Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 5/2020

30.01.2020 | Original Scientific Report

The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery

verfasst von: Liam A Devane, Chwanrow K Baban, A O’Doherty, Cecily Quinn, Enda W McDermott, Ruth S Prichard

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 5/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can improve cosmesis by reducing resection volume. Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) aims to achieve clear excision margins while optimizing cosmesis. However, the influence of NAC on margin re-excision after BCS is unclear. This study examines the rate and determinants of margin re-excision in patients undergoing BCS following NAC in our institution.

Methods

From 2011–2015, all patients treated with NAC prior to BCS were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Mann–Whitney and Fisher’s exact test tests were used to compare variables in patients who did and did not require re-excision. Patients undergoing primary surgical treatment in 2015 comprised an unmatched comparison group.

Results

Of 211 patients treated with NAC, 69 initially underwent BCS. The re-excision rate was 32% (n = 22) compared to 17% in the primary operable group (38 of 221, p = 0.02). Re-excision rates were lowest in triple-negative and HER2+ tumors (0% and 10%, respectively). Lobular carcinoma and ER+ tumors had a significantly higher rate of re-excision (100% and 42%, respectively). Of 22 patients undergoing re-excision, 9 had further BCS and 13 had a mastectomy.

Conclusion

The re-excision rate following NAC is almost twice that of patients who underwent primary operative management. Her2+ and triple-negative tumors have lower re-excision rates and may represent a selected cohort most suitable for BCS. Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma or ER+ disease have significantly higher rates of margin positivity, and these patients should be considered for a cavity shave during primary surgery to reduce the rates of re-excision.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26:778–785CrossRef Rastogi P, Anderson SJ, Bear HD et al (2008) Preoperative chemotherapy: updates of national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project protocols B-18 and B-27. J Clin Oncol 26:778–785CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ (2007) Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2):Cd005002 Mieog JS, van der Hage JA, van de Velde CJ (2007) Preoperative chemotherapy for women with operable breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18(2):Cd005002
3.
Zurück zum Zitat King TA, Morrow M (2015) Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12:335–343CrossRef King TA, Morrow M (2015) Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 12:335–343CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Volders JH, Negenborn VL, Spronk PE et al (2018) Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:1–12CrossRef Volders JH, Negenborn VL, Spronk PE et al (2018) Breast-conserving surgery following neoadjuvant therapy-a systematic review on surgical outcomes. Breast Cancer Res Treat 168:1–12CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Vos EL, Jager A, Verhoef C et al (2015) Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer 51:282–291CrossRef Vos EL, Jager A, Verhoef C et al (2015) Overall survival in patients with a re-excision following breast conserving surgery compared to those without in a large population-based cohort. Eur J Cancer 51:282–291CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Fisher S, Yasui Y, Dabbs K et al (2018) Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study. BMC Health Serv Res 18:94CrossRef Fisher S, Yasui Y, Dabbs K et al (2018) Re-excision and survival following breast conserving surgery in early stage breast cancer patients: a population-based study. BMC Health Serv Res 18:94CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Tang SS, Kaptanis S, Haddow JB et al (2017) Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO–ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Eur J Cancer 84:315–324CrossRef Tang SS, Kaptanis S, Haddow JB et al (2017) Current margin practice and effect on re-excision rates following the publication of the SSO–ASTRO consensus and ABS consensus guidelines: a national prospective study of 2858 women undergoing breast-conserving therapy in the UK and Ireland. Eur J Cancer 84:315–324CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Volders JH, Haloua MH, Krekel NM et al (2016) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery—consequences on margin status and excision volumes: a nationwide pathology study. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:986–993CrossRef Volders JH, Haloua MH, Krekel NM et al (2016) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast-conserving surgery—consequences on margin status and excision volumes: a nationwide pathology study. Eur J Surg Oncol 42:986–993CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Landercasper J, Bennie B, Parsons BM et al (2017) Fewer reoperations after lumpectomy for breast cancer with neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant chemotherapy: a report from the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1507–1515CrossRef Landercasper J, Bennie B, Parsons BM et al (2017) Fewer reoperations after lumpectomy for breast cancer with neoadjuvant rather than adjuvant chemotherapy: a report from the national cancer database. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1507–1515CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Truin W, Vugts G, Roumen RM et al (2016) Differences in response and surgical management with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular versus ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:51–57CrossRef Truin W, Vugts G, Roumen RM et al (2016) Differences in response and surgical management with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in invasive lobular versus ductal breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 23:51–57CrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Bouzon A, Acea B, Garcia A et al (2016) Risk factors for positive margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cir Esp 94:379–384CrossRef Bouzon A, Acea B, Garcia A et al (2016) Risk factors for positive margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cir Esp 94:379–384CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Soucy G, Belanger J, Leblanc G et al (2008) Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact? J Am Coll Surg 206:1116–1121CrossRef Soucy G, Belanger J, Leblanc G et al (2008) Surgical margins in breast-conservation operations for invasive carcinoma: does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have an impact? J Am Coll Surg 206:1116–1121CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN et al (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373:503–510CrossRef Chagpar AB, Killelea BK, Tsangaris TN et al (2015) A randomized, controlled trial of cavity shave margins in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 373:503–510CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW et al (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277–300CrossRef Morrow M, Strom EA, Bassett LW et al (2002) Standard for breast conservation therapy in the management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin 52:277–300CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Margin Re-excision in Breast-Conserving Surgery
verfasst von
Liam A Devane
Chwanrow K Baban
A O’Doherty
Cecily Quinn
Enda W McDermott
Ruth S Prichard
Publikationsdatum
30.01.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 5/2020
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05383-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2020

World Journal of Surgery 5/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.