Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 5/2019

23.01.2019 | Review

The influence of wind turbine visibility on the health of local residents: a systematic review

Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Ausgabe 5/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

The health effects of visible wind turbine features on residents were investigated. Further, it was examined, if visual annoyance has an influence on residents’ health, and if wind turbine visibility impacts residents’ health independently of or in combination with acoustical aspects.

Methods

Medical databases, Google Scholar, public health institutions, and reference lists were searched systematically (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42016041737). Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstract and full texts, extracted data, and critically appraised the methodology of included studies. Study findings were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively.

Results

Seventeen studies from 19 publications of varying methodological quality were included (two cohort studies, fifteen cross-sectional studies). The pooled prevalence of high annoyance due to altered views and shadow flicker was 6% each. The results of other health effects were inconsistent, with some indications showing that direct wind turbine visibility increases sleep disturbance. Annoyance by direct visibility, shadow flicker, and blinking lights was significantly associated with an increased risk for sleep disorders. One study indicated reactions to visual wind turbine features may be influenced by acoustical exposures.

Conclusions

In interpreting the results, the differing methodological quality of the included studies needs to be considered. Direct and indirect wind turbine visibility may affect residents’ health, and reactions may differ in combination with noise. Further, annoyance by wind turbine visibility may interact as mediator between visual exposures and the health of local residents. To confirm the results, more high-quality research is needed.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Kunz R, Khan KS, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2009) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Introduction to instruments of evidence-based medicine for physicians, clinical researchers and experts. In: The health care system [German] (Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen. Einfühung in Instrumente der evidenzbasierten Medizin für Ärzte, klinische Forscher und Experten im Gesundheitswesen), 2. edn. Hans Huber, Bern Kunz R, Khan KS, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2009) Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Introduction to instruments of evidence-based medicine for physicians, clinical researchers and experts. In: The health care system [German] (Systematische Übersichtsarbeiten und Metaanalysen. Einfühung in Instrumente der evidenzbasierten Medizin für Ärzte, klinische Forscher und Experten im Gesundheitswesen), 2. edn. Hans Huber, Bern
Zurück zum Zitat Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRef Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Lauterbach KW (2010) Health economics, management, and evidence-based medicine: handbook for practice, politics, and studies [German] (gesundheitsökonomie, management und evicence-based medicine: handbuch für praxis, politik und studium). edn. Schattauer, Stuttgart, p 3 Lauterbach KW (2010) Health economics, management, and evidence-based medicine: handbook for practice, politics, and studies [German] (gesundheitsökonomie, management und evicence-based medicine: handbuch für praxis, politik und studium). edn. Schattauer, Stuttgart, p 3
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151(4):264–269CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pedersen E, Persson Waye K (2004) Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise-a dose-response relationship. J Acoust Soc Am 116(6):3460–3470CrossRef Pedersen E, Persson Waye K (2004) Perception and annoyance due to wind turbine noise-a dose-response relationship. J Acoust Soc Am 116(6):3460–3470CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pierpont N (2009) Wind turbine syndrome. A report on a natural experiment. K-Selected Books, Santa Fe Pierpont N (2009) Wind turbine syndrome. A report on a natural experiment. K-Selected Books, Santa Fe
Zurück zum Zitat Szumilas M (2010) Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(3):227–229CrossRef Szumilas M (2010) Explaining odds ratios. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 19(3):227–229CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Twardella D (2013) Consequences of wind energy for health [German] (bedeutung des ausbaus der windenergie für die menschliche gesundheit). UMID 3:5–8 Twardella D (2013) Consequences of wind energy for health [German] (bedeutung des ausbaus der windenergie für die menschliche gesundheit). UMID 3:5–8
Zurück zum Zitat UNFCCC (2015) Paris agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris UNFCCC (2015) Paris agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Paris
Metadaten
Titel
The influence of wind turbine visibility on the health of local residents: a systematic review
Publikationsdatum
23.01.2019
Erschienen in
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-019-01403-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe