Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal 9/2017

17.02.2017 | Original Article

The hybrid technique of pelvic organ prolapse treatment: apical sling and subfascial colporrhaphy

verfasst von: Dmitry Shkarupa, Nikita Kubin, Alexey Pisarev, Anastasiya Zaytseva, Ekaterina Shapovalova

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal | Ausgabe 9/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

The majority of patients with cystocele undergoing reconstructive surgery have combined defects of pubocervical fascia and uterosacral/cardinal ligament complex. In this regard, the simultaneous correction of both defects is rational. Furthermore, decreasing the use of synthetic materials in pelvic floor surgery is an important goal. The aim was to evaluate the objective and subjective cure rate of a hybrid technique: bilateral sacrospinous fixation using modern monofilament synthetic tape (apical sling) combined with the original technique of subfascial colporrhaphy.

Materials and methods

This prospective study involved 148 women suffering from cystocele combined with apical prolapse. We used the following criteria to evaluate the results of surgical treatment: results of the vaginal examination (POP-Q system), urodynamic tests, bladder ultrasound, special questionnaires (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory [PFDI-20], Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire [PFIQ-7], Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire [PISQ-12], International Consultation on Incontinence Modular Questionnaire Short Form [ICIQ-SF]). All listed parameters were determined before the surgery and at control examinations at 1, 6, and 12 months after the treatment.

Results

At the 1-year follow-up, the objective cure rate for prolapse was 97.8%. The rate of anatomical recurrence was 2.2% (3 out of 138). The following long-term complications were noted: de novo urgency and stress urinary incontinence de novo in 2 (1.4%) and 4 (2.9%) patients, respectively. Comparison of the scores by the questionnaires also revealed a significant improvement in the quality of life in the postoperative period. Patient satisfaction rate was 97.1%.

Conclusion

The hybrid technique is an effective and safe uterus-sparing method for patients with advanced forms of cystocele combined with apical prolapse. This technique improves voiding function, quality of life, and provides a high satisfaction rate.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wu JM, Matthews CA, Conover MM, Pate V, Jonsson Funk M. Lifetime risk of stress urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123(6):1201–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160-–2.CrossRefPubMed Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the Women’s Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1160-–2.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717–24.CrossRefPubMed DeLancey JO. Anatomic aspects of vaginal eversion after hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;166:1717–24.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, et al. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1837–40.CrossRefPubMed Rooney K, Kenton K, Mueller ER, et al. Advanced anterior vaginal wall prolapse is highly correlated with apical prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:1837–40.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, et al. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1438–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Summers A, Winkel LA, Hussain HK, et al. The relationship between anterior and apical compartment support. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1438–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Elliot CS, Yeh J, Comiter CV, Chen B, Sokol ER. The predictive value of a cystocele for concomitant vaginal apical prolapse. J Urol. 2013;189:200–3. Elliot CS, Yeh J, Comiter CV, Chen B, Sokol ER. The predictive value of a cystocele for concomitant vaginal apical prolapse. J Urol. 2013;189:200–3.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter J. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20–6. Maher CF, Qatawneh AM, Dwyer PL, Carey MP, Cornish A, Schluter J. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: a prospective randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:20–6.
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Holley RL, Varner RE, Gleason BP, Apffel LA, Scott S. Sexual function after sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:355–358.PubMed Holley RL, Varner RE, Gleason BP, Apffel LA, Scott S. Sexual function after sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. J Reprod Med. 1996;41:355–358.PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Margulies R, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:124–34.CrossRefPubMed Margulies R, Rogers MA, Morgan DM. Outcomes of transvaginal uterosacral ligament suspension: systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202:124–34.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Siff L, Barber MD. Native tissue prolapse repairs: comparative effectiveness trials. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(1):69–81.CrossRefPubMed Siff L, Barber MD. Native tissue prolapse repairs: comparative effectiveness trials. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016;43(1):69–81.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Petros PE. New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge, and abnormal emptying classification of urinary dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 1997;8:270–8.CrossRef Petros PE. New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge, and abnormal emptying classification of urinary dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 1997;8:270–8.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Petros PE. Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal support by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:296–303.CrossRef Petros PE. Vault prolapse II: restoration of dynamic vaginal support by infracoccygeal sacropexy, an axial day-case vaginal procedure. Int Urogynecol J. 2001;12:296–303.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Farnsworth BN. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse—a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13:4–8.CrossRefPubMed Farnsworth BN. Posterior intravaginal slingplasty (infracoccygeal sacropexy) for severe posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse—a preliminary report on efficacy and safety. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13:4–8.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Capobianco G, Donolo E, Wenger JM, et al. Efficacy and 9 years’ follow-up of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for genital prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(1):219–23. Capobianco G, Donolo E, Wenger JM, et al. Efficacy and 9 years’ follow-up of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for genital prolapse. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014;40(1):219–23.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Vu MK, Letke J, Jirschele K, et al. Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(12):1753–61.CrossRefPubMed Vu MK, Letke J, Jirschele K, et al. Minimal mesh repair for apical and anterior prolapse: initial anatomical and subjective outcomes. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(12):1753–61.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRefPubMed Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:10–7.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Shkarupa DD, Kubin ND, Peshkov NO, Komyakov BK, Pisarev V, Zaytseva AO. Russian version of questionnaires for life quality assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Exp Clin Urol. 2016;1. Shkarupa DD, Kubin ND, Peshkov NO, Komyakov BK, Pisarev V, Zaytseva AO. Russian version of questionnaires for life quality assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. Exp Clin Urol. 2016;1.
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Rapp DE, King AB, Wolters BR, Wolters JP. Comprehensive evaluation of anterior elevate system for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic floor descent: 2-year follow-up. J Urol. 2014;191:389–94.CrossRefPubMed Rapp DE, King AB, Wolters BR, Wolters JP. Comprehensive evaluation of anterior elevate system for the treatment of anterior and apical pelvic floor descent: 2-year follow-up. J Urol. 2014;191:389–94.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Gomelsky A. Vaginal prolapse repair suture repair versus mesh augmentation: a urology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39(3):335–42.CrossRefPubMed Gomelsky A. Vaginal prolapse repair suture repair versus mesh augmentation: a urology perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2012;39(3):335–42.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Winters JC, Cespedes RD, Vanlangendonck R. Abdominal sacral colpopexy and abdominal enterocele repair in the management of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2000;56:55– 63. Winters JC, Cespedes RD, Vanlangendonck R. Abdominal sacral colpopexy and abdominal enterocele repair in the management of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2000;56:55– 63.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRefPubMed Pan K, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Xu H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;132(3):284–91.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:743–8.CrossRefPubMed Jirschele K, Seitz M, Zhou Y, Rosenblatt P, Culligan P, Sand P. A multicenter, prospective trial to evaluate mesh-augmented sacrospinous hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26:743–8.CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Altman D, Mikkela TS, Beck KM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1337–45. Altman D, Mikkela TS, Beck KM, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse repair using Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: a 1-year multicenter study. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1337–45.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH. Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):901–8. Su TH, Lau HH, Huang WC, Hsieh CH, Chang RC, Su CH. Single-incision mesh repair versus traditional native tissue repair for pelvic organ prolapse: results of a cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(7):901–8.
Metadaten
Titel
The hybrid technique of pelvic organ prolapse treatment: apical sling and subfascial colporrhaphy
verfasst von
Dmitry Shkarupa
Nikita Kubin
Alexey Pisarev
Anastasiya Zaytseva
Ekaterina Shapovalova
Publikationsdatum
17.02.2017
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal / Ausgabe 9/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3286-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2017

International Urogynecology Journal 9/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.