Medical additive manufacturing requires standard tessellation language (STL) models. Such models are commonly derived from computed tomography (CT) images using thresholding. Threshold selection can be performed manually or automatically. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of manual and default threshold selection on the reliability and accuracy of skull STL models using different CT technologies.
One female and one male human cadaver head were imaged using multi-detector row CT, dual-energy CT, and two cone-beam CT scanners. Four medical engineers manually thresholded the bony structures on all CT images. The lowest and highest selected mean threshold values and the default threshold value were used to generate skull STL models. Geometric variations between all manually thresholded STL models were calculated. Furthermore, in order to calculate the accuracy of the manually and default thresholded STL models, all STL models were superimposed on an optical scan of the dry female and male skulls (“gold standard”).
The intra- and inter-observer variability of the manual threshold selection was good (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.9). All engineers selected grey values closer to soft tissue to compensate for bone voids. Geometric variations between the manually thresholded STL models were 0.13 mm (multi-detector row CT), 0.59 mm (dual-energy CT), and 0.55 mm (cone-beam CT). All STL models demonstrated inaccuracies ranging from −0.8 to +1.1 mm (multi-detector row CT), −0.7 to +2.0 mm (dual-energy CT), and −2.3 to +4.8 mm (cone-beam CT).
This study demonstrates that manual threshold selection results in better STL models than default thresholding. The use of dual-energy CT and cone-beam CT technology in its present form does not deliver reliable or accurate STL models for medical additive manufacturing. New approaches are required that are based on pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms.
Abou-El Fetouh A, Barakat A, Abdel-Ghany K (2011) Computer-guided rapid-prototyped templates for segmental mandibular osteotomies: a preliminary report. Int J Med Robot 7:187–192 CrossRef
Johnson TRC (2012) Dual-energy CT: general principles. Am J Roentgenol 199:3–8 CrossRef
Reeves T, Mah P, McDavid W (2012) Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 41:500–508 CrossRef
Sahoo PK, Soltani S, Wong AKC (1988) A survey of thresholding techniques. Comput Vision Graph Image Process 41:233–260 CrossRef
van Dam A, van, Munsteren C, de, Ruiter M, (2015) Fix for life. The development of a new embalming method to preserve life-like morphology. FASEB J 29(547):10
Gibson I, Rosen D, Stucker B (2014) Additive manufacturing technologies—3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. Springer, New York
Huotilainen E, Jaanimets R, Valášek J, Marcián P, Salmi M, Tuomi J, Mäkitie A, Wolff J (2014) Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg 42:e259–e265 CrossRef
Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW (1984) Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am 1:612 CrossRef
Tuy HK (1983) An inversion formula for cone-beam reconstruction. SIAM J Appl Math 43:546–552 CrossRef
Clack R, Zeng GL, Weng Y, Christian PE, Gullberg GT (1991) Cone beam single photon emission computed tomography using two orbits. In: Colchester ACF, Hawkes DJ (eds) Proceedings of the Information processing in medical imaging: 12th international conference, IPMI ’91 Wye, July 7–12, 1991. Springer, Berlin, pp 45–54 CrossRef
Maret D, Telmon N, Peters OA, Lepage B, Treil J, Inglèse JM, Peyre A, Kahn JL, Sixou M (2012) Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 41:649–655 CrossRef
Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS (2015) Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 44:20140224 CrossRef
- The impact of manual threshold selection in medical additive manufacturing
Maureen van Eijnatten
- Springer International Publishing
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
A journal for interdisciplinary research, development and applications of image guided diagnosis and therapy
Print ISSN: 1861-6410
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-6429