Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020

01.02.2019 | Original Article

The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection

verfasst von: Iswanto Sucandy, Abdelrahman Attili, Janelle Spence, Timothy Bordeau, Sharona Ross, Alexander Rosemurgy

Erschienen in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

High body mass index (BMI) is associated with other multiple comorbidities such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, steatohepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and cardiopulmonary diseases, which can impact the perioperative outcomes following liver resection. We aimed to study the impact of BMI on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection. All the patients undergoing robotic liver resection between 2013 and 2017 were prospectively followed. The patients were divided into three groups (BMI < 25, BMI 25–35, BMI > 35 kg/m2) for illustrative purposes. Demographic and perioperative outcome data were compared. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). Thirty-eight patients underwent robotic hepatectomy, 73% were women, age was 58 (57 ± 17.6) years, and ASA class was 3 (3 ± 0.5). Indications for surgery were neoplastic lesions in 34 patients (89%), hemangioma in two patients (6%), fibrous mass in one patient (2.5%), and focal nodular hyperplasia in one patient (2.5%). 32% of the patients underwent right or left hemihepatectomy, 21% underwent sectionectomy, 5% underwent central hepatectomy and the reminder underwent non-anatomical liver resection. Operative time was 261 (254.6 ± 94.3) min. Estimated blood loss was 175 (276 ± 294.8) ml. Length of hospital stay was 3 (5 ± 4.9) days. By regression analysis of the three BMI groups, estimated blood loss, rate of postoperative complication, rate of conversion, need for transfusion, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay did not have a significant relationship with BMI. A total of five patients (13%) experience complications. Four patients had complications that were nonspecific to liver resection, including acute renal injury, respiratory failure, and enterocutaneous fistula. One patient had bile leak, treated with ERCP stenting. No mortality was seen in this study. Obesity should not dissuade surgeons from utilizing minimally invasive robotic approach for liver resection. Robotic technique is a safe and feasible in patients with high BMI. The impact of BMI on outcomes is insignificant.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB et al (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355:763–778CrossRef Adams KF, Schatzkin A, Harris TB et al (2006) Overweight, obesity, and mortality in a large prospective cohort of persons 50 to 71 years old. N Engl J Med 355:763–778CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Bianchini F, Kaaks R, Vainio H (2002) Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 3:565–574CrossRef Bianchini F, Kaaks R, Vainio H (2002) Overweight, obesity, and cancer risk. Lancet Oncol 3:565–574CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Key TJ, Spencer EA, Reeves GK (2010) Symposium 1: overnutrition: consequences and solutions. Obesity and cancer risk. Proc Nutr Soc 69:86–90CrossRef Key TJ, Spencer EA, Reeves GK (2010) Symposium 1: overnutrition: consequences and solutions. Obesity and cancer risk. Proc Nutr Soc 69:86–90CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS (2010) Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 7:245–257CrossRef Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS (2010) Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol 7:245–257CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Klinghoffer Z, Yang B, Kapoor A, Pinthus JH (2009) Obesity and renal cell carcinoma: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms and management considerations. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:975–987CrossRef Klinghoffer Z, Yang B, Kapoor A, Pinthus JH (2009) Obesity and renal cell carcinoma: epidemiology, underlying mechanisms and management considerations. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 9:975–987CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):558–561CrossRef Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Madboulay K, Brady KM, Fazio VW (2003) Laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. J Gastrointest Surg 7(4):558–561CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al. (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16(5):855–8CrossRef Pikarsky AJ, Saida Y, Yamaguchi T et al. (2002) Is obesity a high-risk factor for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 16(5):855–8CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Uchida H, Iwashita Y, Saga K et al (2016 Mar) Benefit of laparoscopic liver resection in high body mass index patients. World J Gastroenterol 14(10):3015–3022 22(CrossRef Uchida H, Iwashita Y, Saga K et al (2016 Mar) Benefit of laparoscopic liver resection in high body mass index patients. World J Gastroenterol 14(10):3015–3022 22(CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho C-M, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Ito N, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRef Ho C-M, Wakabayashi G, Nitta H, Ito N, Hasegawa Y, Takahara T (2013) Systematic review of robotic liver resection. Surg Endosc 27(3):732–739CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Baek S-J, Lee D-W, Park S-S, Kim S-H (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143CrossRef Baek S-J, Lee D-W, Park S-S, Kim S-H (2011) Current status of robot-assisted gastric surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 3(10):137–143CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Reddy SK, Tsung A, Geller DA (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection. World J Surg 35:1478–1486CrossRef Reddy SK, Tsung A, Geller DA (2011) Laparoscopic liver resection. World J Surg 35:1478–1486CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Mitko J, Main W et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy in the obese population: is there a preferred approach ? Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):S114–S115CrossRef Mitko J, Main W et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic cholecystectomy in the obese population: is there a preferred approach ? Surg Obes Relat Dis 12(7):S114–S115CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Larson SC, Wolk A (2007) Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Cancer 97(7):1005–1008CrossRef Larson SC, Wolk A (2007) Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br J Cancer 97(7):1005–1008CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Caldwell SH, Crespo DM, Kang HS, Al-Osaimi AM (2004) Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S97–S103CrossRef Caldwell SH, Crespo DM, Kang HS, Al-Osaimi AM (2004) Obesity and hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:S97–S103CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Aleksandrova K, Stelmach-Mardas M, Schlesinger S (2016) Obesity and liver cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 208:177–198CrossRef Aleksandrova K, Stelmach-Mardas M, Schlesinger S (2016) Obesity and liver cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res 208:177–198CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN et al (1986) The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 104:540–546CrossRef Pasulka PS, Bistrian BR, Benotti PN et al (1986) The risks of surgery in obese patients. Ann Intern Med 104:540–546CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE et al (2014) Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 20:638936 Pierpont YN, Dinh TP, Salas RE et al (2014) Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review. ISRN Obes 20:638936
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H et al (2012) Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:76–81CrossRef Bernardini MQ, Gien LT, Tipping H et al (2012) Surgical outcome of robotic surgery in morbidly obese patient with endometrial cancer compared to laparotomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:76–81CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361:2032–2035CrossRef Dindo D, Muller MK, Weber M, Clavien PA (2003) Obesity in general elective surgery. Lancet 361:2032–2035CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kitahara H, Patel B, McCrorey M, Nisivaco S, Balkhy HH (2017) Morbid obesity does not increase morbidity or mortality in robotic cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila) 12(6):434–439CrossRef Kitahara H, Patel B, McCrorey M, Nisivaco S, Balkhy HH (2017) Morbid obesity does not increase morbidity or mortality in robotic cardiac surgery. Innovations (Phila) 12(6):434–439CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Mathur AK, Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH et al (2010) Body mass index and adverse perioperative outcomes following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1285–1291CrossRef Mathur AK, Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH et al (2010) Body mass index and adverse perioperative outcomes following hepatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1285–1291CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Nomi T, Fuks D, Ferraz JM et al (2015) Influence of body mass index on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 29(12):3647–3654CrossRef Nomi T, Fuks D, Ferraz JM et al (2015) Influence of body mass index on postoperative outcomes after laparoscopic liver resection. Surg Endosc 29(12):3647–3654CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Utsunomiya T, Okamoto M, Kameyama T et al (2008) Impact of obesity on the surgical outcome following repeat hepatic resection in Japanese patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 14:1553–1558CrossRef Utsunomiya T, Okamoto M, Kameyama T et al (2008) Impact of obesity on the surgical outcome following repeat hepatic resection in Japanese patients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 14:1553–1558CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The impact of body mass index on perioperative outcomes after robotic liver resection
verfasst von
Iswanto Sucandy
Abdelrahman Attili
Janelle Spence
Timothy Bordeau
Sharona Ross
Alexander Rosemurgy
Publikationsdatum
01.02.2019
Verlag
Springer London
Erschienen in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2020
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-019-00923-4

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2020

Journal of Robotic Surgery 1/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.