Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 4/2017

08.11.2016 | Original Scientific Report

The Health Gain Obtainable from Pancreatic Resection for Adenocarcinoma in the Elderly

verfasst von: Alessandro Cucchetti, Giorgio Ercolani, Raffaele Pezzilli, Matteo Cescon, Giacomo Frascaroli, Antonio Daniele Pinna

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 4/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In treating pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), age does not represent a contraindication to surgery, even if aging is known to increase postoperative mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, long-term outcome remains poor and there is much debate on whether to operate or not in elderly patients. The aim of this study was to provide a general framework to evaluate the health gain obtainable from surgery for PDAC in relationship with age and tumor stage.

Methods

A Monte Carlo simulation model was built taking into consideration pertinent literature from population-based studies regarding surgical and non-surgical outcomes for stages I–II PDAC. The health gain obtainable from surgery, in comparison to the choice of not resecting patients, was measured through number needed-to-treat (NNT) calculation.

Results

Considering the typical stage I–II PDAC characteristics, the model showed that the mean lifespan after surgery was 28.1 ± 3.9 months and 9.3 ± 1.5 months after non-surgical therapies. The NNT with surgery in order to prevent one death at 5 years was 6 (95% CI 4–10), indicating an overall high gain obtainable from surgery. Sensitivity analyses on patient age and tumor stage suggested that starting from 76 years onward, the NNT progressively increases, resulting in a low cure rate of surgery in the elderly and becoming potentially harmful for patients aged above 80 years. These figures were more pronounced for tumor stages IIA and IIB.

Conclusions

The present general framework suggests that the lifespan benefit obtainable from pancreatectomy in elderly patients is uncertain especially with the advancing of the tumor stage.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Shaib YH, Davila JA, El-Serag HB (2006) The epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in the United States: changes below the surface. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24:87–94CrossRefPubMed Shaib YH, Davila JA, El-Serag HB (2006) The epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in the United States: changes below the surface. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24:87–94CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:347–356CrossRefPubMed Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL et al (2006) Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg 10:347–356CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD (2007) Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 205:729–734CrossRefPubMed Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD (2007) Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high-risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg 205:729–734CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Lightner AM, Glasgow RE, Jordan TH et al (2004) Pancreatic resection in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 198:697–706CrossRefPubMed Lightner AM, Glasgow RE, Jordan TH et al (2004) Pancreatic resection in the elderly. J Am Coll Surg 198:697–706CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Artalejo FR, Banegas JR, Artalejo AR, Guallar-Castillón P (1998) Number-needed-to-treat to prevent one death. Lancet 351:1365CrossRefPubMed Artalejo FR, Banegas JR, Artalejo AR, Guallar-Castillón P (1998) Number-needed-to-treat to prevent one death. Lancet 351:1365CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 124:2610–2642CrossRefPubMed Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL et al (2011) 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 124:2610–2642CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Chong CA, Tomlinson G, Chodirker L et al (2006) An unadjusted NNT was a moderately good predictor of health benefit. J Clin Epidemiol 59:224–233CrossRefPubMed Chong CA, Tomlinson G, Chodirker L et al (2006) An unadjusted NNT was a moderately good predictor of health benefit. J Clin Epidemiol 59:224–233CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Van Heek NT, De Castro SM, van Eijck CH et al (2003) The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life. Ann Surg 238:894–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Van Heek NT, De Castro SM, van Eijck CH et al (2003) The need for a prophylactic gastrojejunostomy for unresectable periampullary cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter trial with special focus on assessment of quality of life. Ann Surg 238:894–902CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338CrossRefPubMed Sonnenberg FA, Beck JR (1993) Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide. Med Decis Making 13:322–338CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York Edge S, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (2010) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY et al (2007) Validation of the 6th edition AJCC pancreatic cancer staging system: report from the national cancer database. Cancer 110:738–744CrossRefPubMed Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Ko CY et al (2007) Validation of the 6th edition AJCC pancreatic cancer staging system: report from the national cancer database. Cancer 110:738–744CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC et al (2009) National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1798–1805CrossRefPubMed Simons JP, Shah SA, Ng SC et al (2009) National complication rates after pancreatectomy: beyond mere mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1798–1805CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH et al (2008) The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg 248:459–467PubMedPubMedCentral Riall TS, Reddy DM, Nealon WH et al (2008) The effect of age on short-term outcomes after pancreatic resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg 248:459–467PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagrial AM, Chang DK, Nguyen NQ et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 110:313–319CrossRefPubMed Nagrial AM, Chang DK, Nguyen NQ et al (2014) Adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 110:313–319CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Davila JA, Chiao EY, Hasche JC et al (2009) Utilization and determinants of adjuvant therapy among older patients who receive curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 38:e18–e25CrossRefPubMed Davila JA, Chiao EY, Hasche JC et al (2009) Utilization and determinants of adjuvant therapy among older patients who receive curative surgery for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 38:e18–e25CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang J, Yu KF (1998) What’s the relative risk?. A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 280:1690–1691CrossRefPubMed Zhang J, Yu KF (1998) What’s the relative risk?. A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 280:1690–1691CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakulinen T, Tenkanen L (1987) Regression analysis of relative survival rates. Appl Statist 36:309–317CrossRef Hakulinen T, Tenkanen L (1987) Regression analysis of relative survival rates. Appl Statist 36:309–317CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Burnand B, Kernan WN, Feinstein AR (1990) Indexes and boundaries for “quantitative significance” in statistical decisions. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1273–1284CrossRefPubMed Burnand B, Kernan WN, Feinstein AR (1990) Indexes and boundaries for “quantitative significance” in statistical decisions. J Clin Epidemiol 43:1273–1284CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Erlbaum, Hillsdale
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Pezzilli R, Falconi M, Zerbi A et al (2011) Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for different diseases: a follow-up study. Pancreas 40:938–945CrossRefPubMed Pezzilli R, Falconi M, Zerbi A et al (2011) Clinical and patient-reported outcomes after pancreatoduodenectomy for different diseases: a follow-up study. Pancreas 40:938–945CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones WB, Jordan P, Pudi M (2015) Pain management of pancreatic head adenocarcinomas that are unresectable: celiac plexus neurolysis and splanchnicectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:445–451PubMedPubMedCentral Jones WB, Jordan P, Pudi M (2015) Pain management of pancreatic head adenocarcinomas that are unresectable: celiac plexus neurolysis and splanchnicectomy. J Gastrointest Oncol 6:445–451PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hidalgo M, Cascinu S, Kleeff J et al (2015) Addressing the challenges of pancreatic cancer: future directions for improving outcomes. Pancreatology 15:8–18CrossRefPubMed Hidalgo M, Cascinu S, Kleeff J et al (2015) Addressing the challenges of pancreatic cancer: future directions for improving outcomes. Pancreatology 15:8–18CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucchetti A, Ricci C, Ercolani G et al (2015) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of immediate surgery versus a wait-and-see strategy for sporadic nonfunctioning T1 pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 101:25–34CrossRefPubMed Cucchetti A, Ricci C, Ercolani G et al (2015) Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of immediate surgery versus a wait-and-see strategy for sporadic nonfunctioning T1 pancreatic endocrine neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 101:25–34CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE et al (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338CrossRefPubMed Eom BW, Jang JY, Lee SE et al (2008) Clinical outcomes compared between laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surg Endosc 22:1334–1338CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc 26:1670–1674CrossRefPubMed Abu Hilal M, Hamdan M, Di Fabio F et al (2012) Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: a clinical and cost-effectiveness study. Surg Endosc 26:1670–1674CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Limongelli P, Vitiello C, Belli A et al (2014) Costs of laparoscopic and open liver and pancreatic resection: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 20:17595–17602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Limongelli P, Vitiello C, Belli A et al (2014) Costs of laparoscopic and open liver and pancreatic resection: a systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 20:17595–17602CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Cucchetti A, Ercolani G, Cescon M et al (2016) Estimation of the Survival Benefit Obtainable From Screening for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 45:714–719CrossRefPubMed Cucchetti A, Ercolani G, Cescon M et al (2016) Estimation of the Survival Benefit Obtainable From Screening for the Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer. Pancreas 45:714–719CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Health Gain Obtainable from Pancreatic Resection for Adenocarcinoma in the Elderly
verfasst von
Alessandro Cucchetti
Giorgio Ercolani
Raffaele Pezzilli
Matteo Cescon
Giacomo Frascaroli
Antonio Daniele Pinna
Publikationsdatum
08.11.2016
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 4/2017
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3793-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2017

World Journal of Surgery 4/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.