Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 1/2017

29.07.2016 | Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The embedded organ sign

verfasst von: Manickam Subramanian, Dinesh Singh, Ashish Chawla

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 1/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

Identifying the organ of origin of a retroperitoneal mass is often difficult for the reporting radiologist, as it can involve several structures around it. One may look for the “embedded organ sign” which is a key to diagnosis. If the retroperitoneal mass is arising from an organ, a part of the organ appears to be embedded in the tumor (Fig. 1a, b). On the contrary, if the retroperitoneal mass is merely compressing the organ and not arising from it, it usually deforms the organ into a crescent shape [1, 2]. Embedded organ sign can be readily appreciated on computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. Retroperitoneal mass lesions can often be large and it is important to identify whether the mass is primarily from the supporting tissues of the retroperitoneum or from a retroperitoneal organ [1, 2]. Apart from the embedded organ sign, there are other signs, which are described in literature to assist in the identification of the organ of origin of a retroperitoneal mass, such as “phantom organ sign,” “beak sign,” and “prominent feeding artery sign” [1]. The management and prognosis of a retroperitoneal mass largely depends on the organ of origin, and the embedded organ sign is useful in identifying the same.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, et al. (2003) Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. RadioGraphics 23:45–57CrossRefPubMed Nishino M, Hayakawa K, Minami M, Yamamoto A, et al. (2003) Primary retroperitoneal neoplasms: CT and MR imaging findings with anatomic and pathologic diagnostic clues. RadioGraphics 23:45–57CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Westphalen AC, et al. (2013) Can CT features differentiate between inferior vena cava leiomyosarcomas and primary retroperitoneal masses? AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:205–209CrossRefPubMed Webb EM, Wang ZJ, Westphalen AC, et al. (2013) Can CT features differentiate between inferior vena cava leiomyosarcomas and primary retroperitoneal masses? AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:205–209CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The embedded organ sign
verfasst von
Manickam Subramanian
Dinesh Singh
Ashish Chawla
Publikationsdatum
29.07.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 1/2017
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0852-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2017

Abdominal Radiology 1/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

Turtleback liver

Classics in Abdominal Imaging

The Mercedes-Benz sign

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.