–328CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Strom CM, Rechitsky S (1998) Use of nested PCR to identify charred human remains and minute amounts of blood. J Forensic Sci 43:696–700CrossRef Strom CM, Rechitsky S (1998) Use of nested PCR to identify charred human remains and minute amounts of blood. J Forensic Sci 43:696–700CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Oh CS, Lee SJ, Lee SD, Kim MJ, Kim Y-S, Lim D-S, Shin DH (2013) Amplification of DNA remnants in mummified human brains from medieval Joseon tombs of Korea. Anthropol Anz 70:57–81CrossRef Oh CS, Lee SJ, Lee SD, Kim MJ, Kim Y-S, Lim D-S, Shin DH (2013) Amplification of DNA remnants in mummified human brains from medieval Joseon tombs of Korea. Anthropol Anz 70:57–81CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Irwin JA, Leney MD, Loreille O, Barritt SM, Christensen AF, Holland TD, Smith BC, Parsons TJ (2007) Application of low copy number STR typing to the identification of aged, degraded skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 52:1322–1327CrossRef Irwin JA, Leney MD, Loreille O, Barritt SM, Christensen AF, Holland TD, Smith BC, Parsons TJ (2007) Application of low copy number STR typing to the identification of aged, degraded skeletal remains. J Forensic Sci 52:1322–1327CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kloosterman A, Kersbergen P (2003) Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci. International Congress Series. Elsevier, pp 795–798 Kloosterman A, Kersbergen P (2003) Efficacy and limits of genotyping low copy number DNA samples by multiplex PCR of STR loci. International Congress Series. Elsevier, pp 795–798
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Seo SB, Ge J, King JL, Budowle B (2014) Reduction of stutter ratios in short tandem repeat loci typing of low copy number DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8:213–218CrossRef Seo SB, Ge J, King JL, Budowle B (2014) Reduction of stutter ratios in short tandem repeat loci typing of low copy number DNA samples. Forensic Sci Int Genet 8:213–218CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Ambers A, Turnbough M, Benjamin R, Gill-King H, King J, Sajantila A, Budowle B (2016) Modified DOP-PCR for improved STR typing of degraded DNA from human skeletal remains and bloodstains. Legal Med 18:7–12CrossRef Ambers A, Turnbough M, Benjamin R, Gill-King H, King J, Sajantila A, Budowle B (2016) Modified DOP-PCR for improved STR typing of degraded DNA from human skeletal remains and bloodstains. Legal Med 18:7–12CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Johnson BM, Kemp BM (2017) Rescue PCR: reagent-rich PCR recipe improves amplification of degraded DNA extracts. J Archaeol Sci Rep 11:683–694 Johnson BM, Kemp BM (2017) Rescue PCR: reagent-rich PCR recipe improves amplification of degraded DNA extracts. J Archaeol Sci Rep 11:683–694
18.
Zurück zum Zitat McNevin D, Edson J, Robertson J, Austin JJ (2015) Reduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairs. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11:326–338CrossRef McNevin D, Edson J, Robertson J, Austin JJ (2015) Reduced reaction volumes and increased Taq DNA polymerase concentration improve STR profiling outcomes from a real-world low template DNA source: telogen hairs. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 11:326–338CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cowen S, Debenham P, Dixon A, Kutranov S, Thomson J, Way K (2011) An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:400–406CrossRef Cowen S, Debenham P, Dixon A, Kutranov S, Thomson J, Way K (2011) An investigation of the robustness of the consensus method of interpreting low-template DNA profiles. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:400–406CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Pajnič IZ, Debska M, Pogorelc BG, Mohorčič KV, Balažic J, Zupanc T, Štefanič B, Geršak K (2016) Highly efficient automated extraction of DNA from old and contemporary skeletal remains. J Forensic Legal Med 37:78–86CrossRef Pajnič IZ, Debska M, Pogorelc BG, Mohorčič KV, Balažic J, Zupanc T, Štefanič B, Geršak K (2016) Highly efficient automated extraction of DNA from old and contemporary skeletal remains. J Forensic Legal Med 37:78–86CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc 2:1756–1762CrossRef Rohland N, Hofreiter M (2007) Ancient DNA extraction from bones and teeth. Nat Protoc 2:1756–1762CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Caragine T, Mikulasovich R, Tamariz J, Bajda E, Sebestyen J, Baum H, Prinz M (2009) Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFLSTR® Identifiler®. Croat Med J 50:250–267CrossRef Caragine T, Mikulasovich R, Tamariz J, Bajda E, Sebestyen J, Baum H, Prinz M (2009) Validation of testing and interpretation protocols for low template DNA samples using AmpFLSTR® Identifiler®. Croat Med J 50:250–267CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Benschop CC, van der Beek CP, Meiland HC, van Gorp AG, Westen AA, Sijen T (2011) Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:316–328CrossRef Benschop CC, van der Beek CP, Meiland HC, van Gorp AG, Westen AA, Sijen T (2011) Low template STR typing: effect of replicate number and consensus method on genotyping reliability and DNA database search results. Forensic Sci Int Genet 5:316–328CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Gittelson S, Steffen CR, Coble MD (2016) Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses. Data Brief 8:375–386CrossRef Gittelson S, Steffen CR, Coble MD (2016) Expected net gain data of low-template DNA analyses. Data Brief 8:375–386CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Gittelson S, Steffen CR, Coble MD (2016) Low-template DNA: a single DNA analysis or two replicates? Forensic Sci Int 264:139–145CrossRef Gittelson S, Steffen CR, Coble MD (2016) Low-template DNA: a single DNA analysis or two replicates? Forensic Sci Int 264:139–145CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Grisedale KS, van Daal A (2012) Comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method. Investig Genet 3:14CrossRef Grisedale KS, van Daal A (2012) Comparison of STR profiling from low template DNA extracts with and without the consensus profiling method. Investig Genet 3:14CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat van Daal A (2010) LCN DNA analysis: limitations prevent ‘general acceptance’. Promega Corporation Web site van Daal A (2010) LCN DNA analysis: limitations prevent ‘general acceptance’. Promega Corporation Web site
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Butler J, Hill C (2010) Scientific issues with analysis of low amounts of DNA. Profiles DNA 13 Butler J, Hill C (2010) Scientific issues with analysis of low amounts of DNA. Profiles DNA 13
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A (2009) Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 2:551–552CrossRef Budowle B, Eisenberg AJ, van Daal A (2009) Low copy number typing has yet to achieve “general acceptance”. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser 2:551–552CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Caddy B, Taylor G, Linacre A (2008) A review of the science of low template DNA analysis. UK Home Office Report Caddy B, Taylor G, Linacre A (2008) A review of the science of low template DNA analysis. UK Home Office Report
32.
Zurück zum Zitat QIAGEN (2012) QIAamp® DNA Investigator handbook QIAGEN (2012) QIAamp® DNA Investigator handbook
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific TF (2012) PrepFiler® and PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kits user guide Scientific TF (2012) PrepFiler® and PrepFiler® BTA Forensic DNA Extraction Kits user guide
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific TF (2017) Quantifiler™ HP and Trio DNA Quantification Kits user guide Scientific TF (2017) Quantifiler™ HP and Trio DNA Quantification Kits user guide
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Scientific TF (2016) GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit user guide Scientific TF (2016) GlobalFiler™ PCR Amplification Kit user guide
36.
Zurück zum Zitat TIBCO (2017) Statistica (data analysis software system). TIBCO Software Inc. TIBCO (2017) Statistica (data analysis software system). TIBCO Software Inc.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Moore D, Dowhan D (2002) Purification and concentration of DNA from aqueous solutions. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2.1. 1-2.1. 10 Moore D, Dowhan D (2002) Purification and concentration of DNA from aqueous solutions. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2.1. 1-2.1. 10
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kemp BM, Monroe C, Smith DG (2006) Repeat silica extraction: a simple technique for the removal of PCR inhibitors from DNA extracts. J Archaeol Sci 33:1680–1689CrossRef Kemp BM, Monroe C, Smith DG (2006) Repeat silica extraction: a simple technique for the removal of PCR inhibitors from DNA extracts. J Archaeol Sci 33:1680–1689CrossRef
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Wikström P, Wiklund A, Andersson A-C, Forsman M (1996) DNA recovery and PCR quantification of catechol 2, 3-dioxygenase genes from different soil types. J Biotechnol 52:107–120CrossRef Wikström P, Wiklund A, Andersson A-C, Forsman M (1996) DNA recovery and PCR quantification of catechol 2, 3-dioxygenase genes from different soil types. J Biotechnol 52:107–120CrossRef
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Lloyd KG, MacGregor BJ, Teske A (2010) Quantitative PCR methods for RNA and DNA in marine sediments: maximizing yield while overcoming inhibition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:143–151CrossRef Lloyd KG, MacGregor BJ, Teske A (2010) Quantitative PCR methods for RNA and DNA in marine sediments: maximizing yield while overcoming inhibition. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:143–151CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The effects of extra PCR cycles when amplifying skeletal samples with the GlobalFiler® PCR Amplification Kit
verfasst von
Michelle Harrel
David Gangitano
Sheree Hughes-Stamm
Publikationsdatum
29.05.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Legal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0937-9827
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-1596
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-018-1860-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2019

International Journal of Legal Medicine 3/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Neu im Fachgebiet Rechtsmedizin