nach oben

Erschienen in:

16.05.2020 | Original Article

The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections

verfasst von: Francesco Giovinazzo, Christoph Kuemmerli, Alma Moekotte, Arab Rawashdeh, Amal Suhool, Thomas Armstrong, John Primrose, Mohammed Abu Hilal

Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery programs (ERP) have been implemented in many surgical specialties. Their impact in liver surgery is poorly understood and approach-specific ERPs have not yet been assessed. This retrospective study aims to analyse the effect of such programs on liver resection. All patients undergoing liver resection at a tertiary referral centre between January 2009 and April 2019 were identified. Primary outcome was the length of stay (LOS), secondary outcomes were functional recovery, complications and readmission rates. Patients in the ERP with different protocols for open, laparoscopic, major and minor resections were compared to a historical cohort. Of 1056 patients, 644 were treated within the ERP. A comparable duration of hospital stay [7 days (IQR (interquartile range) 6–12) vs 7 days (IQR 5–9) p = 0.047] and faster functional recovery with fewer complications was found in the ERP group [94 (50.5%) vs 103 (35.9%) p < 0.002]. Those advantages were smaller after open minor compared to open major resection. In patients undergoing laparoscopic resection no differences were observed except for a lower readmission rate [21 (9.3%) vs 13 (3.6%) p = 0.005]. Multivariable analysis showed that laparoscopy was associated with a shorter LOS. ERPs offer significant advantages in open liver surgery. Those advantages are less evident after laparoscopic resection.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Labgaa I, Jarrar G, Joliat GR, Allemann P, Gander S, Blanc C, Hubner M, Demartines N (2016) Implementation of enhanced recovery (ERAS) in colorectal surgery has a positive impact on non-ERAS liver surgery patients. World J Surg 40(5):1082–1091. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3363-3PubMedCrossRef

Kaibori M, Matsui K, Ishizaki M, Iida H, Yoshii K, Asano H, Kon M (2017) Effects of implementing an “enhanced recovery after surgery” program on patients undergoing resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Today 47(1):42–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1344-2PubMedCrossRef

Geltzeiler CB, Rotramel A, Wilson C, Deng L, Whiteford MH, Frankhouse J (2014) Prospective study of colorectal enhanced recovery after surgery in a community hospital. JAMA Surg 149(9):955–961. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.675PubMedCrossRef

Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society fPC, European Society for Clinical N, Metabolism, International Association for Surgical M, Nutrition (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS((R))) society recommendations. World J Surg 37(2):259–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0PubMedCrossRef

Page AJ, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Zavadsky T, Grant MC, Galante DJ, Wick EC, Weiss M, Makary MA, Wu CL, Pawlik TM (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for open hepatectomy–physiology, immunomodulation, and implementation. J Gastrointest Surg 19(2):387–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2712-0PubMedCrossRef

van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MM, Bemelmans MH, Lassen K, Revhaug A, Fearon KC, Garden OJ, Dejong CH, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery G (2008) Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 95(8):969–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6227PubMedCrossRef

Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C, von Meyenfeldt MF, Fearon KC, Revhaug A, Norderval S, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Dejong CH, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery G (2009) Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group recommendations. Arch Surg 144(10):961–969. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.170PubMedCrossRef

Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a review. JAMA Surg 152(3):292–298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952PubMedCrossRef

Abu Hilal M, Di Fabio F, Badran A, Alsaati H, Clarke H, Fecher I, Armstrong TH, Johnson CD, Pearce NW (2013) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme after pancreatoduodenectomy: a single-centre UK pilot study. Pancreatology 13(1):58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2012.11.312PubMedCrossRef

10.

Richardson J, Di Fabio F, Clarke H, Bajalan M, Davids J, Abu Hilal M (2015) Implementation of enhanced recovery programme for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: feasibility, safety and cost analysis. Pancreatology 15(2):185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2015.01.002PubMedCrossRef

11.

Coolsen MM, Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van der Wilt AA, Slim K, Lassen K, Dejong CH (2013) A systematic review of outcomes in patients undergoing liver surgery in an enhanced recovery after surgery pathways. HPB 15(4):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00572.xPubMedCrossRef

12.

Melloul E, Hubner M, Scott M, Snowden C, Prentis J, Dejong CH, Garden OJ, Farges O, Kokudo N, Vauthey JN, Clavien PA, Demartines N (2016) Guidelines for perioperative care for liver surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. World J Surg 40(10):2425–2440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3700-1PubMedCrossRef

13.

Yang R, Tao W, Chen YY, Zhang BH, Tang JM, Zhong S, Chen XX (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg (Lond, Engl) 36(Pt A):274–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.017CrossRef

14.

Kasai M, Cipriani F, Gayet B, Aldrighetti L, Ratti F, Sarmiento JM, Scatton O, Kim KH, Dagher I, Topal B, Primrose J, Nomi T, Fuks D, Abu Hilal M (2018) Laparoscopic versus open major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.01.020PubMedCrossRef

15.

Bond-Smith G, Belgaumkar AP, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS (2016) Enhanced recovery protocols for major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:011382. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd011382.pub2CrossRef

16.

Savikko J, Ilmakunnas M, Makisalo H, Nordin A, Isoniemi H (2015) Enhanced recovery protocol after liver resection. Br J Surg 102(12):1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9912PubMedCrossRef

17.

He F, Lin X, Xie F, Huang Y, Yuan R (2015) The effect of enhanced recovery program for patients undergoing partial laparoscopic hepatectomy of liver cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 17(9):694–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-015-1296-9PubMedCrossRef

18.

Dasari BV, Rahman R, Khan S, Bennett D, Hodson J, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF, Muiesan P, Roberts KJ, Sutcliffe RP (2015) Safety and feasibility of an enhanced recovery pathway after a liver resection: prospective cohort study. HPB 17(8):700–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12447PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

19.

Wong-Lun-Hing EM, van Dam RM, van Breukelen GJ, Tanis PJ, Ratti F, van Hillegersberg R, Slooter GD, de Wilt JH, Liem MS, de Boer MT, Klaase JM, Neumann UP, Aldrighetti LA, Dejong CH (2017) Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study). Br J Surg 104(5):525–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10438PubMedCrossRef

20.

Di Fabio F, Samim M, Di Gioia P, Godeseth R, Pearce NW, Abu Hilal M (2014) Laparoscopic major hepatectomies: clinical outcomes and classification. World J Surg 38(12):3169–3174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2724-7PubMedCrossRef

21.

Kawaguchi Y, Fuks D, Kokudo N, Gayet B (2018) Difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection: proposal for a new classification. Ann Surg 267(1):13–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002176PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kaltsas G, Caplin M, Davies P, Ferone D, Garcia-Carbonero R, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Horsch D, Tiensuu Janson E, Kianmanesh R, Kos-Kudla B, Pavel M, Rinke A, Falconi M, de Herder WW, All other Antibes Consensus Conference p (2017) ENETS consensus guidelines for the standards of care in neuroendocrine tumors: pre- and perioperative therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1159/000461583PubMedCrossRef

23.

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.aePubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

24.

Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, Riga A, Worthington T, Scott MJ, Vandrevala T, Fry CH, Karanjia N, Quiney N (2013) Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 100(8):1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9165PubMedCrossRef

25.

Yip VS, Dunne DF, Samuels S, Tan CY, Lacasia C, Tang J, Burston C, Malik HZ, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW (2016) Adherence to early mobilisation: key for successful enhanced recovery after liver resection. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 42(10):1561–1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.015CrossRef

26.

Dunne DF, Yip VS, Jones RP, McChesney EA, Lythgoe DT, Psarelli EE, Jones L, Lacasia-Purroy C, Malik HZ, Poston GJ, Fenwick SW (2014) Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 110(2):197–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23616PubMedCrossRef

27.

Cipriani F, Rawashdeh M, Stanton L, Armstrong T, Takhar A, Pearce NW, Primrose J, Abu Hilal M (2016) Propensity score-based analysis of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal metastases. Br J Surg 103(11):1504–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10211PubMedCrossRef

28.

Ratti F, Cipriani F, Reineke R, Catena M, Comotti L, Beretta L, Aldrighetti L (2016) Impact of ERAS approach and minimally-invasive techniques on outcome of patients undergoing liver surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 48(10):1243–1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.06.032PubMedCrossRef

29.

Day RW, Cleeland CS, Wang XS, Fielder S, Calhoun J, Conrad C, Vauthey JN, Gottumukkala V, Aloia TA (2015) Patient-reported outcomes accurately measure the value of an enhanced recovery program in liver surgery. J Am Coll Surg 221(6):1023–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.09.011(e1021–1022)PubMedCrossRef

30.

Hendry PO, van Dam RM, Bukkems SF, McKeown DW, Parks RW, Preston T, Dejong CH, Garden OJ, Fearon KC, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery G (2010) Randomized clinical trial of laxatives and oral nutritional supplements within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol following liver resection. Br J Surg 97(8):1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7120PubMedCrossRef

31.

Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B, Plum LM, Frederiksen HJ, Christensen BM, Kehlet H, Hillingso JG (2013) Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 100(1):138–143. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.8996PubMedCrossRef

32.

Liang X, Ying H, Wang H, Xu H, Yu H, Cai L, Wang Y, Tong Y, Ji L, Luo R, Cai XJ (2016) Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Medicine 95(8):e2835. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000002835PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Sanchez-Perez B, Aranda-Narvaez JM, Suarez-Munoz MA, Eladel-Delfresno M, Fernandez-Aguilar JL, Perez-Daga JA, Pulido-Roa Y, Santoyo-Santoyo J (2012) Fast-track program in laparoscopic liver surgery: theory or fact? World J Gastrointest Surg 4(11):246–250. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v4.i11.246PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

34.

Maessen JM, Dejong CH, Kessels AG, von Meyenfeldt MF (2008) Length of stay: an inappropriate readout of the success of enhanced recovery programs. World J Surg 32(6):971–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9404-9PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

35.

Ni CY, Yang Y, Chang YQ, Cai H, Xu B, Yang F, Lau WY, Wang ZH, Zhou WP (2013) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol J Eur Soc Surg Oncol Br Assoc Surg Oncol 39(6):542–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.03.013CrossRef

36.

Lu H, Fan Y, Zhang F, Li G, Zhang C, Lu L (2014) Fast-track surgery improves postoperative outcomes after hepatectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 61(129):168–172PubMed

37.

Tamandl D, Butte JM, Allen PJ, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Groeger JS, Jarnagin WR, Fong Y (2015) Hospital readmissions after liver surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer. Surgery 157(2):231–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.016PubMedCrossRef

38.

Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, Weiss M, Wolfgang CL, Hirose K, Pawlik TM (2014) Readmission incidence and associated factors after a hepatic resection at a major hepato-pancreatico-biliary academic centre. HPB 16(11):972–978. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12262PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

Titel: The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections
verfasst von: Francesco Giovinazzo
Christoph Kuemmerli
Alma Moekotte
Arab Rawashdeh
Amal Suhool
Thomas Armstrong
John Primrose
Mohammed Abu Hilal
Publikationsdatum: 16.05.2020
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Updates in Surgery / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 2038-131X
Elektronische ISSN: 2038-3312
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00786-7

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

17.04.2024 | Postoperative nausea and vomiting | Nachrichten

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

16.04.2024 | Infektiologie | Nachrichten

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

10.04.2024 | Postoperative Schmerztherapie | Nachrichten

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

weitere anzeigen

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom CME-Kurs

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur CME-Kurs

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis CME-Kurs

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The impact of enhanced recovery on open and laparoscopic liver resections

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis

Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study

The prognostic impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on lymph node sampling in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

Shifting from donor to donor-recipient matching perspective in defining indications for machine perfusion in liver transplantation

Postoperative discomfort and pain in the management of hemorrhoidal disease: laser hemorrhoidoplasty, a minimal invasive treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids

Distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for pancreatic cancer: a pooled analysis of 109 cases

Neu im Fachgebiet Chirurgie

Hochrisiko-Eingriffe für postoperative Übelkeit

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Kein Abstrich bei chronischen Wunden ohne Entzündungszeichen!

Chronische Schmerzen nach Op. oft mit neuropathischer Komponente

Update Chirurgie

Aktuelle BDC Leitlinien-Webinare

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“