Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery 3/2017

29.09.2016 | Original Contributions

The Impact of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) Over 9 Years

verfasst von: Gladys W. Strain, Mehyar H. Torghabeh, Michel Gagner, Faith Ebel, Gregory F. Dakin, Jonathan S. Abelson, Daniel Connolly, Alfons Pomp

Erschienen in: Obesity Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

There is limited information on the multiple long-term effects of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS).

Methods

Patients who consented to a BPD/DS from 1999 to 2010 were evaluated for weight change, complications, comorbidity resolution, body composition, quality of life, and depressive symptoms during visits at 1, 3,5, 7, and 9 years. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and pair-wise comparisons were calculated for each of the five follow-up cohorts vs. the baseline cohort.

Results

Between 1999 and 2010, 284 patients received a BPD/DS; 275 patients (69.8 % women) age 42.7 years, BMI 53.4 kg/m2 qualified for baseline analysis. Two hundred seventy-five patients were available in year 1; 275 patients in year 3; 273 patients in year 5; 259 patients in year 7; and 228 patients in year 9. Gender distribution was not different. BMI was 30.1 at 1 year and 32.0 at 9 years. Body fat was reduced to 26 % after 2 years. Complications requiring surgery were significant. Nutritional problems developed in 29.8 % of patients over the course of observation. The baseline Beck Depression Index (BDI) was 13.9 and 7.2 in year 1. Year 1 through 9 remained unchanged. There were significant positive changes in quality of life between baseline and year 1 for most domains. These positive changes were maintained for the follow-up cohorts. After surgery the resolution of comorbidities continued for the 9 years.

Conclusions

Weight loss during the first year was well maintained, resolving comorbidities and improving quality of life. Rates of surgical complications resemble other bariatric procedures. Long-term nutrient deficiencies are of concern.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.CrossRefPubMed Farrell TM, Haggerty SP, Overby DW, et al. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:930–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–37.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA: Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.3654. Chang SH, Stoll CR, Song J, et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA: Surg. 2014;149(3):275–87. doi:10.​1001/​jamasurg.​2013.​3654.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchwald H, Orien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery world wide 2011. Obesity Surg. 2013;23:427–36.CrossRef Buchwald H, Orien DM. Metabolic/bariatric surgery world wide 2011. Obesity Surg. 2013;23:427–36.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, Karmali S, Gagner M. Biliopancreatic Diversion: The Effectiveness of Duodenal Switch and Its Limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013, Article ID:974762, 8 pp. Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, Karmali S, Gagner M. Biliopancreatic Diversion: The Effectiveness of Duodenal Switch and Its Limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013, Article ID:974762, 8 pp.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A. Five- year follow-up after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:199–205.CrossRefPubMed Topart P, Becouarn G, Salle A. Five- year follow-up after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011;7:199–205.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic Diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRefPubMed Hess DS, Hess DW, Oakley RS. The biliopancreatic Diversion with the duodenal switch: results beyond 10 years. Obes Surg. 2005;15:408–16.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.CrossRefPubMed Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Strain GW, Wang J, Gagner M, et al. Bioimpedance for severe obesity: Comparing research methods for total body water and resting energy expenditure. Obesity. 2008;16:1953–6.CrossRefPubMed Strain GW, Wang J, Gagner M, et al. Bioimpedance for severe obesity: Comparing research methods for total body water and resting energy expenditure. Obesity. 2008;16:1953–6.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Beeson WL, Batech M, Schultz L, et al. Comparison of body composition by bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Hispanic diabetics. Int J Body Comp Res. 2010;8:45–50. Beeson WL, Batech M, Schultz L, et al. Comparison of body composition by bioelectric impedance analysis and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in Hispanic diabetics. Int J Body Comp Res. 2010;8:45–50.
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Feisard MI, Greenway FL, Delany JP. Comparisons of methods to assess body composition changes during a period of weight loss. Obes Res. 2005;13:845–54.CrossRef Feisard MI, Greenway FL, Delany JP. Comparisons of methods to assess body composition changes during a period of weight loss. Obes Res. 2005;13:845–54.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Faria SL, Faria OP, Careal MDA, et al. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectric impedance with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry among obese patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed Faria SL, Faria OP, Careal MDA, et al. Validation study of multi-frequency bioelectric impedance with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry among obese patients. Obes Surg. 2014;24:1476–80.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. 1993; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–11.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD, Kosloski KD, et al. Development of a brief measure to assess quality of life in obesity. Obes Res. 2001;9:102–11.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Weight on Quality Of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–71.CrossRefPubMed Kolotkin RL, Crosby RD. Psychometric evaluation of the Impact of Weight on Quality Of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2002;11:157–71.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelsohn M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.CrossRefPubMed Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelsohn M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961;4:561–71.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.CrossRef Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77–100.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. A comparison of weight loss (WL) and body composition (BC) changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:582–7.CrossRefPubMed Strain GW, Gagner M, Pomp A, et al. A comparison of weight loss (WL) and body composition (BC) changes with four surgical procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5:582–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for super obesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97:160–6.CrossRefPubMed Sovik TT, Taha O, Aasheim ET, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for super obesity. Br J Surg. 2010;97:160–6.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Topart PA, Becouarm G. Revision and reversal after biliopancreatic diversion for excessive side effects or ineffective weight loss: a review of the current literature on indications and procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:965–72.CrossRefPubMed Topart PA, Becouarm G. Revision and reversal after biliopancreatic diversion for excessive side effects or ineffective weight loss: a review of the current literature on indications and procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11:965–72.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.CrossRefPubMed Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bardaro SJ, Gagner M, Consten E, et al. Routine cholecystectomy during laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is not necessary. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(5):549–53.CrossRefPubMed Bardaro SJ, Gagner M, Consten E, et al. Routine cholecystectomy during laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch is not necessary. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(5):549–53.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Crea N, Pata G, Di Betta E, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:139–45.CrossRefPubMed Crea N, Pata G, Di Betta E, et al. Long-term results of biliopancreatic diversion with or without gastric preservation for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2011;21:139–45.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Gourash WF, Ebel F, Lancaster K, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS): Retention strategy and results at 24 months. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;10:514–9.CrossRef Gourash WF, Ebel F, Lancaster K, et al. Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS): Retention strategy and results at 24 months. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;10:514–9.CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Isom KA, Andromatos I, Ariango M, et al. Nutrition and metabolic support recommendation for the bariatric patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:718–39.CrossRefPubMed Isom KA, Andromatos I, Ariango M, et al. Nutrition and metabolic support recommendation for the bariatric patient. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:718–39.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Saif T, Strain G, Gagner M, et al. An evaluation of nutrient status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:542–9.CrossRefPubMed Saif T, Strain G, Gagner M, et al. An evaluation of nutrient status after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8:542–9.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The Impact of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch (BPD/DS) Over 9 Years
verfasst von
Gladys W. Strain
Mehyar H. Torghabeh
Michel Gagner
Faith Ebel
Gregory F. Dakin
Jonathan S. Abelson
Daniel Connolly
Alfons Pomp
Publikationsdatum
29.09.2016
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Obesity Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0960-8923
Elektronische ISSN: 1708-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2371-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2017

Obesity Surgery 3/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.