Oslo in Norway has had the highest incidence of hip fractures in the world. The incidence in Oslo has been thoroughly described every decade since the late 1970s. The incidence in Oslo has previously been higher compared to the rest of Norway but has now decreased to a level below the country average.
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to report the incidence of hip fractures in Oslo in 2019 and compare it with the incidence rates from the previous four decades.
Methods
Patients residing in Oslo in 2019 with a new hip fracture identified by searching the Oslo hospital’s patient administrative systems and protocols from the operating theaters. The diagnosis was verified through medical records and/or radiographs. To compare with previous studies, the direct standardization method was used with the population of Oslo in 2019 as the standard.
Results
A total of 758 hip fractures, 70% women, were identified in 2019. The age-standardized incidence rates per 10,000 person-years in 2019 (95% CI) were 45 (41.1–48.8) for women and 30 (25.8–33.8) for men. In women, there has been a continuous decline in age-standardized rates the last three decades and in men the last two decades. The most pronounced decline was seen in the oldest age groups over 70 years. There has been a secular decline in both cervical and trochanteric fractures; however, the decrease in trochanteric fractures was most distinct for males, with more than two times higher risk in 1996/1997 compared to 2019.
Conclusion
Incidence rates for hip fractures in Oslo in 2019 were the lowest rate reported since 1978. The decrease was significant for both men and women. For the first time, the incidence rates are below the national rates of Norway. However, the rates are still among the highest worldwide.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Introduction
The Scandinavian countries (Norway, Sweden, Denmark) have the highest registered incidence rates for hip fractures in the world [1‐3]. Even though the incidence of hip fractures in general is high in Norway, particularly high rates have been registered in the capital of Norway, Oslo, over decades [3‐6]. Hip fractures in Oslo have been reported to occur at rates up to one-third higher than in rural districts of Norway [7]. Although the incidence of hip fractures is decreasing in most Western countries, the total number of fractures is expected to increase due to an aging population in the years to come [2].
Each year approximately 9000 people suffer a hip fracture in Norway [8]. Hip fractures are considered the most severe osteoporotic fracture. The risk of hip fractures increases exponentially with age and may have major consequences for frail elderly persons [2, 9]. The 1-year mortality rate after hip fractures in Norway is 25% [10]. Half of all hip fracture patients will not return to their pre-fracture function [11]. There are two main types of hip fractures, in the cervical or the trochanteric region of the femur. Individuals sustaining a cervical hip fracture are typically healthier and younger and have a higher physical function prior to the fracture compared to individuals with a trochanteric fracture [12]. Patients with a trochanteric fracture are often frailer with lower body mass density and with an increased risk of falling, and require longer recovery compared to individuals with cervical fracture [12].
Anzeige
Hip fractures, along with stroke and myocardial infarction, serve as healthcare quality indicators in Norwegian hospitals due to their high incidence and elevated risk of death [13]. The societal costs following a hip fracture are substantial, with nearly half of the expenses attributed to rehabilitation and care within the first year post-fracture [14]. Hence, reporting secular trends in high-risk diagnosis, such as hip fractures, is crucial for the maintenance of an effective healthcare system [9, 15].
The incidence of hip fractures in Oslo has been reported with the same thorough method every decade since the late 1970s [3‐5, 7]. In addition, the proportion of cervical and trochanteric hip fractures has been registered for all previous studies. In 1988/1989, the incidence rate was at the highest level, before a decline was seen in 2007 [3, 5]. However, compared with other geographical areas in Norway and other countries, the incidence rate in Oslo remains the highest [3, 5].
In this study, we aimed to investigate the current incidence of hip fractures in Oslo and compare it to the rates over the last four decades. In addition to the rates in other geographical areas.
Methods
Study population
To report the hip fracture incidence in Oslo in 2019, all patients residing in Oslo (around 680,000 inhabitants) with a new hip fracture were identified from the 1st of January to the 31st of December 2019. Fractures with ICD-10 codes S72.0 (cervical fracture) and S72.1 (trochanteric fracture) were identified using patient administrative systems/electronic diagnosis registers. In addition, lists from the operating theaters in all three hospitals in Oslo treating hip fractures were reviewed. Also, related diagnoses in other parts of the femur as well as unspecified diagnoses in the lower limb (S72.2, S72.7, S72.9, T02.3, T02.5, T02.6-T02.9, and T12) were used to identify patients with potential incorrect diagnosis. The hip fracture diagnosis was verified through medical records. If the diagnosis were not clarified by the records, the patients’ radiographs were examined for verification. Patients with a fracture in both hips in the period had each fracture registered separately.
Anzeige
Patients transferred between hospitals were only registered once, at the hospital where the surgery was performed. Patients residing in Oslo, but who had a hip fracture and surgery outside of Oslo, were captured either when they were transferred to their local hospital in Oslo postoperatively. Or if they were discharged directly to home, they were identified at the follow-up at their local hospital in Oslo, which is standard practice. Therefore, we most probably have included nearly all hip fracture cases in our area in the period.
Background information collected from the medical record included age, sex, weight, height, place of trauma, fracture site, type of fracture, and perioperative information, such as time to surgery and type of surgery, history of hip fractures, and use of anti-osteoporosis drugs (AOD) prior to and after a fracture. Previous hip fractures were found by examining radiographs and the patients’ medical records. If a previous hip fracture was not visible on radiographs or not documented in the medical records in the past 5 years, they were not recorded. AOD was defined as oral bisphosphonates, zoledronate, denosumab, or teriparatide which are the registered drugs for use in Norway.
To be able to compare the incidence in 2019 with the previous years, patients with a subtrochanteric fracture (S72.2) were excluded, as in the previous studies. As in the previous studies, fractures due to cancer metastasis, periprosthetic fractures, and patients with registered home address outside of Oslo were also excluded. Patients who were registered with an incorrect hip fracture diagnosis were mostly due to secondary admissions for an already registered hip fracture (Fig supl).
Immigration status was received from Statistics Norway (SSB).
Historical and international comparison
The population of Oslo on the 1st of January 2019 was used as the standard population for the historical and national comparison and was provided by Statistics Norway (SSB) [16]. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates from the four previous studies were used to determine age-standardized incidence rates for hip fractures in Oslo in 2019, 2007 [5], 1996/1997 [3], 1988/1989 [7], and 1978/1979 [4]. Data from a study on hip fracture incidence in the total Norwegian population was used for the national comparison [8]. To compare the age- and sex-standardized incidence rate in Oslo with other geographical areas, we used the 2020 United Nations world population as the standard population [17]. As most other studies on hip fracture incidence included subtrochanteric hip fractures (S72.2), we included this group in our data (n = 37) for the analysis comparing the incidence rate in Oslo with other geographical areas.
Statistics
A two-sample Student t-test was used for comparisons of continuous outcomes. A chi-square test was used to compare categorical outcomes. The sex-specific age-standardized fracture rates were calculated by using the direct method of standardization to the population of Oslo on the 1st of January 2019. Age was divided into 10-year age groups up to 50 years, and 5-year age groups above 50. Incidence rate ratio (IRR) was calculated by Poisson regression. The level of statistical significance was set at 0.05. The results are given as mean (95% confidence interval (CI)). Age was given as median with interquartile range.
Analysis was conducted using Stata SE (Version 17, Stata Inc. College Station, TX, USA).
Ethics and approvals
The study was approved by the Regional Ethical Committee for Medical Research Ethics for South-Eastern Norway (reference number 2018/2235) and the Data Protection Officer at each of the hospitals. For this type of study, patient consent is not required. The study has adhered to the STROBE guidelines and has been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Anzeige
Results
Patient characteristics
In 2019, a total number of 758 hip fractures were identified in 745 patients residing in Oslo (Fig supl) as 13 patients (12 women) had a fracture in both hips. Of the patients, 70% were women (n = 529). The median age was 84 years (IQR 75;89) in women, and 79 years (IQR 70;86) in men. There was an approximately equal number of fractures in the left and right hip, and 446 of the fractures were cervical (59%) and 312 trochanteric (41%), p < 0.001. According to the review of the medical records, 84 patients (11%) had sustained a contralateral hip fracture before 2019 (12.5% in women and 8% in men).
Incidence rates
The age-specific incidence rate for 2019 increased exponentially with age for both sexes and the incidence was higher for females compared with males in all age groups, except in the lowest age groups (Table 1). The number of cervical fractures was higher than trochanteric fractures in nearly all age groups and for both sexes, with a higher ratio in older males compared to older females.
Table 1
Age-standardized incidence rate (IR) for cervical and trochanteric fractures in Oslo, 2019, for all age groups, by sex and fracture type
Annual incidence of fractures per 10,000
Sex
Age group
Population
Fractures
Cervical (c)
Trochanteric (t)
Both
Ratio c/t
Female
0–19
71,042
*
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20–29
62,877
*
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
30–39
62,713
*
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
40–49
45,058
*
0.4
0.0
0.4
0.0
50–54
19,635
*
0.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
55–59
17,218
15
6.4
2.3
8.7
2.7
60–64
15,516
13
6.4
1.9
8.4
3.3
65–69
13,337
31
12.8
10.5
23.3
1.2
70–74
12,481
60
29.7
18.4
48.1
1.6
75–79
8001
59
41.2
32.5
73.7
1.2
80–84
5639
98
108.2
65.6
173.8
1.6
85–89
4426
120
146.9
124.3
271.1
1.1
90–
3529
128
170.0
192.7
362.7
0.8
Male
0–19
74,049
*
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
20–29
56,787
*
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
30–39
66,623
*
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
40–49
50,044
*
0.4
0.6
1.0
0.6
50–54
21,138
*
1.4
0.0
1.4
0.0
55–59
17,998
8
2.8
1.7
4.5
1.6
60–64
15,071
10
4.0
2.7
6.6
1.4
65–69
12,408
22
11.3
6.5
17.7
1.7
70–74
11,529
37
16.5
15.6
32.1
1.0
75–79
6587
31
36.4
10.6
47.1
3.4
80–84
3757
38
63.9
37.3
101.1
1.7
85–89
2340
35
106.8
42.7
149.6
2.5
90–
1268
38
212.9
86.8
299.7
2.4
*Number of fractures is ≤ 5 and not displayed in the table
The age-standardized incidence rate for females and males above 50 years declined significantly between 2007 and 2019 (Table 2). There was a 28% and 52% higher risk of a hip fracture for females and males in 2007 compared to 2019. Compared to 2019, the incidence rate was 84% higher in 1988/1989 when the highest level was recorded for females (Table 2). The incidence rate ratio (IRR) was significantly higher in all previous years compared to 2019 for both sexes (Table 2). The age-specific incidence rate for 2019 compared to 2007 was most pronounced in the oldest age groups above 70 years for both females and males (Fig. 1).
Table 2
Age-adjusted incidence rate of hip fractures in Oslo in 2019 per 10,000 and corresponding incidence rate ratio (IRR) comparing previous years to 2019, for females and males ≥ 50 years
Year
Age-adjusted incidence rate (95% CI) per 10,000 – IRR (95% CI) comparing 2019 to the previous years
Females
Males
Incidence rate
IRR
Incidence rate
IRR
2019
45.0 (41.1, 48.8)
1.00 (reference)
29.8 (25.8, 33.8)
1.00 (reference)
2007
56.3 (51.9, 60.7)
1.28 (1.14, 1.44)
44.3 (38.8, 49.8)
1.52 (1.27, 1.82)
1996/1997
77.7 (72.7, 82.7)
1.74 (1.59, 1.93)
48.2 (42.0, 54.4)
1.63 (1.37, 1.95)
1988/1989
84.2 (78.9, 89.4)
1.84 (1.66, 2.04)
48.1 (41.9, 54.3)
1.67 (1.40, 2.00)
1978/1979
71.4 (66.0, 76.7)
1.60 (1.44, 1.79)
38.4 (32.1, 44.7)
1.37 (1.13, 1.65)
Rates (95% CI) are standardized to the population of Oslo 1st of January 2019
Fig. 1
Age-specific incidence rate for hip fractures in Oslo for females and males in 2007 and 2019 showed a decline in incidence for both females and males in the highest age groups above 70 years
×
The historical comparisons showed a secular decline in the incidence of both cervical and trochanteric fractures with the lowest in 2019 (Table 3). In women, there were somewhat similar changes over time for cervical and trochanteric fractures. However, in men, the changes were more pronounced for trochanteric compared to cervical fractures (Table 3). For example, in men, the IRR was 1.87 for trochanteric fracture and 1.34 for cervical fracture in 2007 compared to 2019.
Table 3
Incidence rate ratio (IRR) for cervical and trochanteric fractures in females and males, ≥ 50 years comparing previous years to 2019, age-adjusted
Year
Cervical IRR (95% CI)
p-value
Trochanteric IRR (95% CI)
p-value
Females
2019
1.00 (reference)
1.00 (reference)
2007
1.38 (1.18, 1.60)
< 0.001
1.16 (0.98, 1.38)
0.082
1996–1997
1.70 (1.48, 1.96)
< 0.001
1.79 (1.52, 2.10)
< 0.001
1988–1989
1.88 (1.63, 2.16)
< 0.001
1.78 (1.52, 2.09)
< 0.001
1978–1979
1.71 (1.48, 1.98)
< 0.001
1.47 (1.23, 1.74)
< 0.001
Males
2019
1.00 (reference)
1.00 (reference)
2007
1.34 (1.07, 1.68)
0.009
1.87 (1.39, 2.50)
< 0.001
1996–1997
1.35 (1.07, 1.69)
0.009
2.19 (1.65, 2.92)
< 0.001
1988–1989
1.53 (1.23, 1.91)
< 0.001
1.97 (1.47, 2.64)
< 0.001
1978–1979
1.21 (0.95, 1.54)
0.112
1.67 (1.23, 2.28)
< 0.001
Anzeige
In the comparison between Oslo and Norway as a whole, the age-standardized hip fracture incidence rate in 2019 (including both cervical, trochanteric, and subtrochanteric fracture) was 8% lower in Oslo compared to Norway for females (47.5 (43.4–51.4) versus 51.5 (52.2–52.8)), and 16% lower for males (30.3 (26.4–34.3) versus 36.2 (34.9–37.5)).
Other descriptives
Almost all hip fractures (95%) occurred due to low energy trauma. Seventy-three percent of the fractures happened indoors, of which 42.5% occurred at home, 23% in nursing homes or other care facilities, and 7.5% in other indoor areas. Twenty-four percent of the fractures were due to a fall outdoors and 3% had no registered site of trauma. Prior to the fracture, 53% of the patients were home dwelling without any assistance, 23% with assistance, 4.5% in short term care facilities, and 18% in permanent nursing homes. Patients with a trochanteric fracture were more likely to live in a permanent nursing home (22%) versus patients with a cervical fracture (14%). Most patients were operated at Diakonhjemmet Hospital (57%), 28% at Oslo University Hospital and 9% at Akershus University Hospital. Four percent were operated outside of Oslo. Prior to the fracture, 9.7% used or had used AOD. However, it was not specified when or for how long the patients had been using AOD. During the hospital stay, 48% of the patients started AOD after the hip fracture. Twenty-one percent did not receive AOD due to medical reasons. Patients were more likely to get AOD if they were operated at Oslo University Hospital (58% versus 39% at Akershus University Hospital and 44% at Diakonhjemmet Hospital). The majority of the patients (96%) received an infusion with zoledronate combined with 100,000 IE of vitamin D3 in the hospital. Twenty-four percent of the patients with a contralateral fracture had been treated with AOD prior to the subsequent fracture.
Influence of immigration
Only 7% of the patients sustaining a hip fracture had immigration background, while two percent were born in Norway with one or two parents with immigrant background. Almost all with immigration background were from a European country (5%), followed by Asia (1.6%). Ninety-three percent of the patients were born in Norway. In contrast, 20% of the females and 25% of the males in the total population of Oslo 50 years or older were immigrants or had one or two parents with immigrant background in 2019 [16].
Discussion
There has been a large reduction in the incidence of hip fractures in Oslo from 2007 to 2019. The incidence of hip fractures in Oslo, despite the large decline, remains higher than in most other populations. However, we found that hip fracture rates were lower than the Norwegian average. This contrasts with previous findings where the incidence in Oslo was higher than in the rest of the country [6, 8]. A systematic review found a higher incidence of hip fractures in urban areas, suggesting differences in lifestyle between cities and rural areas [18]. Furthermore, Norway’s elongated geography, characterized by its extensive coastline, seems to influence the incidence. Notably, regions near the coastline and in the northern districts exhibit the lowest incidence of hip fractures [6, 7]. A study on hip fracture incidence in Norway between 2002 and 2013 found that regional differences were smaller than earlier [6]. However, there was still a 17% higher incidence of hip fractures in Oslo compared to the district in Norway with the lowest registered rate [6]. This seems to have changed over the last decade. When comparing the results from 2019 in Oslo with Norway using Oslo as the standard population, the incidence of hip fractures was 8 and 16% lower in Oslo for females and males. However, reasons for the larger decline in Oslo in contrast to the rest of the country have not been investigated in this study.
Anzeige
The incidence of hip fractures has been higher in the Scandinavian countries compared to the rest of the world for several decades [2, 9]. The reason for this is not fully understood, but it is likely to be multifactorial, including genetics [19]. Even though the winter in Oslo is long, most hip fracture patients fell indoors, and Lofthus [3] did not find any seasonal changes in her study from 1996/1997. Other studies, however, saw a trend toward higher incidences in the winter [19‐21]. The decreasing trend in hip fractures observed in the last decade has also been noted in other Western countries [9, 22, 23]. This decline has been evident across both genders and all age groups, with the biggest decrease observed in the population aged 70 and above [22]. To compare the incidence rates in Oslo to other geographical areas, we age- and sex-standardized our data to the United Nations World population of 2020, the same reference group used by Sing et al. in a global incidence study on hip fractures [9, 17]. We calculated the incidence rate per 100,000 person-years for men and women combined in Oslo to be 314 in 2019. Compared to the countries with the highest registered incidence rates from Sing et al. [9], Denmark and Singapore with age- and sex-standardized incidence rates of 258 and 260 in 2018, respectively, the incidence rate in Oslo is still remarkably high.
Possible explanations for the decrease in incidence
Use of anti-osteoporosis drugs
Bisphosphonates were not on the market in Norway before 1996, and patients with hip fractures before this period were not treated with AOD [24]. In the incidence study from 2007, the use of bisphosphonates may have explained some of the reduction, up to 13% for women between 60 and 69 years and 34% for women 70–79 years [5]. Since 2007, the use of oral bisphosphonates (alendronate) has gradually decreased in Oslo in coherence with other studies and might be due to concerns among general practitioners and patients regarding adverse events [9, 24, 25]. Zoledronate and denosumab became available in Norway in 2007 and 2011, respectively, and the use of both zoledronate and denosumab is increasing in Norway [24, 26]. After the Norwegian Capture the Fracture Initiative (NoFRACT) project started systematic secondary fracture prevention in Oslo in 2015, treatment with AOD increased [24, 27, 28]. However, it is difficult to quantify the number of patients who has received this treatment over the last 5 years as zoledronate is given mostly in hospitals and thereby not registered in the Norwegian prescription database. A study explaining the reduction of hip fracture incidence in Norway found that the use of AOD could explain 20% of the reduction in the incidence between 1999 and 2019 (11% for alendronate, 4% for zoledronate, and 6% for denosumab) [29]. In Denmark, the incidence of hip fractures decreased by 30% from 2005 to 2015, and they could in a best-case scenario conclude that AOD explained 20% of this decrease [23]. A study from Norway found a lower risk of hip fractures for women exposed to bisphosphonates and denosumab [30]. Measuring the effect of AOD could be challenging due to the residual effect after discontinuing the medication both for bisphosphonates and denosumab [31]. Furthermore, the effectiveness of alendronate is influenced by variations in users’ compliance, making it challenging to assess the impact [29]. Additionally, treatment with zoledronate usually starts after the patient has sustained a hip fracture. As a result, determining the impact on the declining incidence of hip fractures can be complex and inconclusive.
Proportion of cervical and trochanteric fractures
The decline in trochanteric fractures seems to be more pronounced than for cervical fractures. For both sexes, the risk of trochanteric fractures was approximately twice as high in 1996/1997 than in 2019 (Table 3). The cause of the substantial decrease in trochanteric fractures remains unknown, although there are disparities between individuals experiencing a trochanteric fracture versus a cervical hip fracture [32]. We found that patients sustaining a trochanteric fracture had a higher mean age than patients with a cervical fracture, 82 and 80, respectively. They were more likely to live in a permanent nursing home prior to the fracture, consistent with the results from Kujala [32] showing less patients with trochanteric fractures living independently at home. The ratio between cervical and trochanteric fractures changed with age, with a higher ratio of cervical fractures in older age groups for males (Table 1). For females, the ratio between cervical and trochanteric fractures was less in the highest age groups. The same results were seen in Tanner et al. [33], where the proportion of females sustaining a trochanteric fracture increases with age, while for males the proportion decreases. Additionally, a Swedish study reported that males with trochanteric fractures had a higher 1-year mortality despite a lower mean age than females [34]. The reduction in trochanteric fractures may be related to improved health among the elderly population, especially in men.
Healthier elderly population
While the elderly population is expected to increase, the age-standardized incidence of hip fractures is decreasing in Western countries [15]. The same trend is seen in two other high-risk diagnoses, stroke and myocardial infarction [35]. As for stroke and myocardial infarction, the decline may partly be explained by a healthier elderly population. Factors such as increased levels of body mass index (BMI), less smoking, and higher physical activity may be part of the explanation [22, 29].
Modifiable risk factors for hip fractures include low BMI and low body weight, which are associated with the highest risk [36]. Additionally, other modifiable risk factors include current smoking, inactivity, and high daily alcohol consumption [36]. In Norway, BMI has increased in all age groups from newborn to the oldest population throughout the twentieth century [37]. A study on hip fracture incidence in Norway in 2019 found that increased BMI could have explained 25% of the hip fracture reduction [29]. As for BMI levels in Oslo, a study conducted in the 1990s found that residents living in Oslo were taller and leaner compared to other areas in Europe [38]. Knowing that the BMI levels in Oslo have increased over the past 30 years, this might have contributed to the decline of hip fractures in Oslo.
Furthermore, current smoking is related to low BMI, and the risk of fractures is higher in persons with both low BMI and current smoking [37]. The Norwegian study from 2019 found an 11% reduction in hip fractures attributed to a decline in daily smokers [29]. The number of daily smokers in Norway in the age groups above 55 years has decreased from 20 to 13.5% for females and 24 to 12% for males between 2004 and 2019 [16]. The reduction appears to be even higher in Oslo compared to the rest of the country, with a six percent prevalence of daily smokers in the adult population in 2018 for Oslo, while the whole country had a nine percent smoking rate [16]. Additionally, both current and former smoking are associated with a higher risk of a trochanteric fracture than a cervical fracture [39]. The number of smokers among men has decreased in Norway, potentially contributing to the large reduction in trochanteric hip fractures over the past decades.
As for BMI, the level of physical activity seems to have increased in the Norwegian population over the last decades, also among elderlies [40]. Given that sedentary behavior increases the risk of hip fractures, increasing physical activity could have contributed to the reduced incidence hip fractures [29]. Most hip fractures occur due to a fall, and low physical activity is associated with risks of fall and subsequent hip fracture [41]. Besides, it has been observed that individuals who engage in excessive alcohol consumption are more disposed to falls [41]. While the overall consumption of alcohol among elderly individuals in Norway has seen a slight upward trend, the number of individuals categorized as excessive alcohol consumers has remained constant [42]. Søgaard et al. [41] found that the use of psychotropic and analgesic medications was a predictor for future hip fractures. The use of benzodiazepine has declined in Norway, and this decline was found to explain 13% of the hip fracture reduction in Norway [29]. Furthermore, as the population experiences improved health and longer lifespans, there has been an almost doubling in the number of individuals in need of total hip arthroplasty over the past decade [8]. Kjeldgaard et al. found that 17% of the hip fracture reduction could be explained due to hip arthroplasty [8]. Although the patient may sustain a periprosthetic fracture instead, however this was not investigated in the referred study [8].
Influence of immigration
In 2019, almost all individuals who experienced a hip fracture in Oslo were born in Norway. A Norwegian study that compared hip fracture rates among immigrant groups to those born in Norway found a lower incidence in all immigrant groups [43]. Similar results have been observed in Sweden [44]. Between 2007 and 2019, the percentage of Oslo residents over 50 years with immigrant background rose from 13 to 20% for females and from 17 to 25% for males [16]. For comparison, elderly with an immigrant background constituted 7% of the total population over 60 years in Norway in 2021 [45]. The proportion of the population with immigrant background has seen a greater increase in Oslo than in other parts of Norway. In fact, Oslo hosts over five times as many elderly immigrants as the municipality with the second-highest immigrant population [45]. As persons with ancestry from Africa and Asia probably are less disposed to suffer hip fractures, this effect may be more prominent in Oslo than in other parts of the country. However, the immigrant population remains relatively young, and the effect of immigration on hip fracture incidence may be more prominent in the years to come.
Strengths and limitations
This study had some limitations. We lacked information on immigration status on the individual level, preventing us from conducting sensitivity analysis on differences due to ethnicity.
To compare the 2019 incidence with previous years, we opted to exclude subtrochanteric fractures from the main analysis, consistent with previous studies. However, subtrochanteric fractures were included in supplementary analysis. Typically, subtrochanteric fractures are included in hip fracture incidence studies, and future incidence studies from Oslo should include these fractures.
The strength of this study was that all data was verified from patients' records from the hospitals’ database. This allowed for clarification of patients who were registered with an incorrect diagnosis. By using the same thorough fracture identification method as in the previous studies, we were able to accurately monitor changes in the incidence of cervical and trochanteric fractures in Oslo over five decades.
Conclusion
The incidence of hip fractures in Oslo has reached the lowest level measured since the late 1970s with a significant reduction in incidence rates for both females and males. The decline in hip fractures was most pronounced in the oldest age groups, particularly among females. The risk of trochanteric fractures has declined, especially throughout the last 20 years for males. The incidence in Oslo has previously been higher compared to the rest of Norway but has now decreased to a level below the country average. The incidence is still remarkably high, and Oslo is still registered with one of the highest hip fracture incidences worldwide. Further investigations of the hip fracture incidence in Oslo are of particular interest due to the remarkably higher decrease compared to the rest of the country of Norway. Factors such as the influence of immigration as well as the increasing number of elderly individuals in the years to come might interfere with the decreasing trend.
Acknowledgements
Akershus University Hospital for contribution to the collection of data for the study.
Declarations
Conflicts of interest
None.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen. Zur Fortbildung und Wissenserweiterung, verfasst und geprüft von Expertinnen und Experten der Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie (AGA).
Menschen mit Psoriasis-Arthritis (PsA) müssen länger auf die Diagnose warten und werden zögerlicher behandelt als an rheumatoider Arthritis (RA) Erkrankte. Diese Defizite hat eine Untersuchung in Großbritannien aufgedeckt.
Menschen mit Gonarthrose profitieren von Yogaübungen nicht weniger als von gezielten Kräftigungsübungen für die lädierten Knie. In einer Vergleichsstudie haben sich für Yogis und Yoginis sogar einige Vorteile ergeben.
Bei akuten Rückenschmerzen können Muskelrelaxanzien, eventuell in Kombination mit NSAR, zur Schmerzlinderung beitragen. Wegen der Nebenwirkungen wird jedoch empfohlen, die Medikamente nur über wenige Tage einzusetzen.
Dass der Blick in die Natur Menschen dazu bringen kann, Schmerzen weniger stark zu empfinden, konnte bereits mehrfach nachgewiesen werden. Jetzt ließen sich in einer experimentellen Studie sogar allein durch das Betrachten von Videos mit Naturszenen analgetische Effekte erzeugen.
