nach oben

Dysphagia

Erschienen in:

01.10.2020 | Original Article

The Influence of Airflow Via High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Duration of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure

verfasst von: Katie Allen, Kristine Galek

Erschienen in: Dysphagia | Ausgabe 4/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The purpose of this experimental study was to investigate the influence of airflow via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) on the duration of laryngeal vestibule closure (dLVC) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores. Twenty-nine healthy adults participated in a repeated-measures design. Each participant completed a videofluoroscopic swallow study while receiving airflow via HFNC across a control condition of zero flow and conditions of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 L/min. Five raters rated dLVC and PAS scores. Laryngeal vestibule closure was complete on all swallows. Linear regression revealed that the amount of airflow via HFNC significantly influenced dLVC, F(1, 810) = 19.056, p < .001. The mode of airway invasion for each airflow condition was PAS 2, with > 80% frequency compared to other PAS scores. Aspiration (PAS 7 or 8) did not occur. A Fisher's Exact test determined there was no association between normal/abnormal PAS score and no airflow/HFNC (p = .610). Findings indicate that for healthy adults, airflow via HFNC influenced dLVC in a dose-dependent manner with no change in airway invasion. The influence of HFNC on dLVC was a positive relationship, meaning when airflow increased, dLVC increased, and when airflow decreased, dLVC decreased. Modulation of dLVC in response to the amount of airflow highlights the ability of healthy adults to adapt to swallow conditions as needed to protect the airway.

Stefan MS, Shieh M-S, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB, Steingrub JS, Lagu T, Lindenauer PK. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute respiratory failure in the United States, 2001 to 2009: a national survey. J Hosp Med. 2013;8:76–82.PubMedCrossRef

Ward JJ. High-flow oxygen administration by nasal cannula for adult and perinatal patients. Respir Care. 2013;58:98–122.PubMedCrossRef

Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CP, Paoli AGD. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ferrara L, Bidiwala A, Sher I, Pirzada M, Barlev D, Islam S, Rosenfeld W, Crowley CC, Hanna N. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on the pharyngeal swallow in neonates. J Perinatol. 2017;37:398.PubMedCrossRef

Gay PC. Complications of non-invasive ventilation in acute care. Respiratory Care. 2009;54:246.PubMed

Brochard L. Mechanical ventilation: invasive versus noninvasive. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:31s–7s.CrossRef

Girou E, Schortgen F, Delclaux C, Brun-Buisson C, Blot F, Lefort Y, Lemaire F, Brochard L. Association of non-invasive ventilation with nosocomial infections and survival in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2000;284:2361–7.PubMedCrossRef

Tiruvoipati R, Lewis D, Haji K, Botha J. High-flow nasal oxygen vs high-flow face mask: a randomized crossover trial in extubated patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25:463–8.PubMedCrossRef

Dodrill P, Gosa M, Thoyre S, Shaker C, Pados B, Park J, DePalma N, Hirst K, Larson K, Perez J, Hernandez K. FIRST, DO NO HARM: a response to “oral alimentation in neonatal and adult populations requiring high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula”. Dysphagia. 2016;31:781–2.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Hanin M, Nuthakki S, Malkar MB, Jadcherla SR. Safety and efficacy of oral feeding in infants with BPD on nasal CPAP. Dysphagia. 2015;30:121–7.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Kadivar M, Mosayebi Z, Razi N, Nariman S, Sangsari R. High flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with insure method: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2016;41:494–500.

12.

Kernick J, Magarey J. What is the evidence for the use of high flow nasal cannula oxygen in adult patients admitted to critical care units? A systematic review. Aust Crit Care. 2010;23:53–70.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Liesching TN, Lei Y. Efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in intensive care units. J Intensive Care Med. 2016;34:140–52.CrossRef

14.

Ambrosino N, Vagheggini G. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in the acute care setting: where are we? Eur Respir J. 2008;31:874–86.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Vose A, Humbert IA. “Hidden in plain sight”: a descriptive review of laryngeal vestibule closure. Dysphagia. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-018-9928-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Temporal variability in the deglutition literature. Dysphagia. 2012;27:162–77.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

17.

Kim YH, Han TR, Nam HS, Seo HG, Oh B-M. Temporal characteristics of laryngeal penetration and aspiration in stroke patients. NeuroRehabilitation. 2019;44:231–8.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Leonard R. Predicting aspiration risk in patients with dysphagia: Evidence from fluoroscopy. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2019;4:83–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

19.

Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Kinematic and temporal factors associated with penetration-aspiration in swallowing liquids. Dysphagia. 2014;29:269–76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

20.

Kahrilas PJ, Lin S, Rademaker AW, Logemann JA. Impaired deglutitive airway protection: a videofluoroscopic analysis of severity and mechanism. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:1457–64.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Nativ-Zeltzer N, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ. Comparison of timing abnormalities leading to penetration versus aspiration during the oropharyngeal swallow. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:935–41.CrossRef

22.

Perlman AL, Booth BM, Grayhack JP. Videofluoroscopic predictors of aspiration in patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1994;9:90–5.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Power ML, Hamdy S, Singh S, Tyrrell PJ, Turnbull I, Thompson DG. Deglutitive laryngeal closure in stroke patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:141–6.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Power ML, Hamdy S, Goulermas JY, Tyrrell PJ, Turnbull I, Thompson DG. Predicting aspiration after hemispheric stroke from timing measures of oropharyngeal bolus flow and laryngeal closure. Dysphagia. 2009;24:257–64.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Steele CM, Cichero J. Physiological factors related to aspiration risk: a systematic review. Dysphagia. 2014;29:295–304.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

26.

Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Cheng J, Pauloski BR, Gibbons PJ, Rademaker AW, Lin S. Closure mechanisms of laryngeal vestibule during swallow. Am J Physiol. 1992;262:G338–344.PubMed

27.

Ekberg O, Sigurjónsson SV. Movement of the epiglottis during deglutition. Gastrointest Radiol. 1982;7:101–7.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Ekberg O. Closure of the laryngeal vestibule during deglutition. Acta Otolaryngol. 1982;93:123–9.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Andaloro C, La Mantia I. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Larynx Arytenoid Cartilage. StatPearls. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2019.

30.

Pearson WG, Taylor BK, Blair J, Martin-Harris B. Computational analysis of swallowing mechanics underlying impaired epiglottic inversion. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1854–8.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Dodds W, Stewart E, Logemann J. Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:953–63.CrossRef

32.

Jose-Flores M, Eng K, Gerrity E, Sinha N. Initiation of oral intake in patients using high-flow nasal cannula: a retrospective analysis. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2019;4:522–31.CrossRef

33.

Jaffe A, Seevaratnam A, Waters S. Risk of aspiration in patients on high-flow oxygen therapy. In: C52. Critical care case reports: good vibrations—mechanical ventilation from NIV to ECMO. American Thoracic Society; 2018. p. A5281. https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm-conference.2018.197.1_MeetingAbstracts.A5281.

34.

Leder SB, Siner JM, Bizzarro MJ, McGinley BM, Lefton-Greif MA. Oral alimentation in neonatal and adult populations requiring high-flow oxygen via nasal cannula. Dysphagia. 2016;31:154–9.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Samson N, St-Hilaire M, Nsegbe E, Reix P, Moreau-Bussiere F, Praud JP. Effect of nasal continuous or intermittent positive airway pressure on nonnutritive swallowing in the newborn lamb. J Appl Physiol (Bethesda, Md: 1985). 2005;99:1636–42.CrossRef

36.

Nishino T, Sugimori K, Kohchi A, Hiraga K. Nasal constant positive airway pressure inhibits the swallowing reflex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140:1290–3.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Sanuki T, Mishima G, Kiriishi K, Watanabe T, Okayasu I, Kawai M, Kurata S, Ayuse T. Effect of nasal high-flow oxygen therapy on the swallowing reflex: an in vivo volunteer study. Clin Oral Invest. 2017;21:915–20.CrossRef

38.

Garguilo M, Lejaille M, Vaugier I, Orlikowski D, Terzi N, Lofaso F, Prigent H. Non-invasive mechanical ventilation improves breathing-swallowing interaction of ventilator dependent neuromuscular patients: a prospective crossover study. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148673.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

39.

Oomagari M, Fujishima I, Katagiri N, Arizono S, Watanabe K, Ohno T, Maeda H, Moriwaki M, Fujimori M, Ohgi S. Swallowing function during high-flow nasal cannula therapy. Eur Respir J. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2015.pa4199.CrossRef

40.

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91.PubMedCrossRef

41.

Humbert IA, Sunday KL, Karagiorgos E, Vose AK, Gould F, Greene L, Tolar A, Rivet A. Swallowing kinematic differences across frozen, mixed, and ultrathin liquid boluses in healthy adults: age, sex, and normal variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61:1544–59.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

42.

Bennett JW, Van Lieshout PHHM, Pelletier CA, Steele CM. Sip-sizing behaviors in natural drinking conditions compared to instructed experimental conditions. Dysphagia. 2009;24:152–8.PubMedCrossRef

43.

Adnerhill I, Ekberg O, Groher ME. Determining normal bolus size for thin liquids. Dysphagia. 1989;4:1–3.PubMedCrossRef

44.

Lawless HT, Bender S, Oman C, Pelletier C. Gender, age, vessel size, cup vs. straw sipping, and sequence effects on sip volume. Dysphagia. 2003;18:196–202.PubMedCrossRef

45.

Nilsson H, Ekberg O, Olsson R, Kjellin O, Hindfelt B. Quantitative assessment of swallowing in healthy adults. Dysphagia. 1996;11:110–6.PubMedCrossRef

46.

Leonard R, Kendall KA. Dysphagia assessment and treatment planning. 4th ed. San Diego: Plural Publishing; 2019.

47.

Rosenbek JC, Robbins J, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Baijens L, Barikroo A, Pilz W. Intrarater and interrater reliability for measurements in videofluoroscopy of swallowing. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:1683–95.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Nordin NA, Miles A, Allen JJD. Measuring competency development in objective evaluation of videofluoroscopic swallowing studies. Dysphagia. 2017;32:427–36.PubMedCrossRef

50.

Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Variation in temporal measures of swallowing: sex and volume effects. Dysphagia. 2013;28:226–33.PubMedCrossRef

51.

Robbins J, Coyle JL, Rosenbek JC, Roecker E, Wood J. Differentiation of normal and abnormal airway protection during swallowing using the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Dysphagia. 1999;14:228–32.PubMedCrossRef

52.

Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15:155–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

53.

Stoeckli SJ, Huisman TAGM, Seifert BAGM, Martin-Harris BJW. Interrater reliability of videofluoroscopic swallow evaluation. Dysphagia. 2003;18:53–7.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Steele CM, Grace-Martin K. Reflections on clinical and statistical use of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Dysphagia. 2017;32:601–16.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

55.

Allen JE, White CJ, Leonard RJ, Belafsky PC. Prevalence of penetration and aspiration on videofluoroscopy in normal individuals without dysphagia. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;142:208–13.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA, Kahrilas PJ, Smith CH. Temporal and biomechanical characteristics of oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older men. J Speech Lang Hear Res: JSLHR. 2000;43:1264–74.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Kahrilas PJ. Oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older women: videofluoroscopic analysis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45:434–45.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Hiss SG, Strauss M, Treole K, Stuart A, Boutilier S. Swallowing apnea as a function of airway closure. Dysphagia. 2003;18:293–300.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Kendall KA, McKenzie S, Leonard RJ, Gonçalves MI, Walker A. Timing of events in normal swallowing: a videofluoroscopic study. Dysphagia. 2000;15:74–83.PubMedCrossRef

60.

Hoffman MR, Ciucci MR, Mielens JD, Jiang JJ, McCulloch TM. Pharyngeal swallow adaptations to bolus volume measured with high resolution manometry. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2367–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

61.

Humbert IA, German RZ. New directions for understanding neural control in swallowing: the potential and promise of motor learning. Dysphagia. 2013;28:1–10.PubMedCrossRef

62.

Humbert IA, Lokhande A, Christopherson H, German R, Stone A. Adaptation of swallowing hyo-laryngeal kinematics is distinct in oral vs. pharyngeal sensory processing. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1698–705.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

63.

Parke RL, McGuinness S, Eccleston M. Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. BJA: Br J Anaesth. 2009;103:886–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

64.

Groves N, Tobin A. High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care. 2007;20:126–31.PubMedCrossRef

65.

Park T, Kim Y, Ko D-H, McCullough GH. Initiation and duration of laryngeal closure during the pharyngeal swallow in post-stroke patients. Dysphagia. 2010;25:177–82.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: The Influence of Airflow Via High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Duration of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure
verfasst von: Katie Allen
Kristine Galek
Publikationsdatum: 01.10.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Dysphagia / Ausgabe 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0179-051X
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-0460
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-020-10193-0

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

16.04.2024 | HNO-Chirurgie | Nachrichten

Update HNO

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

The Influence of Airflow Via High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Duration of Laryngeal Vestibule Closure

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO

Live-Webinar: Aktuelle Leitlinien bei Herz-Kreislauf-Erkrankungen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2021

A Preliminary Investigation of Whether HRCA Signals Can Differentiate Between Swallows from Healthy People and Swallows from People with Neurodegenerative Diseases

Variability of Voluntary Cough Airflow in Healthy Adults and Parkinson’s Disease

Visuoperceptual Analysis of the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing: An International Delphi Study

Comparison of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Brazilian Children with Prenatal Exposure to Zika Virus, With and Without Microcephaly

A Rare Case of Dysphagia with Palatal Tremor

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Mandarin Version of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire

Neu im Fachgebiet HNO

HNO-Op. auch mit über 90?

Intrakapsuläre Tonsillektomie gewinnt an Boden

Bilateraler Hörsturz hat eine schlechte Prognose

„Nur wer sich gut aufgehoben fühlt, kann auch für Patientensicherheit sorgen“

Update HNO