Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2022

23.07.2021 | Original Article – Clinical Oncology

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on 40 cohorts incorporating 3697 individuals

verfasst von: Rixiong Wang, Nan Lin, Binbin Mao, Qing Wu

Erschienen in: Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 5/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Electronic databases were scanned to identify relevant trials. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and their prognostic factors. Stratified analyses were accomplished on ICIs agent and evaluation criteria.

Results

Totally, 3697 individuals from 40 cohorts were recruited. For patients treated with ICIs, the pooled median time to progression (TTP) was 8.0 months, median PFS 4.9 months, and median OS 12.0 months; the pooled median PFS and OS of ICIs plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents (PFS: 6.3 months, OS: 16.4 months) were longer than those of ICIs alone. Furthermore, Child–Pugh stage (HR = 1.37, P = 0.0123) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (HR = 1.40, P = 0.0016) were prognostic factors for PFS. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) (HR = 0.71, P = 0.0356), Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (HR = 1.17, P < 0.0001), Child–Pugh stage (HR = 1.58, P < 0.0001), Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage (HR = 1.23, P = 0.0005), ECOG (HR = 1.50, P = 0.0012), portal vein invasion (HR = 1.32, P = 0.0053), extrahepatic metastasis (HR = 0.84, P = 0.0047), best response (HR = 0.58, P < 0.0001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (HR = 1.23, P = 0.0451) were the prognostic factors for OS. According to both RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) rate of ICIs plus anti-VEGF agents were better than those of ICIs alone. The overall rate of any grade adverse events (AEs) was 0.76 (95% CI 0.61–0.89), grade 3 or higher AEs was 0.28 (95% CI 0.15–0.42), and the rate of AEs leading to treatment discontinuation was 0.09 (95% CI 0.06–0.12).

Conclusions

The ICIs was promising in HCC with good efficacy and tolerated toxicity. Compared with ICIs monotherapy, the joint application of ICIs and anti-VEGF agents can contribute a lot more benefits to the survival of patients according to clinical practices.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Gonda K, Shibata M, Kanke Y, Yazawa T, Takenoshita S (2013) Circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and correlation to poor prognosis, Th2- polarization, inflammation, and nutritional damages in patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(15 Suppl):3063CrossRef Gonda K, Shibata M, Kanke Y, Yazawa T, Takenoshita S (2013) Circulating myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and correlation to poor prognosis, Th2- polarization, inflammation, and nutritional damages in patients with gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(15 Suppl):3063CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kuo HY, Chiang NJ, Chuang CH et al (2020) Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on organ-specific efficacy and macrovascular invasion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Res Treat 43(5):211–220. https://doi.org/10.1159/000505933CrossRefPubMed Kuo HY, Chiang NJ, Chuang CH et al (2020) Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without a combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors on organ-specific efficacy and macrovascular invasion in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Res Treat 43(5):211–220. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1159/​000505933CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis based on 40 cohorts incorporating 3697 individuals
verfasst von
Rixiong Wang
Nan Lin
Binbin Mao
Qing Wu
Publikationsdatum
23.07.2021
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 5/2022
Print ISSN: 0171-5216
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1335
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03716-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2022

Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 5/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.