Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2017

12.08.2016 | Original Paper

The influence of plastic surgeon age and gender on decision-making in breast reconstruction: a national survey of American plastic surgeons

verfasst von: Shruti C. Tannan, Shawna R. Kleban, Wendy M. Novicoff, Chris A. Campbell

Erschienen in: European Journal of Plastic Surgery | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

There are numerous options for breast reconstruction after mastectomy, and the final reconstructive option is often influenced by patient preference. This study surveyed plastic surgeons regarding their personal preferences for breast reconstruction after mastectomy to identify the impact of gender and age on reconstructive preference. An anonymous online survey was distributed to plastic surgeons in the American Society of Plastic Surgeons member directory and current plastic surgery residents. Female surgeons were asked to select reconstructive options for themselves as patients, while male surgeons were asked to answer the same questions as if advising a loved one. After unilateral mastectomy, 60.2 % of respondents preferred implant-based reconstruction, increasing to 67.8 % after bilateral mastectomy. Top reasons for selecting implant-based reconstruction were recovery time (78.0 %) and hospital length of stay (54.5 %). In contrast, respondents who preferred abdominal flap-based autologous reconstruction cited the longevity (83.3 %) and the aesthetic appearance of the final result (82.7 %) as top reasons. Female surgeons were significantly more likely to choose implant-based reconstruction than male surgeons (68.7 vs. 56.6 %, p = 0.001). Younger male surgeons preferred autologous reconstruction (58.8 %). Plastic surgeons’ reconstructive choices parallel current patient-based surveys favoring breast reconstruction with implants. Respondents’ reasons for selecting one reconstructive method over another are consistent with prior patient-based surveys. Female plastic surgeons prefer implant-based reconstruction to a greater extent than male plastic surgeons. This survey identifies the need for further prospective study of physician perspectives of patient experiences.
Level of Evidence: Not ratable.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al. (2013) A paradigm shift in U.S. Breast reconstruction: increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131(1):15–23CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer L (2009) Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 198(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer L (2009) Recent trends and predictors in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 198(2):237–243CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, et al. (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19(5):463–469PubMed Hernandez-Boussard T, Zeidler K, Barzin A, et al. (2013) Breast reconstruction national trends and healthcare implications. Breast J 19(5):463–469PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson J, Tchou J, Domchek S, et al. (2012) Breast reconstruction in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy patients: factors that influence decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(11):1481–1489CrossRefPubMed Nelson J, Tchou J, Domchek S, et al. (2012) Breast reconstruction in bilateral prophylactic mastectomy patients: factors that influence decision making. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 65(11):1481–1489CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, et al. (2011) Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 64:1062–1067CrossRef Gopie JP, Hilhorst MT, Kleijne A, et al. (2011) Women’s motives to opt for either implant or DIEP-flap breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 64:1062–1067CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Leone MS, Priano V, Franchelli S, et al. (2011) Factors affecting symmetrization of the contralateral breast: a 7-year unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:446–451CrossRefPubMed Leone MS, Priano V, Franchelli S, et al. (2011) Factors affecting symmetrization of the contralateral breast: a 7-year unilateral postmastectomy breast reconstruction experience. Aesthetic Plast Surg 35:446–451CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89–97CrossRefPubMed Losken A, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (2002) Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:89–97CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, et al. (2008) Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1519–1526CrossRefPubMed Vyas RM, Dickinson BP, Fastekjian JH, et al. (2008) Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(5):1519–1526CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. (2010) Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):202–210CrossRefPubMed Berry T, Brooks S, Sydow N, et al. (2010) Complication rates of radiation on tissue expander and autologous tissue breast reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3):202–210CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg:1111–1115 discussion, 1116–1118 Evans GR, Schusterman MA, Kroll SS, et al. (1995) Reconstruction and the radiated breast: is there a role for implants? Plast Reconstr Surg:1111–1115 discussion, 1116–1118
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (1997) The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. (1997) The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1153–1160CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rogers NE, Allen RJ (2002) Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1919–1924 discussion 1925-1926CrossRefPubMed Rogers NE, Allen RJ (2002) Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1919–1924 discussion 1925-1926CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Spear SL, Onyewu C (2000) Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:930–942CrossRefPubMed Spear SL, Onyewu C (2000) Staged breast reconstruction with saline-filled implants in the irradiated breast: recent trends and therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:930–942CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. (2004) Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed Schwartz MD, Lerman C, Brogan B, et al. (2004) Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22(10):1823–1829CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard-Mcnatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, et al. (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg 202:298–302CrossRefPubMed Howard-Mcnatt M, Schroll RW, Hurt GJ, et al. (2011) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer patients who test negative for BRCA mutations. Am J Surg 202:298–302CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in this patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed Weichman KE, Broer PN, Thanik VD, et al. (2015) Patient-reported satisfaction and quality of life following breast reconstruction in this patients: a comparison between microsurgical and prosthetic implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(2):213–220CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
The influence of plastic surgeon age and gender on decision-making in breast reconstruction: a national survey of American plastic surgeons
verfasst von
Shruti C. Tannan
Shawna R. Kleban
Wendy M. Novicoff
Chris A. Campbell
Publikationsdatum
12.08.2016
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Plastic Surgery / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0930-343X
Elektronische ISSN: 1435-0130
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1229-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

European Journal of Plastic Surgery 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

CME: 2 Punkte

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht, PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske Das Webinar S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“ beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

CME: 2 Punkte

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.