Skip to main content

29.10.2018 | Review Article

The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

verfasst von: Meixuan Li, Liang Yao, Caiwen Han, Huijuan Li, Yangqin Xun, Peijing Yan, Meng Wang, Wenbo He, Cuncun Lu, Kehu Yang

Erschienen in: International Urogynecology Journal

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) and complications of different urinary drainage methods (indwelling urinary catheterization, suprapubic catheterization, and intermittent catheterization.).

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched from their inception to March 2018. We selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing at least two of the three possible urinary drainage routes after gynecologic surgery. A meta-analysis was performed using the RevMan software, and a random-effects model was used to pool the effect size. The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to rate the quality of evidence.

Results

Fifteen RCTs met eligibility criteria (N = 1607), the meta-analysis indicated that suprapubic drainage was associated with a reduction in the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria compared with indwelling urinary catheterization [risk ratios (RR) = 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.24–0.65, P = 0.0003) but was associated with a higher rate of hematuria (RR = 4.49, 95% CI: 1.16–17.41, P = 0.03). Indwelling urinary catheterization increased the rate of recatheterization compared with suprapubic drainage (RR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.22–7.11, P = 0.02) and was associated with higher rate of symptomatic UTI compared with intermittent catheterization (RR = 2.79, 95% CI: 1.09–7.14, P = 0.03). No difference was found in other aspects (complication rate and catheter-related pain) among the three drainage routes.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggested that suprapubic drainage was superior to indwelling urethral catheterization in reduction of asymptomatic bacteriuria and rate of recatheterization but was associated with higher rate of hematuria. Intermittent catheterization was associated with a reduction in symptomatic UTI compared with indwelling urinary catheterization. More high-quality randomized trials are needed to determine which route is most appropriate for catheterization in patients after gynecologic surgery.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Buchko BL, Robinson LE. An evidence-based approach to decrease early post-operative urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery. Urol Nurs. 2012;32:260–4.CrossRefPubMed Buchko BL, Robinson LE. An evidence-based approach to decrease early post-operative urinary retention following urogynecologic surgery. Urol Nurs. 2012;32:260–4.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Partoll LM. Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with other pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1292–8.CrossRefPubMed Partoll LM. Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with other pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1292–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P. Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:144–7.PubMed Stanton SL, Ozsoy C, Hilton P. Voiding difficulties in the female: prevalence, clinical and urodynamic review. Obstet Gynecol. 1983;61:144–7.PubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Kidd EA, Stewart F, Kassis NC et al. Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004203. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858. Kidd EA, Stewart F, Kassis NC et al. Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(12):CD004203. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​14651858.
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Stekkinger E, Linden PJQVD. A comparison of suprapubic and transurethral catheterization on postoperative urinary retention after vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2011;72:109–16.CrossRef Stekkinger E, Linden PJQVD. A comparison of suprapubic and transurethral catheterization on postoperative urinary retention after vaginal prolapse repair: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecol Obstet Investig. 2011;72:109–16.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Schiøtz HA, Malme PA, Tanbo TG. Urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria after vaginal plastic surgery: a comparison of suprapubic and transurethral catheters. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68:453–5.CrossRefPubMed Schiøtz HA, Malme PA, Tanbo TG. Urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria after vaginal plastic surgery: a comparison of suprapubic and transurethral catheters. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1989;68:453–5.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Dixon L, Dolan LM, Brown K, et al. RCT of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Nurs. 2010;19:S7–S13.CrossRefPubMed Dixon L, Dolan LM, Brown K, et al. RCT of urethral versus suprapubic catheterization. Br J Nurs. 2010;19:S7–S13.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Naik R, Maughan K, Nordin A, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of intermittent self-catheterisation vs. supra-pubic catheterisation for post-operative bladder care following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:437–42.CrossRefPubMed Naik R, Maughan K, Nordin A, et al. A prospective randomised controlled trial of intermittent self-catheterisation vs. supra-pubic catheterisation for post-operative bladder care following radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:437–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Jannelli ML, Wu JM, Plunkett LW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:72.e1–4.CrossRef Jannelli ML, Wu JM, Plunkett LW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of clean intermittent self-catheterization versus suprapubic catheterization after urogynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:72.e1–4.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Higgins JE. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 2011;5:S38. Higgins JE. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 2011;5:S38.
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3; 2014. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer program]. Version 5.3; 2014.
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Wells GA, Shea BJ, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis. Appl Eng Agric. 2012;18:727–34. Wells GA, Shea BJ, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis. Appl Eng Agric. 2012;18:727–34.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Barents JW, Dankert J, Ilic P, et al. The indwelling catheter in gynecology and the development of bacteriuria; a comparative study of patients with the transurethral and the suprapubic catheter. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1978;122:1321–7.PubMed Barents JW, Dankert J, Ilic P, et al. The indwelling catheter in gynecology and the development of bacteriuria; a comparative study of patients with the transurethral and the suprapubic catheter. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1978;122:1321–7.PubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Bergman A, Matthews L, Ballard CA, et al. Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1987;22:144–6. Bergman A, Matthews L, Ballard CA, et al. Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1987;22:144–6.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Harms E, Christmann U, Klock FK. Suprapubic urinary diversion following gynecologic operations. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985;31:665–9. Harms E, Christmann U, Klock FK. Suprapubic urinary diversion following gynecologic operations. Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985;31:665–9.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Nwabineli NJ, Walsh DJ, Davis JA. Urinary drainage following radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma - a pilot comparison of urethral and suprapubic routes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1993:208-210. Nwabineli NJ, Walsh DJ, Davis JA. Urinary drainage following radical hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma - a pilot comparison of urethral and suprapubic routes. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 1993:208-210.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiser WL, Morrison JC, Loveday GL, et al. Management of bladder drainage following vaginal plastic repairs. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:65–71.PubMed Wiser WL, Morrison JC, Loveday GL, et al. Management of bladder drainage following vaginal plastic repairs. Obstet Gynecol. 1974;44:65–71.PubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Andersen JT, Heisterberg L, Hebjørn S, et al. Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after Colposuspension/vaginal repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64:139–43.CrossRefPubMed Andersen JT, Heisterberg L, Hebjørn S, et al. Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after Colposuspension/vaginal repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1985;64:139–43.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Dobbs SP, Jackson SR, Wilson AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing continuous bladder drainage with catheterization at abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Urol. 1997;80:554–6.CrossRefPubMed Dobbs SP, Jackson SR, Wilson AM, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing continuous bladder drainage with catheterization at abdominal hysterectomy. Br J Urol. 1997;80:554–6.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Hakvoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119:113–4.CrossRef Hakvoort RA, Thijs SD, Bouwmeester FW, et al. Comparing clean intermittent catheterisation and transurethral indwelling catheterisation for incomplete voiding after vaginal prolapse surgery: a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;119:113–4.CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Schröder UC, Bokeloh F, O'Sullivan M, et al. Guidelines on urological infections. Biomicrofluidics. 2015;13:361. Schröder UC, Bokeloh F, O'Sullivan M, et al. Guidelines on urological infections. Biomicrofluidics. 2015;13:361.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Elvy J, Colville A. Catheter associated urinary tract infection: what is it, what causes it and how can we prevent it? J Infect Prev. 2009;10:36–43.CrossRef Elvy J, Colville A. Catheter associated urinary tract infection: what is it, what causes it and how can we prevent it? J Infect Prev. 2009;10:36–43.CrossRef
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, et al. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:637–42.CrossRefPubMed Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B, et al. Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary-tract infection. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:637–42.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Tenke P, Kovacs B, Johansen TEB et al European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urologiia. 2008;(6):84-91. Tenke P, Kovacs B, Johansen TEB et al European and Asian guidelines on management and prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Urologiia. 2008;(6):84-91.
Metadaten
Titel
The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
verfasst von
Meixuan Li
Liang Yao
Caiwen Han
Huijuan Li
Yangqin Xun
Peijing Yan
Meng Wang
Wenbo He
Cuncun Lu
Kehu Yang
Publikationsdatum
29.10.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
International Urogynecology Journal
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3791-3

Update Gynäkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.