Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2016

30.08.2016 | Original Article

The important risk factor for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis of lower rectal cancer is node-positive status on magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Lymph Node Committee of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

verfasst von: Shimpei Ogawa, Jin-ichi Hida, Hideyuki Ike, Tetsushi Kinugasa, Mitsuyoshi Ota, Eiji Shinto, Michio Itabashi, Takahiro Okamoto, Kenichi Sugihara

Erschienen in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Ausgabe 10/2016

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

This study seeks to evaluate lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) and perirectal lymph node (PRLN) status on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis.

Methods

The subjects were 394 patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent MRI prior to mesorectal excision (combined with lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in 272 patients) at 6 institutes. No patients received neoadjuvant therapy. Cases were classified as cN(+) and cN(−) based on the short axis of the largest lymph node ≥5 and <5 mm, respectively. LPLN and PRLN status and other clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. The importance of identified risk factors for lymph node metastasis was examined using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

Independent risk factors for right LPLN metastasis included histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), M1, cLPLN(+) [odds ratio (OR) 10.73, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 4.59–27.1], and those for left LPLN metastasis were age (<64), histopathological grade (G3 + G4), pPRLN(+), and cLPLN(+) (OR 24.53, 95 % CI 9.16–77.7). ORs for cLPLN(+) were highest. The AUCs for right and left cLPLN status of 0.7484 (95 % CI 0.6672–0.8153) and 0.7904 (95 % CI 0.7088–0.8538), respectively, were significantly higher than those for other risk factors. In contrast, the ORs for cPRLN(+) and cPRLN status of 2.46 (95 % CI 1.47–4.18) and 0.6396 (95 % CI 0.5917–0.6848) were not much higher than for other factors.

Conclusions

An LPLN-positive status with a short axis ≥5 mm on MRI is an important predictor of LPLN metastasis, but PRLN status is not a strong predictor of PRLN metastasis.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Koh DM, Brown G, Husband JE (2006) Nodal staging in rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 31:652–659CrossRefPubMed Koh DM, Brown G, Husband JE (2006) Nodal staging in rectal cancer. Abdom Imaging 31:652–659CrossRefPubMed
2.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kusters M, Beets GL, van de Velde CJ, Beets-Tan RG, Marijnen CA, Rutten HJ, Putter H, Moriya Y (2009) A comparison between the treatment of low rectal cancer in Japan and the Netherlands, focusing on the patterns of local recurrence. Ann Surg 249:229–235. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a664 CrossRefPubMed Kusters M, Beets GL, van de Velde CJ, Beets-Tan RG, Marijnen CA, Rutten HJ, Putter H, Moriya Y (2009) A comparison between the treatment of low rectal cancer in Japan and the Netherlands, focusing on the patterns of local recurrence. Ann Surg 249:229–235. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e318190a664​ CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Matsueda K, Konishi T, Fujimoto Y, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, Unno T, Kano A, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Yamaguchi T, Watanabe T, Muto T (2014) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced low rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on pretreatment imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 21:189–196. doi:10.1245/s10434-013-3216-y CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Matsueda K, Konishi T, Fujimoto Y, Nagayama S, Fukunaga Y, Unno T, Kano A, Kuroyanagi H, Oya M, Yamaguchi T, Watanabe T, Muto T (2014) Selective lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with advanced low rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy based on pretreatment imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 21:189–196. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-013-3216-y CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T (2005) Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:756–763CrossRefPubMed Ueno M, Oya M, Azekura K, Yamaguchi T, Muto T (2005) Incidence and prognostic significance of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with advanced low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:756–763CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Mori T, Mochizuki H, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 49:1663–1672 Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T, Mori T, Mochizuki H, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon rectum 49:1663–1672
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Kato T, Mori T, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Sugihara K (2009) Outcomes of surgery alone for lower rectal cancer with and without pelvic sidewall dissection. Dis Colon rectum 52:567–576. doi:10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a1d994 Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Kato T, Mori T, Kameoka S, Shirouzu K, Sugihara K (2009) Outcomes of surgery alone for lower rectal cancer with and without pelvic sidewall dissection. Dis Colon rectum 52:567–576. doi:10.​1007/​DCR.​0b013e3181a1d994​
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, Kotake K, Muto T, Sugihara K (2012) Results of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional study on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: is it regional or distant disease? Ann Surg 255:1129–1134. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182565d9d CrossRefPubMed Akiyoshi T, Watanabe T, Miyata S, Kotake K, Muto T, Sugihara K (2012) Results of a Japanese nationwide multi-institutional study on lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer: is it regional or distant disease? Ann Surg 255:1129–1134. doi:10.​1097/​SLA.​0b013e3182565d9d​ CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishiguro M, Miyoshi M, Kajiwara Y, Sato T, Shimazaki H, Hase K (2007) Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg 245:80–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Ishiguro M, Miyoshi M, Kajiwara Y, Sato T, Shimazaki H, Hase K (2007) Potential prognostic benefit of lateral pelvic node dissection for rectal cancer located below the peritoneal reflection. Ann Surg 245:80–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan KY, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2010) Improving prediction of lateral node spread in low rectal cancers—multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors in 1,046 cases. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395:545–549. doi:10.1007/s00423-010-0642-1 CrossRef Tan KY, Yamamoto S, Fujita S, Akasu T, Moriya Y (2010) Improving prediction of lateral node spread in low rectal cancers—multivariate analysis of clinicopathological factors in 1,046 cases. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 395:545–549. doi:10.​1007/​s00423-010-0642-1 CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinugasa T, Akagi Y, Ochi T, Ishibashi Y, Tanaka N, Oka Y, Mizobe T, Yuge K, Fujino S, Kibe S, Shirouzu K (2013) Lateral lymph-node dissection for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of all 944 cases undergoing surgery during 1975-2004. Anticancer Res 33:2921–2927PubMed Kinugasa T, Akagi Y, Ochi T, Ishibashi Y, Tanaka N, Oka Y, Mizobe T, Yuge K, Fujino S, Kibe S, Shirouzu K (2013) Lateral lymph-node dissection for rectal cancer: meta-analysis of all 944 cases undergoing surgery during 1975-2004. Anticancer Res 33:2921–2927PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Ogawa S, Hida JI, Ike H, Kinugasa T, Ota M, Shinto E, Itabashi M, Kameoka S, Sugihara K (2016) Selection of lymph node-positive cases based on perirectal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1187–1194. doi:10.1245/s10434-015-5021-2 CrossRefPubMed Ogawa S, Hida JI, Ike H, Kinugasa T, Ota M, Shinto E, Itabashi M, Kameoka S, Sugihara K (2016) Selection of lymph node-positive cases based on perirectal and lateral pelvic lymph nodes using magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Ann Surg Oncol 23:1187–1194. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-015-5021-2 CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (2010). Springer, New York American Joint Committee on Cancer: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual (2010). Springer, New York
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96:644–647CrossRefPubMed Akobeng AK (2007) Understanding diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic curves. Acta Paediatr 96:644–647CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, Beyene J, Victor JC, Schmocker S, Brown G, McLeod R, Kennedy E (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2212–2223. doi:10.1245/s10434-011-2210-5 CrossRefPubMed Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, Beyene J, Victor JC, Schmocker S, Brown G, McLeod R, Kennedy E (2012) Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 19:2212–2223. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-011-2210-5 CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227:371–377CrossRefPubMed Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, Williams GT (2003) Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology 227:371–377CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim TH, Jeong SY, Choi DH, Kim DY, Jung KH, Moon SH, Chang HJ, Lim SB, Choi HS, Park JG (2008) Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:729–737CrossRefPubMed Kim TH, Jeong SY, Choi DH, Kim DY, Jung KH, Moon SH, Chang HJ, Lim SB, Choi HS, Park JG (2008) Lateral lymph node metastasis is a major cause of locoregional recurrence in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative resection. Ann Surg Oncol 15:729–737CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Akasu T, Iinuma G, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N (2009) Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2787–2794. doi:10.1245/s10434-009-0613-3 CrossRefPubMed Akasu T, Iinuma G, Takawa M, Yamamoto S, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N (2009) Accuracy of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2787–2794. doi:10.​1245/​s10434-009-0613-3 CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat MERCURY Study Group, Shihab OC, Taylor F, Bees N, et al. (2011) Relevance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected pelvic sidewall lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 98:1798–1804. doi:10.1002/bjs.7662 CrossRef MERCURY Study Group, Shihab OC, Taylor F, Bees N, et al. (2011) Relevance of magnetic resonance imaging-detected pelvic sidewall lymph node involvement in rectal cancer. Br J Surg 98:1798–1804. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​7662 CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
The important risk factor for lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis of lower rectal cancer is node-positive status on magnetic resonance imaging: study of the Lymph Node Committee of Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
verfasst von
Shimpei Ogawa
Jin-ichi Hida
Hideyuki Ike
Tetsushi Kinugasa
Mitsuyoshi Ota
Eiji Shinto
Michio Itabashi
Takahiro Okamoto
Kenichi Sugihara
Publikationsdatum
30.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Ausgabe 10/2016
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2641-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 10/2016

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 10/2016 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.